Tahm Kenchvs Vi
Tahm Kench vs Vi is a very close matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Tahm Kench wins with a 50.0% win rate (+0.0%) over Vi based on 6 games. Tahm Kench wins the early laning phase while Vi scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Tahm Kench build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Tahm Kench vs Vi matchup.
Tahm Kench Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Tahm Kench performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Vi(50.0%)Who Wins the Tahm Kench vs Vi Matchup?
Tahm Kench vs Vi Matchup Summary
The Tahm Kench vs Vi matchup is essentially a coin-flip matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 6 recent matches analyzed, Tahm Kench wins with a 50.0% win rate compared to Vi's 50.0%, giving Tahm Kench a 0.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Tahm Kench controls the early laning stage, but Vi outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Tahm Kench needs to press advantages before Vi reaches their power spikes, while Vi should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Tahm Kench leads by 1,148 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Tahm Kench has a statistical edge, but the margin is close enough that respecting Vi's strengths is important. Trade when cooldowns are favorable, track the enemy jungler, and build toward your strongest item spikes to convert the slight advantage into a decisive lead. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Tahm Kench vs Vi Laning Phase Breakdown
Tahm Kench is favored during the laning phase against Vi, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Tahm Kench holds advantages in farming, gold income, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Tahm Kench Build Against Vi
Plated Steelcaps is the optimal boots choice against Vi, providing the mobility and stats Tahm Kench needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Tahm Kench against Vi are Hollow Radiance, Heartsteel and Thornmail. This combination gives Tahm Kench an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Tahm Kench vs Vi matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Tahm Kench75.0%Vi25.0%Tahm Kench0.0%Vi100.0%Tahm Kench dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 75.0% win rate — a 50.0 percentage point lead over Vi. This lopsided early game means Tahm Kench can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Vi is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 100.0% win rate — 100.0 points above Tahm Kench. Extended games heavily favor Vi, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Tahm Kench must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Vi reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Vi survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Tahm Kench Runes Against Vi
Resolve
Precision
The Resolve primary with Precision secondary combination helps Tahm Kench maximize their potential in this closely contested matchup, providing the right mix of offensive and defensive tools to edge out Vi.
Tahm Kench matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Tahm Kench's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Tahm Kench build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43.09% | 181 | 1.3 | 571 | 9,296 | 42.3% | 43.7% | |
| 51.83% | 164 | 1.4 | 576 | 9,618 | 50.0% | 53.2% | |
| 47.10% | 155 | 1.3 | 586 | 8,774 | 50.0% | 43.5% | |
| 47.86% | 140 | 1.3 | 564 | 9,200 | 46.7% | 49.2% | |
| 40.91% | 132 | 4.6 | 680 | 10,533 | 40.4% | 41.3% | |
| 49.19% | 124 | 1.4 | 586 | 8,632 | 43.1% | 55.9% | |
| 50.00% | 114 | 1.3 | 567 | 9,359 | 47.2% | 52.5% | |
| 50.00% | 112 | 1.7 | 591 | 9,160 | 63.3% | 39.7% | |
| 50.94% | 106 | 5.8 | 980 | 11,665 | 41.9% | 57.1% | |
| 40.57% | 106 | 1.3 | 578 | 9,762 | 39.5% | 41.3% | |
| 51.89% | 106 | 1.2 | 580 | 9,340 | 46.9% | 56.1% | |
| 49.50% | 101 | 5.2 | 827 | 10,607 | 40.5% | 54.7% | |
| 52.63% | 95 | 1.4 | 632 | 9,320 | 54.8% | 50.9% | |
| 49.45% | 91 | 5.3 | 982 | 12,059 | 42.4% | 53.5% | |
| 59.55% | 89 | 1.3 | 583 | 10,006 | 61.9% | 57.5% | |
| 61.80% | 89 | 5.0 | 850 | 11,999 | 53.6% | 65.6% | |
| 44.58% | 83 | 5.3 | 852 | 10,936 | 40.0% | 48.8% | |
| 56.63% | 83 | 2.5 | 718 | 10,965 | 53.1% | 58.8% | |
| 53.16% | 79 | 1.4 | 648 | 8,906 | 51.2% | 55.6% | |
| 57.58% | 66 | 1.3 | 501 | 9,547 | 70.0% | 47.2% | |
| 53.03% | 66 | 1.3 | 585 | 9,263 | 64.9% | 37.9% | |
| 51.56% | 64 | 1.2 | 648 | 9,402 | 60.7% | 44.4% | |
| 58.06% | 62 | 1.3 | 560 | 8,891 | 66.7% | 46.1% | |
| 53.33% | 60 | 5.3 | 708 | 10,736 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 56.67% | 60 | 1.3 | 613 | 10,301 | 65.0% | 52.5% | |
| 57.63% | 59 | 5.2 | 925 | 12,997 | 59.3% | 56.3% | |
| 43.86% | 57 | 1.4 | 507 | 8,756 | 39.1% | 47.1% | |
