Gekko vs Fade matchup in Valorant
Win Rate
0.0%
Matches
3
Avg KDA
1.00
Avg ADR
134

Gekko vs FadeMatchup

Initiator
Patch12.01
Matches82,189
RegionAll Regions
RankAll Ranks
PlatformAll Platforms
ModeCompetitive
Last UpdatedFeb 4, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

Gekko vs Fade matchup guide: Fade leads with a 100.0% win rate, but Gekko can still win. Learn how Gekko's 134 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 3-match dataset into ranked wins.

Gekko Matchup Breakdown

Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Gekko's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.

Compare against an opponent
Fade - 0.0% win rateFade(0.0%)
Gekko - 0.0% win rate in this matchup
Gekko
0.0% WR
VS
Fade vs Gekko matchup - 100.0% win rate
Fade
100.0% WR

Who Wins the Gekko vs Fade Matchup?

Fade wins the Gekko vs Fade matchup
Winner
Fade
Matches: 3
0.0%
Win Rate
100.0%
1.00
Avg KDA
1.31
13.0
Avg Kills
11.0
16.7
Avg Deaths
13.0
133.7
DMG/Round
116.2
30.1%
HS %
23.9%
194
Combat Score
162
30.6%
Attack WR
53.8%
46.2%
Defense WR
69.4%

Gekko vs Fade Performance Breakdown

Gekko vs Fade matchup breakdown - overall performance winner

Analysis of 3 matches reveals that Fade holds a clear advantage over Gekko in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Gekko shows strength in one category, Fade's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.

Fragging Power
1.00Gekko
1.31Fade
Fade maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.31 KDA versus Gekko's 1.00. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Fade players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
133.7Gekko
116.2Fade
Gekko delivers substantially higher damage per round (133.7 ADR) compared to Fade's 116.2 ADR. This 17.5 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Gekko a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
30.6%Gekko
53.8%Fade
On the attacking side, Fade dominates with a 53.8% win rate compared to Gekko's 30.6%. This 23.3 percentage point gap indicates Fade is significantly more effective at executing onto sites, whether through superior entry fragging, better utility usage for site takes, or stronger post-plant positioning.
Defense Side
46.2%Gekko
69.4%Fade
Fade excels on the defensive half with a commanding 69.4% win rate, far surpassing Gekko's 46.2%. This 23.3 percentage point advantage demonstrates Fade's superior ability to anchor sites, gather information, and deny enemy executes through effective utility and positioning.

Gekko vs Fade Matchup Summary

The Gekko vs Fade matchup in Valorant is a heavily one-sided matchup. Based on 3 competitive matches analyzed, Fade wins 100.0% of the time compared to Gekko's 0.0%, a 100.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in attack-side performance, where Fade consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Initiator matchup, Fade has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Gekko should never take isolated fights against Fade and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.

Gekko vs Fade Fragging Analysis

Gekko wins fragging stats against Fade in Valorant

Gekko edges out Fade in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 3 matches analyzed, this Gekko vs Fade matchup remains contestable for both sides. Fade shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Fade's favor.

KDA
1.00Gekko
1.31Fade
Fade demonstrates noticeably stronger kill-death-assist performance against Gekko, maintaining a 1.31 KDA versus 1.00. This 0.31 point gap reflects Fade's superior ability to secure eliminations while avoiding death in these head-to-head encounters. Gekko players facing Fade should prioritize team coordination over solo aggression — look for 2v1 situations, coordinate utility usage with teammates, and focus on trading rather than taking isolated duels where Fade's statistical advantage becomes most pronounced.
Avg Kills
13.0Gekko
11.0Fade
Gekko substantially outfrags Fade in this matchup, averaging 13.0 kills compared to 11.0 — a difference of nearly 2.0 eliminations per match. When Gekko faces Fade, the data clearly shows Gekko finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Fade players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Gekko in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
16.7Gekko
13.0Fade
The death disparity between Fade and Gekko is stark: 13.0 versus 16.7 deaths per game. Gekko dies 3.7 more times per match on average, fundamentally impacting their ability to influence rounds. This suggests Gekko either takes unfavorable fights against Fade or lacks the tools to disengage safely. Gekko players must completely rethink their aggression patterns — prioritize information and utility over kills, always have an exit plan, and never take coin-flip duels against Fade.
DMG/Round
133.7Gekko
116.2Fade
Gekko significantly outdamages Fade in head-to-head encounters, posting 133.7 ADR versus 116.2. This 17.5 damage-per-round advantage means Gekko consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Fade players should avoid prolonged dueling with Gekko — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
Headshot %
30.1%Gekko
23.9%Fade
The headshot percentage disparity between Gekko and Fade is substantial: 30.1% compared to 23.9%, a 6.1 point difference. Gekko consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Fade, challenging Gekko in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Gekko's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.

