Master Yivs Fizz
Master Yi vs Fizz is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Fizz wins with a 58.1% win rate (+16.3%) over Master Yi based on 43 games. Fizz holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Master Yi build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Master Yi vs Fizz matchup.
Master Yi Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Master Yi performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Master Yi vs Fizz Matchup?
Master Yi vs Fizz Matchup Summary
The Master Yi vs Fizz matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 43 recent matches analyzed, Fizz wins with a 58.1% win rate compared to Master Yi's 41.9%, giving Fizz a 16.3 percentage point advantage. Fizz dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Master Yi players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Fizz leads by 0.3s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Fizz has a strong advantage in this matchup. Master Yi players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Fizz overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Master Yi vs Fizz Laning Phase Breakdown
Fizz is favored during the laning phase against Master Yi, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Fizz holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Master Yi Build Against Fizz
Berserker's Greaves is the optimal boots choice against Fizz, providing the mobility and stats Master Yi needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Master Yi against Fizz are Kraken Slayer, Blade of The Ruined King and Guinsoo's Rageblade. This combination gives Master Yi an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 71.4% win rate across 7 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Fizz. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Master Yi vs Fizz matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Master Yi35.0%
Fizz65.0%Master Yi47.8%Fizz52.2%Fizz dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 65.0% win rate — a 30.0 percentage point lead over Master Yi. This lopsided early game means Fizz can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
In the late game (25+ minutes), Fizz takes over with a 52.2% win rate, leading Master Yi by 4.3 percentage points. Fizz scales more effectively into team fights and objective contests.
Fizz holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Master Yi players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Master Yi Runes Against Fizz
Domination
Precision
The Domination and Precision rune setup gives Master Yi the best tools to compete against Fizz in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Master Yi matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Master Yi's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Master Yi build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.73% | 597 | 1.3 | 744 | 12,530 | 46.2% | 47.3% | |
| 51.64% | 550 | 1.1 | 799 | 13,343 | 49.1% | 53.5% | |
| 47.62% | 525 | 1.2 | 789 | 13,353 | 43.6% | 50.9% | |
| 49.62% | 522 | 1.2 | 757 | 13,131 | 46.6% | 52.4% | |
| 47.80% | 500 | 1.2 | 769 | 12,952 | 45.5% | 50.0% | |
| 45.31% | 437 | 1.1 | 765 | 13,247 | 43.0% | 47.5% | |
| 44.74% | 371 | 1.1 | 766 | 13,160 | 40.1% | 48.7% | |
| 48.47% | 359 | 1.6 | 703 | 12,643 | 46.3% | 50.3% | |
| 51.56% | 353 | 1.2 | 737 | 13,667 | 56.1% | 47.6% | |
| 45.69% | 348 | 1.2 | 736 | 12,850 | 42.6% | 48.2% | |
| 50.48% | 315 | 1.2 | 797 | 12,696 | 49.7% | 51.4% | |
| 53.25% | 308 | 1.2 | 730 | 13,839 | 59.6% | 49.5% | |
| 52.73% | 275 | 1.2 | 742 | 13,374 | 50.4% | 54.8% | |
| 45.86% | 266 | 1.1 | 706 | 13,031 | 46.0% | 45.8% | |
| 51.72% | 232 | 1.7 | 789 | 12,683 | 54.2% | 49.6% | |
| 49.55% | 222 | 1.2 | 737 | 14,334 | 48.8% | 50.0% | |
| 44.98% | 209 | 1.4 | 750 | 12,999 | 47.1% | 42.9% | |
| 48.50% | 200 | 1.3 | 686 | 13,322 | 42.7% | 52.0% | |
| 55.96% | 193 | 1.2 | 777 | 13,669 | 49.5% | 62.8% | |
| 48.44% | 192 | 1.1 | 795 | 13,388 | 48.9% | 48.0% | |
| 54.29% | 175 | 1.1 | 762 | 12,290 | 51.5% | 57.7% | |
| 53.76% | 173 | 1.1 | 792 | 13,320 | 47.2% | 58.4% | |
| 56.17% | 162 | 1.3 | 775 | 14,008 | 65.8% | 48.3% | |
| 56.41% | 156 | 1.2 | 805 | 13,101 | 50.0% | 61.6% | |
| 62.34% | 154 | 1.3 | 814 | 13,667 | 57.4% | 65.6% | |
| 52.32% | 151 | 2.8 | 727 | 13,117 | 50.0% | 54.4% | |
| 46.98% | 149 | 1.1 | 697 | 12,533 | 45.6% | 48.1% | |
