正义之手云顶之弈阵容
女神之泪
拳套使用 正义之手的团队阵容，TFT Set 16.8。查看C位英雄装备此物品以获得最大效果的阵容。
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize 正义之手 as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 57 viable team comps currently building 正义之手, with an average win rate of 37.57% across all compositions. The highest performing 正义之手 comp achieves a 97.53% win rate, primarily featuring 斗神, 旅人, 斗士 traits with 奥瑞利安·索尔 as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where 正义之手 is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
2.08 Avg Place | 97.53% Top 4 Rate | 36.42% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.13 Avg Place | 97.44% Top 4 Rate | 35.26% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.90 Avg Place | 83.61% Top 4 Rate | 27.87% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.00 Avg Place | 82.65% Top 4 Rate | 20.41% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.98 Avg Place | 79.53% Top 4 Rate | 24.25% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.57 Avg Place | 70.46% Top 4 Rate | 14.12% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.58 Avg Place | 70.05% Top 4 Rate | 13.61% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.82 Avg Place | 69.70% Top 4 Rate | 8.71% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.86 Avg Place | 64.81% Top 4 Rate | 12.41% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.93 Avg Place | 63.33% Top 4 Rate | 13.33% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.28 Avg Place | 55.73% Top 4 Rate | 8.14% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.26 Avg Place | 53.81% Top 4 Rate | 3.39% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.41 Avg Place | 53.44% Top 4 Rate | 4.21% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.40 Avg Place | 52.98% Top 4 Rate | 6.67% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.50 Avg Place | 50.36% Top 4 Rate | 6.57% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 4.60 Avg Place | 48.27% Top 4 Rate | 6.44% First Place | Low Contested | |||
4.52 Avg Place | 47.71% Top 4 Rate | 6.86% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.78 Avg Place | 46.50% Top 4 Rate | 6.18% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.83 Avg Place | 42.92% Top 4 Rate | 7.29% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.02 Avg Place | 41.75% Top 4 Rate | 6.80% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 4.81 Avg Place | 41.72% Top 4 Rate | 13.50% First Place | Low Contested | |||
4.89 Avg Place | 41.57% Top 4 Rate | 6.42% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.93 Avg Place | 39.70% Top 4 Rate | 3.52% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.91 Avg Place | 39.18% Top 4 Rate | 2.86% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.06 Avg Place | 38.41% Top 4 Rate | 1.99% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.09 Avg Place | 37.19% Top 4 Rate | 2.88% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.43 Avg Place | 31.18% Top 4 Rate | 2.69% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 5.26 Avg Place | 30.46% Top 4 Rate | 4.60% First Place | Low Contested | |||
- | 5.27 Avg Place | 30.25% Top 4 Rate | 4.94% First Place | Low Contested | |||
5.36 Avg Place | 29.49% Top 4 Rate | 3.21% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.70 Avg Place | 28.82% Top 4 Rate | 2.94% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.47 Avg Place | 28.80% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.41 Avg Place | 28.65% Top 4 Rate | 0.28% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.50 Avg Place | 25.23% Top 4 Rate | 3.67% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.85 Avg Place | 25.07% Top 4 Rate | 4.27% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.94 Avg Place | 22.67% Top 4 Rate | 1.74% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.62 Avg Place | 22.56% Top 4 Rate | 5.26% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.74 Avg Place | 22.16% Top 4 Rate | 2.23% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.80 Avg Place | 22.15% Top 4 Rate | 1.68% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.50 Avg Place | 21.64% Top 4 Rate | 3.73% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.82 Avg Place | 21.17% Top 4 Rate | 0.90% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.84 Avg Place | 19.66% Top 4 Rate | 0.28% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.85 Avg Place | 19.58% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.92 Avg Place | 19.41% Top 4 Rate | 2.13% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.80 Avg Place | 18.72% Top 4 Rate | 0.46% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.04 Avg Place | 18.43% Top 4 Rate | 1.44% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.13 Avg Place | 16.78% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.13 Avg Place | 16.61% Top 4 Rate | 1.28% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.98 Avg Place | 15.22% Top 4 Rate | 3.26% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.12 Avg Place | 14.66% Top 4 Rate | 1.72% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.18 Avg Place | 14.46% Top 4 Rate | 2.07% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.27 Avg Place | 13.98% Top 4 Rate | 0.61% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.12 Avg Place | 13.81% Top 4 Rate | 0.62% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.27 Avg Place | 13.29% Top 4 Rate | 0.63% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.49 Avg Place | 10.14% Top 4 Rate | 1.45% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.66 Avg Place | 9.22% Top 4 Rate | 0.92% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.09 Avg Place | 6.99% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
正义之手阵容 - 常见问题
云顶之弈第17赛季正义之手的最佳阵容是什么？
云顶之弈第17赛季使用正义之手的最佳阵容胜率为97.53%，选取率为0.06%。这个阵容使用斗神, 旅人, and 斗士羁绊，在包含正义之手的对局中有0.06%的选择率。
云顶之弈中有多少阵容使用正义之手？
云顶之弈第17赛季有57个常用正义之手的可行阵容。正义之手出现在平均胜率为37.57%的阵容中，共分析了30,586场对局。
云顶之弈中哪个阵容最常使用正义之手？
云顶之弈第17赛季正义之手最热门的阵容使用挑战者, 新星特攻队, and 斗士羁绊，选取率为2.02%。这个阵容胜率为53.44%，平均排名4.41。
云顶之弈中哪些羁绊与正义之手搭配效果好？
云顶之弈第17赛季与正义之手协同最佳的羁绊是斗神, 旅人, 斗士, 神谕, 霸天机甲, 狂战士, 黑暗魔女, and 命运祭司。这些羁绊组合出现在正义之手胜率最高的阵容中。