Vyse vs RazeMatchup
Vyse vs Raze head-to-head analysis. Vyse holds a 50.0% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 6 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
Vyse Matchup Breakdown
Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Vyse's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Who Wins the Vyse vs Raze Matchup?
Vyse vs Raze Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 6 matches reveals that Vyse holds a clear advantage over Raze in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Raze shows strength in one category, Vyse's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Vyse vs Raze Matchup Summary
The Vyse vs Raze matchup in Valorant is an extremely balanced duel where aim and game sense determine the winner. Based on 6 competitive matches analyzed, Vyse wins 50.0% of the time compared to Raze's 50.0%, a 0.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Vyse consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Duelist matchup, Neither Vyse nor Raze has a clear statistical advantage. Victory comes down to individual mechanical skill, utility usage timing, and reading your opponent's positioning. Focus on winning your aim duels and making smart rotations.
Vyse vs Raze Fragging Analysis
Vyse edges out Raze in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 6 matches analyzed, this Vyse vs Raze matchup remains contestable for both sides. Raze shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Raze's favor.
Vyse vs Raze Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side Breakdown
Vyse significantly outperforms Raze on attack side, achieving a 45.1% round win rate versus 39.1%. This 6.0 point disparity reveals Vyse as the clearly superior offensive agent in this head-to-head, with advantages that Raze cannot easily overcome through individual skill alone.
Based on 6 matches analyzed, Vyse dominates attack-side scenarios through multiple vectors. Entry success rate, post-plant conversion, and mid-round adaptability all favor Vyse significantly. Raze teams must make structural adjustments to their attack approach: rely less on Raze for key fragging roles, design executes that minimize Raze's direct engagement with Vyse, and consider how team composition can cover Raze's offensive weaknesses. Simply "playing better" isn't enough to overcome a 6.0% gap.
Raze should avoid entry fragging roles against Vyse whenever possible. The data clearly shows Vyse wins a disproportionate share of first contacts on attack. Raze players should volunteer for support roles — flashing for teammates, trading entries, or lurking to create map pressure without direct Vyse confrontation. If forced to entry, wait for maximum utility support and ensure a trade is guaranteed. Vyse can and should take aggressive entries, knowing statistical backing supports confident play.
Post-plant scenarios heavily favor Vyse in this matchup. Raze struggles to convert spike plants into round wins at the same rate, whether due to weaker defuse denial, inferior retake resistance, or less effective post-plant positioning. Raze teams should never leave Raze alone in post-plant — always have teammates nearby for crossfires and trades. Consider giving the spike to a different player when possible. Vyse should recognize their post-plant dominance and play for spike aggressively after site takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Vyse substantially outclasses Raze on defense, achieving 60.9% round wins compared to 54.9%. This 6.0 percentage point gap indicates Vyse excels at core defensive tasks — anchoring sites, gathering information, stalling executes, and contributing to retakes — at a level Raze cannot match.
Raze should never solo anchor against Vyse. The 6.0% defensive gap makes isolated site holds extremely unfavorable for Raze. Instead, pair Raze with a teammate, give them off-site positions that allow early rotates, or have them play supportive roles that don't require extended site holds. Vyse should actively anchor difficult sites, knowing their defensive capabilities significantly exceed Raze's.
Retake dynamics heavily favor Vyse. When Raze needs to retake against Vyse, success requires overwhelming numbers and utility coordination — never attempt equal-number retakes and absolutely avoid solo retakes. Vyse should play post-plant positions confidently, knowing Raze struggles to clear them effectively. In clutch scenarios, Vyse has a significant statistical edge that Raze cannot overcome through individual skill alone.
Economy management becomes critical for Raze in this matchup. Force buying against Vyse is mathematically unfavorable — the defensive gap compounds when utility is limited. Raze should advocate for full saves, ensuring full buy rounds have maximum utility to compensate for their defensive disadvantages. Vyse can confidently force buy, knowing their defensive kit provides advantages that partially compensate for economic disadvantages.
Overall Side Analysis
Vyse demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (45.1%) and defense (60.9%), comprehensively outperforming Raze across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 6 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Vyse holding advantages at every stage.
Map selection and team composition cannot fix Raze's disadvantage in this matchup. Vyse outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Raze into Vyse, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Raze's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Raze in isolated Vyse encounters.
For ranked climbing, avoid playing Raze when you expect to face Vyse frequently. The 12.0 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Vyse is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.
Final verdict: Vyse decisively wins the Vyse vs Raze matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Vyse has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Raze players facing Vyse should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.
Sentinel vs Duelist Dynamics
The Sentinel (Vyse) vs Duelist (Raze) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Vyse's Sentinel abilities serve different purposes than Raze's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Sentinel abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Vyse's Sentinel toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Raze's Duelist kit counters others. The Vyse advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Vyse has favorable matchups against 12 agents and unfavorable matchups against 5 agents in Valorant. Vyse's strongest matchup is against Tejo with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Phoenix at 25.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61.54% | 65 | 1.34 | 139.3 | 32.8% | 49.0% | 54.7% | |
| 64.00% | 50 | 1.33 | 129.8 | 31.5% | 53.1% | 56.0% | |
| 58.97% | 39 | 1.37 | 137.5 | 30.8% | 53.8% | 48.4% | |
| 61.76% | 34 | 1.30 | 128.0 | 31.3% | 52.1% | 52.4% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 1.29 | 136.0 | 32.1% | 47.2% | 46.8% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 1.33 | 128.2 | 34.0% | 44.8% | 56.6% | |
| 34.78% | 23 | 1.30 | 140.7 | 33.5% | 44.8% | 52.7% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 1.14 | 128.2 | 33.9% | 51.7% | 54.3% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 1.25 | 136.8 | 36.3% | 44.0% | 51.2% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 1.09 | 130.9 | 31.1% | 49.0% | 41.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.39 | 139.2 | 35.7% | 47.9% | 52.1% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.09 | 117.6 | 29.2% | 51.2% | 43.8% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.48 | 148.6 | 32.5% | 55.7% | 52.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.42 | 137.6 | 31.5% | 45.1% | 60.9% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.54 | 154.7 | 35.9% | 50.0% | 69.7% | |
| 100.00% | 4 | 1.68 | 175.1 | 36.8% | 62.2% | 61.5% | |
| 25.00% | 4 | 0.78 | 98.8 | 31.7% | 28.6% | 35.1% |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Vyse's best matchup in Valorant?
Vyse's best matchup is against Tejo, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Vyse excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Vyse's hardest matchup?
Vyse's hardest matchup is against Phoenix, with only a 25.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Vyse should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Vyse have?
Vyse has 12 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 5 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Vyse in difficult matchups?
When playing Vyse in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Vyse's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Vyse's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Vyse's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.