已归档赛季: 这些阵容来自云顶之弈第undefined赛季,已不再属于当前赛季。显示的数据来自该赛季活跃期间。

按排名分类的最佳云顶之弈阵容

此表按平均排名对云顶之弈第undefined赛季阵容进行排序,展示哪些阵容能持续获得顶级排名。 顶级 9英雄Set undefined阵容:魔术师 (97.0% 胜率, 1.8 均), 新星特攻队 (91.0% 胜率, 2.0 均), 暗星 (91.5% 胜率, 2.1 均)。 魔术师/新星特攻队以96.97%胜率和1.80平均排名领先。 新星特攻队以91.00%胜率紧随其后。 实时分析69个9英雄阵容的性能数据。

Filter by Trait
Filter by Champion
Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4FirstContested Risk
1.80
Avg Place
96.97%
Top 4 Rate
54.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.98
Avg Place
91.00%
Top 4 Rate
57.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.14
Avg Place
91.52%
Top 4 Rate
46.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
92.22%
Top 4 Rate
42.45%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.20
Avg Place
91.30%
Top 4 Rate
44.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.26
Avg Place
95.46%
Top 4 Rate
32.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.27
Avg Place
93.97%
Top 4 Rate
31.16%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.37
Avg Place
92.42%
Top 4 Rate
33.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.38
Avg Place
94.26%
Top 4 Rate
29.50%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.39
Avg Place
92.65%
Top 4 Rate
24.93%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.47
Avg Place
92.06%
Top 4 Rate
28.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.52
Avg Place
90.38%
Top 4 Rate
26.97%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.55
Avg Place
89.60%
Top 4 Rate
25.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.76
Avg Place
85.47%
Top 4 Rate
31.83%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.81
Avg Place
84.04%
Top 4 Rate
32.53%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.84
Avg Place
82.86%
Top 4 Rate
27.24%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.88
Avg Place
83.61%
Top 4 Rate
21.58%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.95
Avg Place
77.73%
Top 4 Rate
27.50%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.98
Avg Place
79.95%
Top 4 Rate
24.70%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.98
Avg Place
83.60%
Top 4 Rate
18.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.99
Avg Place
79.29%
Top 4 Rate
26.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.01
Avg Place
76.08%
Top 4 Rate
33.63%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.08
Avg Place
77.54%
Top 4 Rate
23.19%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
81.35%
Top 4 Rate
12.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
80.65%
Top 4 Rate
18.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.13
Avg Place
76.66%
Top 4 Rate
25.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.13
Avg Place
81.76%
Top 4 Rate
12.79%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.18
Avg Place
78.25%
Top 4 Rate
18.31%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.18
Avg Place
79.86%
Top 4 Rate
20.49%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.19
Avg Place
81.05%
Top 4 Rate
16.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
75.80%
Top 4 Rate
23.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
73.93%
Top 4 Rate
25.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
13.81%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.25
Avg Place
73.75%
Top 4 Rate
18.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.25
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
12.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.26
Avg Place
76.38%
Top 4 Rate
20.70%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.08%
Top 4 Rate
19.48%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.34%
Top 4 Rate
15.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
76.14%
Top 4 Rate
14.05%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.32
Avg Place
73.63%
Top 4 Rate
18.75%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
76.43%
Top 4 Rate
16.25%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.34
Avg Place
74.47%
Top 4 Rate
18.24%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.40
Avg Place
78.75%
Top 4 Rate
11.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.41
Avg Place
73.89%
Top 4 Rate
17.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.46
Avg Place
73.54%
Top 4 Rate
13.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.48
Avg Place
69.26%
Top 4 Rate
23.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.54
Avg Place
71.12%
Top 4 Rate
13.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.55
Avg Place
70.03%
Top 4 Rate
14.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.64
Avg Place
62.99%
Top 4 Rate
28.89%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.66
Avg Place
65.12%
Top 4 Rate
19.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.67
Avg Place
69.93%
Top 4 Rate
11.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.74
Avg Place
71.06%
Top 4 Rate
7.72%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.75
Avg Place
66.95%
Top 4 Rate
11.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.77
Avg Place
65.31%
Top 4 Rate
16.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.94
Avg Place
64.09%
Top 4 Rate
5.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.96
Avg Place
58.72%
Top 4 Rate
20.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.03
Avg Place
61.02%
Top 4 Rate
6.66%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.09
Avg Place
57.03%
Top 4 Rate
17.84%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.20
Avg Place
53.08%
Top 4 Rate
10.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.30
Avg Place
52.73%
Top 4 Rate
6.06%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.34
Avg Place
54.48%
Top 4 Rate
6.09%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.45
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
5.17%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.63
Avg Place
48.61%
Top 4 Rate
3.61%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.65
Avg Place
44.05%
Top 4 Rate
5.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.76
Avg Place
44.20%
Top 4 Rate
6.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.12
Avg Place
36.36%
Top 4 Rate
3.84%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.29
Avg Place
33.61%
Top 4 Rate
2.73%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.75
Avg Place
20.00%
Top 4 Rate
0.39%
First Place
Severely Contested
6.01
Avg Place
19.83%
Top 4 Rate
2.20%
First Place
Severely Contested

