최고 승률 TFT 팀 조합

이 표는 가장 높은 승률을 기록한 TFT 팀 조합을 보여주며, 랭크 상승을 위한 가장 성공적인 조합을 식별하는 데 도움이 됩니다. 최고 8챔피언 세트 17 조합: N.O.V.A. (89.3% WR, 2.6 avg), 불한당 (88.5% WR, 2.9 avg), N.O.V.A. (85.4% WR, 2.9 avg). N.O.V.A./싸움꾼가 89.29% 승률과 2.64 평균 순위로 선두. 불한당가 88.52% 승률로 뒤따름. 실시간 성능 통계로 55개의 8챔피언 조합 분석 중.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
2.64
Avg Place
89.29%
Top 4 Rate
29.93%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.91
Avg Place
88.52%
Top 4 Rate
13.88%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.93
Avg Place
85.42%
Top 4 Rate
21.09%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.80
Avg Place
83.41%
Top 4 Rate
28.29%
First Place
Low Contested
3.09
Avg Place
79.75%
Top 4 Rate
23.42%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.18
Avg Place
77.84%
Top 4 Rate
23.07%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.18
Avg Place
75.47%
Top 4 Rate
26.42%
First Place
Low Contested
3.24
Avg Place
73.79%
Top 4 Rate
24.17%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.69
Avg Place
72.63%
Top 4 Rate
10.99%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.28
Avg Place
72.42%
Top 4 Rate
23.74%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.42
Avg Place
72.20%
Top 4 Rate
14.72%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.55
Avg Place
71.68%
Top 4 Rate
12.35%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.76
Avg Place
67.76%
Top 4 Rate
9.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.81
Avg Place
66.78%
Top 4 Rate
7.88%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.76
Avg Place
66.51%
Top 4 Rate
18.18%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.83
Avg Place
65.07%
Top 4 Rate
10.93%
First Place
Low Contested
3.76
Avg Place
64.15%
Top 4 Rate
14.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.87
Avg Place
59.68%
Top 4 Rate
17.31%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.07
Avg Place
59.04%
Top 4 Rate
14.62%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.25
Avg Place
55.33%
Top 4 Rate
6.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
-
4.31
Avg Place
53.25%
Top 4 Rate
7.53%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.46
Avg Place
50.20%
Top 4 Rate
8.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.53
Avg Place
50.20%
Top 4 Rate
8.84%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.62
Avg Place
47.83%
Top 4 Rate
6.14%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.68
Avg Place
46.67%
Top 4 Rate
5.50%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.71
Avg Place
46.43%
Top 4 Rate
4.30%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.97
Avg Place
42.69%
Top 4 Rate
2.31%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.90
Avg Place
41.42%
Top 4 Rate
8.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.99
Avg Place
40.92%
Top 4 Rate
6.52%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.18
Avg Place
39.48%
Top 4 Rate
3.24%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.96
Avg Place
39.34%
Top 4 Rate
4.58%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.97
Avg Place
38.00%
Top 4 Rate
2.50%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.03
Avg Place
37.43%
Top 4 Rate
6.27%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.34
Avg Place
33.60%
Top 4 Rate
2.02%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.51
Avg Place
32.68%
Top 4 Rate
0.39%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.32
Avg Place
32.17%
Top 4 Rate
1.61%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.34
Avg Place
30.13%
Top 4 Rate
3.40%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.52
Avg Place
29.74%
Top 4 Rate
5.20%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.76
Avg Place
28.44%
Top 4 Rate
0.46%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.46
Avg Place
28.13%
Top 4 Rate
5.10%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.48
Avg Place
27.63%
Top 4 Rate
2.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.38
Avg Place
27.54%
Top 4 Rate
1.93%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.56
Avg Place
26.46%
Top 4 Rate
1.06%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.61
Avg Place
26.45%
Top 4 Rate
1.24%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.55
Avg Place
26.06%
Top 4 Rate
1.77%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.72
Avg Place
25.43%
Top 4 Rate
0.99%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.56
Avg Place
25.24%
Top 4 Rate
2.59%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.61
Avg Place
24.81%
Top 4 Rate
2.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.63
Avg Place
24.61%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.80
Avg Place
22.28%
Top 4 Rate
1.04%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.80
Avg Place
21.69%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.98
Avg Place
19.34%
Top 4 Rate
1.44%
First Place
Highly Contested
6.15
Avg Place
18.99%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
6.06
Avg Place
18.79%
Top 4 Rate
2.73%
First Place
Low Contested
6.22
Avg Place
14.31%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Severely Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 55 team compositions ranked by performance to help you make informed decisions, based on 53.8K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 47.0% and average placement of 4.65 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is N.O.V.A./싸움꾼 with 빅토르 as the primary carry, achieving a 89.3% win rate. Following closely is 불한당/N.O.V.A. at 88.5% win rate, and N.O.V.A./싸움꾼 at 85.4%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • N.O.V.A./싸움꾼 (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around 빅토르
  • 불한당/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around 잭스
  • N.O.V.A./싸움꾼 (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around 미스 포츈

