Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Harbor's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
The Harbor vs Yoru matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 9 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
The Harbor vs Yoru matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 9 competitive matches analyzed, Harbor wins 55.6% of the time compared to Yoru's 44.4%, a 11.1 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Harbor consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Duelist matchup, Harbor has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Yoru should never take isolated fights against Harbor and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Harbor achieves a clean sweep in the fragging department, winning all five combat metrics against Yoru in the Harbor vs Yoru matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Harbor holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 9 competitive matches, Harbor players can approach duels against Yoru with confidence, while Yoru players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on utility-based contributions, information gathering, and team coordination to remain impactful.
Yoru significantly outperforms Harbor on attack side, achieving a 53.2% round win rate versus 45.9%. This 7.3 point disparity reveals Yoru as the clearly superior offensive agent in this head-to-head, with advantages that Harbor cannot easily overcome through individual skill alone.
Based on 9 matches analyzed, Yoru dominates attack-side scenarios through multiple vectors. Entry success rate, post-plant conversion, and mid-round adaptability all favor Yoru significantly. Harbor teams must make structural adjustments to their attack approach: rely less on Harbor for key fragging roles, design executes that minimize Harbor's direct engagement with Yoru, and consider how team composition can cover Harbor's offensive weaknesses. Simply "playing better" isn't enough to overcome a 7.3% gap.
Harbor should avoid entry fragging roles against Yoru whenever possible. The data clearly shows Yoru wins a disproportionate share of first contacts on attack. Harbor players should volunteer for support roles — flashing for teammates, trading entries, or lurking to create map pressure without direct Yoru confrontation. If forced to entry, wait for maximum utility support and ensure a trade is guaranteed. Yoru can and should take aggressive entries, knowing statistical backing supports confident play.
Harbor has favorable matchups against 4 agents and unfavorable matchups against 8 agents in Valorant. Harbor's strongest matchup is against Omen with a 66.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Fade at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33.33% | 33 | 1.39 | 121.8 | 32.9% | 45.4% |
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Harbor's best matchup is against Omen, achieving a 66.7% win rate. Harbor excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
Harbor's hardest matchup is against Fade, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Harbor should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
Harbor has 4 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 8 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
When playing Harbor in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Harbor's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
Key stats to analyze in Harbor's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios heavily favor Yoru in this matchup. Harbor struggles to convert spike plants into round wins at the same rate, whether due to weaker defuse denial, inferior retake resistance, or less effective post-plant positioning. Harbor teams should never leave Harbor alone in post-plant — always have teammates nearby for crossfires and trades. Consider giving the spike to a different player when possible. Yoru should recognize their post-plant dominance and play for spike aggressively after site takes.
Yoru substantially outclasses Harbor on defense, achieving 54.1% round wins compared to 46.8%. This 7.3 percentage point gap indicates Yoru excels at core defensive tasks — anchoring sites, gathering information, stalling executes, and contributing to retakes — at a level Harbor cannot match.
Harbor should never solo anchor against Yoru. The 7.3% defensive gap makes isolated site holds extremely unfavorable for Harbor. Instead, pair Harbor with a teammate, give them off-site positions that allow early rotates, or have them play supportive roles that don't require extended site holds. Yoru should actively anchor difficult sites, knowing their defensive capabilities significantly exceed Harbor's.
Retake dynamics heavily favor Yoru. When Harbor needs to retake against Yoru, success requires overwhelming numbers and utility coordination — never attempt equal-number retakes and absolutely avoid solo retakes. Yoru should play post-plant positions confidently, knowing Harbor struggles to clear them effectively. In clutch scenarios, Yoru has a significant statistical edge that Harbor cannot overcome through individual skill alone.
Economy management becomes critical for Harbor in this matchup. Force buying against Yoru is mathematically unfavorable — the defensive gap compounds when utility is limited. Harbor should advocate for full saves, ensuring full buy rounds have maximum utility to compensate for their defensive disadvantages. Yoru can confidently force buy, knowing their defensive kit provides advantages that partially compensate for economic disadvantages.
Yoru demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (53.2%) and defense (54.1%), comprehensively outperforming Harbor across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 9 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Yoru holding advantages at every stage.
Map selection and team composition cannot fix Harbor's disadvantage in this matchup. Yoru outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Harbor into Yoru, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Harbor's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Harbor in isolated Yoru encounters.
For ranked climbing, avoid playing Harbor when you expect to face Yoru frequently. The 14.7 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Yoru is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.
Final verdict: Yoru decisively wins the Harbor vs Yoru matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Yoru has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Harbor players facing Yoru should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.
The Controller (Harbor) vs Duelist (Yoru) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Harbor's Controller abilities serve different purposes than Yoru's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Controller abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Harbor's Controller toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Yoru's Duelist kit counters others. The Yoru advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
| 50.1% |
| 23.33% | 30 | 1.27 | 117.1 | 34.3% | 36.2% | 46.9% |
| 44.00% | 25 | 1.35 | 118.6 | 30.1% | 48.2% | 45.2% |
| 47.06% | 17 | 1.63 | 131.9 | 30.0% | 48.0% | 52.0% |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.58 | 142.6 | 33.2% | 50.3% | 43.1% |
| 37.50% | 16 | 1.42 | 130.7 | 31.1% | 40.3% | 45.4% |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.53 | 129.9 | 30.8% | 57.8% | 51.0% |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.60 | 137.9 | 33.6% | 45.9% | 46.8% |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.51 | 136.0 | 33.3% | 39.0% | 43.5% |
| 50.00% | 4 | 1.34 | 122.0 | 23.3% | 33.3% | 55.8% |
| 0.00% | 3 | 0.93 | 88.4 | 32.5% | 26.3% | 53.8% |
| 66.67% | 3 | 1.18 | 122.4 | 32.5% | 47.1% | 57.9% |
Harbor vs Yoru matchup breakdown: Harbor dominates with a 55.6% win rate across 9 matches. Superior fragging (1.60 KDA) gives Harbor a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.