Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Viper's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Analysis of 18 matches reveals that Viper holds a clear advantage over Phoenix in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Phoenix shows strength in one category, Viper's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
The Viper vs Phoenix matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 18 competitive matches analyzed, Viper wins 61.1% of the time compared to Phoenix's 38.9%, a 22.2 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Viper consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Duelist matchup, Viper has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Phoenix should never take isolated fights against Viper and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Viper edges out Phoenix in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 18 matches analyzed, this Viper vs Phoenix matchup remains contestable for both sides. Phoenix shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Phoenix's favor.
Viper significantly outperforms Phoenix on attack side, achieving a 51.9% round win rate versus 43.9%. This 8.1 point disparity reveals Viper as the clearly superior offensive agent in this head-to-head, with advantages that Phoenix cannot easily overcome through individual skill alone.
Based on 18 matches analyzed, Viper dominates attack-side scenarios through multiple vectors. Entry success rate, post-plant conversion, and mid-round adaptability all favor Viper significantly. Phoenix teams must make structural adjustments to their attack approach: rely less on Phoenix for key fragging roles, design executes that minimize Phoenix's direct engagement with Viper, and consider how team composition can cover Phoenix's offensive weaknesses. Simply "playing better" isn't enough to overcome a 8.1% gap.
Phoenix should avoid entry fragging roles against Viper whenever possible. The data clearly shows Viper wins a disproportionate share of first contacts on attack. Phoenix players should volunteer for support roles — flashing for teammates, trading entries, or lurking to create map pressure without direct Viper confrontation. If forced to entry, wait for maximum utility support and ensure a trade is guaranteed. Viper can and should take aggressive entries, knowing statistical backing supports confident play.
Viper has favorable matchups against 18 agents and unfavorable matchups against 9 agents in Valorant. Viper's strongest matchup is against KAY/O with a 70.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Vyse at 9.1% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.71% | 262 | 1.36 | 139.8 | 32.1% | 48.9% | 50.6% | |
| 53.33% | 255 | 1.34 | 140.1 | 31.5% | 50.5% | ||
| 48.95% | 237 | 1.27 | 133.6 | 32.2% | 49.4% | ||
| 51.37% | 183 | 1.50 | 150.3 | 31.9% | 48.6% | ||
| 52.27% | 132 | 1.32 | 140.7 | 32.3% | 48.8% | ||
| 56.92% | 130 | 1.37 | 134.5 | 31.3% | 49.6% | ||
| 45.78% | 83 | 1.33 | 140.3 | 31.1% | 49.5% | ||
| 50.00% | 80 | 1.42 | 145.5 | 32.6% | 45.4% | ||
| 47.95% | 73 | 1.44 | 143.0 | 28.6% | 51.5% | ||
| 40.00% | 55 | 1.31 | 140.6 | 32.5% | 47.5% | ||
| 58.18% | 55 | 1.46 | 154.4 | 31.6% | 51.3% | ||
| 53.85% | 52 | 1.42 | 143.9 | 31.5% | 45.9% | ||
| 48.94% | 47 | 1.32 | 136.3 | 34.4% | 46.0% | ||
| 54.29% | 35 | 1.42 | 151.6 | 29.6% | 51.3% | ||
| 57.58% | 33 | 1.39 | 143.9 | 27.3% | 50.9% | ||
| 50.00% | 18 | 1.27 | 132.2 | 34.0% | 48.6% | ||
| 61.11% | 18 | 1.51 | 146.7 | 31.1% | 51.9% | ||
| 56.25% | 16 | 1.32 | 139.3 | 32.0% | 56.9% | ||
| 60.00% | 15 | 1.31 | 139.6 | 31.4% | 44.7% | ||
| 53.33% | 15 | 1.45 | 153.6 | 24.1% | 61.5% | ||
| 35.71% | 14 | 1.48 | 163.0 | 33.0% | 43.1% | ||
| 9.09% | 11 | 1.42 | 155.1 | 28.1% | 42.0% | ||
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.59 | 151.5 | 35.9% | 54.5% | ||
| 70.00% | 10 | 1.39 | 139.9 | 29.8% | 59.3% | ||
| 44.44% | 9 | 1.39 | 135.9 | 31.9% | 45.1% | ||
| 66.67% | 6 | 1.44 | 135.1 | 34.4% | 60.5% | ||
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.40 | 143.5 | 33.7% | 40.7% |
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Viper's best matchup is against KAY/O, achieving a 70.0% win rate. Viper excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
Viper's hardest matchup is against Vyse, with only a 9.1% win rate. Against this opponent, Viper should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
Viper has 18 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 9 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
When playing Viper in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Viper's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
Key stats to analyze in Viper's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios heavily favor Viper in this matchup. Phoenix struggles to convert spike plants into round wins at the same rate, whether due to weaker defuse denial, inferior retake resistance, or less effective post-plant positioning. Phoenix teams should never leave Phoenix alone in post-plant — always have teammates nearby for crossfires and trades. Consider giving the spike to a different player when possible. Viper should recognize their post-plant dominance and play for spike aggressively after site takes.