| 57.86% | 140 | 1.2 | 764 | 13,331 | 56.1% | 59.0% | |
| 55.71% | 140 | 1.3 | 798 | 13,874 | 51.7% | 58.5% | |
| 57.55% | 139 | 1.1 | 739 | 13,586 | 63.3% | 53.2% | |
| 51.72% | 116 | 1.3 | 800 | 13,760 | 48.1% | 54.7% | |
| 50.44% | 113 | 2.8 | 781 | 13,301 | 50.0% | 50.8% | |
| 50.91% | 110 | 2.8 | 764 | 12,728 | 38.8% | 60.7% | |
| 50.00% | 110 | 1.4 | 807 | 13,854 | 52.3% | 48.5% | |
| 51.92% | 104 | 2.6 | 963 | 12,386 | 58.3% | 46.4% | |
| 46.15% | 104 | 1.2 | 819 | 14,202 | 52.1% | 41.1% | |
| 40.00% | 100 | 3.5 | 839 | 12,670 | 40.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.90% | 98 | 1.8 | 744 | 12,790 | 50.0% | 40.7% | |
| 47.37% | 95 | 1.5 | 808 | 13,062 | 45.8% | 48.9% | |
| 52.63% | 95 | 1.1 | 808 | 13,208 | 43.6% | 58.9% | |
| 47.87% | 94 | 1.3 | 705 | 13,278 | 40.5% | 53.9% | |
| 54.84% | 93 | 3.0 | 903 | 12,557 | 46.7% | 62.5% | |
| 49.43% | 87 | 1.7 | 744 | 13,077 | 57.1% | 44.2% | |
| 47.62% | 84 | 1.0 | 715 | 13,073 | 48.8% | 46.5% | |
| 39.51% | 81 | 1.6 | 714 | 11,333 | 37.2% | 42.1% | |
| 48.05% | 77 | 1.2 | 753 | 13,929 | 42.4% | 52.3% | |
| 53.95% | 76 | 2.5 | 841 | 12,983 | 35.7% | 64.6% | |
| 60.00% | 75 | 1.3 | 820 | 14,098 | 56.3% | 62.8% | |
| 43.84% | 73 | 3.1 | 764 | 11,828 | 38.5% | 50.0% | |
| 56.94% | 72 | 2.0 | 801 | 14,033 | 58.6% | 55.8% | |
| 49.25% | 67 | 2.6 | 818 | 12,543 | 50.0% | 48.7% | |
| 49.23% | 65 | 5.9 | 931 | 12,516 | 53.1% | 45.5% | |
| 49.18% | 61 | 2.7 | 907 | 11,758 | 54.3% | 42.3% | |
| 48.33% | 60 | 2.4 | 842 | 12,667 | 59.4% | 35.7% | |
| 66.67% | 57 | 2.2 | 846 | 13,153 | 69.2% | 64.5% | |
| 47.06% | 51 | 5.0 | 902 | 12,647 | 42.9% | 48.6% | |
| 60.00% | 50 | 0.9 | 741 | 12,456 | 60.7% | 59.1% | |
| 55.32% | 47 | 1.9 | 889 | 13,362 | 52.4% | 57.7% | |
| 37.78% | 45 | 4.5 | 830 | 11,569 | 37.5% | 38.1% | |
| 51.11% | 45 | 5.7 | 997 | 13,738 | 59.1% | 43.5% | |
| 41.86% | 43 | 2.3 | 770 | 12,918 | 35.0% | 47.8% | |
| 45.00% | 40 | 4.4 | 771 | 11,797 | 35.0% | 55.0% | |
| 51.28% | 39 | 4.4 | 1,001 | 13,062 | 41.2% | 59.1% | |
| 44.74% | 38 | 2.0 | 895 | 14,417 | 33.3% | 55.0% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 3.2 | 925 | 13,253 | 43.8% | 47.6% | |
| 47.22% | 36 | 5.5 | 882 | 12,827 | 43.8% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 2.3 | 797 | 12,764 | 38.9% | 62.5% | |
| 47.06% | 34 | 5.1 | 1,039 | 13,425 | 62.5% | 33.3% | |
| 32.35% | 34 | 1.4 | 880 | 14,534 | 18.2% | 39.1% | |
| 44.12% | 34 | 5.6 | 775 | 12,590 | 38.5% | 47.6% | |
| 54.55% | 33 | 5.1 | 918 | 13,347 | 53.9% | 55.0% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 4.9 | 1,018 | 13,742 | 38.5% | 46.7% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 5.4 | 891 | 13,074 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 39.29% | 28 | 5.2 | 933 | 12,887 | 30.0% | 44.4% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 2.9 | 714 | 13,330 | 60.0% | 46.1% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 5.3 | 1,025 | 13,957 | 66.7% | 46.7% | |
| 55.56% | 27 | 1.4 | 675 | 14,434 | 70.0% | 47.1% | |
| 42.31% | 26 | 6.3 | 959 | 13,603 | 38.5% | 46.1% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 1.3 | 700 | 12,661 | 58.3% | 50.0% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 5.8 | 896 | 12,485 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 5.9 | 788 | 12,120 | 30.0% | 76.9% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 4.9 | 966 | 12,219 | 25.0% | 57.1% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 1.2 | 784 | 11,921 | 41.7% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 1.4 | 696 | 14,480 | 57.1% | 35.7% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 5.8 | 817 | 13,411 | 28.6% | 64.3% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 1.1 | 696 | 11,794 | 25.0% | 62.5% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 3.4 | 810 | 13,202 | 22.2% | 77.8% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 5.5 | 867 | 14,215 | 37.5% | 60.0% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 3.0 | 924 | 12,970 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 1.6 | 689 | 11,880 | 63.6% | 20.0% | |