| 41.07% | 56 | 1.2 | 590 | 9,732 | 40.9% | 41.2% | |
| 40.38% | 52 | 5.4 | 716 | 11,568 | 45.0% | 37.5% | |
| 55.77% | 52 | 5.6 | 897 | 10,680 | 52.2% | 58.6% | |
| 58.82% | 51 | 3.9 | 742 | 10,146 | 56.5% | 60.7% | |
| 44.00% | 50 | 1.6 | 558 | 9,682 | 29.4% | 51.5% | |
| 48.00% | 50 | 1.4 | 530 | 9,632 | 50.0% | 47.1% | |
| 57.14% | 49 | 5.6 | 813 | 10,776 | 62.5% | 52.0% | |
| 44.90% | 49 | 5.5 | 1,079 | 9,951 | 48.1% | 40.9% | |
| 41.67% | 48 | 5.7 | 994 | 10,749 | 38.1% | 44.4% | |
| 60.00% | 45 | 1.5 | 655 | 10,404 | 70.6% | 53.6% | |
| 42.22% | 45 | 4.8 | 909 | 10,920 | 20.0% | 53.3% | |
| 50.00% | 44 | 5.3 | 892 | 11,601 | 47.1% | 51.9% | |
| 47.73% | 44 | 4.3 | 760 | 11,470 | 62.5% | 39.3% | |
| 54.76% | 42 | 4.8 | 892 | 10,371 | 44.4% | 62.5% | |
| 56.10% | 41 | 5.2 | 891 | 12,088 | 64.7% | 50.0% | |
| 43.90% | 41 | 5.3 | 823 | 9,678 | 42.9% | 45.0% | |
| 43.90% | 41 | 1.3 | 618 | 9,793 | 41.2% | 45.8% | |
| 53.85% | 39 | 1.7 | 570 | 9,840 | 46.1% | 57.7% | |
| 47.37% | 38 | 1.4 | 581 | 8,937 | 38.9% | 55.0% | |
| 51.35% | 37 | 5.4 | 829 | 11,501 | 75.0% | 40.0% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 1.4 | 529 | 9,222 | 56.3% | 38.1% | |
| 57.14% | 35 | 1.3 | 632 | 9,986 | 42.9% | 66.7% | |
| 48.57% | 35 | 5.1 | 860 | 11,608 | 38.5% | 54.5% | |
| 37.14% | 35 | 1.3 | 538 | 9,608 | 43.8% | 31.6% | |
| 55.88% | 34 | 5.5 | 761 | 10,825 | 70.6% | 41.2% | |
| 51.52% | 33 | 4.9 | 800 | 11,551 | 80.0% | 27.8% | |
| 57.58% | 33 | 1.3 | 503 | 8,285 | 61.1% | 53.3% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 5.3 | 891 | 10,308 | 44.4% | 64.3% | |
| 56.25% | 32 | 5.6 | 1,042 | 12,247 | 54.5% | 57.1% | |
| 36.67% | 30 | 4.8 | 862 | 10,384 | 50.0% | 30.0% | |
| 50.00% | 30 | 1.7 | 539 | 10,071 | 46.1% | 52.9% | |
| 63.33% | 30 | 4.3 | 809 | 10,895 | 66.7% | 58.3% | |
| 50.00% | 30 | 5.8 | 845 | 11,884 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 58.62% | 29 | 5.5 | 850 | 10,378 | 57.1% | 60.0% | |
| 58.62% | 29 | 5.8 | 831 | 10,594 | 71.4% | 46.7% | |
| 65.52% | 29 | 2.5 | 799 | 10,658 | 85.7% | 46.7% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 4.6 | 781 | 10,587 | 55.6% | 18.2% | |
| 64.29% | 28 | 5.1 | 893 | 11,174 | 72.7% | 58.8% | |
| 57.14% | 28 | 3.6 | 642 | 10,595 | 61.5% | 53.3% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 5.0 | 862 | 10,851 | 63.6% | 56.3% | |
| 66.67% | 27 | 4.7 | 810 | 10,742 | 64.3% | 69.2% | |
| 62.96% | 27 | 2.4 | 756 | 9,183 | 64.3% | 61.5% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 1.5 | 610 | 10,036 | 63.6% | 46.7% | |
| 38.46% | 26 | 4.5 | 751 | 11,873 | 20.0% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 5.5 | 900 | 10,417 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 25 | 4.8 | 762 | 9,808 | 40.0% | 40.0% | |
| 73.91% | 23 | 5.7 | 802 | 11,723 | 66.7% | 78.6% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 5.6 | 950 | 11,088 | 62.5% | 53.3% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 4.2 | 827 | 10,188 | 25.0% | 57.1% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 1.6 | 586 | 10,793 | 50.0% | 68.8% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 5.4 | 958 | 10,489 | 66.7% | 44.4% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 4.9 | 822 | 12,010 | 25.0% | 58.3% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 4.7 | 828 | 12,339 | 85.7% | 53.9% | |
| 60.00% | 20 | 5.2 | 804 | 11,299 | 62.5% | 58.3% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 5.2 | 779 | 10,359 | 63.6% | 62.5% | |
| 68.42% | 19 | 4.6 | 699 | 12,114 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 5.3 | 827 | 9,842 | 60.0% | 83.3% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 5.0 | 747 | 9,931 | 40.0% | 83.3% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 2.8 | 722 | 11,030 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 5.2 | 915 | 12,836 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 35.71% | 14 | 4.7 | 754 | 11,406 | 60.0% | 22.2% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 3.5 | 680 | 9,772 | 71.4% | 50.0% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 6.3 | 1,097 | 9,790 | 28.6% | 66.7% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 5.1 | 799 | 10,323 | 60.0% | 25.0% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 5.8 | 911 | 9,464 | 77.8% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 6.0 | 1,118 | 12,335 | 80.0% | 37.5% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 5.0 | 919 | 10,566 | 16.7% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 4.9 | 838 | 12,438 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.1 | 796 | 11,572 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 5.7 | 852 | 13,731 | 80.0% | 66.7% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 4.8 | 967 | 11,690 | 33.3% | 37.5% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 5.7 | 764 | 13,230 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 4.8 | 935 | 10,940 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 3.9 | 894 | 11,229 | 0.0% | 42.9% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 4.3 | 712 | 9,497 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.5 | 708 | 13,374 | 100.0% | 62.5% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 2.1 | 648 | 7,832 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.4 | 778 | 12,675 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.0 | 487 | 7,057 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.8 | 1,018 | 12,728 | 33.3% | 83.