Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Vyse's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
In the Vyse vs Omen matchup, Omen demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 20 analyzed matches, Omen outperforms Vyse in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Omen the statistically favored pick when facing Vyse in ranked Valorant matches.
The Vyse vs Omen matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 20 competitive matches analyzed, Omen wins 55.0% of the time compared to Vyse's 45.0%, a 10.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Omen consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Controller matchup, Omen has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Vyse should never take isolated fights against Omen and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Omen edges out Vyse in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. With only a 3-2 margin based on 20 matches analyzed, this Vyse vs Omen matchup remains contestable for both sides. Vyse shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Vyse's favor.
Omen holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Vyse vs Omen matchup, winning 56.7% of offensive rounds compared to 52.9% for Vyse. This 3.9 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 20 matches reveals Omen's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Omen consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Vyse teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Omen's favor in this matchup. When Omen takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Vyse. For Vyse players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Omen's advantages. Omen can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Vyse has favorable matchups against 16 agents and unfavorable matchups against 10 agents in Valorant. Vyse's strongest matchup is against Breach with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Iso at 33.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.79% | 146 | 1.37 | 140.0 | 33.4% | 50.3% |
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Vyse's best matchup is against Breach, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Vyse excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
Vyse's hardest matchup is against Iso, with only a 33.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Vyse should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
Vyse has 16 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 10 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
When playing Vyse in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Vyse's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
Key stats to analyze in Vyse's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant is where Omen's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 3.9% attack-side gap suggests Omen excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Vyse should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Omen's kit advantages become decisive. For Omen, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
Omen demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Vyse, holding 47.1% of rounds versus 43.3%. This 3.9 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for Omen's defensive advantage. Omen can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Vyse should avoid solo anchor positions against Omen — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Vyse's site with Omen on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Omen in this matchup. Our 20 match analysis shows Omen converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Vyse should never attempt solo retakes against Omen — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Omen can confidently take 1vX retakes that Vyse should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight Omen's defensive advantages. Vyse should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Omen, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Omen can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Vyse should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
Omen holds clear advantages on both attack (56.7%) and defense (47.1%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Vyse vs Omen matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Omen doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Omen's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Omen performs better. Vyse teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Vyse with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Vyse's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Omen is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Omen provides a measurable ranked advantage. Vyse players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Omen confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Omen wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 7.8 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Vyse isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
The Sentinel (Vyse) vs Controller (Omen) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Vyse's Sentinel abilities serve different purposes than Omen's Controller kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Sentinel abilities interact with Controller counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Vyse's Sentinel toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Omen's Controller kit counters others. The Omen advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
| 53.3% |
| 50.00% | 102 | 1.31 | 136.0 | 32.9% | 50.4% | 49.1% |
| 51.49% | 101 | 1.32 | 130.8 | 33.8% | 51.0% | 50.5% |
| 50.52% | 97 | 1.34 | 138.6 | 33.0% | 45.2% | 52.6% |
| 51.35% | 74 | 1.27 | 132.3 | 30.2% | 48.1% | 50.4% |
| 40.98% | 61 | 1.31 | 132.8 | 33.3% | 45.1% | 50.0% |
| 47.54% | 61 | 1.26 | 136.9 | 35.9% | 49.2% | 48.7% |
| 47.37% | 57 | 1.31 | 137.0 | 31.8% | 47.2% | 53.0% |
| 62.00% | 50 | 1.37 | 136.4 | 36.7% | 50.6% | 56.2% |
| 34.48% | 29 | 1.24 | 136.8 | 34.2% | 40.9% | 48.6% |
| 34.78% | 23 | 1.24 | 136.0 | 31.5% | 39.5% | 55.5% |
| 45.00% | 20 | 1.27 | 133.8 | 36.6% | 52.9% | 43.3% |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.20 | 131.2 | 32.0% | 42.0% | 52.3% |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.48 | 148.9 | 32.1% | 56.0% | 51.8% |
| 90.91% | 11 | 1.34 | 139.6 | 33.7% | 61.2% | 58.0% |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.21 | 130.9 | 29.4% | 46.5% | 47.1% |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.43 | 144.3 | 32.6% | 56.7% | 50.4% |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.20 | 118.2 | 29.8% | 52.1% | 56.0% |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.30 | 141.9 | 33.6% | 52.7% | 49.4% |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.36 | 150.9 | 35.2% | 50.7% | 50.0% |
| 85.71% | 7 | 1.67 | 146.7 | 31.2% | 59.4% | 53.4% |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.53 | 150.6 | 33.9% | 52.9% | 49.4% |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.16 | 145.0 | 34.4% | 32.4% | 50.0% |
| 100.00% | 4 | 1.38 | 126.7 | 36.5% | 68.1% | 51.3% |
| 50.00% | 4 | 1.62 | 159.2 | 26.7% | 44.2% | 66.7% |
| 33.33% | 3 | 1.16 | 118.5 | 32.3% | 37.9% | 41.9% |
Vyse vs Omen is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (45.0% vs 55.0%). Based on 20 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.