此表显示基于选择率的最常使用的云顶之弈第15赛季阵容,展示当前版本趋势和流行策略。 顶级 9英雄Set 15阵容:护卫 (75.8% 胜率, 3.2 均), 刀锋领主 (62.7% 胜率, 3.9 均), 护卫 (75.3% 胜率, 3.3 均)。 护卫/战斗学院以75.80%胜率和3.24平均排名领先。 刀锋领主以62.71%胜率紧随其后。 实时分析51个9英雄阵容的性能数据。

Primary
Champions
Builds
Traits
AvgWinFirstPick
-
3.24
Avg Place
75.80%
Win Rate
19.77%
First Place
0.83%
Pick Rate
-
3.94
Avg Place
62.71%
Win Rate
10.69%
First Place
0.73%
Pick Rate
-
3.34
Avg Place
75.31%
Win Rate
16.16%
First Place
0.68%
Pick Rate
-
3.54
Avg Place
70.66%
Win Rate
16.96%
First Place
0.58%
Pick Rate
-
4.13
Avg Place
55.56%
Win Rate
14.21%
First Place
0.57%
Pick Rate
-
2.12
Avg Place
92.29%
Win Rate
47.64%
First Place
0.46%
Pick Rate
-
3.43
Avg Place
72.88%
Win Rate
18.33%
First Place
0.38%
Pick Rate
-
4.78
Avg Place
43.69%
Win Rate
7.66%
First Place
0.38%
Pick Rate
-
2.97
Avg Place
81.27%
Win Rate
23.81%
First Place
0.36%
Pick Rate
-
3.07
Avg Place
80.74%
Win Rate
22.59%
First Place
0.32%
Pick Rate
-
4.06
Avg Place
57.18%
Win Rate
18.00%
First Place
0.23%
Pick Rate
-
3.78
Avg Place
62.26%
Win Rate
23.69%
First Place
0.21%
Pick Rate
-
4.10
Avg Place
57.60%
Win Rate
9.06%
First Place
0.19%
Pick Rate
-
3.58
Avg Place
70.45%
Win Rate
14.94%
First Place
0.17%
Pick Rate
-
3.46
Avg Place
71.01%
Win Rate
17.92%
First Place
0.17%
Pick Rate
-
3.53
Avg Place
68.14%
Win Rate
20.00%
First Place
0.17%
Pick Rate
-
3.73
Avg Place
63.92%
Win Rate
18.21%
First Place
0.17%
Pick Rate
-
5.24
Avg Place
33.07%
Win Rate
5.18%
First Place
0.14%
Pick Rate
-
4.28
Avg Place
55.69%
Win Rate
11.38%
First Place
0.14%
Pick Rate
-
2.48
Avg Place
86.83%
Win Rate
35.80%
First Place
0.14%
Pick Rate
-
3.43
Avg Place
72.25%
Win Rate
14.98%
First Place
0.13%
Pick Rate
-
3.21
Avg Place
77.17%
Win Rate
17.81%
First Place
0.12%
Pick Rate
-
2.77
Avg Place
82.24%
Win Rate
35.05%
First Place
0.12%
Pick Rate
-
3.52
Avg Place
72.51%
Win Rate
14.69%
First Place
0.12%
Pick Rate
-
2.64
Avg Place
84.88%
Win Rate
30.73%
First Place
0.12%
Pick Rate
-
2.67
Avg Place
87.06%
Win Rate
30.35%
First Place
0.11%
Pick Rate
-
3.83
Avg Place
67.51%
Win Rate
9.64%
First Place
0.11%
Pick Rate
-
5.92
Avg Place
22.83%
Win Rate
1.63%
First Place
0.10%
Pick Rate
-
4.17
Avg Place
53.07%
Win Rate
10.06%
First Place
0.10%
Pick Rate
-
4.02
Avg Place
56.32%
Win Rate
12.07%
First Place
0.10%
Pick Rate
-
3.79
Avg Place
63.91%
Win Rate
9.47%
First Place
0.10%
Pick Rate
-
4.48
Avg Place
50.91%
Win Rate
7.27%
First Place
0.09%
Pick Rate
-
2.68
Avg Place
84.08%
Win Rate
27.39%
First Place
0.09%
Pick Rate
-
2.40
Avg Place
89.36%
Win Rate
36.88%
First Place
0.08%
Pick Rate
-
4.25
Avg Place
53.49%
Win Rate
14.73%
First Place
0.07%
Pick Rate
-
3.51
Avg Place
73.23%
Win Rate
14.96%
First Place
0.07%
Pick Rate
-
4.02
Avg Place
62.60%
Win Rate
16.26%
First Place
0.07%
Pick Rate
-
2.56
Avg Place
86.99%
Win Rate
30.08%
First Place
0.07%
Pick Rate
-
3.94
Avg Place
56.76%
Win Rate
18.92%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
-
5.01
Avg Place
37.27%
Win Rate
10.91%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
-
4.29
Avg Place
52.78%
Win Rate
8.33%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
-
2.49
Avg Place
86.27%
Win Rate
38.24%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
-
3.15
Avg Place
75.49%
Win Rate
26.47%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
-
3.71
Avg Place
69.61%
Win Rate
9.80%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
-
3.49
Avg Place
71.29%
Win Rate
18.81%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
-
3.45
Avg Place
72.45%
Win Rate
15.31%
First Place
0.06%
Pick Rate
-
5.83
Avg Place
22.92%
Win Rate
3.13%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
-
3.32
Avg Place
74.47%
Win Rate
17.02%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
-
5.06
Avg Place
36.56%
Win Rate
5.38%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
-
3.21
Avg Place
71.43%
Win Rate
19.78%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate
-
4.22
Avg Place
51.11%
Win Rate
14.44%
First Place
0.05%
Pick Rate

