Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Brimstone's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Brimstone
44.1% WR
VS
Fade
55.9% WR
Who Wins the Brimstone vs Fade Matchup?
Winner
Fade
Matches: 34
44.1%
Win Rate
55.9%
1.82
Avg KDA
1.35
15.9
Avg Kills
14.6
14.7
Avg Deaths
14.6
141.0
DMG/Round
125.1
25.9%
HS %
30.1%
221
Combat Score
190
46.9%
Attack WR
50.1%
49.9%
Defense WR
53.1%
Brimstone vs Fade Performance Breakdown
The Brimstone vs Fade matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 34 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Fragging Power
1.82Brimstone
1.35Fade
Brimstone maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.82 KDA versus Fade's 1.35. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Brimstone players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
141.0Brimstone
125.1Fade
Brimstone delivers substantially higher damage per round (141.0 ADR) compared to Fade's 125.1 ADR. This 16.0 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Brimstone a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
46.9%Brimstone
50.1%Fade
Fade shows stronger attack-side performance with a 50.1% win rate versus Brimstone's 46.9%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Fade provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
49.9%Brimstone
53.1%Fade
Defensive capabilities favor Fade at 53.1% win rate compared to Brimstone's 49.9%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Fade provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Brimstone vs Fade matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 34 competitive matches analyzed, Fade wins 55.9% of the time compared to Brimstone's 44.1%, a 11.8 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Brimstone consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Initiator matchup, Fade has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Brimstone should never take isolated fights against Fade and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Brimstone vs Fade Fragging Analysis
Brimstone edges out Fade in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. With only a 3-2 margin based on 34 matches analyzed, this Brimstone vs Fade matchup remains contestable for both sides. Fade shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Fade's favor.
Avg KDA
1.82Brimstone
1.35Fade
Brimstone demonstrates noticeably stronger kill-death-assist performance against Fade, maintaining a 1.82 KDA versus 1.35. This 0.48 point gap reflects Brimstone's superior ability to secure eliminations while avoiding death in these head-to-head encounters. Fade players facing Brimstone should prioritize team coordination over solo aggression — look for 2v1 situations, coordinate utility usage with teammates, and focus on trading rather than taking isolated duels where Brimstone's statistical advantage becomes most pronounced.
Avg Kills
15.9Brimstone
14.6Fade
Brimstone secures approximately 1.4 more kills per match than Fade in this head-to-head (15.9 vs 14.6). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Brimstone contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Brimstone's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Fade can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
14.7Brimstone
14.6Fade
Survivability metrics are nearly equal between Brimstone (14.7 deaths/game) and Fade (14.6 deaths/game). Neither agent demonstrates a clear advantage in staying alive during these matchups, suggesting both have similar risk profiles and neither kit provides notably better escape tools or defensive utility against the other. Round outcomes in this matchup hinge on which player makes fewer critical positioning errors rather than any agent-based survival advantage.
DMG/Round
141.0Brimstone
125.1Fade
Brimstone significantly outdamages Fade in head-to-head encounters, posting 141.0 ADR versus 125.1. This 16.0 damage-per-round advantage means Brimstone consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Fade players should avoid prolonged dueling with Brimstone — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
25.9%Brimstone
30.1%Fade
Fade demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Brimstone: 30.1% versus 25.9%. This 4.2 percentage point gap in precision means Fade ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Brimstone faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).
Brimstone vs Fade Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Fade
46.9%
50.1%
Defense Side
Fade
49.9%
53.1%
Attack Side Breakdown
Fade holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Brimstone vs Fade matchup, winning 50.1% of offensive rounds compared to 46.9% for Brimstone. This 3.3 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 34 matches reveals Fade's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Fade consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Brimstone teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Fade's favor in this matchup. When Fade takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Brimstone. For Brimstone players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Fade's advantages. Fade can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Brimstone has favorable matchups against 10 agents and unfavorable matchups against 11 agents in Valorant. Brimstone's strongest matchup is against KAY/O with a 66.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Astra at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Brimstone matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Brimstone's best matchup is against KAY/O, achieving a 66.7% win rate. Brimstone excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Brimstone's hardest matchup?
Brimstone's hardest matchup is against Astra, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Brimstone should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Brimstone have?
Brimstone has 10 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 11 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Brimstone in difficult matchups?
When playing Brimstone in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Brimstone's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Brimstone's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Brimstone's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant is where Fade's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 3.3% attack-side gap suggests Fade excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Brimstone should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Fade's kit advantages become decisive. For Fade, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Fade demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Brimstone, holding 53.1% of rounds versus 49.9%. This 3.3 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for Fade's defensive advantage. Fade can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Brimstone should avoid solo anchor positions against Fade — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Brimstone's site with Fade on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Fade in this matchup. Our 34 match analysis shows Fade converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Brimstone should never attempt solo retakes against Fade — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Fade can confidently take 1vX retakes that Brimstone should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight Fade's defensive advantages. Brimstone should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Fade, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Fade can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Brimstone should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
Overall Side Analysis
Fade holds clear advantages on both attack (50.1%) and defense (53.1%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Brimstone vs Fade matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Fade doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Fade's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Fade performs better. Brimstone teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Brimstone with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Brimstone's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Fade is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Fade provides a measurable ranked advantage. Brimstone players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Fade confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Fade wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 6.6 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Brimstone isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Controller vs Initiator Dynamics
The Controller (Brimstone) vs Initiator (Fade) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Brimstone's Controller abilities serve different purposes than Fade's Initiator kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Controller abilities interact with Initiator counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Brimstone's Controller toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Fade's Initiator kit counters others. The Fade advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Brimstone vs Fade matchup guide: Fade leads with a 55.9% win rate, but Brimstone can still win. Learn how Brimstone's 141 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 34-match dataset into ranked wins.
