Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Chamber's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Chamber
45.5% WR
VS
Deadlock
54.5% WR
Who Wins the Chamber vs Deadlock Matchup?
Winner
Deadlock
Matches: 44
45.5%
Win Rate
54.5%
1.27
Avg KDA
1.32
16.3
Avg Kills
14.5
14.5
Avg Deaths
14.5
136.8
DMG/Round
125.8
29.2%
HS %
30.7%
212
Combat Score
194
46.3%
Attack WR
48.8%
51.2%
Defense WR
53.7%
Chamber vs Deadlock Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 44 matches reveals that Deadlock holds a clear advantage over Chamber in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Chamber shows strength in one category, Deadlock's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.27Chamber
1.32Deadlock
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Chamber and Deadlock, with KDA ratios of 1.27 and 1.32 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
136.8Chamber
125.8Deadlock
Chamber outputs 136.8 average damage per round, edging out Deadlock's 125.8 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Chamber secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
46.3%Chamber
48.8%Deadlock
Deadlock shows stronger attack-side performance with a 48.8% win rate versus Chamber's 46.3%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Deadlock provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
51.2%Chamber
53.7%Deadlock
Defensive capabilities favor Deadlock at 53.7% win rate compared to Chamber's 51.2%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Deadlock provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Chamber vs Deadlock matchup in Valorant is a clear advantage for one side. Based on 44 competitive matches analyzed, Deadlock wins 54.5% of the time compared to Chamber's 45.5%, a 9.1 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in damage output, where Chamber consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Sentinel matchup, Deadlock dominates this matchup statistically. Deadlock can confidently take 1v1 duels, while Chamber should focus on playing with teammates, using utility to create advantages, and avoiding direct confrontations.
Chamber vs Deadlock Fragging Analysis
Chamber edges out Deadlock in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, survivability, damage output. With only a 3-2 margin based on 44 matches analyzed, this Chamber vs Deadlock matchup remains contestable for both sides. Deadlock shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Deadlock's favor.
Avg KDA
1.27Chamber
1.32Deadlock
The KDA comparison between Chamber and Deadlock reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Chamber averaging 1.27 and Deadlock posting 1.32. This razor-thin margin of just 0.05 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
16.3Chamber
14.5Deadlock
Chamber substantially outfrags Deadlock in this matchup, averaging 16.3 kills compared to 14.5 — a difference of nearly 1.8 eliminations per match. When Chamber faces Deadlock, the data clearly shows Chamber finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Deadlock players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Chamber in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
14.5Chamber
14.5Deadlock
Survivability metrics are nearly equal between Chamber (14.5 deaths/game) and Deadlock (14.5 deaths/game). Neither agent demonstrates a clear advantage in staying alive during these matchups, suggesting both have similar risk profiles and neither kit provides notably better escape tools or defensive utility against the other. Round outcomes in this matchup hinge on which player makes fewer critical positioning errors rather than any agent-based survival advantage.
DMG/Round
136.8Chamber
125.8Deadlock
Chamber significantly outdamages Deadlock in head-to-head encounters, posting 136.8 ADR versus 125.8. This 11.0 damage-per-round advantage means Chamber consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Deadlock players should avoid prolonged dueling with Chamber — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
29.2%Chamber
30.7%Deadlock
Deadlock lands headshots at a slightly higher rate (30.7% vs 29.2%), providing a modest but meaningful advantage in time-to-kill during duels. This 1.5 percentage point edge translates to Deadlock more frequently one-tapping or two-tapping opponents before Chamber can fully react. Chamber players should counter this by avoiding predictable angle holds, using movement to throw off Deadlock's crosshair placement, and prefiring common positions to negate the accuracy gap.
Chamber vs Deadlock Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Deadlock
46.3%
48.8%
Defense Side
Deadlock
51.2%
53.7%
Attack Side Breakdown
Deadlock demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Chamber in this matchup, converting 48.8% of attacking rounds versus 46.3%. While this 2.4 point edge gives Deadlock slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Chamber players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 44 competitive games suggests Deadlock's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Chamber teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 2.4% gap.
When taking entry duels, Deadlock holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Chamber players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Deadlock can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Chamber has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 17 agents in Valorant. Chamber's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 58.3% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sage at 39.7% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Chamber matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Chamber's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 58.3% win rate. Chamber excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Chamber's hardest matchup?
Chamber's hardest matchup is against Sage, with only a 39.7% win rate. Against this opponent, Chamber should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Chamber have?
Chamber has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 17 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Chamber in difficult matchups?
When playing Chamber in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Chamber's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Chamber's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Chamber's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Deadlock's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Chamber should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 2.4 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Deadlock shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Chamber, winning 53.7% of defense rounds compared to 51.2%. This 2.4 percentage point edge suggests Deadlock's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Chamber players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Deadlock can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 2.4% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Chamber should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Deadlock demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Deadlock converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Chamber should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Deadlock when you can wait for teammates. Deadlock can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 2.4% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Chamber should be more conservative with eco aggression against Deadlock and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Deadlock can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Deadlock holds clear advantages on both attack (48.8%) and defense (53.7%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Chamber vs Deadlock matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Deadlock doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Deadlock's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Deadlock performs better. Chamber teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Chamber with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Chamber's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Deadlock is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Deadlock provides a measurable ranked advantage. Chamber players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Deadlock confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Deadlock wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 4.8 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Chamber isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Sentinel vs Sentinel Dynamics
Both Chamber and Deadlock fill the Sentinel role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Sentinel performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Deadlock is the stronger Sentinel pick when these agents face each other.
In Sentinel vs Sentinel encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Deadlock's statistical advantage suggests their specific Sentinel kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.
52.5%
50.3%
51.0%
52.5%
51.9%
51.5%
51.0%
51.1%
52.1%
51.7%
55.3%
51.8%
50.2%
52.2%
52.5%
49.0%
52.1%
48.9%
49.8%
48.9%
49.5%
51.2%
53.8%
52.0%
49.7%
50.8%
50.3%
Chamber vs Deadlock is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (45.5% vs 54.5%). Based on 44 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.
