巨人腰带云顶之弈阵容
使用 巨人腰带的团队阵容，TFT Set 16.9。查看C位英雄装备此物品以获得最大效果的阵容。
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize 巨人腰带 as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 58 viable team comps currently building 巨人腰带, with an average win rate of 40.92% across all compositions. The highest performing 巨人腰带 comp achieves a 83.71% win rate, primarily featuring 游侠, 新星特攻队, 织命人 traits with 凯特琳 as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where 巨人腰带 is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
3.13 Avg Place | 83.71% Top 4 Rate | 11.80% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.91 Avg Place | 83.08% Top 4 Rate | 23.01% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.09 Avg Place | 80.14% Top 4 Rate | 24.47% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.33 Avg Place | 78.54% Top 4 Rate | 17.24% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.11 Avg Place | 76.34% Top 4 Rate | 22.69% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.32 Avg Place | 74.43% Top 4 Rate | 17.39% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.26 Avg Place | 74.34% Top 4 Rate | 23.64% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.43 Avg Place | 68.84% Top 4 Rate | 22.46% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.74 Avg Place | 67.43% Top 4 Rate | 11.43% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.90 Avg Place | 67.28% Top 4 Rate | 4.32% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.79 Avg Place | 64.92% Top 4 Rate | 9.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.17 Avg Place | 61.21% Top 4 Rate | 4.21% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.99 Avg Place | 60.76% Top 4 Rate | 9.49% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.42 Avg Place | 56.12% Top 4 Rate | 4.32% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.26 Avg Place | 56.01% Top 4 Rate | 6.22% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.39 Avg Place | 54.39% Top 4 Rate | 5.10% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.35 Avg Place | 54.23% Top 4 Rate | 2.99% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 4.49 Avg Place | 50.70% Top 4 Rate | 8.80% First Place | Low Contested | |||
4.49 Avg Place | 49.34% Top 4 Rate | 10.50% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.47 Avg Place | 49.34% Top 4 Rate | 12.59% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.67 Avg Place | 49.16% Top 4 Rate | 7.66% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.65 Avg Place | 47.50% Top 4 Rate | 8.90% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 4.55 Avg Place | 46.72% Top 4 Rate | 8.03% First Place | Low Contested | |||
4.70 Avg Place | 44.96% Top 4 Rate | 7.78% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 4.95 Avg Place | 43.83% Top 4 Rate | 8.64% First Place | Low Contested | |||
4.74 Avg Place | 41.55% Top 4 Rate | 7.75% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.04 Avg Place | 39.60% Top 4 Rate | 4.19% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.94 Avg Place | 38.82% Top 4 Rate | 4.12% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.02 Avg Place | 37.54% Top 4 Rate | 4.31% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.98 Avg Place | 37.35% Top 4 Rate | 3.21% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.20 Avg Place | 34.33% Top 4 Rate | 5.58% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.16 Avg Place | 33.98% Top 4 Rate | 4.30% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.39 Avg Place | 31.13% Top 4 Rate | 4.09% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.67 Avg Place | 30.16% Top 4 Rate | 2.22% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.48 Avg Place | 29.15% Top 4 Rate | 3.24% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.34 Avg Place | 29.00% Top 4 Rate | 7.67% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.44 Avg Place | 28.64% Top 4 Rate | 5.34% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.55 Avg Place | 28.48% Top 4 Rate | 0.43% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 5.47 Avg Place | 27.04% Top 4 Rate | 1.89% First Place | Low Contested | |||
5.55 Avg Place | 26.79% Top 4 Rate | 1.79% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.47 Avg Place | 26.64% Top 4 Rate | 1.39% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.53 Avg Place | 26.62% Top 4 Rate | 1.18% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.61 Avg Place | 25.68% Top 4 Rate | 2.93% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.85 Avg Place | 25.00% Top 4 Rate | 0.35% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.70 Avg Place | 22.84% Top 4 Rate | 1.85% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.81 Avg Place | 22.16% Top 4 Rate | 1.80% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.73 Avg Place | 21.19% Top 4 Rate | 0.39% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.70 Avg Place | 21.05% Top 4 Rate | 4.68% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.64 Avg Place | 20.73% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.92 Avg Place | 18.91% Top 4 Rate | 1.82% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.03 Avg Place | 18.59% Top 4 Rate | 1.12% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.02 Avg Place | 17.09% Top 4 Rate | 1.82% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.16 Avg Place | 16.31% Top 4 Rate | 1.16% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.04 Avg Place | 15.27% Top 4 Rate | 1.15% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.13 Avg Place | 14.01% Top 4 Rate | 0.64% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.97 Avg Place | 11.89% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.17 Avg Place | 8.11% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.72 Avg Place | 4.25% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
巨人腰带阵容 - 常见问题
云顶之弈第17赛季巨人腰带的最佳阵容是什么？
云顶之弈第17赛季使用巨人腰带的最佳阵容胜率为83.71%，选取率为0.07%。这个阵容使用游侠, 新星特攻队, and 织命人羁绊，在包含巨人腰带的对局中有0.07%的选择率。
云顶之弈中有多少阵容使用巨人腰带？
云顶之弈第17赛季有58个常用巨人腰带的可行阵容。巨人腰带出现在平均胜率为40.92%的阵容中，共分析了39,710场对局。
云顶之弈中哪个阵容最常使用巨人腰带？
云顶之弈第17赛季巨人腰带最热门的阵容使用游侠, 新星特攻队, and 织命人羁绊，选取率为1.91%。这个阵容胜率为74.43%，平均排名3.32。
使用巨人腰带的哪个阵容平均排名最好？
平均排名最好的巨人腰带阵容使用游侠, 新星特攻队, and 织命人羁绊，达到2.91。这个阵容胜率为83.08%，选取率为0.22%。
云顶之弈中哪些羁绊与巨人腰带搭配效果好？
云顶之弈第17赛季与巨人腰带协同最佳的羁绊是游侠, 新星特攻队, 织命人, 堡垒卫士, 救世主, and 太空律动。这些羁绊组合出现在巨人腰带胜率最高的阵容中。