Chamber vs DeadlockMatchup
Chamber vs Deadlock matchup guide: Deadlock leads with a 61.9% win rate, but Chamber can still win. Learn the combat stats and strategies to turn this 21-match dataset into ranked wins.
Chamber Matchup Breakdown
Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Chamber's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Who Wins the Chamber vs Deadlock Matchup?
Chamber vs Deadlock Performance Breakdown
In the Chamber vs Deadlock matchup, Deadlock demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 21 analyzed matches, Deadlock outperforms Chamber in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Deadlock the statistically favored pick when facing Chamber in ranked Valorant matches.
Chamber vs Deadlock Matchup Summary
The Chamber vs Deadlock matchup in Valorant is a heavily one-sided matchup. Based on 21 competitive matches analyzed, Deadlock wins 61.9% of the time compared to Chamber's 38.1%, a 23.8 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Deadlock consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Sentinel matchup, Deadlock has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Chamber should never take isolated fights against Deadlock and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Chamber vs Deadlock Fragging Analysis
Deadlock achieves a clean sweep in the fragging department, winning all five combat metrics against Chamber in the Chamber vs Deadlock matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Deadlock holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 21 competitive matches, Deadlock players can approach duels against Chamber with confidence, while Chamber players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on utility-based contributions, information gathering, and team coordination to remain impactful.
Chamber vs Deadlock Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side Breakdown
Deadlock holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Chamber vs Deadlock matchup, winning 55.9% of offensive rounds compared to 51.8% for Chamber. This 4.1 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 21 matches reveals Deadlock's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Deadlock consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Chamber teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Deadlock's favor in this matchup. When Deadlock takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Chamber. For Chamber players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Deadlock's advantages. Deadlock can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Post-plant is where Deadlock's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 4.1% attack-side gap suggests Deadlock excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Chamber should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Deadlock's kit advantages become decisive. For Deadlock, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Deadlock demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Chamber, holding 48.2% of rounds versus 44.1%. This 4.1 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for Deadlock's defensive advantage. Deadlock can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Chamber should avoid solo anchor positions against Deadlock — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Chamber's site with Deadlock on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Deadlock in this matchup. Our 21 match analysis shows Deadlock converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Chamber should never attempt solo retakes against Deadlock — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Deadlock can confidently take 1vX retakes that Chamber should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight Deadlock's defensive advantages. Chamber should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Deadlock, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Deadlock can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Chamber should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
Overall Side Analysis
Deadlock demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (55.9%) and defense (48.2%), comprehensively outperforming Chamber across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 21 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Deadlock holding advantages at every stage.
Map selection and team composition cannot fix Chamber's disadvantage in this matchup. Deadlock outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Chamber into Deadlock, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Chamber's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Chamber in isolated Deadlock encounters.
For ranked climbing, avoid playing Chamber when you expect to face Deadlock frequently. The 8.2 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Deadlock is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.
Final verdict: Deadlock decisively wins the Chamber vs Deadlock matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Deadlock has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Chamber players facing Deadlock should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.
Sentinel vs Sentinel Dynamics
Both Chamber and Deadlock fill the Sentinel role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Sentinel performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Deadlock is the stronger Sentinel pick when these agents face each other.
In Sentinel vs Sentinel encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Deadlock's statistical advantage suggests their specific Sentinel kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.
Chamber has favorable matchups against 17 agents and unfavorable matchups against 10 agents in Valorant. Chamber's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Breach at 33.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.26% | 475 | 1.29 | 141.4 | 28.9% | 47.8% | 51.2% | |
| 49.47% | 378 | 1.24 | 140.1 | 29.6% | 48.1% | 50.5% | |
| 50.54% | 277 | 1.28 | 141.9 | 30.4% | 50.5% | 50.2% | |
| 50.20% | 247 | 1.28 | 143.2 | 30.1% | 49.7% | 50.6% | |
| 53.40% | 206 | 1.27 | 139.9 | 29.1% | 47.0% | 54.8% | |
| 53.40% | 191 | 1.31 | 140.5 | 28.3% | 47.9% | 52.4% | |
| 52.22% | 180 | 1.34 | 144.8 | 29.9% | 49.5% | 51.9% | |
| 45.45% | 143 | 1.25 | 139.2 | 28.1% | 46.2% | 50.0% | |
| 51.28% | 117 | 1.21 | 135.9 | 29.4% | 47.5% | 52.7% | |
| 43.02% | 86 | 1.15 | 133.3 | 26.9% | 42.7% | 53.2% | |
| 60.00% | 70 | 1.24 | 136.0 | 30.2% | 50.3% | 51.2% | |
| 61.19% | 67 | 1.41 | 147.1 | 28.8% | 51.4% | 56.8% | |
| 43.33% | 60 | 1.16 | 131.8 | 28.7% | 46.7% | 50.0% | |
| 41.51% | 53 | 1.37 | 154.2 | 26.4% | 47.8% | 48.5% | |
| 50.00% | 48 | 1.41 | 148.8 | 31.5% | 52.3% | 51.0% | |
| 51.22% | 41 | 1.23 | 132.6 | 29.6% | 47.7% | 56.3% | |
| 50.00% | 38 | 1.39 | 150.9 | 24.9% | 49.9% | 51.9% | |
| 62.86% | 35 | 1.27 | 139.0 | 33.6% | 51.7% | 53.9% | |
| 44.12% | 34 | 1.33 | 148.6 | 24.3% | 44.3% | 51.0% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 1.21 | 140.2 | 29.1% | 48.5% | 50.7% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 1.20 | 129.3 | 27.3% | 51.8% | 44.1% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 1.39 | 146.4 | 27.2% | 56.7% | 44.7% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 1.38 | 139.6 | 27.9% | 58.5% | 48.8% | |
| 78.57% | 14 | 1.55 | 143.5 | 29.1% | 63.6% | 57.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.24 | 149.7 | 27.5% | 37.3% | 47.0% | |
| 100.00% | 4 | 1.38 | 132.7 | 20.3% | 59.3% | 60.5% | |
| 100.00% | 3 | 1.65 | 156.7 | 18.2% | 54.5% | 65.6% |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Chamber's best matchup in Valorant?
Chamber's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Chamber excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Chamber's hardest matchup?
Chamber's hardest matchup is against Breach, with only a 33.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Chamber should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Chamber have?
Chamber has 17 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 10 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Chamber in difficult matchups?
When playing Chamber in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Chamber's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Chamber's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Chamber's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.