按胜率排名的最佳云顶之弈阵容
此表展示具有最高胜率的云顶之弈第undefined赛季阵容,帮助你识别最成功的上分阵容。 顶级 9英雄Set undefined阵容:魔术师 (97.0% 胜率, 1.8 均), 游侠 (95.5% 胜率, 2.3 均), 新星特攻队 (94.3% 胜率, 2.4 均)。 魔术师/新星特攻队以96.97%胜率和1.80平均排名领先。 游侠以95.46%胜率紧随其后。 实时分析69个9英雄阵容的性能数据。
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.80 Avg Place | 96.97% Top 4 Rate | 54.55% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.26 Avg Place | 95.46% Top 4 Rate | 32.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.38 Avg Place | 94.26% Top 4 Rate | 29.50% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.27 Avg Place | 93.97% Top 4 Rate | 31.16% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.39 Avg Place | 92.65% Top 4 Rate | 24.93% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.37 Avg Place | 92.42% Top 4 Rate | 33.71% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.14 Avg Place | 92.22% Top 4 Rate | 42.45% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.47 Avg Place | 92.06% Top 4 Rate | 28.97% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.14 Avg Place | 91.52% Top 4 Rate | 46.49% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.20 Avg Place | 91.30% Top 4 Rate | 44.80% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
1.98 Avg Place | 91.00% Top 4 Rate | 57.67% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.52 Avg Place | 90.38% Top 4 Rate | 26.97% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.55 Avg Place | 89.60% Top 4 Rate | 25.87% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.76 Avg Place | 85.47% Top 4 Rate | 31.83% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.81 Avg Place | 84.04% Top 4 Rate | 32.53% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.88 Avg Place | 83.61% Top 4 Rate | 21.58% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.98 Avg Place | 83.60% Top 4 Rate | 18.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.84 Avg Place | 82.86% Top 4 Rate | 27.24% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.13 Avg Place | 81.76% Top 4 Rate | 12.79% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 81.35% Top 4 Rate | 12.30% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.19 Avg Place | 81.05% Top 4 Rate | 16.49% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 80.65% Top 4 Rate | 18.21% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.98 Avg Place | 79.95% Top 4 Rate | 24.70% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 79.86% Top 4 Rate | 20.49% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.99 Avg Place | 79.29% Top 4 Rate | 26.43% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 79.28% Top 4 Rate | 13.81% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.25 Avg Place | 79.28% Top 4 Rate | 12.29% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.40 Avg Place | 78.75% Top 4 Rate | 11.30% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 78.25% Top 4 Rate | 18.31% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.95 Avg Place | 77.73% Top 4 Rate | 27.50% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.08 Avg Place | 77.54% Top 4 Rate | 23.19% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 77.34% Top 4 Rate | 15.71% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 77.08% Top 4 Rate | 19.48% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.13 Avg Place | 76.66% Top 4 Rate | 25.21% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.32 Avg Place | 76.43% Top 4 Rate | 16.25% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.26 Avg Place | 76.38% Top 4 Rate | 20.70% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 76.14% Top 4 Rate | 14.05% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.01 Avg Place | 76.08% Top 4 Rate | 33.63% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 75.80% Top 4 Rate | 23.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.34 Avg Place | 74.47% Top 4 Rate | 18.24% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 73.93% Top 4 Rate | 25.57% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.41 Avg Place | 73.89% Top 4 Rate | 17.52% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.25 Avg Place | 73.75% Top 4 Rate | 18.15% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.32 Avg Place | 73.63% Top 4 Rate | 18.75% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.46 Avg Place | 73.54% Top 4 Rate | 13.57% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.54 Avg Place | 71.12% Top 4 Rate | 13.55% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.74 Avg Place | 71.06% Top 4 Rate | 7.72% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.55 Avg Place | 70.03% Top 4 Rate | 14.54% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.67 Avg Place | 69.93% Top 4 Rate | 11.15% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.48 Avg Place | 69.26% Top 4 Rate | 23.75% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.75 Avg Place | 66.95% Top 4 Rate | 11.76% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.77 Avg Place | 65.31% Top 4 Rate | 16.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.66 Avg Place | 65.12% Top 4 Rate | 19.63% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.94 Avg Place | 64.09% Top 4 Rate | 5.79% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.64 Avg Place | 62.99% Top 4 Rate | 28.89% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.03 Avg Place | 61.02% Top 4 Rate | 6.66% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.96 Avg Place | 58.72% Top 4 Rate | 20.64% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.09 Avg Place | 57.03% Top 4 Rate | 17.84% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.34 Avg Place | 54.48% Top 4 Rate | 6.09% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.20 Avg Place | 53.08% Top 4 Rate | 10.00% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.30 Avg Place | 52.73% Top 4 Rate | 6.06% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.45 Avg Place | 50.00% Top 4 Rate | 5.17% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.63 Avg Place | 48.61% Top 4 Rate | 3.61% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.76 Avg Place | 44.20% Top 4 Rate | 6.43% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.65 Avg Place | 44.05% Top 4 Rate | 5.56% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.12 Avg Place | 36.36% Top 4 Rate | 3.84% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.29 Avg Place | 33.61% Top 4 Rate | 2.73% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.75 Avg Place | 20.00% Top 4 Rate | 0.39% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
6.01 Avg Place | 19.83% Top 4 Rate | 2.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
云顶之弈第undefined赛季阵容常见问题
TFT 第undefined赛季中最好的TFT阵容是什么?
TFT 第undefined赛季中最好的TFT阵容是魔术师/新星特攻队,以米利欧作为主C,达到97.0%胜率和1.80平均名次。这个阵容对爬分有效,能持续进入前四。
如何玩魔术师/新星特攻队阵容?
玩魔术师/新星特攻队时,专注于以米利欧为主C。尽早寻找米利欧和辅助单位,优先选择与主C协同的装备,目标在7-8级达到战力巅峰。这个阵容的选取率为0.1%,相对来说不太被抢。
TFT 第undefined赛季中哪些阵容适合爬分?
在TFT 第undefined赛季中稳定获得LP,魔术师/新星特攻队提供最佳平均名次1.80。其他可靠选择包括新星特攻队/斗神 (1.98 avg)和暗星/斗士 (2.14 avg)。稳定的阵容最大限度减少下四名,提供稳定的爬分体验。
最简单的TFT阵容是什么?
魔术师/新星特攻队对于寻求轻松爬分的玩家来说是个好选择。胜率97.0%但选取率仅0.1%,您不太可能被抢,使游戏更容易进行。低争抢意味着您可以自然找到单位而不必强行转型。
在TFT 第undefined赛季中什么时候应该强玩阵容vs灵活转型?
在TFT 第undefined赛季中,木灵族/织命人的选取率为1.5%,意味着被大量抢夺。如果您看到其他人玩这个,考虑转型到魔术师/新星特攻队等替代方案。当您早期命中单位和装备,或者阵容没人抢时强玩。当2+玩家争抢相同单位时转型。
TFT 第undefined赛季中胜率最高的阵容是哪些?
胜率前三的阵容是:1) 魔术师/新星特攻队 (97.0%),2) 游侠/新星特攻队 (95.5%),3) 新星特攻队/暗星 (94.3%)。这些代表了在排位赛中最大化LP的最强阵容。
为什么胜率对TFT阵容很重要?
胜率显示阵容进入前四的频率,这在排位中获得LP。像魔术师/新星特攻队(97.0%)这样的高胜率阵容在多场游戏中持续表现良好。但是,也要考虑选取率——被大量抢夺的阵容如果多个玩家强玩可能在您的游戏中表现不佳。