最高胜率TFT双人作战阵容

此表展示胜率最高的TFT双人作战队伍阵容,帮助你和搭档找到最成功的上分阵容。 热门 9棋子双人作战赛季17阵容:N.O.V.A. (97.9% WR, 2.2 avg), Replicator (88.7% WR, 2.7 avg), Rogue (88.6% WR, 2.7 avg)。 N.O.V.A./Brawler以97.87%胜率和2.19平均排名领先。 Replicator以88.68%胜率紧随其后。 分析88个9棋子双人作战阵容的实时性能统计数据。

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
2.19
Avg Place
97.87%
Top 4 Rate
34.04%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.72
Avg Place
88.68%
Top 4 Rate
22.64%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.71
Avg Place
88.61%
Top 4 Rate
24.05%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.46
Avg Place
87.18%
Top 4 Rate
28.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.80
Avg Place
83.67%
Top 4 Rate
26.53%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.83
Avg Place
82.81%
Top 4 Rate
26.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.80
Avg Place
63.41%
Top 4 Rate
17.07%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.93
Avg Place
82.61%
Top 4 Rate
28.26%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.78
Avg Place
82.42%
Top 4 Rate
26.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.11
Avg Place
78.57%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.12
Avg Place
80.23%
Top 4 Rate
20.93%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.11
Avg Place
80.00%
Top 4 Rate
23.08%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.94
Avg Place
81.48%
Top 4 Rate
22.22%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.97
Avg Place
81.20%
Top 4 Rate
22.22%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.21
Avg Place
76.32%
Top 4 Rate
21.05%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.72
Avg Place
59.80%
Top 4 Rate
14.71%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.29
Avg Place
73.51%
Top 4 Rate
18.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.17
Avg Place
76.74%
Top 4 Rate
21.86%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.68
Avg Place
65.81%
Top 4 Rate
18.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.27
Avg Place
72.73%
Top 4 Rate
18.18%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.47
Avg Place
67.94%
Top 4 Rate
23.66%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.21
Avg Place
71.43%
Top 4 Rate
14.29%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.99
Avg Place
82.93%
Top 4 Rate
21.95%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.63
Avg Place
63.89%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.59
Avg Place
64.86%
Top 4 Rate
21.62%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.81
Avg Place
59.46%
Top 4 Rate
18.92%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.24
Avg Place
52.94%
Top 4 Rate
5.88%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.79
Avg Place
57.34%
Top 4 Rate
20.63%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
68.61%
Top 4 Rate
23.36%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.52
Avg Place
87.50%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.59
Avg Place
68.25%
Top 4 Rate
20.63%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.61
Avg Place
66.07%
Top 4 Rate
21.43%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.49
Avg Place
67.44%
Top 4 Rate
23.26%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.47
Avg Place
71.88%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Low Contested
2.97
Avg Place
80.73%
Top 4 Rate
22.28%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.59
Avg Place
64.43%
Top 4 Rate
27.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.71
Avg Place
62.22%
Top 4 Rate
24.44%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.98
Avg Place
59.52%
Top 4 Rate
13.10%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.04
Avg Place
54.35%
Top 4 Rate
13.04%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.56
Avg Place
65.93%
Top 4 Rate
20.88%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.85
Avg Place
65.38%
Top 4 Rate
19.23%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.26
Avg Place
70.37%
Top 4 Rate
20.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.04
Avg Place
75.94%
Top 4 Rate
21.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
65.00%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.85
Avg Place
65.00%
Top 4 Rate
20.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.98
Avg Place
58.49%
Top 4 Rate
16.60%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.69
Avg Place
64.14%
Top 4 Rate
19.31%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.38
Avg Place
72.73%
Top 4 Rate
22.73%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.19
Avg Place
55.93%
Top 4 Rate
15.68%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.93
Avg Place
57.89%
Top 4 Rate
22.81%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.53
Avg Place
71.05%
Top 4 Rate
18.42%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.83
Avg Place
39.66%
Top 4 Rate
8.62%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.46
Avg Place
68.10%
Top 4 Rate
27.62%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.55
Avg Place
71.05%
Top 4 Rate
15.79%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.15
Avg Place
53.27%
Top 4 Rate
14.74%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.65
Avg Place
64.65%
Top 4 Rate
17.32%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.66
Avg Place
67.95%
Top 4 Rate
18.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.33
Avg Place
71.05%
Top 4 Rate
14.04%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.60
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
20.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.23
Avg Place
29.55%
Top 4 Rate
9.09%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.81
Avg Place
59.74%
Top 4 Rate
12.99%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.63
Avg Place
59.26%
Top 4 Rate
22.22%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.38
Avg Place
54.17%
Top 4 Rate
16.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.38
Avg Place
45.59%
Top 4 Rate
11.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.54
Avg Place
41.67%
Top 4 Rate
8.33%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.06
Avg Place
58.68%
Top 4 Rate
16.77%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.04
Avg Place
62.50%
Top 4 Rate
12.50%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.35
Avg Place
55.00%
Top 4 Rate
15.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.55
Avg Place
54.55%
Top 4 Rate
36.36%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.08
Avg Place
60.27%
Top 4 Rate
15.07%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.13
Avg Place
52.08%
Top 4 Rate
14.58%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.40
Avg Place
50.94%
Top 4 Rate
7.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.93
Avg Place
57.94%
Top 4 Rate
15.89%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.31
Avg Place
50.72%
Top 4 Rate
12.92%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.67
Avg Place
53.85%
Top 4 Rate
2.56%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.97
Avg Place
59.78%
Top 4 Rate
20.65%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.49
Avg Place
47.06%
Top 4 Rate
7.84%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.38
Avg Place
50.85%
Top 4 Rate
12.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.50
Avg Place
48.80%
Top 4 Rate
13.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.07
Avg Place
46.67%
Top 4 Rate
33.33%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.20
Avg Place
53.06%
Top 4 Rate
22.45%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.47
Avg Place
50.53%
Top 4 Rate
12.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.68
Avg Place
44.30%
Top 4 Rate
10.53%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.78
Avg Place
43.84%
Top 4 Rate
6.85%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.78
Avg Place
36.96%
Top 4 Rate
8.70%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.96
Avg Place
36.97%
Top 4 Rate
11.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.40
Avg Place
27.27%
Top 4 Rate
9.09%
First Place
Highly Contested
6.06
Avg Place
18.75%
Top 4 Rate
6.25%
First Place
Highly Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 88 team compositions sorted by win rate to help you find the strongest compositions for climbing ranked, based on 11.3K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 63.1% and average placement of 3.76 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is N.O.V.A./Brawler with Viktor as the primary carry, achieving a 97.9% win rate. Following closely is Replicator/N.O.V.A. at 88.7% win rate, and Rogue/N.O.V.A. at 88.6%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Pantheon
  • Rogue/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider Rogue/Meeple which achieves first place in 36.4% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 97.9% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A.: 88.7% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Rogue/N.O.V.A.: 88.6% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Challenger/Rogue with a 1.3% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 80.7% win rate despite high contestation. Replicator/Dark Star follows at 1.3% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

