最高胜率TFT阵容
此表格展示了胜率最高的TFT阵容,帮助您识别爬分最成功的阵容。 顶级 9英雄Set 17阵容:挑战者 (97.4% WR, 2.2 avg), 游侠 (96.4% WR, 2.1 avg), 游侠 (95.9% WR, 2.1 avg)。 挑战者/游侠以97.42%胜率和2.25平均排名领先。 游侠以96.39%胜率紧随其后。 实时分析62个9英雄阵容的性能数据。
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.25 Avg Place | 97.42% Top 4 Rate | 31.61% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.06 Avg Place | 96.39% Top 4 Rate | 39.25% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.08 Avg Place | 95.88% Top 4 Rate | 37.05% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.17 Avg Place | 95.67% Top 4 Rate | 34.66% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
1.99 Avg Place | 94.82% Top 4 Rate | 42.42% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.14 Avg Place | 94.75% Top 4 Rate | 37.37% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.20 Avg Place | 94.07% Top 4 Rate | 37.29% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.43 Avg Place | 92.56% Top 4 Rate | 29.35% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.36 Avg Place | 92.29% Top 4 Rate | 30.35% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.41 Avg Place | 91.99% Top 4 Rate | 30.04% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.55 Avg Place | 89.66% Top 4 Rate | 26.17% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.32 Avg Place | 89.49% Top 4 Rate | 39.95% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.47 Avg Place | 88.33% Top 4 Rate | 28.02% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.40 Avg Place | 87.58% Top 4 Rate | 40.35% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.44 Avg Place | 87.13% Top 4 Rate | 39.82% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.73 Avg Place | 86.01% Top 4 Rate | 27.97% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.71 Avg Place | 85.26% Top 4 Rate | 30.52% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.97 Avg Place | 83.85% Top 4 Rate | 25.77% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.84 Avg Place | 83.06% Top 4 Rate | 28.72% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.03 Avg Place | 81.98% Top 4 Rate | 16.47% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.11 Avg Place | 81.06% Top 4 Rate | 17.41% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.14 Avg Place | 80.24% Top 4 Rate | 18.76% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.82 Avg Place | 80.15% Top 4 Rate | 37.13% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.03 Avg Place | 79.64% Top 4 Rate | 23.68% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.05 Avg Place | 79.45% Top 4 Rate | 25.12% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.13 Avg Place | 79.36% Top 4 Rate | 18.53% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.91 Avg Place | 78.77% Top 4 Rate | 29.16% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.16 Avg Place | 78.50% Top 4 Rate | 20.56% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 78.42% Top 4 Rate | 21.98% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.05 Avg Place | 77.94% Top 4 Rate | 26.83% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 77.78% Top 4 Rate | 27.53% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.01 Avg Place | 77.15% Top 4 Rate | 25.22% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.37 Avg Place | 75.92% Top 4 Rate | 16.97% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.23 Avg Place | 75.51% Top 4 Rate | 19.05% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.39 Avg Place | 74.82% Top 4 Rate | 19.56% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.23 Avg Place | 74.27% Top 4 Rate | 23.03% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.30 Avg Place | 74.25% Top 4 Rate | 19.77% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.49 Avg Place | 71.84% Top 4 Rate | 16.65% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.56 Avg Place | 70.89% Top 4 Rate | 14.41% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.50 Avg Place | 69.83% Top 4 Rate | 19.63% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.45 Avg Place | 68.14% Top 4 Rate | 23.67% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.55 Avg Place | 67.92% Top 4 Rate | 20.82% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.66 Avg Place | 67.38% Top 4 Rate | 17.91% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.66 Avg Place | 67.14% Top 4 Rate | 16.30% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.74 Avg Place | 66.70% Top 4 Rate | 11.92% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.83 Avg Place | 66.60% Top 4 Rate | 16.19% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.70 Avg Place | 66.30% Top 4 Rate | 20.65% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.93 Avg Place | 65.47% Top 4 Rate | 7.82% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.74 Avg Place | 64.80% Top 4 Rate | 17.51% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.95 Avg Place | 63.45% Top 4 Rate | 6.99% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.07 Avg Place | 59.35% Top 4 Rate | 7.61% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.90 Avg Place | 59.24% Top 4 Rate | 20.93% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.32 Avg Place | 56.96% Top 4 Rate | 6.03% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.26 Avg Place | 56.43% Top 4 Rate | 4.97% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.32 Avg Place | 55.03% Top 4 Rate | 8.52% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.43 Avg Place | 54.22% Top 4 Rate | 3.21% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.43 Avg Place | 51.97% Top 4 Rate | 5.34% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.43 Avg Place | 49.82% Top 4 Rate | 5.78% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.60 Avg Place | 49.74% Top 4 Rate | 3.95% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.86 Avg Place | 43.02% Top 4 Rate | 3.49% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.85 Avg Place | 42.51% Top 4 Rate | 7.58% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.97 Avg Place | 41.14% Top 4 Rate | 6.69% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
云顶之弈阵容 - 第17赛季常见问题
TFT 第17赛季中最好的TFT阵容是什么?
TFT 第17赛季中最好的TFT阵容是挑战者/游侠,以卡莎为主C,胜率为97.4%,平均排名2.25。这个阵容非常适合爬分,能稳定进前四。
如何玩挑战者/游侠阵容?
玩挑战者/游侠阵容时,重点围绕卡莎作为主C来构建。尽早寻找卡莎和辅助单位,优先选择与你的C位协同的装备,目标在7-8级时达到强势期。该阵容使用率为0.1%,是一个相对不被抢的选择。
TFT 第17赛季中哪些阵容适合爬分?
在TFT 第17赛季中稳定获取LP,游侠/新星特攻队提供最佳平均排名1.99。其他可靠选择包括游侠/新星特攻队(平均名次 2.06)和游侠/新星特攻队(平均名次 2.08)。稳定阵容可以减少倒四,实现稳步攀升。
TFT中最简单的阵容是什么?
挑战者/游侠对于想要轻松爬分的玩家来说是一个很好的选择。胜率97.4%但使用率仅0.1%,你不太可能被抢,使游戏更容易进行。低竞争意味着你可以自然地找到你的单位,而不必强行转型。
在TFT 第17赛季中什么时候应该强行玩阵容vs灵活转型?
在TFT 第17赛季中,魔术师/暗星的使用率为1.4%,意味着竞争激烈。如果你看到其他人也在玩,考虑灵活转向挑战者/游侠等替代阵容。当你在早期找到单位和装备或阵容没有竞争时强行玩。当你看到2个以上玩家争夺相同单位时要灵活。