Chamber vs Deadlock matchup in Valorant
Win Rate
38.1%
Matches
21
Avg KDA
1.20
Avg ADR
129

Chamber vs DeadlockMatchup

Sentinel
Patch12.01
Matches82,189
RegionAll Regions
RankAll Ranks
PlatformAll Platforms
ModeCompetitive
Last UpdatedFeb 3, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

Chamber vs Deadlock matchup guide: Deadlock leads with a 61.9% win rate, but Chamber can still win. Learn the combat stats and strategies to turn this 21-match dataset into ranked wins.

Chamber Matchup Breakdown

Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Chamber's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.

Compare against an opponent
Deadlock - 38.1% win rateDeadlock(38.1%)
Chamber - 38.1% win rate in this matchup
Chamber
38.1% WR
VS
Deadlock vs Chamber matchup - 61.9% win rate
Deadlock
61.9% WR

Who Wins the Chamber vs Deadlock Matchup?

Deadlock wins the Chamber vs Deadlock matchup
Winner
Deadlock
Matches: 21
38.1%
Win Rate
61.9%
1.20
Avg KDA
1.41
15.0
Avg Kills
15.8
15.0
Avg Deaths
14.4
129.3
DMG/Round
134.9
27.3%
HS %
32.6%
200
Combat Score
209
51.8%
Attack WR
55.9%
44.1%
Defense WR
48.2%

Chamber vs Deadlock Performance Breakdown

Chamber vs Deadlock matchup breakdown - overall performance winner

In the Chamber vs Deadlock matchup, Deadlock demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 21 analyzed matches, Deadlock outperforms Chamber in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Deadlock the statistically favored pick when facing Chamber in ranked Valorant matches.

Fragging Power
1.20Chamber
1.41Deadlock
Deadlock maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.41 KDA versus Chamber's 1.20. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Deadlock players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
129.3Chamber
134.9Deadlock
Deadlock outputs 134.9 average damage per round, edging out Chamber's 129.3 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Deadlock secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
51.8%Chamber
55.9%Deadlock
Deadlock shows stronger attack-side performance with a 55.9% win rate versus Chamber's 51.8%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Deadlock provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
44.1%Chamber
48.2%Deadlock
Defensive capabilities favor Deadlock at 48.2% win rate compared to Chamber's 44.1%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Deadlock provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.

Chamber vs Deadlock Matchup Summary

The Chamber vs Deadlock matchup in Valorant is a heavily one-sided matchup. Based on 21 competitive matches analyzed, Deadlock wins 61.9% of the time compared to Chamber's 38.1%, a 23.8 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Deadlock consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Sentinel matchup, Deadlock has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Chamber should never take isolated fights against Deadlock and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.

Chamber vs Deadlock Fragging Analysis

Deadlock wins fragging stats against Chamber in Valorant

Deadlock achieves a clean sweep in the fragging department, winning all five combat metrics against Chamber in the Chamber vs Deadlock matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Deadlock holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 21 competitive matches, Deadlock players can approach duels against Chamber with confidence, while Chamber players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on utility-based contributions, information gathering, and team coordination to remain impactful.

KDA
1.20Chamber
1.41Deadlock
Deadlock holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.41 compared to Chamber's 1.20. While this 0.22 point difference indicates Deadlock tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Chamber players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Deadlock's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Chamber players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
15.0Chamber
15.8Deadlock
Deadlock secures approximately 0.8 more kills per match than Chamber in this head-to-head (15.8 vs 15.0). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Deadlock contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Deadlock's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Chamber can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
15.0Chamber
14.4Deadlock
Deadlock survives longer in this matchup, dying 14.4 times per game compared to Chamber's 15.0 deaths. This 0.5 death difference per match means Deadlock is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. Chamber players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Deadlock's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
129.3Chamber
134.9Deadlock
Deadlock applies 5.5 more damage per round than Chamber in this matchup (134.9 vs 129.3 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Deadlock contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Chamber can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
Headshot %
27.3%Chamber
32.6%Deadlock
The headshot percentage disparity between Deadlock and Chamber is substantial: 32.6% compared to 27.3%, a 5.3 point difference. Deadlock consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Chamber, challenging Deadlock in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Deadlock's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.

