最高第一名率TFT双人作战阵容

此表突出显示第一名率最高的TFT双人作战队伍阵容,非常适合希望最大化获胜机会的双排搭档。 热门 8棋子双人作战赛季17阵容:N.O.V.A. (50.0% WR, 4.0 avg), N.O.V.A. (74.2% WR, 3.4 avg), Replicator (63.0% WR, 3.7 avg)。 N.O.V.A./Fateweaver以50.00%胜率和4.00平均排名领先。 N.O.V.A.以74.19%胜率紧随其后。 分析68个8棋子双人作战阵容的实时性能统计数据。

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
4.00
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.37
Avg Place
74.19%
Top 4 Rate
24.19%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.65
Avg Place
62.97%
Top 4 Rate
21.20%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.91
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
18.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.43
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
17.39%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.89
Avg Place
56.88%
Top 4 Rate
16.88%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.75
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
20.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.44
Avg Place
46.67%
Top 4 Rate
15.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.09
Avg Place
58.46%
Top 4 Rate
15.38%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.69
Avg Place
58.06%
Top 4 Rate
19.35%
First Place
Low Contested
4.69
Avg Place
45.24%
Top 4 Rate
16.67%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.08
Avg Place
57.14%
Top 4 Rate
14.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.51
Avg Place
67.57%
Top 4 Rate
21.62%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.93
Avg Place
58.33%
Top 4 Rate
11.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.81
Avg Place
37.21%
Top 4 Rate
13.95%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.83
Avg Place
62.45%
Top 4 Rate
16.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.02
Avg Place
59.09%
Top 4 Rate
13.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.77
Avg Place
45.54%
Top 4 Rate
13.39%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.53
Avg Place
67.65%
Top 4 Rate
12.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.96
Avg Place
63.83%
Top 4 Rate
8.51%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.97
Avg Place
39.39%
Top 4 Rate
9.09%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.31
Avg Place
49.20%
Top 4 Rate
16.04%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.82
Avg Place
62.50%
Top 4 Rate
19.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.89
Avg Place
61.63%
Top 4 Rate
15.59%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.51
Avg Place
69.77%
Top 4 Rate
16.28%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.36
Avg Place
52.17%
Top 4 Rate
15.44%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.65
Avg Place
47.80%
Top 4 Rate
8.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.84
Avg Place
55.97%
Top 4 Rate
18.66%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.22
Avg Place
33.33%
Top 4 Rate
5.88%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.99
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
14.00%
First Place
Low Contested
4.24
Avg Place
54.45%
Top 4 Rate
10.68%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.59
Avg Place
48.87%
Top 4 Rate
11.65%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.05
Avg Place
58.62%
Top 4 Rate
11.49%
First Place
Low Contested
5.12
Avg Place
42.42%
Top 4 Rate
3.03%
First Place
Low Contested
4.30
Avg Place
52.17%
Top 4 Rate
10.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.80
Avg Place
40.96%
Top 4 Rate
9.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.49
Avg Place
46.15%
Top 4 Rate
10.26%
First Place
Low Contested
5.13
Avg Place
33.33%
Top 4 Rate
5.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.21
Avg Place
34.15%
Top 4 Rate
9.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.80
Avg Place
25.00%
Top 4 Rate
5.95%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.40
Avg Place
27.91%
Top 4 Rate
9.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.37
Avg Place
32.61%
Top 4 Rate
8.70%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.03
Avg Place
36.21%
Top 4 Rate
8.62%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.49
Avg Place
26.38%
Top 4 Rate
5.51%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.44
Avg Place
49.02%
Top 4 Rate
10.83%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.30
Avg Place
32.54%
Top 4 Rate
7.69%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.02
Avg Place
41.67%
Top 4 Rate
8.33%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.14
Avg Place
57.14%
Top 4 Rate
19.05%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.80
Avg Place
20.00%
Top 4 Rate
6.67%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.95
Avg Place
41.67%
Top 4 Rate
6.67%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.68
Avg Place
46.77%
Top 4 Rate
6.45%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.52
Avg Place
25.81%
Top 4 Rate
3.23%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.73
Avg Place
47.13%
Top 4 Rate
8.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.57
Avg Place
29.13%
Top 4 Rate
4.85%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.24
Avg Place
29.41%
Top 4 Rate
5.88%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.00
Avg Place
32.35%
Top 4 Rate
8.82%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.83
Avg Place
18.75%
Top 4 Rate
4.17%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.87
Avg Place
19.49%
Top 4 Rate
4.24%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.71
Avg Place
44.12%
Top 4 Rate
8.82%
First Place
Low Contested
5.52
Avg Place
28.26%
Top 4 Rate
4.35%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.87
Avg Place
23.38%
Top 4 Rate
7.79%
First Place
Moderately Contested
6.22
Avg Place
12.70%
Top 4 Rate
3.17%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.19
Avg Place
37.50%
Top 4 Rate
6.25%
First Place
Moderately Contested
-
5.18
Avg Place
32.97%
Top 4 Rate
7.14%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.57
Avg Place
28.57%
Top 4 Rate
2.86%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.36
Avg Place
28.57%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.63
Avg Place
36.84%
Top 4 Rate
5.26%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.23
Avg Place
32.14%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Highly Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 68 team compositions sorted by first place rate to find compositions with the highest potential to win lobbies, based on 9.9K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 44.5% and average placement of 4.68 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is N.O.V.A./Brawler with Viktor as the primary carry, achieving a 74.2% win rate. Following closely is Replicator/N.O.V.A. at 69.8% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Brawler at 67.6%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax
  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider N.O.V.A./Fateweaver which achieves first place in 25.0% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 74.2% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A.: 69.8% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 67.6% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Rogue/N.O.V.A. with a 2.1% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 61.6% win rate despite high contestation. Challenger/N.O.V.A. follows at 1.4% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

帮助我们保持准确性! 如果您发现不正确的统计数据、缺失的数据或任何问题,您的反馈将直接帮助我们提高整个社区的数据质量。

报告问题

TFT双人作战阵容 - 赛季17常见问题

TFT 第17赛季中最好的TFT双人作战阵容是什么?

TFT 第17赛季中最好的TFT双人作战阵容是N.O.V.A./Brawler,以Viktor为主C,达到74.2%胜率和3.37平均排名。这个阵容适合与搭档一起上分。

双人作战中如何玩N.O.V.A./Brawler阵容?

在双人作战中玩N.O.V.A./Brawler,需要与搭档协调。专注于以Viktor为主C进行构建。此阵容选取率为0.1%,是一个相对不被抢的选择。与搭档协调援助和共享装备以获得最佳效果。

TFT 第17赛季双人作战中哪些阵容适合上分?

在TFT 第17赛季双人作战中稳定获得LP,N.O.V.A./Brawler提供最佳平均排名3.37。其他可靠选择包括Replicator/N.O.V.A.(平均名次 3.51)和Rogue/N.O.V.A.(平均名次 3.51)。与搭档协调避免互相抢棋子。

最容易玩的TFT双人作战阵容是什么?

N.O.V.A./Brawler对于想要轻松爬分的玩家来说是一个很好的选择。胜率74.2%但使用率仅0.1%,你不太可能被抢,使游戏更容易进行。低竞争意味着你可以自然地找到你的单位,而不必强行转型。

双人作战中我和搭档应该玩同一个阵容吗?

在TFT 第17赛季双人作战中,通常最好玩不同的阵容以避免抢棋子。Rogue/N.O.V.A.以2.1%选取率最受欢迎。考虑让搭档玩N.O.V.A./Brawler作为互补选择。