Tahm Kenchvs Fizz
Tahm Kench vs Fizz is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Tahm Kench wins with a 60.0% win rate (+20.0%) over Fizz based on 5 games. Tahm Kench wins the early laning phase while Fizz scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Tahm Kench build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Tahm Kench vs Fizz matchup.
Tahm Kench Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Tahm Kench performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Tahm Kench vs Fizz Matchup?
Tahm Kench vs Fizz Matchup Summary
The Tahm Kench vs Fizz matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 5 recent matches analyzed, Tahm Kench wins with a 60.0% win rate compared to Fizz's 40.0%, giving Tahm Kench a 20.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Tahm Kench controls the early laning stage, but Fizz outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Tahm Kench needs to press advantages before Fizz reaches their power spikes, while Fizz should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Tahm Kench leads by 1.1s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Tahm Kench players can confidently pick into Fizz and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Fizz away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Tahm Kench vs Fizz Laning Phase Breakdown
Tahm Kench is favored during the laning phase against Fizz, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Tahm Kench holds advantages in damage, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Tahm Kench Build Against Fizz
Mercury's Treads is the optimal boots choice against Fizz, providing the mobility and stats Tahm Kench needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Tahm Kench against Fizz are Riftmaker, Guinsoo's Rageblade and Dusk and Dawn. This combination gives Tahm Kench an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Fizz. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Tahm Kench vs Fizz matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Tahm Kench100.0%
Fizz0.0%Tahm Kench33.3%Fizz66.7%Tahm Kench dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 100.0% win rate — a 100.0 percentage point lead over Fizz. This lopsided early game means Tahm Kench can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Fizz is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Tahm Kench. Extended games heavily favor Fizz, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Tahm Kench must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Fizz reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Fizz survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Tahm Kench Runes Against Fizz
Resolve
Inspiration
Running Resolve primary with Inspiration secondary allows Tahm Kench to press their advantage against Fizz, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Tahm Kench matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Tahm Kench's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Tahm Kench build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.45% | 182 | 1.6 | 546 | 9,467 | 47.3% | 50.9% | |
| 50.29% | 171 | 1.4 | 597 | 9,277 | 53.0% | 47.7% | |
| 50.30% | 169 | 1.4 | 581 | 9,884 | 55.6% | 47.8% | |
| 52.47% | 162 | 1.2 | 599 | 9,109 | 51.9% | 53.1% | |
| 44.65% | 159 | 1.4 | 601 | 9,632 | 44.0% | 45.2% | |
| 43.36% | 143 | 1.4 | 583 | 9,517 | 34.9% | 50.6% | |
| 50.41% | 123 | 5.0 | 731 | 10,697 | 51.0% | 50.0% | |
| 53.78% | 119 | 1.4 | 502 | 9,154 | 54.0% | 53.6% | |
| 40.17% | 117 | 5.7 | 864 | 11,365 | 46.8% | 35.7% | |
| 53.21% | 109 | 1.2 | 562 | 8,747 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 41.12% | 107 | 4.9 | 837 | 10,904 | 30.6% | 46.5% | |
| 57.00% | 100 | 1.4 | 573 | 9,535 | 62.0% | 52.0% | |
| 50.52% | 97 | 1.5 | 573 | 10,052 | 53.9% | 48.3% | |
| 47.42% | 97 | 2.6 | 722 | 10,796 | 63.4% | 35.7% | |
| 62.77% | 94 | 5.0 | 854 | 11,352 | 60.0% | 64.8% | |
| 47.73% | 88 | 5.2 | 895 | 11,410 | 43.6% | 51.0% | |
| 53.41% | 88 | 5.3 | 956 | 10,436 | 45.6% | 61.9% | |
| 54.88% | 82 | 1.4 | 629 | 10,085 | 56.5% | 54.2% | |
| 44.44% | 81 | 1.5 | 702 | 9,037 | 46.1% | 42.9% | |
| 46.67% | 75 | 1.4 | 565 | 9,567 | 54.0% | 39.5% | |
| 47.95% | 73 | 5.3 | 767 | 10,579 | 51.4% | 44.7% | |
| 47.83% | 69 | 1.5 | 499 | 9,118 | 46.4% | 48.8% | |
| 46.38% | 69 | 4.4 | 836 | 10,948 | 30.8% | 55.8% | |
| 41.79% | 67 | 1.2 | 560 | 8,920 | 46.9% | 37.1% | |
| 48.44% | 64 | 1.2 | 584 | 8,892 | 44.1% | 53.3% | |
| 46.03% | 63 | 5.1 | 805 | 10,138 | 35.7% | 54.3% | |
| 54.10% | 61 | 1.3 | 599 | 9,227 | 56.5% | 52.6% | |
| 46.55% | 58 | 1.1 | 568 | 8,785 | 46.1% | 46.9% | |