Chamber vs Deadlock Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side
Deadlock
Chamber51.8%
Deadlock55.9%
Defense Side
Deadlock
Chamber44.1%
Deadlock48.2%

Attack Side Breakdown

Deadlock holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Chamber vs Deadlock matchup, winning 55.9% of offensive rounds compared to 51.8% for Chamber. This 4.1 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.

Our analysis of 21 matches reveals Deadlock's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Deadlock consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Chamber teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.

Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Deadlock's favor in this matchup. When Deadlock takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Chamber. For Chamber players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Deadlock's advantages. Deadlock can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.

Post-plant is where Deadlock's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 4.1% attack-side gap suggests Deadlock excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Chamber should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Deadlock's kit advantages become decisive. For Deadlock, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.

Defense Side Breakdown

Deadlock demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Chamber, holding 48.2% of rounds versus 44.1%. This 4.1 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.

Site anchor assignments should account for Deadlock's defensive advantage. Deadlock can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Chamber should avoid solo anchor positions against Deadlock — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Chamber's site with Deadlock on the execute, expect faster site falls.

Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Deadlock in this matchup. Our 21 match analysis shows Deadlock converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Chamber should never attempt solo retakes against Deadlock — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Deadlock can confidently take 1vX retakes that Chamber should avoid.

Economy rounds highlight Deadlock's defensive advantages. Chamber should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Deadlock, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Deadlock can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Chamber should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.

Overall Side Analysis

Deadlock demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (55.9%) and defense (48.2%), comprehensively outperforming Chamber across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 21 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Deadlock holding advantages at every stage.

Map selection and team composition cannot fix Chamber's disadvantage in this matchup. Deadlock outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Chamber into Deadlock, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Chamber's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Chamber in isolated Deadlock encounters.

For ranked climbing, avoid playing Chamber when you expect to face Deadlock frequently. The 8.2 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Deadlock is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.

Final verdict: Deadlock decisively wins the Chamber vs Deadlock matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Deadlock has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Chamber players facing Deadlock should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.

Sentinel vs Sentinel Dynamics

Both Chamber and Deadlock fill the Sentinel role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Sentinel performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Deadlock is the stronger Sentinel pick when these agents face each other.

In Sentinel vs Sentinel encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Deadlock's statistical advantage suggests their specific Sentinel kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.

Chamber has favorable matchups against 17 agents and unfavorable matchups against 10 agents in Valorant. Chamber's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Breach at 33.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.

Chamber matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 12.01)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
DMG/Rnd
HS %
Atk WR
Def WR
49.26%4751.29141.428.9%47.8%51.2%
49.47%3781.24140.129.6%48.1%50.5%
50.54%2771.28141.930.4%50.5%50.2%
50.20%2471.28143.230.1%49.7%50.6%
53.40%2061.27139.929.1%47.0%54.8%
53.40%1911.31140.528.3%47.9%52.4%
52.22%1801.34144.829.9%49.5%51.9%
45.45%1431.25139.228.1%46.2%50.0%
51.28%1171.21135.929.4%47.5%52.7%
43.02%861.15133.326.9%42.7%53.2%
60.00%701.24136.030.2%50.3%51.2%
61.19%671.41147.128.8%51.4%56.8%
43.33%601.16131.828.7%46.7%50.0%
41.51%531.37154.226.4%47.8%48.5%
50.00%481.41148.831.5%52.3%51.0%
51.22%411.23132.629.6%47.7%56.3%
50.00%381.39150.924.9%49.9%51.9%
62.86%351.27139.033.6%51.7%53.9%
44.12%341.33148.624.3%44.3%51.0%
51.61%311.21140.229.1%48.5%50.7%
38.10%211.20129.327.3%51.8%44.1%
42.11%191.39146.427.2%56.7%44.7%
60.00%151.38139.627.9%58.5%48.8%
78.57%141.55143.529.1%63.6%57.0%
33.33%61.24149.727.5%37.3%47.0%
100.00%41.38132.720.3%59.3%60.5%
100.00%31.65156.718.2%54.5%65.6%
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Chamber's best matchup in Valorant?

Chamber's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Chamber excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.

What is Chamber's hardest matchup?

Chamber's hardest matchup is against Breach, with only a 33.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Chamber should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.

How many favorable matchups does Chamber have?

Chamber has 17 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 10 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play Chamber in difficult matchups?

When playing Chamber in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Chamber's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.

What stats matter most in Chamber's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in Chamber's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.

See Also: Other Sentinels