En Yüksek Birincilik Oranı TFT Double Up Dizilişleri

Bu tablo en yüksek birincilik oranlarına sahip TFT Double Up takım dizilişlerini öne çıkarır, kazanma şanslarını en üst düzeye çıkarmak isteyen duolar için mükemmel. En iyi 8 şampiyonlu Double Up Set 17 dizilişleri: N.O.V.A. (50.0% WR, 4.0 avg), N.O.V.A. (74.2% WR, 3.4 avg), Replicator (63.0% WR, 3.7 avg). N.O.V.A./Fateweaver 50.00% kazanma oranı ve 4.00 ortalama sıralama ile lider. N.O.V.A. 74.19% kazanma oranı ile takip ediyor. 68 adet 8 şampiyonlu Double Up dizilişi gerçek zamanlı performans istatistikleriyle analiz ediliyor.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
4.00
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.37
Avg Place
74.19%
Top 4 Rate
24.19%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.65
Avg Place
62.97%
Top 4 Rate
21.20%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.91
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
18.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.43
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
17.39%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.89
Avg Place
56.88%
Top 4 Rate
16.88%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.75
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
20.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.44
Avg Place
46.67%
Top 4 Rate
15.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.09
Avg Place
58.46%
Top 4 Rate
15.38%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.69
Avg Place
58.06%
Top 4 Rate
19.35%
First Place
Low Contested
4.69
Avg Place
45.24%
Top 4 Rate
16.67%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.08
Avg Place
57.14%
Top 4 Rate
14.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.51
Avg Place
67.57%
Top 4 Rate
21.62%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.93
Avg Place
58.33%
Top 4 Rate
11.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.81
Avg Place
37.21%
Top 4 Rate
13.95%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.83
Avg Place
62.45%
Top 4 Rate
16.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.02
Avg Place
59.09%
Top 4 Rate
13.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.77
Avg Place
45.54%
Top 4 Rate
13.39%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.53
Avg Place
67.65%
Top 4 Rate
12.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.96
Avg Place
63.83%
Top 4 Rate
8.51%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.97
Avg Place
39.39%
Top 4 Rate
9.09%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.31
Avg Place
49.20%
Top 4 Rate
16.04%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.82
Avg Place
62.50%
Top 4 Rate
19.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.89
Avg Place
61.63%
Top 4 Rate
15.59%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.51
Avg Place
69.77%
Top 4 Rate
16.28%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.36
Avg Place
52.17%
Top 4 Rate
15.44%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.65
Avg Place
47.80%
Top 4 Rate
8.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.84
Avg Place
55.97%
Top 4 Rate
18.66%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.22
Avg Place
33.33%
Top 4 Rate
5.88%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.99
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
14.00%
First Place
Low Contested
4.24
Avg Place
54.45%
Top 4 Rate
10.68%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.59
Avg Place
48.87%
Top 4 Rate
11.65%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.05
Avg Place
58.62%
Top 4 Rate
11.49%
First Place
Low Contested
5.12
Avg Place
42.42%
Top 4 Rate
3.03%
First Place
Low Contested
4.30
Avg Place
52.17%
Top 4 Rate
10.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.80
Avg Place
40.96%
Top 4 Rate
9.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.49
Avg Place
46.15%
Top 4 Rate
10.26%
First Place
Low Contested
5.13
Avg Place
33.33%
Top 4 Rate
5.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.21
Avg Place
34.15%
Top 4 Rate
9.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.80
Avg Place
25.00%
Top 4 Rate
5.95%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.40
Avg Place
27.91%
Top 4 Rate
9.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.37
Avg Place
32.61%
Top 4 Rate
8.70%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.03
Avg Place
36.21%
Top 4 Rate
8.62%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.49
Avg Place
26.38%
Top 4 Rate
5.51%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.44
Avg Place
49.02%
Top 4 Rate
10.83%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.30
Avg Place
32.54%
Top 4 Rate
7.69%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.02
Avg Place
41.67%
Top 4 Rate
8.33%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.14
Avg Place
57.14%
Top 4 Rate
19.05%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.80
Avg Place
20.00%
Top 4 Rate
6.67%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.95
Avg Place
41.67%
Top 4 Rate
6.67%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.68
Avg Place
46.77%
Top 4 Rate
6.45%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.52
Avg Place
25.81%
Top 4 Rate
3.23%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.73
Avg Place
47.13%
Top 4 Rate
8.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.57
Avg Place
29.13%
Top 4 Rate
4.85%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.24
Avg Place
29.41%
Top 4 Rate
5.88%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.00
Avg Place
32.35%
Top 4 Rate
8.82%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.83
Avg Place
18.75%
Top 4 Rate
4.17%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.87
Avg Place
19.49%
Top 4 Rate
4.24%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.71
Avg Place
44.12%
Top 4 Rate
8.82%
First Place
Low Contested
5.52
Avg Place
28.26%
Top 4 Rate
4.35%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.87
Avg Place
23.38%
Top 4 Rate
7.79%
First Place
Moderately Contested
6.22
Avg Place
12.70%
Top 4 Rate
3.17%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.19
Avg Place
37.50%
Top 4 Rate
6.25%
First Place
Moderately Contested
-
5.18
Avg Place
32.97%
Top 4 Rate
7.14%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.57
Avg Place
28.57%
Top 4 Rate
2.86%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.36
Avg Place
28.57%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.63
Avg Place
36.84%
Top 4 Rate
5.26%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.23
Avg Place
32.14%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Highly Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 68 team compositions sorted by first place rate to find compositions with the highest potential to win lobbies, based on 9.9K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 44.5% and average placement of 4.68 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is N.O.V.A./Brawler with Viktor as the primary carry, achieving a 74.2% win rate. Following closely is Replicator/N.O.V.A. at 69.8% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Brawler at 67.6%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax
  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider N.O.V.A./Fateweaver which achieves first place in 25.0% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 74.2% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A.: 69.8% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 67.6% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Rogue/N.O.V.A. with a 2.1% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 61.6% win rate despite high contestation. Challenger/N.O.V.A. follows at 1.4% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Doğruluğu korumamıza yardım edin! Yanlış istatistikler, eksik veriler veya herhangi bir sorun fark ederseniz, geri bildiriminiz tüm topluluk için veri kalitemizi doğrudan iyileştirir.

