Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Deadlock's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Deadlock
36.4% WR
VS
Iso
63.6% WR
Who Wins the Deadlock vs Iso Matchup?
Winner
Iso
Matches: 11
36.4%
Win Rate
63.6%
1.51
Avg KDA
1.14
19.0
Avg Kills
14.5
15.1
Avg Deaths
17.2
156.1
DMG/Round
138.9
30.5%
HS %
36.2%
240
Combat Score
199
50.8%
Attack WR
55.6%
44.4%
Defense WR
49.2%
Deadlock vs Iso Performance Breakdown
The Deadlock vs Iso matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 11 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Fragging Power
1.51Deadlock
1.14Iso
Deadlock maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.51 KDA versus Iso's 1.14. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Deadlock players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
156.1Deadlock
138.9Iso
Deadlock delivers substantially higher damage per round (156.1 ADR) compared to Iso's 138.9 ADR. This 17.2 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Deadlock a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
50.8%Deadlock
55.6%Iso
Iso shows stronger attack-side performance with a 55.6% win rate versus Deadlock's 50.8%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Iso provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
44.4%Deadlock
49.2%Iso
Defensive capabilities favor Iso at 49.2% win rate compared to Deadlock's 44.4%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Iso provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Deadlock vs Iso matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 11 competitive matches analyzed, Iso wins 63.6% of the time compared to Deadlock's 36.4%, a 27.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Deadlock consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Duelist matchup, Iso has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Deadlock should never take isolated fights against Iso and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Deadlock vs Iso Fragging Analysis
Deadlock claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Deadlock vs Iso matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability. Our analysis of 11 ranked games reveals Deadlock consistently outperforms Iso in direct combat scenarios. While Iso manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Deadlock in gunfights. Iso players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Deadlock dominates.
Avg KDA
1.51Deadlock
1.14Iso
Deadlock demonstrates noticeably stronger kill-death-assist performance against Iso, maintaining a 1.51 KDA versus 1.14. This 0.37 point gap reflects Deadlock's superior ability to secure eliminations while avoiding death in these head-to-head encounters. Iso players facing Deadlock should prioritize team coordination over solo aggression — look for 2v1 situations, coordinate utility usage with teammates, and focus on trading rather than taking isolated duels where Deadlock's statistical advantage becomes most pronounced.
Avg Kills
19.0Deadlock
14.5Iso
The kill differential between Deadlock and Iso is dramatic: 19.0 versus 14.5, representing 4.5 additional kills per game for Deadlock. This massive gap shows Deadlock consistently dominates the kill feed when these agents meet. For Iso players, this data suggests a fundamental mismatch in direct combat scenarios. Success against Deadlock requires reimagining your role — become the setup player, the information gatherer, the utility specialist — rather than trying to match Deadlock's fragging output head-to-head.
Avg Deaths
15.1Deadlock
17.2Iso
The death disparity between Deadlock and Iso is stark: 15.1 versus 17.2 deaths per game. Iso dies 2.1 more times per match on average, fundamentally impacting their ability to influence rounds. This suggests Iso either takes unfavorable fights against Deadlock or lacks the tools to disengage safely. Iso players must completely rethink their aggression patterns — prioritize information and utility over kills, always have an exit plan, and never take coin-flip duels against Deadlock.
DMG/Round
156.1Deadlock
138.9Iso
Deadlock significantly outdamages Iso in head-to-head encounters, posting 156.1 ADR versus 138.9. This 17.2 damage-per-round advantage means Deadlock consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Iso players should avoid prolonged dueling with Deadlock — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
30.5%Deadlock
36.2%Iso
The headshot percentage disparity between Iso and Deadlock is substantial: 36.2% compared to 30.5%, a 5.7 point difference. Iso consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Deadlock, challenging Iso in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Iso's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Deadlock vs Iso Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Iso
50.8%
55.6%
Defense Side
Iso
44.4%
49.2%
Attack Side Breakdown
Iso holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Deadlock vs Iso matchup, winning 55.6% of offensive rounds compared to 50.8% for Deadlock. This 4.7 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 11 matches reveals Iso's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Iso consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Deadlock teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Iso's favor in this matchup. When Iso takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Deadlock. For Deadlock players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Iso's advantages. Iso can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Deadlock has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 11 agents in Valorant. Deadlock's strongest matchup is against Sage with a 72.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Breach at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Deadlock matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Deadlock's best matchup is against Sage, achieving a 72.7% win rate. Deadlock excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Deadlock's hardest matchup?
Deadlock's hardest matchup is against Breach, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Deadlock should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Deadlock have?
Deadlock has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 11 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Deadlock in difficult matchups?
When playing Deadlock in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Deadlock's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Deadlock's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Deadlock's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant is where Iso's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 4.7% attack-side gap suggests Iso excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Deadlock should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Iso's kit advantages become decisive. For Iso, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Iso demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Deadlock, holding 49.2% of rounds versus 44.4%. This 4.7 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for Iso's defensive advantage. Iso can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Deadlock should avoid solo anchor positions against Iso — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Deadlock's site with Iso on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Iso in this matchup. Our 11 match analysis shows Iso converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Deadlock should never attempt solo retakes against Iso — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Iso can confidently take 1vX retakes that Deadlock should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight Iso's defensive advantages. Deadlock should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Iso, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Iso can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Deadlock should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
Overall Side Analysis
Iso demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (55.6%) and defense (49.2%), comprehensively outperforming Deadlock across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 11 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Iso holding advantages at every stage.
Map selection and team composition cannot fix Deadlock's disadvantage in this matchup. Iso outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Deadlock into Iso, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Deadlock's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Deadlock in isolated Iso encounters.
For ranked climbing, avoid playing Deadlock when you expect to face Iso frequently. The 9.5 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Iso is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.
Final verdict: Iso decisively wins the Deadlock vs Iso matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Iso has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Deadlock players facing Iso should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.
Sentinel vs Duelist Dynamics
The Sentinel (Deadlock) vs Duelist (Iso) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Deadlock's Sentinel abilities serve different purposes than Iso's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Sentinel abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Deadlock's Sentinel toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Iso's Duelist kit counters others. The Iso advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
52.9%
53.7%
48.5%
56.3%
53.6%
49.1%
52.4%
53.3%
54.1%
45.3%
56.9%
53.5%
44.4%
55.4%
52.1%
56.7%
40.4%
59.5%
51.9%
54.2%
54.5%
Deadlock vs Iso matchup guide: Iso leads with a 63.6% win rate, but Deadlock can still win. Learn how Deadlock's 156 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 11-match dataset into ranked wins.
