Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Viper's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Viper
47.7% WR
VS
Chamber
50.8% WR
Who Wins the Viper vs Chamber Matchup?
Winner
Chamber
Matches: 262
47.7%
Win Rate
50.8%
1.36
Avg KDA
1.23
15.6
Avg Kills
15.9
14.9
Avg Deaths
15.1
139.8
DMG/Round
137.8
32.1%
HS %
28.3%
208
Combat Score
209
48.9%
Attack WR
49.4%
50.6%
Defense WR
51.1%
Viper vs Chamber Performance Breakdown
The Viper vs Chamber matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 262 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Fragging Power
1.36Viper
1.23Chamber
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Viper and Chamber, with KDA ratios of 1.36 and 1.23 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
139.8Viper
137.8Chamber
Damage output is evenly distributed in this matchup, with Viper averaging 139.8 ADR and Chamber at 137.8 ADR. Neither agent holds a decisive firepower advantage, making utility usage and team coordination the key differentiators.
Attack Side
48.9%Viper
49.4%Chamber
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Viper at 48.9% and Chamber at 49.4% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
50.6%Viper
51.1%Chamber
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Viper posting a 50.6% win rate and Chamber at 51.1%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Viper vs Chamber matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 262 competitive matches analyzed, Chamber wins 50.8% of the time compared to Viper's 47.7%, a 3.1 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Viper consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Sentinel matchup, Chamber has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Viper players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Viper vs Chamber Fragging Analysis
Viper claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Viper vs Chamber matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, damage output. Our analysis of 262 ranked games reveals Viper consistently outperforms Chamber in direct combat scenarios. While Chamber manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Viper in gunfights. Chamber players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Viper dominates.
Avg KDA
1.36Viper
1.23Chamber
Viper holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.36 compared to Chamber's 1.23. While this 0.13 point difference indicates Viper tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Chamber players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Viper's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Chamber players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
15.6Viper
15.9Chamber
Kill production between Viper and Chamber is virtually identical, with Viper averaging 15.6 kills per game and Chamber securing 15.9. This parity suggests both agents are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and round outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, utility usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — entries, clutch situations, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
14.9Viper
15.1Chamber
Survivability metrics are nearly equal between Viper (14.9 deaths/game) and Chamber (15.1 deaths/game). Neither agent demonstrates a clear advantage in staying alive during these matchups, suggesting both have similar risk profiles and neither kit provides notably better escape tools or defensive utility against the other. Round outcomes in this matchup hinge on which player makes fewer critical positioning errors rather than any agent-based survival advantage.
DMG/Round
139.8Viper
137.8Chamber
Damage output per round is essentially equal between Viper (139.8 ADR) and Chamber (137.8 ADR). This parity indicates both agents apply similar pressure in firefights and contribute comparably to wearing down enemy health pools. When these agents face off, neither can rely on superior damage output to swing rounds — instead, the deciding factors become headshot consistency, timing of engagements, and coordination with teammates' utility and damage.
HS %
32.1%Viper
28.3%Chamber
Viper demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Chamber: 32.1% versus 28.3%. This 3.9 percentage point gap in precision means Viper ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Chamber faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).
Viper vs Chamber Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Chamber
48.9%
49.4%
Defense Side
Chamber
50.6%
51.1%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Viper and Chamber reveals near-perfect parity, with Viper winning 48.9% of attacking rounds compared to Chamber's 49.4%. This negligible 0.6 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Viper nor Chamber should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 262 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Viper and Chamber players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Viper or Chamber, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Viper has favorable matchups against 18 agents and unfavorable matchups against 9 agents in Valorant. Viper's strongest matchup is against KAY/O with a 70.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Vyse at 9.1% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Viper matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Viper's best matchup is against KAY/O, achieving a 70.0% win rate. Viper excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Viper's hardest matchup?
Viper's hardest matchup is against Vyse, with only a 9.1% win rate. Against this opponent, Viper should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Viper have?
Viper has 18 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 9 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Viper in difficult matchups?
When playing Viper in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Viper's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Viper's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Viper's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.6% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Viper and Chamber is virtually identical, with Viper holding 50.6% of rounds on CT side and Chamber at 51.1%. This 0.6 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Viper and Chamber can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.6% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Viper and Chamber. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 262 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Viper or Chamber.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Viper vs Chamber specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
Chamber maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 49.4% attack win rate and 51.1% defense win rate. While Chamber is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Viper remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Viper vs Chamber specific factors. The slight Chamber advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Viper and Chamber are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Chamber has a slight statistical edge, but Viper is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Viper, don't switch to Chamber just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Controller vs Sentinel Dynamics
The Controller (Viper) vs Sentinel (Chamber) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Viper's Controller abilities serve different purposes than Chamber's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Controller abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Viper's Controller toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Chamber's Sentinel kit counters others. The Chamber advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Viper vs Chamber is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (47.7% vs 50.8%). Based on 262 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.