TFT Set undefined Meta Analysis

This page displays 69 team compositions sorted by average placement to find the most consistent compositions for reliable top 4 finishes, based on 67.9K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 72.8% and average placement of 3.37 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is 魔术师/新星特攻队 with 米利欧 as the primary carry, achieving a 97.0% win rate. Following closely is 游侠/新星特攻队 at 95.5% win rate, and 新星特攻队/暗星 at 94.3%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • 魔术师/新星特攻队 (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around 米利欧
  • 游侠/新星特攻队 (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around 崔斯特
  • 新星特攻队/暗星 (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around 贝蕾亚

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider 新星特攻队/斗神 which achieves first place in 57.7% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • 魔术师/新星特攻队: 97.0% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • 游侠/新星特攻队: 95.5% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • 新星特攻队/暗星: 94.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is 木灵族/织命人 with a 1.5% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 83.6% win rate despite high contestation. 挑战者/新星特攻队 follows at 0.9% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

帮助我们保持准确性! 如果您发现不正确的统计数据、缺失的数据或任何问题,您的反馈将直接帮助我们提高整个社区的数据质量。

报告问题

云顶之弈第undefined赛季阵容常见问题

TFT 第undefined赛季中最好的TFT阵容是什么?

TFT 第undefined赛季中最好的TFT阵容是魔术师/新星特攻队,以米利欧作为主C,达到97.0%胜率和1.80平均名次。这个阵容对爬分有效,能持续进入前四。

如何玩魔术师/新星特攻队阵容?

玩魔术师/新星特攻队时,专注于以米利欧为主C。尽早寻找米利欧和辅助单位,优先选择与主C协同的装备,目标在7-8级达到战力巅峰。这个阵容的选取率为0.1%,相对来说不太被抢。

TFT 第undefined赛季中哪些阵容适合爬分?

在TFT 第undefined赛季中稳定获得LP,魔术师/新星特攻队提供最佳平均名次1.80。其他可靠选择包括新星特攻队/斗神 (1.98 avg)和暗星/斗士 (2.14 avg)。稳定的阵容最大限度减少下四名,提供稳定的爬分体验。

最简单的TFT阵容是什么?

魔术师/新星特攻队对于寻求轻松爬分的玩家来说是个好选择。胜率97.0%但选取率仅0.1%,您不太可能被抢,使游戏更容易进行。低争抢意味着您可以自然找到单位而不必强行转型。

在TFT 第undefined赛季中什么时候应该强玩阵容vs灵活转型?

在TFT 第undefined赛季中,木灵族/织命人的选取率为1.5%,意味着被大量抢夺。如果您看到其他人玩这个,考虑转型到魔术师/新星特攻队等替代方案。当您早期命中单位和装备,或者阵容没人抢时强玩。当2+玩家争抢相同单位时转型。

TFT 第undefined赛季中最稳定的TFT阵容是什么?

魔术师/新星特攻队拥有最佳平均名次1.80,是爬分最稳定的阵容。其他可靠选择包括新星特攻队/斗神 follows at 1.98和暗星/斗士 at 2.14。更低的平均名次意味着更少的下四名。

平均名次比胜率更适合爬分吗?

对于稳定的LP收益,平均名次通常比纯胜率更可靠。像魔术师/新星特攻队这样平均名次1.80的阵容最大限度减少下四带来的大量LP损失。高方差阵容可能赢得更多对局但也更容易第八。对于爬分,稳定性通常优于赌博策略。