Viper substantially outclasses Phoenix on defense, achieving 56.1% round wins compared to 48.1%. This 8.1 percentage point gap indicates Viper excels at core defensive tasks — anchoring sites, gathering information, stalling executes, and contributing to retakes — at a level Phoenix cannot match.
Phoenix should never solo anchor against Viper. The 8.1% defensive gap makes isolated site holds extremely unfavorable for Phoenix. Instead, pair Phoenix with a teammate, give them off-site positions that allow early rotates, or have them play supportive roles that don't require extended site holds. Viper should actively anchor difficult sites, knowing their defensive capabilities significantly exceed Phoenix's.
Retake dynamics heavily favor Viper. When Phoenix needs to retake against Viper, success requires overwhelming numbers and utility coordination — never attempt equal-number retakes and absolutely avoid solo retakes. Viper should play post-plant positions confidently, knowing Phoenix struggles to clear them effectively. In clutch scenarios, Viper has a significant statistical edge that Phoenix cannot overcome through individual skill alone.
Economy management becomes critical for Phoenix in this matchup. Force buying against Viper is mathematically unfavorable — the defensive gap compounds when utility is limited. Phoenix should advocate for full saves, ensuring full buy rounds have maximum utility to compensate for their defensive disadvantages. Viper can confidently force buy, knowing their defensive kit provides advantages that partially compensate for economic disadvantages.
Viper demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (51.9%) and defense (56.1%), comprehensively outperforming Phoenix across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 18 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Viper holding advantages at every stage.
Map selection and team composition cannot fix Phoenix's disadvantage in this matchup. Viper outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Phoenix into Viper, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Phoenix's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Phoenix in isolated Viper encounters.
For ranked climbing, avoid playing Phoenix when you expect to face Viper frequently. The 16.2 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Viper is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.
Final verdict: Viper decisively wins the Viper vs Phoenix matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Viper has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Phoenix players facing Viper should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.
The Controller (Viper) vs Duelist (Phoenix) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Viper's Controller abilities serve different purposes than Phoenix's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Controller abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Viper's Controller toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Phoenix's Duelist kit counters others. The Viper advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
| 52.1% |
| 50.4% |
| 52.9% |
| 53.0% |
| 53.6% |
| 48.1% |
| 53.6% |
| 52.1% |
| 49.3% |
| 53.5% |
| 55.7% |
| 51.3% |
| 49.9% |
| 57.4% |
| 52.6% |
| 56.1% |
| 49.7% |
| 58.6% |
| 44.0% |
| 52.7% |
| 38.8% |
| 54.8% |
| 56.1% |
| 51.5% |
| 56.9% |
| 56.1% |
Viper vs Phoenix matchup breakdown: Viper dominates with a 61.1% win rate across 18 matches. Superior fragging (1.51 KDA) gives Viper a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.