Sorun Bildir

TFT Double Up Dizilişleri - Set 17 SSS

TFT Set 17 için en iyi TFT Double Up dizilişi nedir?

TFT Set 17 için en iyi TFT Double Up dizilişi N.O.V.A./Brawler, Viktor ana taşıyıcı olarak olup, 74.2% kazanma oranı ve 3.37 ortalama sıralama elde etmektedir. Bu kompozisyon bir partnerle birlikte yükselmek için etkilidir.

Double Up'ta N.O.V.A./Brawler dizilişi nasıl oynanır?

Double Up'ta N.O.V.A./Brawler oynamak için partnerinizle koordine olun. Viktor etrafında ana carry olarak kurmaya odaklanın. Bu dizilişin seçilme oranı 0.1%, nispeten yarışılmayan bir seçenek yapıyor. Duo partnerinizle destek ve paylaşılan eşyaları koordine edin.

TFT Set 17 Double Up'ta yükselmek için hangi dizilişler iyi?

TFT Set 17 Double Up'ta tutarlı LP kazanımları için N.O.V.A./Brawler 3.37 ile en iyi ortalama sıralamayı sunar. Diğer güvenilir seçenekler Replicator/N.O.V.A. (ort. 3.51) ve Rogue/N.O.V.A. (ort. 3.51). Birbirinizle yarışmamak için partnerinizle koordine olun.

En kolay TFT Double Up dizilişi nedir?

N.O.V.A./Brawler daha kolay tırmanma arayan oyuncular için harika bir seçenek. %74.2 kazanma oranı ama sadece %0.1 seçim oranıyla yarışılma ihtimaliniz düşük, oyunu daha kolay gezinebilir kılıyor. Düşük yarışma, pivotları zorlamadan birimlerinizi doğal olarak bulabileceğiniz anlamına gelir.

Double Up'ta duo partnerim ve ben aynı dizilişi mi oynamalıyız?

TFT Set 17 Double Up'ta birimler için yarışmamak adına genellikle farklı dizilişler oynamak daha iyidir. Rogue/N.O.V.A. 2.1% seçilme oranıyla en popülerdir. Partnerinizin tamamlayıcı bir seçenek olarak N.O.V.A./Brawler oynamasını düşünün.