最高胜率TFT阵容
此表格展示了胜率最高的TFT阵容,帮助您识别爬分最成功的阵容。 顶级 8英雄Set 17阵容:新星特攻队 (89.3% WR, 2.6 avg), 游侠 (88.5% WR, 2.9 avg), 新星特攻队 (85.4% WR, 2.9 avg)。 新星特攻队/斗士以89.29%胜率和2.64平均排名领先。 游侠以88.52%胜率紧随其后。 实时分析55个8英雄阵容的性能数据。
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.64 Avg Place | 89.29% Top 4 Rate | 29.93% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.91 Avg Place | 88.52% Top 4 Rate | 13.88% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.93 Avg Place | 85.42% Top 4 Rate | 21.09% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.80 Avg Place | 83.41% Top 4 Rate | 28.29% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.09 Avg Place | 79.75% Top 4 Rate | 23.42% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 77.84% Top 4 Rate | 23.07% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 75.47% Top 4 Rate | 26.42% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.24 Avg Place | 73.79% Top 4 Rate | 24.17% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.69 Avg Place | 72.63% Top 4 Rate | 10.99% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.28 Avg Place | 72.42% Top 4 Rate | 23.74% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.42 Avg Place | 72.20% Top 4 Rate | 14.72% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.55 Avg Place | 71.68% Top 4 Rate | 12.35% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.76 Avg Place | 67.76% Top 4 Rate | 9.79% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.81 Avg Place | 66.78% Top 4 Rate | 7.88% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.76 Avg Place | 66.51% Top 4 Rate | 18.18% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.83 Avg Place | 65.07% Top 4 Rate | 10.93% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.76 Avg Place | 64.15% Top 4 Rate | 14.57% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.87 Avg Place | 59.68% Top 4 Rate | 17.31% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.07 Avg Place | 59.04% Top 4 Rate | 14.62% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.25 Avg Place | 55.33% Top 4 Rate | 6.87% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
- | 4.31 Avg Place | 53.25% Top 4 Rate | 7.53% First Place | Moderately Contested | |||
4.46 Avg Place | 50.20% Top 4 Rate | 8.87% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.53 Avg Place | 50.20% Top 4 Rate | 8.84% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.62 Avg Place | 47.83% Top 4 Rate | 6.14% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.68 Avg Place | 46.67% Top 4 Rate | 5.50% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.71 Avg Place | 46.43% Top 4 Rate | 4.30% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.97 Avg Place | 42.69% Top 4 Rate | 2.31% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.90 Avg Place | 41.42% Top 4 Rate | 8.41% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.99 Avg Place | 40.92% Top 4 Rate | 6.52% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.18 Avg Place | 39.48% Top 4 Rate | 3.24% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.96 Avg Place | 39.34% Top 4 Rate | 4.58% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.97 Avg Place | 38.00% Top 4 Rate | 2.50% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.03 Avg Place | 37.43% Top 4 Rate | 6.27% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.34 Avg Place | 33.60% Top 4 Rate | 2.02% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.51 Avg Place | 32.68% Top 4 Rate | 0.39% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.32 Avg Place | 32.17% Top 4 Rate | 1.61% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.34 Avg Place | 30.13% Top 4 Rate | 3.40% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.52 Avg Place | 29.74% Top 4 Rate | 5.20% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.76 Avg Place | 28.44% Top 4 Rate | 0.46% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.46 Avg Place | 28.13% Top 4 Rate | 5.10% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.48 Avg Place | 27.63% Top 4 Rate | 2.63% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.38 Avg Place | 27.54% Top 4 Rate | 1.93% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.56 Avg Place | 26.46% Top 4 Rate | 1.06% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.61 Avg Place | 26.45% Top 4 Rate | 1.24% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.55 Avg Place | 26.06% Top 4 Rate | 1.77% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.72 Avg Place | 25.43% Top 4 Rate | 0.99% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.56 Avg Place | 25.24% Top 4 Rate | 2.59% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.61 Avg Place | 24.81% Top 4 Rate | 2.76% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.63 Avg Place | 24.61% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.80 Avg Place | 22.28% Top 4 Rate | 1.04% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.80 Avg Place | 21.69% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.98 Avg Place | 19.34% Top 4 Rate | 1.44% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
6.15 Avg Place | 18.99% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
6.06 Avg Place | 18.79% Top 4 Rate | 2.73% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.22 Avg Place | 14.31% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
云顶之弈阵容 - 第17赛季常见问题
TFT 第17赛季中最好的TFT阵容是什么?
TFT 第17赛季中最好的TFT阵容是新星特攻队/斗士,以维克托为主C,胜率为89.3%,平均排名2.64。这个阵容非常适合爬分,能稳定进前四。
如何玩新星特攻队/斗士阵容?
玩新星特攻队/斗士阵容时,重点围绕维克托作为主C来构建。尽早寻找维克托和辅助单位,优先选择与你的C位协同的装备,目标在7-8级时达到强势期。该阵容使用率为0.1%,是一个相对不被抢的选择。
TFT 第17赛季中哪些阵容适合爬分?
在TFT 第17赛季中稳定获取LP,新星特攻队/斗士提供最佳平均排名2.64。其他可靠选择包括汪星机器人/狙神(平均名次 2.80)和游侠/新星特攻队(平均名次 2.91)。稳定阵容可以减少倒四,实现稳步攀升。
TFT中最简单的阵容是什么?
新星特攻队/斗士对于想要轻松爬分的玩家来说是一个很好的选择。胜率89.3%但使用率仅0.1%,你不太可能被抢,使游戏更容易进行。低竞争意味着你可以自然地找到你的单位,而不必强行转型。
在TFT 第17赛季中什么时候应该强行玩阵容vs灵活转型?
在TFT 第17赛季中,游侠/木灵族的使用率为3.3%,意味着竞争激烈。如果你看到其他人也在玩,考虑灵活转向新星特攻队/斗士等替代阵容。当你在早期找到单位和装备或阵容没有竞争时强行玩。当你看到2个以上玩家争夺相同单位时要灵活。