已归档赛季: 这些阵容来自云顶之弈第15赛季,已不再属于当前赛季。显示的数据来自该赛季活跃期间。

按排名分类的最佳云顶之弈阵容

此表按平均排名对云顶之弈第15赛季阵容进行排序,展示哪些阵容能持续获得顶级排名。 顶级 8英雄Set 15阵容:护卫 (67.3% 胜率, 3.6 均), 至高天 (67.2% 胜率, 3.6 均), 护卫 (63.2% 胜率, 3.7 均)。 护卫/战斗学院以67.32%胜率和3.56平均排名领先。 至高天以67.17%胜率紧随其后。 实时分析44个8英雄阵容的性能数据。

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4FirstContested Risk
-
3.56
Avg Place
67.32%
Top 4 Rate
19.44%
First Place
Low Contested
-
3.62
Avg Place
67.17%
Top 4 Rate
15.89%
First Place
Low Contested
-
3.74
Avg Place
63.20%
Top 4 Rate
22.40%
First Place
Low Contested
-
3.79
Avg Place
63.78%
Top 4 Rate
16.83%
First Place
Low Contested
-
3.80
Avg Place
65.38%
Top 4 Rate
15.38%
First Place
Low Contested
-
3.80
Avg Place
66.12%
Top 4 Rate
11.48%
First Place
Low Contested
-
3.83
Avg Place
60.33%
Top 4 Rate
14.05%
First Place
Low Contested
-
3.86
Avg Place
62.87%
Top 4 Rate
12.66%
First Place
Low Contested
-
3.95
Avg Place
62.70%
Top 4 Rate
12.13%
First Place
Low Contested
-
3.96
Avg Place
60.78%
Top 4 Rate
14.49%
First Place
Low Contested
-
4.05
Avg Place
58.05%
Top 4 Rate
15.33%
First Place
Low Contested
-
4.08
Avg Place
50.93%
Top 4 Rate
13.89%
First Place
Low Contested
-
4.09
Avg Place
58.68%
Top 4 Rate
14.07%
First Place
Low Contested
-
4.23
Avg Place
53.23%
Top 4 Rate
11.29%
First Place
Low Contested
-
4.26
Avg Place
53.39%
Top 4 Rate
11.76%
First Place
Low Contested
-
4.27
Avg Place
55.91%
Top 4 Rate
3.23%
First Place
Low Contested
-
4.28
Avg Place
55.96%
Top 4 Rate
5.50%
First Place
Low Contested
-
4.29
Avg Place
53.45%
Top 4 Rate
6.90%
First Place
Low Contested
-
4.32
Avg Place
51.88%
Top 4 Rate
12.50%
First Place
Low Contested
-
4.38
Avg Place
51.04%
Top 4 Rate
9.38%
First Place
Low Contested
-
4.44
Avg Place
51.99%
Top 4 Rate
6.19%
First Place
Low Contested
-
4.44
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
7.95%
First Place
Low Contested
-
4.45
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
5.74%
First Place
Low Contested
-
4.53
Avg Place
48.61%
Top 4 Rate
9.03%
First Place
Low Contested
-
4.57
Avg Place
48.36%
Top 4 Rate
8.06%
First Place
Low Contested
-
4.59
Avg Place
47.60%
Top 4 Rate
6.59%
First Place
Low Contested
-
4.61
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
6.42%
First Place
Low Contested
-
4.64
Avg Place
44.82%
Top 4 Rate
5.18%
First Place
Low Contested
-
4.69
Avg Place
46.99%
Top 4 Rate
8.43%
First Place
Low Contested
-
4.72
Avg Place
46.65%
Top 4 Rate
5.48%
First Place
Low Contested
-
4.73
Avg Place
47.57%
Top 4 Rate
4.85%
First Place
Low Contested
-
4.83
Avg Place
43.59%
Top 4 Rate
5.98%
First Place
Low Contested
-
4.97
Avg Place
39.09%
Top 4 Rate
5.45%
First Place
Low Contested
-
5.22
Avg Place
38.60%
Top 4 Rate
3.51%
First Place
Low Contested
-
5.23
Avg Place
33.45%
Top 4 Rate
3.83%
First Place
Low Contested
-
5.25
Avg Place
32.23%
Top 4 Rate
2.48%
First Place
Low Contested
-
5.28
Avg Place
31.48%
Top 4 Rate
1.85%
First Place
Low Contested
-
5.33
Avg Place
31.97%
Top 4 Rate
6.56%
First Place
Low Contested
-
5.35
Avg Place
30.21%
Top 4 Rate
3.13%
First Place
Low Contested
-
5.40
Avg Place
31.83%
Top 4 Rate
2.14%
First Place
Low Contested
-
5.42
Avg Place
30.33%
Top 4 Rate
3.89%
First Place
Low Contested
-
5.67
Avg Place
25.51%
Top 4 Rate
3.06%
First Place
Low Contested
-
5.87
Avg Place
22.45%
Top 4 Rate
5.44%
First Place
Low Contested
-
7.03
Avg Place
5.17%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Low Contested