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • N.O.V.A./싸움꾼: 89.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • 불한당/N.O.V.A.: 88.5% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./싸움꾼: 85.4% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is 불한당/정령족 with a 3.3% pick rate, though its 46.7% win rate suggests it may be over-contested. 복제자/N.O.V.A. follows at 1.9% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

정확성 유지를 도와주세요! 잘못된 통계, 누락된 데이터 또는 문제를 발견하면 피드백을 보내주세요. 커뮤니티 전체의 데이터 품질 향상에 직접적으로 도움이 됩니다.

문제 신고

전략적 팀 전투 팀 조합 - 시즌 17 FAQ

TFT 시즌 17에서 최고의 TFT 조합은 무엇인가요?

TFT 시즌 17에서 최고의 TFT 조합은 N.O.V.A./싸움꾼입니다, 빅토르가 주력 캐리. 승률 89.3%, 평균 순위 2.64를 달성합니다. 이 조합은 랭크 상승에 효과적이며 꾸준히 4등 안에 듭니다.

N.O.V.A./싸움꾼 조합을 어떻게 플레이하나요?

N.O.V.A./싸움꾼을 플레이할 때, 빅토르를 메인 캐리로 빌드하는 데 집중하세요. 초반에 빅토르와 서포트 유닛을 찾고, 캐리와 시너지가 맞는 아이템을 우선시하며, 7-8레벨에서 파워 스파이크를 목표로 하세요. 이 조합의 픽률은 0.1%입니다, 상대적으로 경쟁이 적은 옵션입니다.

TFT 시즌 17에서 랭크 상승에 좋은 조합은 무엇인가요?

TFT 시즌 17에서 꾸준한 LP 획득을 위해, N.O.V.A./싸움꾼이 평균 순위 2.64로 최고의 성능을 보입니다. 다른 신뢰할 만한 옵션으로는 파티광/저격수 (평균 2.80)와 불한당/N.O.V.A. (평균 2.91)이 있습니다. 안정적인 조합은 하위 4등을 최소화하고 꾸준한 상승을 제공합니다.

TFT에서 가장 쉬운 조합은 무엇인가요?

N.O.V.A./싸움꾼은 쉬운 상승을 원하는 플레이어에게 좋은 옵션입니다. 승률 89.3%에 픽률 0.1%만으로 경쟁이 적어 게임을 더 쉽게 진행할 수 있습니다. 낮은 경쟁은 강제 피벗 없이 자연스럽게 유닛을 찾을 수 있음을 의미합니다.

TFT 시즌 17에서 조합을 강제로 가져가야 할 때와 유연하게 가야 할 때는 언제인가요?

TFT 시즌 17에서 불한당/정령족의 픽률은 3.3%로 경쟁이 치열합니다. 다른 사람들이 가져가는 것을 보면 N.O.V.A./싸움꾼 같은 대안으로 유연하게 전환하는 것을 고려하세요. 초반 유닛과 아이템을 맞췄거나 경쟁이 없을 때 강제로 가세요. 2명 이상이 같은 유닛을 경쟁할 때는 유연하게 대처하세요.