Astra vs SovaMatchup
Astra vs Sova matchup guide: Sova leads with a 61.0% win rate, but Astra can still win. Learn how Astra's 132 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 59-match dataset into ranked wins.
Astra Matchup Breakdown
Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Astra's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Who Wins the Astra vs Sova Matchup?
Astra vs Sova Performance Breakdown
The Astra vs Sova matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 59 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Astra vs Sova Matchup Summary
The Astra vs Sova matchup in Valorant is a heavily one-sided matchup. Based on 59 competitive matches analyzed, Sova wins 61.0% of the time compared to Astra's 39.0%, a 22.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Astra consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Initiator matchup, Sova has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Astra should never take isolated fights against Sova and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Astra vs Sova Fragging Analysis
Astra claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Astra vs Sova matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. Our analysis of 59 ranked games reveals Astra consistently outperforms Sova in direct combat scenarios. While Sova manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Astra in gunfights. Sova players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Astra dominates.
Astra vs Sova Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side Breakdown
Sova holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Astra vs Sova matchup, winning 53.1% of offensive rounds compared to 49.2% for Astra. This 4.0 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 59 matches reveals Sova's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Sova consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Astra teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Sova's favor in this matchup. When Sova takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Astra. For Astra players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Sova's advantages. Sova can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Post-plant is where Sova's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 4.0% attack-side gap suggests Sova excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Astra should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Sova's kit advantages become decisive. For Sova, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Sova demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Astra, holding 50.8% of rounds versus 46.9%. This 4.0 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for Sova's defensive advantage. Sova can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Astra should avoid solo anchor positions against Sova — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Astra's site with Sova on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Sova in this matchup. Our 59 match analysis shows Sova converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Astra should never attempt solo retakes against Sova — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Sova can confidently take 1vX retakes that Astra should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight Sova's defensive advantages. Astra should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Sova, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Sova can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Astra should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
Overall Side Analysis
Sova holds clear advantages on both attack (53.1%) and defense (50.8%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Astra vs Sova matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Sova doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Sova's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Sova performs better. Astra teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Astra with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Astra's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Sova is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Sova provides a measurable ranked advantage. Astra players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Sova confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Sova wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 8.0 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Astra isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Controller vs Initiator Dynamics
The Controller (Astra) vs Initiator (Sova) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Astra's Controller abilities serve different purposes than Sova's Initiator kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Controller abilities interact with Initiator counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Astra's Controller toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Sova's Initiator kit counters others. The Sova advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Astra has favorable matchups against 7 agents and unfavorable matchups against 13 agents in Valorant. Astra's strongest matchup is against Brimstone with a 66.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sage at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41.43% | 70 | 1.47 | 125.7 | 33.1% | 48.9% | 50.5% | |
| 46.88% | 64 | 1.48 | 131.5 | 33.8% | 47.1% | 50.5% | |
| 38.98% | 59 | 1.48 | 132.2 | 34.9% | 49.2% | 46.9% | |
| 47.92% | 48 | 1.57 | 130.9 | 30.8% | 47.8% | 50.7% | |
| 43.59% | 39 | 1.46 | 124.5 | 33.6% | 46.7% | 53.6% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 1.65 | 136.4 | 31.8% | 47.8% | 53.0% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 1.45 | 134.4 | 30.7% | 47.9% | 49.1% | |
| 57.69% | 26 | 1.67 | 139.6 | 28.9% | 48.9% | 52.4% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 1.43 | 128.6 | 33.0% | 46.0% | 46.8% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 1.43 | 128.6 | 30.5% | 52.4% | 46.8% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 1.42 | 119.4 | 33.3% | 45.5% | 52.7% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 1.28 | 115.9 | 30.2% | 46.1% | 48.9% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.45 | 137.1 | 33.5% | 48.0% | 44.3% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.61 | 132.6 | 28.4% | 47.7% | 54.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.55 | 127.2 | 27.8% | 48.8% | 47.4% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.93 | 155.3 | 32.5% | 48.4% | 50.8% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.57 | 132.9 | 40.6% | 48.2% | 46.9% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.32 | 136.1 | 25.8% | 52.0% | 40.9% | |
| 0.00% | 4 | 1.47 | 129.1 | 31.1% | 37.2% | 39.0% | |
| 66.67% | 3 | 2.09 | 127.4 | 43.0% | 70.0% | 63.9% |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Astra's best matchup in Valorant?
Astra's best matchup is against Brimstone, achieving a 66.7% win rate. Astra excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Astra's hardest matchup?
Astra's hardest matchup is against Sage, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Astra should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Astra have?
Astra has 7 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 13 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Astra in difficult matchups?
When playing Astra in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Astra's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Astra's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Astra's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.