| 45.61% | 57 | 1.4 | 583 | 9,662 | 38.9% | 48.7% | |
| 50.88% | 57 | 5.6 | 847 | 11,268 | 41.4% | 60.7% | |
| 38.60% | 57 | 5.3 | 1,197 | 9,872 | 42.9% | 31.8% | |
| 44.64% | 56 | 5.2 | 910 | 10,321 | 41.7% | 46.9% | |
| 35.19% | 54 | 5.2 | 698 | 9,772 | 25.9% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 54 | 1.9 | 651 | 10,302 | 47.8% | 51.6% | |
| 50.98% | 51 | 1.3 | 600 | 9,757 | 51.9% | 50.0% | |
| 62.00% | 50 | 1.3 | 559 | 8,430 | 60.0% | 65.0% | |
| 46.94% | 49 | 1.2 | 583 | 9,562 | 60.9% | 34.6% | |
| 54.17% | 48 | 5.3 | 678 | 9,957 | 48.1% | 61.9% | |
| 45.83% | 48 | 5.5 | 915 | 10,731 | 37.9% | 57.9% | |
| 64.58% | 48 | 5.3 | 960 | 10,530 | 68.2% | 61.5% | |
| 57.45% | 47 | 1.4 | 716 | 10,728 | 57.1% | 57.7% | |
| 55.32% | 47 | 1.9 | 744 | 9,801 | 72.0% | 36.4% | |
| 41.30% | 46 | 5.8 | 980 | 11,305 | 47.8% | 34.8% | |
| 53.33% | 45 | 5.2 | 700 | 11,231 | 35.7% | 61.3% | |
| 46.67% | 45 | 5.5 | 755 | 10,209 | 54.5% | 39.1% | |
| 55.56% | 45 | 5.0 | 878 | 10,361 | 60.0% | 52.0% | |
| 33.33% | 45 | 4.9 | 784 | 10,027 | 36.4% | 30.4% | |
| 51.11% | 45 | 5.5 | 874 | 9,609 | 48.3% | 56.3% | |
| 55.56% | 45 | 5.5 | 797 | 11,111 | 66.7% | 48.1% | |
| 52.27% | 44 | 5.7 | 964 | 11,956 | 55.0% | 50.0% | |
| 55.81% | 43 | 3.7 | 727 | 10,936 | 72.2% | 44.0% | |
| 48.78% | 41 | 1.3 | 602 | 9,394 | 45.0% | 52.4% | |
| 58.54% | 41 | 1.2 | 570 | 9,241 | 47.4% | 68.2% | |
| 58.97% | 39 | 5.4 | 891 | 10,928 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 29.73% | 37 | 1.5 | 528 | 8,045 | 20.0% | 41.2% | |
| 48.65% | 37 | 5.2 | 816 | 11,289 | 43.8% | 52.4% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 5.6 | 914 | 12,036 | 38.5% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 36 | 1.4 | 525 | 8,434 | 40.9% | 42.9% | |
| 62.86% | 35 | 5.2 | 928 | 11,655 | 78.6% | 52.4% | |
| 44.12% | 34 | 4.6 | 546 | 9,843 | 46.7% | 42.1% | |
| 48.48% | 33 | 1.4 | 457 | 8,651 | 61.5% | 40.0% | |
| 37.50% | 32 | 5.2 | 627 | 9,405 | 35.7% | 38.9% | |
| 56.25% | 32 | 5.2 | 925 | 11,704 | 40.0% | 70.6% | |
| 50.00% | 30 | 5.2 | 932 | 11,167 | 61.5% | 41.2% | |
| 24.14% | 29 | 5.0 | 927 | 10,827 | 8.3% | 35.3% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 5.0 | 835 | 10,086 | 50.0% | 53.9% | |
| 39.29% | 28 | 1.5 | 484 | 8,614 | 50.0% | 31.3% | |
| 51.85% | 27 | 5.2 | 961 | 10,935 | 46.7% | 58.3% | |
| 64.00% | 25 | 5.7 | 1,001 | 12,643 | 42.9% | 72.2% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 4.5 | 956 | 12,124 | 71.4% | 58.8% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 2.0 | 600 | 10,840 | 57.1% | 41.2% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 4.7 | 619 | 10,346 | 43.8% | 42.9% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 4.8 | 817 | 13,000 | 40.0% | 55.6% | |
| 40.91% | 22 | 5.3 | 815 | 11,535 | 28.6% | 46.7% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 5.3 | 979 | 14,325 | 57.1% | 40.0% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 5.0 | 851 | 11,086 | 62.5% | 35.7% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 5.0 | 636 | 10,047 | 16.7% | 50.0% | |
| 70.00% | 20 | 4.2 | 757 | 10,210 | 81.8% | 55.6% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 1.5 | 620 | 8,146 | 70.0% | 20.0% | |
| 63.16% | 19 | 4.1 | 947 | 11,925 | 57.1% | 66.7% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 5.7 | 795 | 11,935 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 1.2 | 459 | 9,521 | 57.1% | 41.7% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 5.5 | 881 | 13,725 | 60.0% | 53.9% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 4.9 | 798 | 10,783 | 63.6% | 28.6% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 2.4 | 721 | 9,360 | 44.4% | 37.5% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 5.3 | 1,002 | 11,212 | 71.4% | 50.0% | |
| 23.53% | 17 | 3.9 | 717 | 11,006 | 20.0% | 25.0% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 3.4 | 655 | 10,902 | 50.0% | 72.7% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 5.3 | 856 | 11,375 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 5.2 | 735 | 12,243 | 66.7% | 45.5% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 2.3 | 651 | 8,938 | 44.4% | 42.9% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 5.2 | 947 | 13,220 | 37.5% | 75.0% | |
| 31.25% | 16 | 5.0 | 696 | 10,383 | 37.5% | 25.0% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 3.5 | 717 | 10,015 | 28.6% | 44.4% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 5.0 | 876 | 12,559 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 4.1 | 776 | 10,998 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 21.43% | 14 | 5.5 | 741 | 9,775 | 42.9% | 0.0% | |
