Astra vs Omen•Matchup

Astra vs Omen Matchup Summary

The Astra vs Omen matchup in Valorant is a heavily one-sided matchup. Based on 7 competitive matches analyzed, Astra wins 57.1% of the time compared to Omen's 42.9%, a 14.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Omen consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Controller matchup, Astra has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Omen should never take isolated fights against Astra and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.

Astra vs Omen Fragging Analysis

Omen edges out Astra in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 7 matches analyzed, this Astra vs Omen matchup remains contestable for both sides. Astra shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Astra's favor.

Astra vs Omen Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side

Omen

48.8%

52.6%

Defense Side

Omen

47.4%

51.2%

Attack Side Breakdown

Omen holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Astra vs Omen matchup, winning 52.6% of offensive rounds compared to 48.8% for Astra. This 3.8 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.

Our analysis of 7 matches reveals Omen's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Omen consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Astra teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.

Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Omen's favor in this matchup. When Omen takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Astra. For Astra players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Omen's advantages. Omen can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.

Post-plant is where Omen's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 3.8% attack-side gap suggests Omen excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Astra should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Omen's kit advantages become decisive. For Omen, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.

Defense Side Breakdown

Omen demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Astra, holding 51.2% of rounds versus 47.4%. This 3.8 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.

Site anchor assignments should account for Omen's defensive advantage. Omen can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Astra should avoid solo anchor positions against Omen — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Astra's site with Omen on the execute, expect faster site falls.

Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Omen in this matchup. Our 7 match analysis shows Omen converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Astra should never attempt solo retakes against Omen — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Omen can confidently take 1vX retakes that Astra should avoid.

Economy rounds highlight Omen's defensive advantages. Astra should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Omen, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Omen can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Astra should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.

Overall Side Analysis

Omen holds clear advantages on both attack (52.6%) and defense (51.2%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Astra vs Omen matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Omen doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.

Omen's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Omen performs better. Astra teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Astra with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Astra's positioning.

For ranked climbing specifically, Omen is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Omen provides a measurable ranked advantage. Astra players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Omen confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.

The verdict is clear: Omen wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 7.6 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Astra isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.

Controller vs Controller Dynamics

Both Astra and Omen fill the Controller role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Controller performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Omen is the stronger Controller pick when these agents face each other.

In Controller vs Controller encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Omen's statistical advantage suggests their specific Controller kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.