
Fiddlesticksvs Malzahar
Fiddlesticks vs Malzahar is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.4. Malzahar wins with a 71.4% win rate (+42.9%) over Fiddlesticks based on 7 games. Malzahar holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Fiddlesticks build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Fiddlesticks vs Malzahar matchup.
Fiddlesticks Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Fiddlesticks performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Fiddlesticks vs Malzahar Matchup?

Fiddlesticks vs Malzahar Matchup Summary
The Fiddlesticks vs Malzahar matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 7 recent matches analyzed, Malzahar wins with a 71.4% win rate compared to Fiddlesticks's 28.6%, giving Malzahar a 42.9 percentage point advantage. Malzahar dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Fiddlesticks players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Fiddlesticks leads by 475 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Malzahar has a strong advantage in this matchup. Fiddlesticks players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Malzahar overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Fiddlesticks vs Malzahar Laning Phase Breakdown
Malzahar is favored during the laning phase against Fiddlesticks, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Malzahar holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Fiddlesticks Build Against Malzahar
Spellslinger's Shoes is the optimal boots choice against Malzahar, providing the mobility and stats Fiddlesticks needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Fiddlesticks against Malzahar are Luden's Echo, Shadowflame and Hextech Rocketbelt. This combination gives Fiddlesticks an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Fiddlesticks vs Malzahar matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Malzahar dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 66.7% win rate — a 33.3 percentage point lead over Fiddlesticks. This lopsided early game means Malzahar can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Malzahar is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 75.0% win rate — 50.0 points above Fiddlesticks. Extended games heavily favor Malzahar, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Malzahar holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Fiddlesticks players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Fiddlesticks Runes Against Malzahar
The Sorcery and Precision rune setup gives Fiddlesticks the best tools to compete against Malzahar in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Fiddlesticks matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.4. The table below shows Fiddlesticks's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Fiddlesticks build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.34% | 146 | 1.1 | 720 | 13,114 | 62.7% | 41.9% | |
| 45.65% | 139 | 1.1 | 694 | 12,169 | 53.5% | 40.0% | |
| 39.67% | 121 | 1.1 | 738 | 11,750 | 40.4% | 39.1% | |
| 47.32% | 112 | 1.1 | 759 | 12,482 | 60.8% | 36.1% | |
| 54.00% | 102 | 1.0 | 745 | 12,547 | 55.8% | 52.6% | |
| 50.52% | 98 | 2.1 | 967 | 11,523 | 44.4% | 55.8% | |
| 44.44% | 90 | 1.0 | 735 | 12,517 | 42.9% | 45.5% | |
| 43.68% | 87 | 1.3 | 729 | 14,052 | 44.0% | 43.5% | |
| 51.16% | 86 | 1.4 | 793 | 12,580 | 35.3% | 61.5% | |
| 51.81% | 84 | 1.0 | 719 | 11,742 | 54.3% | 50.0% | |
| 47.37% | 78 | 1.0 | 692 | 12,086 | 39.5% | 55.3% | |
| 61.04% | 77 | 1.0 | 776 | 12,607 | 67.9% | 57.1% | |
| 33.33% | 75 | 1.1 | 815 | 12,117 | 31.0% | 34.8% | |
| 49.28% | 69 | 1.6 | 799 | 13,097 | 57.1% | 45.8% | |
| 51.47% | 69 | 1.2 | 729 | 12,531 | 53.9% | 50.0% | |
| 45.59% | 68 | 1.4 | 750 | 11,322 | 41.0% | 51.7% | |
| 49.23% | 65 | 1.2 | 784 | 13,320 | 45.0% | 51.1% | |
| 50.77% | 65 | 1.1 | 683 | 11,905 | 42.9% | 56.8% | |
| 40.63% | 64 | 1.6 | 779 | 11,955 | 54.2% | 32.5% | |
| 61.29% | 62 | 1.2 | 717 | 12,338 | 64.3% | 58.8% | |
| 46.55% | 60 | 1.2 | 840 | 13,964 | 57.1% | 43.2% | |
| 46.55% | 58 | 1.1 | 759 | 12,933 | 52.4% | 43.2% | |
| 54.39% | 57 | 1.1 | 766 | 11,999 | 56.7% | 51.9% | |
| 58.18% | 55 | 1.1 | 741 | 13,168 | 79.0% | 47.2% | |
| 50.00% | 52 | 0.9 | 723 | 12,102 | 45.0% | 53.1% | |
| 52.08% | 48 | 1.1 | 777 | 12,525 | 44.4% | 56.7% | |
| 44.68% | 47 | 1.9 | 644 | 10,204 | 52.4% | 38.5% | |
| 57.14% | 43 | 2.9 | 799 | 12,133 | 42.9% | 64.3% | |
| 53.66% | 42 | 1.6 | 761 | 11,937 | 55.6% | 52.2% | |
| 53.66% | 41 | 1.4 | 768 | 12,662 | 53.3% | 53.9% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 1.8 | 763 | 11,894 | 62.5% | 37.5% | |
| 43.59% | 39 | 1.0 | 739 | 12,256 | 47.1% | 40.9% | |
| 55.26% | 38 | 2.3 | 793 | 12,255 | 63.6% | 51.9% | |
| 55.26% | 38 | 1.4 | 674 | 10,001 | 66.7% | 47.8% | |