| 26.67% | 15 | 4.8 | 662 | 10,573 | 33.3% | 16.7% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 5.1 | 712 | 11,430 | 50.0% | 22.2% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 2.8 | 759 | 14,149 | 71.4% | 42.9% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 5.0 | 844 | 11,757 | 14.3% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.0 | 833 | 11,890 | 85.7% | 0.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 5.1 | 967 | 13,414 | 75.0% | 42.9% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 6.1 | 982 | 13,573 | 50.0% | 85.7% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.3 | 935 | 13,092 | 71.4% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.5 | 912 | 13,530 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.4 | 1,068 | 13,802 | 66.7% | 57.1% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.8 | 803 | 12,816 | 60.0% | 60.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 946 | 13,408 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.4 | 625 | 13,096 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 2.9 | 669 | 11,663 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 4.2 | 1,184 | 11,891 | 75.0% | 80.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 5.9 | 757 | 10,561 | 40.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 4.8 | 1,009 | 16,870 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 4.4 | 764 | 11,911 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.0 | 1,153 | 12,143 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 5.7 | 913 | 14,666 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.1 | 1,341 | 17,358 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.8 | 960 | 13,907 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.1 | 1,045 | 11,951 | 80.0% | 33.3% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.6 | 980 | 16,288 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.0 | 1,087 | 9,636 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.4 | 1,073 | 15,948 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.4 | 749 | 8,334 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.3 | 930 | 15,252 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 2.9 | 831 | 16,112 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.5 | 833 | 14,537 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 638 | 13,975 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.5 | 616 | 12,218 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.2 | 787 | 11,785 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 1.7 | 656 | 8,831 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.3 | 1,235 | 15,889 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 4.6 | 1,090 | 12,919 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Master Yi vs Fizz - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Master Yi do against Fizz in League of Legends?
Fizz wins the Master Yi vs Fizz matchup with a 58.1% win rate compared to Master Yi's 41.9%, a 16.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 43 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Master Yi do against Fizz in the early game?
In the early game, Fizz has the advantage against Master Yi with a 65.0% win rate versus 35.0%. Fizz players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Master Yi do against Fizz in the late game?
In the late game, Fizz takes over the Master Yi vs Fizz matchup with a 52.2% win rate compared to 47.8%. Fizz scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Master Yi vs Fizz matchup?
Fizz wins the matchup against Master Yi with a 58.1% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 16.3 percentage point advantage means Fizz is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 43 games analyzed.
What is the best Master Yi build against Fizz?
The best Master Yi build against Fizz includes Kraken Slayer, Blade of The Ruined King, Guinsoo's Rageblade with Berserker's Greaves. This build achieves a 71.4% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Master Yi runes against Fizz?
The best Master Yi runes against Fizz use the Domination primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 50.0% win rate in the Master Yi vs Fizz matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Master Yi counter Fizz?
No, Master Yi struggles against Fizz with only a 41.9% win rate. Fizz has the advantage in this matchup. Master Yi players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Fizz's lead.
How do I play Master Yi against Fizz?
When playing Master Yi against Fizz, play cautiously and avoid Fizz's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Fizz has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.