Gekko vs Fade Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side
Fade
Gekko30.6%
Fade53.8%
Defense Side
Fade
Gekko46.2%
Fade69.4%

Attack Side Breakdown

The attack-side performance gap between Fade and Gekko is dramatic: 53.8% versus 30.6%, a commanding 23.3 percentage point advantage. Fade dominates offensive scenarios in this matchup to a degree that requires Gekko to fundamentally change their approach to attack-side play.

Our analysis of 3 competitive matches reveals Fade has overwhelming attack-side superiority in every measurable category. Site executions, entry success, post-plant conversion, and mid-round adaptability all massively favor Fade. This isn't a gap that Gekko can overcome through practice or "playing better" — it's a structural matchup disadvantage. Gekko teams must build their entire attack strategy around protecting Gekko from direct Fade engagement: give Gekko lurk roles, put them in trade positions rather than entry, and design executes where Gekko's weaknesses are covered by teammate utility.

Under no circumstances should Gekko take entry duels against Fade. The 23.3% attack gap makes entry fragging against Fade one of the lowest-percentage plays in Valorant. Gekko must exclusively play support roles on attack: flash for teammates, smoke for executes, trade after entries, or create map pressure through lurks that don't involve Fade confrontation. Fade should actively hunt Gekko entries, knowing the statistical advantage is overwhelming.

Gekko's post-plant conversion rate against Fade is catastrophic. The data shows Gekko fails to hold spike plants at a dramatically higher rate than Fade. Never leave Gekko alone post-plant — they need constant teammate support, crossfire setups, and utility coordination to have any chance of winning these scenarios. Consider not planting at all if Gekko is the only survivor. Fade should play extremely confidently in post-plants, knowing Gekko struggles to convert even favorable positions.

Defense Side Breakdown

The defensive disparity between Fade and Gekko is substantial: 69.4% versus 46.2%, a 23.3 point chasm. Fade absolutely dominates CT side in this matchup — their site holds are significantly harder to break, their retake contributions more impactful, and their defensive utility more effective at every level.

Gekko cannot be trusted with traditional site anchor responsibilities against Fade. The 23.3% defensive gap is too large to overcome through positioning or individual skill. Teams must protect Gekko: pair them with multiple teammates, give them off-site lurk positions, or have them rotate immediately when Fade's presence is identified on their site. Fade should aggressively anchor the most difficult sites on any map, knowing their defensive capability is overwhelming.

Gekko should avoid retake scenarios against Fade entirely when possible. The data from 3 matches shows Gekko's retake conversion rate against Fade is dramatically lower than average. If Gekko must retake, require 3+ player numbers advantage and full utility coordination. Fade should play post-plant positions knowing Gekko lacks the capability to effectively contest them. In clutch scenarios, Fade wins at overwhelming rates.

Economy decisions for Gekko must account for their defensive inadequacy. Force buying against Fade is essentially throwing away credits — the defensive gap makes partial buys nearly unwinnable. Gekko should always advocate for full saves, building toward rounds where team utility can compensate for their individual defensive weakness. Fade can confidently force and half-buy, knowing their defensive advantages persist across all economy states.

Overall Side Analysis

Fade demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (53.8%) and defense (69.4%), comprehensively outperforming Gekko across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 3 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Fade holding advantages at every stage.

Map selection and team composition cannot fix Gekko's disadvantage in this matchup. Fade outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Gekko into Fade, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Gekko's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Gekko in isolated Fade encounters.

For ranked climbing, avoid playing Gekko when you expect to face Fade frequently. The 46.6 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Fade is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.

Final verdict: Fade decisively wins the Gekko vs Fade matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Fade has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Gekko players facing Fade should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.

Initiator vs Initiator Dynamics

Both Gekko and Fade fill the Initiator role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Initiator performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Fade is the stronger Initiator pick when these agents face each other.

In Initiator vs Initiator encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Fade's statistical advantage suggests their specific Initiator kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.

Gekko has favorable matchups against 0 agents and unfavorable matchups against 3 agents in Valorant. Gekko's strongest matchup is against Clove with a 33.3% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Fade at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.

Gekko matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 12.01)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
DMG/Rnd
HS %
Atk WR
Def WR
33.33%31.02105.534.1%41.7%38.5%
33.33%31.11123.442.3%33.3%48.5%
0.00%31.00133.730.1%30.6%46.2%
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Gekko's best matchup in Valorant?

Gekko's best matchup is against Clove, achieving a 33.3% win rate. Gekko excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.

What is Gekko's hardest matchup?

Gekko's hardest matchup is against Fade, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Gekko should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.

How many favorable matchups does Gekko have?

Gekko has 0 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 3 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play Gekko in difficult matchups?

When playing Gekko in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Gekko's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.

What stats matter most in Gekko's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in Gekko's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.

See Also: Other Initiators