Brimstone vs JettMatchup
Brimstone vs Jett matchup guide: Jett leads with a 63.2% win rate, but Brimstone can still win. Learn how Brimstone's 139 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 19-match dataset into ranked wins.
Brimstone Matchup Breakdown
Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Brimstone's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Who Wins the Brimstone vs Jett Matchup?
Brimstone vs Jett Performance Breakdown
The Brimstone vs Jett matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 19 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Brimstone vs Jett Matchup Summary
The Brimstone vs Jett matchup in Valorant is a heavily one-sided matchup. Based on 19 competitive matches analyzed, Jett wins 63.2% of the time compared to Brimstone's 36.8%, a 26.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Brimstone consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Duelist matchup, Jett has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Brimstone should never take isolated fights against Jett and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Brimstone vs Jett Fragging Analysis
Brimstone edges out Jett in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, damage output. With only a 3-2 margin based on 19 matches analyzed, this Brimstone vs Jett matchup remains contestable for both sides. Jett shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Jett's favor.
Brimstone vs Jett Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side Breakdown
Jett significantly outperforms Brimstone on attack side, achieving a 53.8% round win rate versus 46.7%. This 7.1 point disparity reveals Jett as the clearly superior offensive agent in this head-to-head, with advantages that Brimstone cannot easily overcome through individual skill alone.
Based on 19 matches analyzed, Jett dominates attack-side scenarios through multiple vectors. Entry success rate, post-plant conversion, and mid-round adaptability all favor Jett significantly. Brimstone teams must make structural adjustments to their attack approach: rely less on Brimstone for key fragging roles, design executes that minimize Brimstone's direct engagement with Jett, and consider how team composition can cover Brimstone's offensive weaknesses. Simply "playing better" isn't enough to overcome a 7.1% gap.
Brimstone should avoid entry fragging roles against Jett whenever possible. The data clearly shows Jett wins a disproportionate share of first contacts on attack. Brimstone players should volunteer for support roles — flashing for teammates, trading entries, or lurking to create map pressure without direct Jett confrontation. If forced to entry, wait for maximum utility support and ensure a trade is guaranteed. Jett can and should take aggressive entries, knowing statistical backing supports confident play.
Post-plant scenarios heavily favor Jett in this matchup. Brimstone struggles to convert spike plants into round wins at the same rate, whether due to weaker defuse denial, inferior retake resistance, or less effective post-plant positioning. Brimstone teams should never leave Brimstone alone in post-plant — always have teammates nearby for crossfires and trades. Consider giving the spike to a different player when possible. Jett should recognize their post-plant dominance and play for spike aggressively after site takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Jett substantially outclasses Brimstone on defense, achieving 53.3% round wins compared to 46.2%. This 7.1 percentage point gap indicates Jett excels at core defensive tasks — anchoring sites, gathering information, stalling executes, and contributing to retakes — at a level Brimstone cannot match.
Brimstone should never solo anchor against Jett. The 7.1% defensive gap makes isolated site holds extremely unfavorable for Brimstone. Instead, pair Brimstone with a teammate, give them off-site positions that allow early rotates, or have them play supportive roles that don't require extended site holds. Jett should actively anchor difficult sites, knowing their defensive capabilities significantly exceed Brimstone's.
Retake dynamics heavily favor Jett. When Brimstone needs to retake against Jett, success requires overwhelming numbers and utility coordination — never attempt equal-number retakes and absolutely avoid solo retakes. Jett should play post-plant positions confidently, knowing Brimstone struggles to clear them effectively. In clutch scenarios, Jett has a significant statistical edge that Brimstone cannot overcome through individual skill alone.
Economy management becomes critical for Brimstone in this matchup. Force buying against Jett is mathematically unfavorable — the defensive gap compounds when utility is limited. Brimstone should advocate for full saves, ensuring full buy rounds have maximum utility to compensate for their defensive disadvantages. Jett can confidently force buy, knowing their defensive kit provides advantages that partially compensate for economic disadvantages.
Overall Side Analysis
Jett demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (53.8%) and defense (53.3%), comprehensively outperforming Brimstone across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 19 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Jett holding advantages at every stage.
Map selection and team composition cannot fix Brimstone's disadvantage in this matchup. Jett outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Brimstone into Jett, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Brimstone's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Brimstone in isolated Jett encounters.
For ranked climbing, avoid playing Brimstone when you expect to face Jett frequently. The 14.3 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Jett is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.
Final verdict: Jett decisively wins the Brimstone vs Jett matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Jett has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Brimstone players facing Jett should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.
Controller vs Duelist Dynamics
The Controller (Brimstone) vs Duelist (Jett) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Brimstone's Controller abilities serve different purposes than Jett's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Controller abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Brimstone's Controller toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Jett's Duelist kit counters others. The Jett advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Brimstone has favorable matchups against 5 agents and unfavorable matchups against 10 agents in Valorant. Brimstone's strongest matchup is against Phoenix with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Clove at 28.6% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.39% | 31 | 1.66 | 135.2 | 24.8% | 49.3% | 51.5% | |
| 28.57% | 21 | 1.80 | 155.4 | 27.8% | 44.4% | 48.1% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 1.65 | 139.2 | 30.1% | 46.7% | 46.2% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 1.85 | 142.4 | 27.8% | 52.0% | 58.3% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 1.58 | 138.5 | 27.9% | 49.2% | 47.8% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 1.87 | 145.8 | 27.8% | 45.7% | 61.7% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 1.83 | 161.8 | 30.9% | 39.4% | 48.7% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.95 | 157.3 | 22.5% | 48.0% | 55.3% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.76 | 145.1 | 27.5% | 46.1% | 53.8% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.31 | 117.0 | 33.8% | 41.7% | 52.4% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.63 | 157.8 | 25.5% | 43.3% | 37.5% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.85 | 148.2 | 28.6% | 37.1% | 63.1% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.60 | 121.1 | 16.1% | 59.4% | 43.0% | |
| 100.00% | 4 | 2.18 | 156.3 | 35.1% | 52.5% | 71.7% | |
| 33.33% | 3 | 1.27 | 102.9 | 29.4% | 36.1% | 30.0% |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Brimstone's best matchup in Valorant?
Brimstone's best matchup is against Phoenix, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Brimstone excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Brimstone's hardest matchup?
Brimstone's hardest matchup is against Clove, with only a 28.6% win rate. Against this opponent, Brimstone should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Brimstone have?
Brimstone has 5 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 10 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Brimstone in difficult matchups?
When playing Brimstone in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Brimstone's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Brimstone's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Brimstone's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.