Viper vs Raze•Matchup

Viper vs Raze Matchup Summary

The Viper vs Raze matchup in Valorant is a heavily one-sided matchup. Based on 21 competitive matches analyzed, Viper wins 57.1% of the time compared to Raze's 42.9%, a 14.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Viper consistently outperforms. In this Controller vs Duelist matchup, Viper has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Raze should never take isolated fights against Viper and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.

Viper vs Raze Fragging Analysis

Viper achieves a clean sweep in the fragging department, winning all five combat metrics against Raze in the Viper vs Raze matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Viper holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 21 competitive matches, Viper players can approach duels against Raze with confidence, while Raze players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on utility-based contributions, information gathering, and team coordination to remain impactful.

Viper vs Raze Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side

Viper

51.9%

50.7%

Defense Side

Viper

49.3%

48.1%

Attack Side Breakdown

Viper demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Raze in this matchup, converting 51.9% of attacking rounds versus 50.7%. While this 1.3 point edge gives Viper slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Raze players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.

The data from 21 competitive games suggests Viper's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Raze teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.3% gap.

When taking entry duels, Viper holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Raze players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Viper can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.

In post-plant situations, Viper's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Raze should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.3 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.

Defense Side Breakdown

Viper shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Raze, winning 49.3% of defense rounds compared to 48.1%. This 1.3 percentage point edge suggests Viper's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Raze players to overcome.

When deciding site assignments, Viper can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.3% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Raze should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.

Viper demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Viper converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Raze should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Viper when you can wait for teammates. Viper can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.

On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.3% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Raze should be more conservative with eco aggression against Viper and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Viper can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.

Overall Side Analysis

Viper maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 51.9% attack win rate and 49.3% defense win rate. While Viper is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Raze remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.

Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Viper vs Raze specific factors. The slight Viper advantage doesn't change based on external factors.

For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Viper and Raze are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.

Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Viper has a slight statistical edge, but Raze is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Raze, don't switch to Viper just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.

Controller vs Duelist Dynamics

The Controller (Viper) vs Duelist (Raze) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Viper's Controller abilities serve different purposes than Raze's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.

Understanding how Controller abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Viper's Controller toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Raze's Duelist kit counters others. The Viper advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.