Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Brimstone's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Brimstone
52.0% WR
VS
Neon
44.0% WR
Who Wins the Brimstone vs Neon Matchup?
Winner
Brimstone
Matches: 25
52.0%
Win Rate
44.0%
1.82
Avg KDA
1.22
16.7
Avg Kills
16.2
15.1
Avg Deaths
17.2
151.2
DMG/Round
139.0
28.5%
HS %
23.5%
230
Combat Score
220
44.6%
Attack WR
43.8%
56.2%
Defense WR
55.4%
Brimstone vs Neon Performance Breakdown
In the Brimstone vs Neon matchup, Brimstone demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 25 analyzed matches, Brimstone outperforms Neon in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Brimstone the statistically favored pick when facing Neon in ranked Valorant matches.
Fragging Power
1.82Brimstone
1.22Neon
Brimstone significantly outperforms Neon in fragging efficiency with a 1.82 KDA compared to 1.22. This 0.61 KDA differential indicates that Brimstone players consistently secure more eliminations while dying less frequently, translating to more impactful rounds and better economy management throughout matches.
Damage Output
151.2Brimstone
139.0Neon
Brimstone outputs 151.2 average damage per round, edging out Neon's 139.0 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Brimstone secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
44.6%Brimstone
43.8%Neon
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Brimstone at 44.6% and Neon at 43.8% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
56.2%Brimstone
55.4%Neon
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Brimstone posting a 56.2% win rate and Neon at 55.4%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Brimstone vs Neon matchup in Valorant is a clear advantage for one side. Based on 25 competitive matches analyzed, Brimstone wins 52.0% of the time compared to Neon's 44.0%, a 8.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Brimstone consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Duelist matchup, Brimstone dominates this matchup statistically. Brimstone can confidently take 1v1 duels, while Neon should focus on playing with teammates, using utility to create advantages, and avoiding direct confrontations.
Brimstone vs Neon Fragging Analysis
Brimstone achieves a clean sweep in the fragging department, winning all five combat metrics against Neon in the Brimstone vs Neon matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Brimstone holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 25 competitive matches, Brimstone players can approach duels against Neon with confidence, while Neon players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on utility-based contributions, information gathering, and team coordination to remain impactful.
Avg KDA
1.82Brimstone
1.22Neon
The KDA disparity between Brimstone and Neon is substantial: 1.82 versus 1.22, a commanding 0.61 point difference that reveals Brimstone's dominance in direct combat exchanges. This matchup data from 25 games shows Brimstone consistently outfragging and outliving Neon in these encounters. For Neon players, the strategic implication is clear: avoid 1v1 gunfights against Brimstone whenever possible. Instead, leverage team utility, information gathering, and multi-person pushes to neutralize Brimstone's mechanical advantage. Playing for trades and crossfires becomes essential rather than optional.
Avg Kills
16.7Brimstone
16.2Neon
Brimstone secures approximately 0.6 more kills per match than Neon in this head-to-head (16.7 vs 16.2). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Brimstone contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Brimstone's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Neon can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
15.1Brimstone
17.2Neon
The death disparity between Brimstone and Neon is stark: 15.1 versus 17.2 deaths per game. Neon dies 2.1 more times per match on average, fundamentally impacting their ability to influence rounds. This suggests Neon either takes unfavorable fights against Brimstone or lacks the tools to disengage safely. Neon players must completely rethink their aggression patterns — prioritize information and utility over kills, always have an exit plan, and never take coin-flip duels against Brimstone.
DMG/Round
151.2Brimstone
139.0Neon
Brimstone significantly outdamages Neon in head-to-head encounters, posting 151.2 ADR versus 139.0. This 12.2 damage-per-round advantage means Brimstone consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Neon players should avoid prolonged dueling with Brimstone — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
28.5%Brimstone
23.5%Neon
The headshot percentage disparity between Brimstone and Neon is substantial: 28.5% compared to 23.5%, a 5.0 point difference. Brimstone consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Neon, challenging Brimstone in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Brimstone's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Brimstone vs Neon Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Brimstone
44.6%
43.8%
Defense Side
Brimstone
56.2%
55.4%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Brimstone and Neon reveals near-perfect parity, with Brimstone winning 44.6% of attacking rounds compared to Neon's 43.8%. This negligible 0.7 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Brimstone nor Neon should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 25 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Brimstone and Neon players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Brimstone or Neon, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Brimstone has favorable matchups against 10 agents and unfavorable matchups against 11 agents in Valorant. Brimstone's strongest matchup is against KAY/O with a 66.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Astra at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Brimstone matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Brimstone's best matchup is against KAY/O, achieving a 66.7% win rate. Brimstone excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Brimstone's hardest matchup?
Brimstone's hardest matchup is against Astra, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Brimstone should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Brimstone have?
Brimstone has 10 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 11 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Brimstone in difficult matchups?
When playing Brimstone in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Brimstone's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Brimstone's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Brimstone's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.7% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Brimstone and Neon is virtually identical, with Brimstone holding 56.2% of rounds on CT side and Neon at 55.4%. This 0.7 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Brimstone and Neon can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.7% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Brimstone and Neon. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 25 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Brimstone or Neon.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Brimstone vs Neon specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
Brimstone maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 44.6% attack win rate and 56.2% defense win rate. While Brimstone is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Neon remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Brimstone vs Neon specific factors. The slight Brimstone advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Brimstone and Neon are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Brimstone has a slight statistical edge, but Neon is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Neon, don't switch to Brimstone just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Controller vs Duelist Dynamics
The Controller (Brimstone) vs Duelist (Neon) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Brimstone's Controller abilities serve different purposes than Neon's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Controller abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Brimstone's Controller toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Neon's Duelist kit counters others. The Brimstone advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Brimstone vs Neon head-to-head analysis. Brimstone holds a 52.0% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 25 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
