Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Astra's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Astra
43.8% WR
VS
Sova
56.3% WR
Who Wins the Astra vs Sova Matchup?
Winner
Sova
Matches: 144
43.8%
Win Rate
56.3%
1.49
Avg KDA
1.34
15.4
Avg Kills
14.4
14.9
Avg Deaths
14.6
134.2
DMG/Round
133.0
34.3%
HS %
32.6%
204
Combat Score
193
49.3%
Attack WR
52.1%
47.9%
Defense WR
50.7%
Astra vs Sova Performance Breakdown
The Astra vs Sova matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 144 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Fragging Power
1.49Astra
1.34Sova
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Astra and Sova, with KDA ratios of 1.49 and 1.34 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
134.2Astra
133.0Sova
Damage output is evenly distributed in this matchup, with Astra averaging 134.2 ADR and Sova at 133.0 ADR. Neither agent holds a decisive firepower advantage, making utility usage and team coordination the key differentiators.
Attack Side
49.3%Astra
52.1%Sova
Sova shows stronger attack-side performance with a 52.1% win rate versus Astra's 49.3%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Sova provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
47.9%Astra
50.7%Sova
Defensive capabilities favor Sova at 50.7% win rate compared to Astra's 47.9%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Sova provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Astra vs Sova matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 144 competitive matches analyzed, Sova wins 56.3% of the time compared to Astra's 43.8%, a 12.5 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Astra consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Initiator matchup, Sova has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Astra should never take isolated fights against Sova and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Astra vs Sova Fragging Analysis
Astra claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Astra vs Sova matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. Our analysis of 144 ranked games reveals Astra consistently outperforms Sova in direct combat scenarios. While Sova manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Astra in gunfights. Sova players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Astra dominates.
Avg KDA
1.49Astra
1.34Sova
Astra holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.49 compared to Sova's 1.34. While this 0.14 point difference indicates Astra tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Sova players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Astra's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Sova players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
15.4Astra
14.4Sova
Astra secures approximately 1.0 more kills per match than Sova in this head-to-head (15.4 vs 14.4). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Astra contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Astra's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Sova can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
14.9Astra
14.6Sova
Sova survives longer in this matchup, dying 14.6 times per game compared to Astra's 14.9 deaths. This 0.4 death difference per match means Sova is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. Astra players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Sova's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
134.2Astra
133.0Sova
Damage output per round is essentially equal between Astra (134.2 ADR) and Sova (133.0 ADR). This parity indicates both agents apply similar pressure in firefights and contribute comparably to wearing down enemy health pools. When these agents face off, neither can rely on superior damage output to swing rounds — instead, the deciding factors become headshot consistency, timing of engagements, and coordination with teammates' utility and damage.
HS %
34.3%Astra
32.6%Sova
Astra lands headshots at a slightly higher rate (34.3% vs 32.6%), providing a modest but meaningful advantage in time-to-kill during duels. This 1.7 percentage point edge translates to Astra more frequently one-tapping or two-tapping opponents before Sova can fully react. Sova players should counter this by avoiding predictable angle holds, using movement to throw off Astra's crosshair placement, and prefiring common positions to negate the accuracy gap.
Astra vs Sova Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Sova
49.3%
52.1%
Defense Side
Sova
47.9%
50.7%
Attack Side Breakdown
Sova demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Astra in this matchup, converting 52.1% of attacking rounds versus 49.3%. While this 2.8 point edge gives Sova slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Astra players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 144 competitive games suggests Sova's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Astra teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 2.8% gap.
When taking entry duels, Sova holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Astra players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Sova can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Astra has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 14 agents in Valorant. Astra's strongest matchup is against Brimstone with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sage at 18.2% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Astra matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Astra's best matchup is against Brimstone, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Astra excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Astra's hardest matchup?
Astra's hardest matchup is against Sage, with only a 18.2% win rate. Against this opponent, Astra should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Astra have?
Astra has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 14 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Astra in difficult matchups?
When playing Astra in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Astra's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Astra's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Astra's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Sova's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Astra should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 2.8 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Sova shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Astra, winning 50.7% of defense rounds compared to 47.9%. This 2.8 percentage point edge suggests Sova's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Astra players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Sova can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 2.8% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Astra should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Sova demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Sova converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Astra should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Sova when you can wait for teammates. Sova can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 2.8% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Astra should be more conservative with eco aggression against Sova and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Sova can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Sova holds clear advantages on both attack (52.1%) and defense (50.7%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Astra vs Sova matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Sova doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Sova's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Sova performs better. Astra teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Astra with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Astra's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Sova is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Sova provides a measurable ranked advantage. Astra players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Sova confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Sova wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 5.7 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Astra isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Controller vs Initiator Dynamics
The Controller (Astra) vs Initiator (Sova) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Astra's Controller abilities serve different purposes than Sova's Initiator kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Controller abilities interact with Initiator counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Astra's Controller toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Sova's Initiator kit counters others. The Sova advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Astra vs Sova matchup guide: Sova leads with a 56.3% win rate, but Astra can still win. Learn how Astra's 134 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 144-match dataset into ranked wins.
