Deadlock vs Chamber matchup in Valorant
Win Rate
61.9%
Matches
21
Avg KDA
1.41
Avg ADR
135

Deadlock vs ChamberMatchup

Sentinel
Patch12.01
Matches82,189
RegionAll Regions
RankAll Ranks
PlatformAll Platforms
ModeCompetitive
Last UpdatedFeb 3, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

Deadlock vs Chamber matchup breakdown: Deadlock dominates with a 61.9% win rate across 21 matches. Superior fragging (1.41 KDA) gives Deadlock a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.

Deadlock Matchup Breakdown

Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Deadlock's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.

Compare against an opponent
Chamber - 61.9% win rateChamber(61.9%)
Deadlock - 61.9% win rate in this matchup
Deadlock
61.9% WR
VS
Chamber vs Deadlock matchup - 38.1% win rate
Chamber
38.1% WR

Who Wins the Deadlock vs Chamber Matchup?

Deadlock wins the Deadlock vs Chamber matchup
Winner
Deadlock
Matches: 21
61.9%
Win Rate
38.1%
1.41
Avg KDA
1.20
15.8
Avg Kills
15.0
14.4
Avg Deaths
15.0
134.9
DMG/Round
129.3
32.6%
HS %
27.3%
209
Combat Score
200
55.9%
Attack WR
51.8%
48.2%
Defense WR
44.1%

Deadlock vs Chamber Performance Breakdown

Deadlock vs Chamber matchup breakdown - overall performance winner

In the Deadlock vs Chamber matchup, Deadlock demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 21 analyzed matches, Deadlock outperforms Chamber in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Deadlock the statistically favored pick when facing Chamber in ranked Valorant matches.

Fragging Power
1.41Deadlock
1.20Chamber
Deadlock maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.41 KDA versus Chamber's 1.20. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Deadlock players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
134.9Deadlock
129.3Chamber
Deadlock outputs 134.9 average damage per round, edging out Chamber's 129.3 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Deadlock secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
55.9%Deadlock
51.8%Chamber
Deadlock shows stronger attack-side performance with a 55.9% win rate versus Chamber's 51.8%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Deadlock provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
48.2%Deadlock
44.1%Chamber
Defensive capabilities favor Deadlock at 48.2% win rate compared to Chamber's 44.1%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Deadlock provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.

Deadlock vs Chamber Matchup Summary

The Deadlock vs Chamber matchup in Valorant is a heavily one-sided matchup. Based on 21 competitive matches analyzed, Deadlock wins 61.9% of the time compared to Chamber's 38.1%, a 23.8 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Deadlock consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Sentinel matchup, Deadlock has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Chamber should never take isolated fights against Deadlock and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.

Deadlock vs Chamber Fragging Analysis

Deadlock wins fragging stats against Chamber in Valorant

Deadlock achieves a clean sweep in the fragging department, winning all five combat metrics against Chamber in the Deadlock vs Chamber matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Deadlock holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 21 competitive matches, Deadlock players can approach duels against Chamber with confidence, while Chamber players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on utility-based contributions, information gathering, and team coordination to remain impactful.

KDA
1.41Deadlock
1.20Chamber
Deadlock holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.41 compared to Chamber's 1.20. While this 0.22 point difference indicates Deadlock tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Chamber players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Deadlock's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Chamber players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
15.8Deadlock
15.0Chamber
Deadlock secures approximately 0.8 more kills per match than Chamber in this head-to-head (15.8 vs 15.0). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Deadlock contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Deadlock's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Chamber can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
14.4Deadlock
15.0Chamber
Deadlock survives longer in this matchup, dying 14.4 times per game compared to Chamber's 15.0 deaths. This 0.5 death difference per match means Deadlock is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. Chamber players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Deadlock's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
134.9Deadlock
129.3Chamber
Deadlock applies 5.5 more damage per round than Chamber in this matchup (134.9 vs 129.3 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Deadlock contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Chamber can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
Headshot %
32.6%Deadlock
27.3%Chamber
The headshot percentage disparity between Deadlock and Chamber is substantial: 32.6% compared to 27.3%, a 5.3 point difference. Deadlock consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Chamber, challenging Deadlock in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Deadlock's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.