| 43.24% | 37 | 1.2 | 857 | 12,811 | 43.8% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 1.5 | 805 | 13,152 | 38.5% | 56.5% | |
| 42.86% | 35 | 2.5 | 814 | 11,276 | 27.8% | 58.8% | |
| 45.71% | 35 | 1.2 | 725 | 12,011 | 46.7% | 45.0% | |
| 67.65% | 34 | 1.2 | 828 | 13,265 | 83.3% | 59.1% | |
| 70.59% | 34 | 1.1 | 681 | 12,350 | 73.3% | 68.4% | |
| 54.55% | 33 | 3.3 | 906 | 10,931 | 76.5% | 31.3% | |
| 56.25% | 33 | 1.1 | 742 | 12,666 | 76.5% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 32 | 2.0 | 717 | 11,008 | 36.4% | 57.1% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 1.6 | 741 | 9,351 | 29.4% | 60.0% | |
| 40.00% | 31 | 1.3 | 777 | 11,754 | 30.8% | 47.1% | |
| 35.48% | 31 | 1.1 | 666 | 10,894 | 30.0% | 45.5% | |
| 63.33% | 30 | 1.6 | 678 | 10,112 | 69.2% | 58.8% | |
| 43.33% | 30 | 1.9 | 671 | 10,167 | 29.4% | 61.5% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 1.7 | 799 | 11,911 | 53.3% | 60.0% | |
| 34.48% | 30 | 3.0 | 777 | 11,084 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 1.2 | 865 | 13,951 | 28.6% | 52.4% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 1.1 | 713 | 12,310 | 23.1% | 66.7% | |
| 53.85% | 27 | 1.7 | 781 | 10,630 | 45.5% | 60.0% | |
| 51.85% | 27 | 1.0 | 722 | 12,788 | 50.0% | 52.9% | |
| 60.00% | 26 | 1.2 | 796 | 11,983 | 70.0% | 53.3% | |
| 42.31% | 26 | 2.3 | 864 | 13,176 | 45.5% | 40.0% | |
| 38.46% | 26 | 1.3 | 706 | 11,771 | 12.5% | 50.0% | |
| 64.00% | 25 | 4.4 | 1,057 | 11,139 | 62.5% | 64.7% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 1.2 | 741 | 12,771 | 44.4% | 68.8% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 1.7 | 704 | 10,938 | 61.5% | 63.6% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 1.6 | 749 | 9,996 | 60.0% | 46.1% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 4.4 | 956 | 12,042 | 40.0% | 41.2% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 1.8 | 856 | 13,113 | 62.5% | 46.1% | |
| 35.00% | 21 | 4.8 | 953 | 11,693 | 28.6% | 38.5% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.5 | 711 | 11,402 | 57.1% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 1.4 | 564 | 8,655 | 75.0% | 12.5% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 1.8 | 918 | 11,855 | 54.5% | 55.6% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 1.2 | 751 | 12,633 | 63.6% | 55.6% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 4.8 | 935 | 11,345 | 55.6% | 54.5% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 5.3 | 836 | 10,059 | 44.4% | 20.0% | |
| 70.59% | 19 | 1.4 | 753 | 10,621 | 100.0% | 61.5% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 2.1 | 827 | 9,394 | 37.5% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 2.0 | 898 | 12,704 | 33.3% | 58.3% | |
| 56.25% | 17 | 2.1 | 815 | 14,296 | 40.0% | 63.6% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 3.9 | 881 | 11,952 | 14.3% | 60.0% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 1.4 | 593 | 8,982 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 1.8 | 698 | 10,617 | 62.5% | 33.3% | |
| 62.50% | 16 | 1.6 | 693 | 9,804 | 37.5% | 87.5% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 3.2 | 910 | 11,373 | 50.0% | 30.0% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 1.8 | 793 | 11,981 | 100.0% | 22.2% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 5.2 | 942 | 10,633 | 66.7% | 55.6% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 2.1 | 777 | 10,171 | 28.6% | 62.5% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 5.1 | 867 | 12,196 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 2.9 | 858 | 9,643 | 62.5% | 66.7% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 3.5 | 697 | 8,278 | 28.6% | 28.6% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 0.8 | 647 | 12,893 | 33.3% | 37.5% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 1.8 | 849 | 11,314 | 33.3% | 36.4% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 1.4 | 699 | 10,090 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 1.4 | 580 | 9,725 | 14.3% | 50.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 1.9 | 647 | 8,881 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 2.9 | 849 | 11,945 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 2.2 | 793 | 10,599 | 57.1% | 33.3% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 5.4 | 897 | 11,999 | 66.7% | 57.1% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 1.7 | 607 | 9,500 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 2.1 | 642 | 9,236 | 37.5% | 20.0% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 4.7 | 737 | 10,830 | 57.1% | 33.3% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 5.8 | 866 | 10,735 | 20.0% | 37.5% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 2.6 | 757 | 10,864 | 37.5% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 5.3 | 785 | 10,066 | 71.4% | 60.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 1.2 | 700 | 9,930 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 3.0 | 725 | 10,888 | 40.0% | 42.9% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 2.0 | 618 | 9,993 | 25.0% | 28.6% | |
