Waylay vs FadeMatchup
Waylay vs Fade head-to-head analysis. Waylay holds a 52.6% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 137 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
Waylay Matchup Breakdown
Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Waylay's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Who Wins the Waylay vs Fade Matchup?
Waylay vs Fade Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 137 matches reveals that Fade holds a clear advantage over Waylay in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Waylay shows strength in one category, Fade's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Waylay vs Fade Matchup Summary
The Waylay vs Fade matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 137 competitive matches analyzed, Waylay wins 52.6% of the time compared to Fade's 47.4%, a 5.1 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Fade consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Initiator matchup, Waylay has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Fade players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Waylay vs Fade Fragging Analysis
Fade edges out Waylay in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 137 matches analyzed, this Waylay vs Fade matchup remains contestable for both sides. Waylay shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Waylay's favor.
Waylay vs Fade Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side Breakdown
Fade demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Waylay in this matchup, converting 48.9% of attacking rounds versus 47.6%. While this 1.3 point edge gives Fade slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Waylay players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 137 competitive games suggests Fade's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Waylay teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.3% gap.
When taking entry duels, Fade holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Waylay players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Fade can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
In post-plant situations, Fade's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Waylay should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.3 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Fade shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Waylay, winning 52.4% of defense rounds compared to 51.1%. This 1.3 percentage point edge suggests Fade's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Waylay players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Fade can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.3% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Waylay should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Fade demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Fade converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Waylay should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Fade when you can wait for teammates. Fade can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.3% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Waylay should be more conservative with eco aggression against Fade and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Fade can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Fade maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 48.9% attack win rate and 52.4% defense win rate. While Fade is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Waylay remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Waylay vs Fade specific factors. The slight Fade advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Waylay and Fade are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Fade has a slight statistical edge, but Waylay is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Waylay, don't switch to Fade just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Duelist vs Initiator Dynamics
The Duelist (Waylay) vs Initiator (Fade) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Waylay's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Fade's Initiator kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Initiator counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Waylay's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Fade's Initiator kit counters others. The Fade advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Waylay has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 14 agents in Valorant. Waylay's strongest matchup is against Iso with a 76.9% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Tejo at 26.7% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.69% | 257 | 1.29 | 144.3 | 29.1% | 46.9% | 50.9% | |
| 47.78% | 180 | 1.22 | 136.9 | 29.9% | 48.1% | 50.5% | |
| 49.35% | 154 | 1.19 | 137.9 | 29.5% | 47.8% | 52.1% | |
| 52.55% | 137 | 1.24 | 141.0 | 29.2% | 47.6% | 51.1% | |
| 46.46% | 127 | 1.19 | 138.2 | 27.8% | 47.5% | 50.5% | |
| 43.97% | 116 | 1.18 | 137.2 | 30.7% | 47.2% | 49.3% | |
| 52.00% | 100 | 1.29 | 142.8 | 29.7% | 48.0% | 52.6% | |
| 47.27% | 55 | 1.17 | 132.1 | 26.6% | 45.9% | 52.2% | |
| 54.90% | 51 | 1.27 | 141.2 | 28.1% | 48.5% | 51.1% | |
| 51.02% | 49 | 1.31 | 140.9 | 27.8% | 47.3% | 51.4% | |
| 48.94% | 47 | 1.21 | 138.5 | 29.3% | 47.0% | 51.5% | |
| 52.78% | 36 | 1.18 | 139.0 | 28.6% | 49.5% | 54.2% | |
| 38.89% | 36 | 1.23 | 139.1 | 27.2% | 44.0% | 51.7% | |
| 55.56% | 36 | 1.21 | 142.7 | 33.4% | 48.1% | 53.5% | |
| 40.00% | 35 | 1.23 | 137.3 | 33.3% | 51.3% | 43.7% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 1.18 | 131.7 | 26.2% | 44.4% | 55.0% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 1.32 | 143.7 | 28.7% | 49.3% | 47.1% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 1.23 | 141.4 | 28.2% | 42.6% | 50.9% | |
| 26.67% | 15 | 1.22 | 134.4 | 26.7% | 45.4% | 45.7% | |
| 76.92% | 13 | 1.60 | 154.6 | 27.7% | 55.3% | 57.7% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.54 | 175.7 | 35.2% | 50.0% | 51.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.18 | 135.8 | 35.2% | 44.7% | 52.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 1.19 | 130.6 | 26.0% | 51.6% | 55.9% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 1.35 | 138.5 | 29.3% | 58.5% | 59.1% | |
| 50.00% | 4 | 1.07 | 137.4 | 31.5% | 40.0% | 55.0% |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Waylay's best matchup in Valorant?
Waylay's best matchup is against Iso, achieving a 76.9% win rate. Waylay excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Waylay's hardest matchup?
Waylay's hardest matchup is against Tejo, with only a 26.7% win rate. Against this opponent, Waylay should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Waylay have?
Waylay has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 14 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Waylay in difficult matchups?
When playing Waylay in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Waylay's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Waylay's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Waylay's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.