Deadlock vs Chamber Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side
Deadlock
Deadlock55.9%
Chamber51.8%
Defense Side
Deadlock
Deadlock48.2%
Chamber44.1%

Attack Side Breakdown

Deadlock holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Deadlock vs Chamber matchup, winning 55.9% of offensive rounds compared to 51.8% for Chamber. This 4.1 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.

Our analysis of 21 matches reveals Deadlock's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Deadlock consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Chamber teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.

Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Deadlock's favor in this matchup. When Deadlock takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Chamber. For Chamber players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Deadlock's advantages. Deadlock can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.

Post-plant is where Deadlock's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 4.1% attack-side gap suggests Deadlock excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Chamber should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Deadlock's kit advantages become decisive. For Deadlock, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.

Defense Side Breakdown

Deadlock demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Chamber, holding 48.2% of rounds versus 44.1%. This 4.1 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.

Site anchor assignments should account for Deadlock's defensive advantage. Deadlock can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Chamber should avoid solo anchor positions against Deadlock — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Chamber's site with Deadlock on the execute, expect faster site falls.

Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Deadlock in this matchup. Our 21 match analysis shows Deadlock converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Chamber should never attempt solo retakes against Deadlock — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Deadlock can confidently take 1vX retakes that Chamber should avoid.

Economy rounds highlight Deadlock's defensive advantages. Chamber should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Deadlock, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Deadlock can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Chamber should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.

Overall Side Analysis

Deadlock demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (55.9%) and defense (48.2%), comprehensively outperforming Chamber across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 21 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Deadlock holding advantages at every stage.

Map selection and team composition cannot fix Chamber's disadvantage in this matchup. Deadlock outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Chamber into Deadlock, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Chamber's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Chamber in isolated Deadlock encounters.

For ranked climbing, avoid playing Chamber when you expect to face Deadlock frequently. The 8.2 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Deadlock is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.

Final verdict: Deadlock decisively wins the Deadlock vs Chamber matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Deadlock has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Chamber players facing Deadlock should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.

Sentinel vs Sentinel Dynamics

Both Deadlock and Chamber fill the Sentinel role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Sentinel performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Deadlock is the stronger Sentinel pick when these agents face each other.

In Sentinel vs Sentinel encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Deadlock's statistical advantage suggests their specific Sentinel kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.

Deadlock has favorable matchups against 12 agents and unfavorable matchups against 4 agents in Valorant. Deadlock's strongest matchup is against Sage with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Neon at 11.1% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.

Deadlock matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 12.01)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
DMG/Rnd
HS %
Atk WR
Def WR
60.47%431.45137.931.8%48.4%57.8%
50.00%261.29135.236.0%46.0%53.7%
59.09%221.48143.935.1%50.4%53.9%
61.90%211.41134.932.6%55.9%48.2%
55.56%181.44138.931.4%49.7%55.5%
58.82%171.45143.332.6%53.3%52.2%
53.33%151.37139.533.4%48.1%56.1%
36.36%111.29134.235.3%44.1%48.4%
54.55%111.64149.039.7%54.3%57.4%
70.00%101.39123.834.6%60.0%56.3%
11.11%91.12128.834.8%48.0%39.0%
42.86%71.16122.727.7%32.3%55.2%
75.00%41.34127.635.3%67.4%46.5%
100.00%41.39134.028.0%57.5%60.4%
50.00%41.75169.232.1%56.4%45.8%
33.33%31.05120.423.1%61.3%25.0%
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Deadlock's best matchup in Valorant?

Deadlock's best matchup is against Sage, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Deadlock excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.

What is Deadlock's hardest matchup?

Deadlock's hardest matchup is against Neon, with only a 11.1% win rate. Against this opponent, Deadlock should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.

How many favorable matchups does Deadlock have?

Deadlock has 12 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 4 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play Deadlock in difficult matchups?

When playing Deadlock in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Deadlock's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.

What stats matter most in Deadlock's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in Deadlock's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.

See Also: Other Sentinels