| 78.57% | 14 | 4.4 | 613 | 11,142 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 2.4 | 517 | 10,335 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 5.4 | 893 | 12,324 | 33.3% | 42.9% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 5.8 | 792 | 11,227 | 40.0% | 14.3% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 3.1 | 620 | 9,405 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 81.82% | 11 | 3.9 | 782 | 10,996 | 80.0% | 83.3% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 2.0 | 722 | 9,517 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 5.7 | 908 | 12,052 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 2.1 | 630 | 10,850 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 4.8 | 816 | 9,161 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 2.6 | 977 | 11,904 | 75.0% | 80.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.1 | 771 | 10,617 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.3 | 656 | 8,941 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 3.7 | 779 | 12,099 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 4.7 | 895 | 14,182 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.7 | 616 | 8,821 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 2.8 | 712 | 11,441 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 2.4 | 789 | 12,670 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.4 | 697 | 8,161 | 16.7% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 4.9 | 864 | 10,872 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 5.0 | 856 | 7,111 | 71.4% | 100.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.0 | 680 | 8,370 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 4.7 | 809 | 9,028 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.3 | 536 | 11,689 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.6 | 584 | 8,328 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.1 | 602 | 12,030 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 2.1 | 790 | 9,471 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.1 | 662 | 10,755 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.5 | 732 | 11,746 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 4.2 | 756 | 10,456 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.6 | 653 | 10,154 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 4.6 | 912 | 13,360 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 4.8 | 860 | 12,128 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.9 | 929 | 13,391 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.3 | 670 | 12,717 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 700 | 8,075 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.5 | 901 | 11,460 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Tahm Kench vs Fizz - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Tahm Kench do against Fizz in League of Legends?
Tahm Kench wins the Tahm Kench vs Fizz matchup with a 60.0% win rate compared to Fizz's 40.0%, a 20.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 5 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Tahm Kench do against Fizz in the early game?
In the early game, Tahm Kench has the advantage against Fizz with a 100.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Tahm Kench players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Tahm Kench do against Fizz in the late game?
In the late game, Fizz takes over the Tahm Kench vs Fizz matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Fizz scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Tahm Kench vs Fizz matchup?
Tahm Kench wins the matchup against Fizz with a 60.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 20.0 percentage point advantage means Tahm Kench is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 5 games analyzed.
What is the best Tahm Kench build against Fizz?
The best Tahm Kench build against Fizz includes Riftmaker, Guinsoo's Rageblade, Dusk and Dawn with Mercury's Treads. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Tahm Kench runes against Fizz?
The best Tahm Kench runes against Fizz use the Resolve primary tree with Inspiration secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Tahm Kench vs Fizz matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Tahm Kench counter Fizz?
Yes, Tahm Kench has a favorable matchup against Fizz with a 60.0% win rate. Tahm Kench strongly counters Fizz in lane based on current patch 26.11 data.
How do I play Tahm Kench against Fizz?
When playing Tahm Kench against Fizz, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.