帮助我们保持准确性! 如果您发现不正确的统计数据、缺失的数据或任何问题,您的反馈将直接帮助我们提高整个社区的数据质量。

报告问题

TFT双人作战阵容 - 赛季17常见问题

TFT 第17赛季中最好的TFT双人作战阵容是什么?

TFT 第17赛季中最好的TFT双人作战阵容是N.O.V.A./Brawler,以Viktor为主C,达到97.9%胜率和2.19平均排名。这个阵容适合与搭档一起上分。

双人作战中如何玩N.O.V.A./Brawler阵容?

在双人作战中玩N.O.V.A./Brawler,需要与搭档协调。专注于以Viktor为主C进行构建。此阵容选取率为0.1%,是一个相对不被抢的选择。与搭档协调援助和共享装备以获得最佳效果。

TFT 第17赛季双人作战中哪些阵容适合上分?

在TFT 第17赛季双人作战中稳定获得LP,N.O.V.A./Brawler提供最佳平均排名2.19。其他可靠选择包括Replicator/N.O.V.A.(平均名次 2.46)和Dark Star/Brawler(平均名次 2.52)。与搭档协调避免互相抢棋子。

最容易玩的TFT双人作战阵容是什么?

N.O.V.A./Brawler对于想要轻松爬分的玩家来说是一个很好的选择。胜率97.9%但使用率仅0.1%,你不太可能被抢,使游戏更容易进行。低竞争意味着你可以自然地找到你的单位,而不必强行转型。

双人作战中我和搭档应该玩同一个阵容吗?

在TFT 第17赛季双人作战中,通常最好玩不同的阵容以避免抢棋子。Challenger/Rogue以1.3%选取率最受欢迎。考虑让搭档玩N.O.V.A./Brawler作为互补选择。