| 55.56% | 10 | 4.8 | 846 | 8,399 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 1.1 | 976 | 14,398 | 66.7% | 71.4% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 4.8 | 926 | 13,930 | 0.0% | 55.6% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 5.4 | 986 | 12,431 | 80.0% | 80.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 5.1 | 976 | 11,025 | 20.0% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.1 | 1,076 | 12,785 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 4.2 | 943 | 12,032 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 2.4 | 867 | 13,682 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 3.9 | 925 | 11,518 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.9 | 858 | 12,490 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.2 | 778 | 11,215 | 75.0% | 40.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.5 | 767 | 9,485 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 4.9 | 764 | 10,637 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 3.8 | 770 | 11,999 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.7 | 851 | 12,275 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 2.6 | 780 | 11,245 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 4.8 | 811 | 11,212 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.7 | 686 | 11,545 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 3.9 | 939 | 12,317 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.0 | 1,063 | 12,329 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.3 | 882 | 11,716 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.4 | 610 | 8,808 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.0 | 935 | 10,765 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 1.3 | 552 | 7,477 | 20.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.0 | 734 | 8,502 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 1,227 | 15,270 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 700 | 9,370 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 4.4 | 732 | 10,510 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 960 | 12,050 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.5 | 795 | 12,784 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 941 | 6,873 | 25.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.5 | 1,028 | 11,439 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 818 | 11,788 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.0 | 1,024 | 13,169 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Fiddlesticks vs Malzahar - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Fiddlesticks do against Malzahar in League of Legends?
Malzahar wins the Fiddlesticks vs Malzahar matchup with a 71.4% win rate compared to Fiddlesticks's 28.6%, a 42.9 percentage point difference. This data is based on 7 recent ranked games in patch 26.4.
How does Fiddlesticks do against Malzahar in the early game?
In the early game, Malzahar has the advantage against Fiddlesticks with a 66.7% win rate versus 33.3%. Malzahar players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Fiddlesticks do against Malzahar in the late game?
In the late game, Malzahar takes over the Fiddlesticks vs Malzahar matchup with a 75.0% win rate compared to 25.0%. Malzahar scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Fiddlesticks vs Malzahar matchup?
Malzahar wins the matchup against Fiddlesticks with a 71.4% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.4. The 42.9 percentage point advantage means Malzahar is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 7 games analyzed.
What is the best Fiddlesticks build against Malzahar?
The best Fiddlesticks build against Malzahar includes Luden's Echo, Shadowflame, Hextech Rocketbelt with Spellslinger's Shoes. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Fiddlesticks runes against Malzahar?
The best Fiddlesticks runes against Malzahar use the Sorcery primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Fiddlesticks vs Malzahar matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Fiddlesticks counter Malzahar?
No, Fiddlesticks struggles against Malzahar with only a 28.6% win rate. Malzahar has the advantage in this matchup. Fiddlesticks players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Malzahar's lead.
How do I play Fiddlesticks against Malzahar?
When playing Fiddlesticks against Malzahar, play cautiously and avoid Malzahar's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Malzahar has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.