TFT Set 15 Meta Analysis

This page displays 51 team compositions sorted by popularity to show what the meta is currently playing, based on 16.8K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 65.8% and average placement of 3.68 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is 护卫/卡牌大师, achieving a 92.3% win rate. Following closely is 护卫/卡牌大师 at 89.4% win rate, and 至高天/重量级斗士 at 87.1%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • 护卫/卡牌大师 (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes
  • 护卫/卡牌大师 (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes
  • 至高天/重量级斗士 (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • 护卫/卡牌大师: 92.3% win rate with only 0.5% pick rate
  • 护卫/卡牌大师: 89.4% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • 至高天/重量级斗士: 87.1% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is 护卫/战斗学院 with a 0.8% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 75.8% win rate despite high contestation. 刀锋领主/主宰 follows at 0.7% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

🔍

帮助我们保持准确性! 如果您发现不正确的统计数据、缺失的数据或任何问题,您的反馈将直接帮助我们提高整个社区的数据质量。

报告问题

云顶之弈第15赛季阵容常见问题

TFT 第15赛季中最好的TFT阵容是什么?

TFT 第15赛季中最好的TFT阵容是护卫/卡牌大师,达到92.3%胜率和2.12平均名次。这个阵容对爬分有效,能持续进入前四。

如何玩护卫/卡牌大师阵容?

专注于尽早找到核心单位和装备,然后稳定并升级以完成最终阵容。

TFT 第15赛季中哪些阵容适合爬分?

在TFT 第15赛季中稳定获得LP,护卫/卡牌大师提供最佳平均名次2.12。其他可靠选择包括护卫/卡牌大师 (2.40 avg)和决斗大师/至高天 (2.48 avg)。稳定的阵容最大限度减少下四名,提供稳定的爬分体验。

最简单的TFT阵容是什么?

护卫/卡牌大师对于寻求轻松爬分的玩家来说是个好选择。胜率92.3%但选取率仅0.5%,您不太可能被抢,使游戏更容易进行。低争抢意味着您可以自然找到单位而不必强行转型。

在TFT 第15赛季中什么时候应该强玩阵容vs灵活转型?

在TFT 第15赛季中,护卫/战斗学院的选取率为0.8%,意味着被大量抢夺。如果您看到其他人玩这个,考虑转型到护卫/卡牌大师等替代方案。当您早期命中单位和装备,或者阵容没人抢时强玩。当2+玩家争抢相同单位时转型。

TFT 第15赛季当前的TFT版本趋势是什么?

TFT 第15赛季版本由护卫/战斗学院主导,选取率0.8%, followed by 刀锋领主/主宰 at 0.7%。高选取率阵容定义版本但经常被抢。对于不被抢的游戏,考虑像护卫/卡牌大师 (0.1% pick rate)这样不太热门的替代方案。

在TFT中应该避免玩热门阵容吗?

不一定。像护卫/战斗学院(0.8%选取率)这样的热门阵容热门是有原因的——它们很强。但是,当多个玩家争抢同一个阵容时,每个人的名次都会受影响。尽早侦察对局。如果2+玩家强玩同一阵容,转型到替代方案以避免争抢单位。