TFT Set 15 Meta Analysis

This page displays 44 team compositions sorted by average placement to find the most consistent compositions for reliable top 4 finishes, based on 16.4K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 48.0% and average placement of 4.58 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is 护卫/战斗学院, achieving a 67.3% win rate. Following closely is 至高天/重量级斗士 at 67.2% win rate, and 至高天/重量级斗士 at 66.1%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • 护卫/战斗学院 (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes
  • 至高天/重量级斗士 (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes
  • 至高天/重量级斗士 (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider 护卫/战斗学院 which achieves first place in 22.4% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • 护卫/战斗学院: 67.3% win rate with only 1.2% pick rate
  • 至高天/重量级斗士: 67.2% win rate with only 0.5% pick rate
  • 至高天/重量级斗士: 66.1% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is 刀锋领主/主宰 with a 1.2% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 52.0% win rate despite high contestation. 护卫/战斗学院 follows at 1.2% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

帮助我们保持准确性! 如果您发现不正确的统计数据、缺失的数据或任何问题,您的反馈将直接帮助我们提高整个社区的数据质量。

报告问题

云顶之弈第15赛季阵容常见问题

TFT 第15赛季中最好的TFT阵容是什么?

TFT 第15赛季中最好的TFT阵容是护卫/战斗学院,达到67.3%胜率和3.56平均名次。这个阵容对爬分有效,能持续进入前四。

如何玩护卫/战斗学院阵容?

专注于尽早找到核心单位和装备,然后稳定并升级以完成最终阵容。

TFT 第15赛季中哪些阵容适合爬分?

在TFT 第15赛季中稳定获得LP,护卫/战斗学院提供最佳平均名次3.56。其他可靠选择包括至高天/重量级斗士 (3.62 avg)和护卫/战斗学院 (3.74 avg)。稳定的阵容最大限度减少下四名,提供稳定的爬分体验。

最简单的TFT阵容是什么?

护卫/战斗学院对于寻求轻松爬分的玩家来说是个好选择。胜率67.3%但选取率仅1.2%,您不太可能被抢,使游戏更容易进行。低争抢意味着您可以自然找到单位而不必强行转型。

在TFT 第15赛季中什么时候应该强玩阵容vs灵活转型?

在TFT 第15赛季中,刀锋领主/主宰的选取率为1.2%,意味着被大量抢夺。如果您看到其他人玩这个,考虑转型到护卫/战斗学院等替代方案。当您早期命中单位和装备,或者阵容没人抢时强玩。当2+玩家争抢相同单位时转型。

TFT 第15赛季中最稳定的TFT阵容是什么?

护卫/战斗学院拥有最佳平均名次3.56,是爬分最稳定的阵容。其他可靠选择包括至高天/重量级斗士 follows at 3.62和护卫/战斗学院 at 3.74。更低的平均名次意味着更少的下四名。

平均名次比胜率更适合爬分吗?

对于稳定的LP收益,平均名次通常比纯胜率更可靠。像护卫/战斗学院这样平均名次3.56的阵容最大限度减少下四带来的大量LP损失。高方差阵容可能赢得更多对局但也更容易第八。对于爬分,稳定性通常优于赌博策略。