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.8 | 601 | 10,118 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 4.3 | 765 | 10,970 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.5 | 597 | 9,185 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 3.0 | 580 | 8,534 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 4.6 | 885 | 14,394 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 5.3 | 739 | 10,165 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 3.5 | 740 | 10,588 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.2 | 794 | 12,803 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 4.8 | 848 | 13,397 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.4 | 616 | 10,156 | 33.3% | 75.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.6 | 771 | 10,794 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.2 | 578 | 9,879 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 3.6 | 404 | 6,717 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.3 | 745 | 10,541 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 3.0 | 617 | 9,653 | 75.0% | 0.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.4 | 642 | 9,607 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.2 | 1,044 | 10,265 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.0 | 842 | 10,512 | 33.3% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.1 | 562 | 9,982 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.6 | 843 | 12,290 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.1 | 942 | 11,414 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.7 | 828 | 13,290 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 3.9 | 828 | 9,945 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 4.9 | 1,095 | 14,341 | 0.0% | 83.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 834 | 12,731 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 1,145 | 12,224 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 4.3 | 715 | 9,854 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 4.8 | 1,151 | 11,390 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.9 | 735 | 11,460 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.4 | 929 | 14,023 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 646 | 8,889 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 545 | 7,079 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.2 | 732 | 9,837 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Tahm Kench vs Vi - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Tahm Kench do against Vi in League of Legends?
Tahm Kench wins the Tahm Kench vs Vi matchup with a 50.0% win rate compared to Vi's 50.0%, a 0.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 6 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Tahm Kench do against Vi in the early game?
In the early game, Tahm Kench has the advantage against Vi with a 75.0% win rate versus 25.0%. Tahm Kench players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Tahm Kench do against Vi in the late game?
In the late game, Vi takes over the Tahm Kench vs Vi matchup with a 100.0% win rate compared to 0.0%. Vi scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Tahm Kench vs Vi matchup?
Tahm Kench wins the matchup against Vi with a 50.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 0.0 percentage point advantage means Tahm Kench is slightly favored in this lane matchup based on 6 games analyzed.
What is the best Tahm Kench build against Vi?
The best Tahm Kench build against Vi includes Hollow Radiance, Heartsteel, Thornmail with Plated Steelcaps. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Tahm Kench runes against Vi?
The best Tahm Kench runes against Vi use the Resolve primary tree with Precision secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Tahm Kench vs Vi matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Tahm Kench counter Vi?
Yes, Tahm Kench has a favorable matchup against Vi with a 50.0% win rate. Tahm Kench slightly edges out Vi in lane based on current patch 26.10 data.
How do I play Tahm Kench against Vi?
When playing Tahm Kench against Vi, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.