최고 승률 TFT 팀 조합

이 표는 가장 높은 승률을 기록한 TFT 팀 조합을 보여주며, 랭크 상승을 위한 가장 성공적인 조합을 식별하는 데 도움이 됩니다. 최고 9챔피언 세트 17 조합: 도전자 (97.4% WR, 2.2 avg), 불한당 (96.4% WR, 2.1 avg), 불한당 (95.9% WR, 2.1 avg). 도전자/불한당가 97.42% 승률과 2.25 평균 순위로 선두. 불한당가 96.39% 승률로 뒤따름. 실시간 성능 통계로 62개의 9챔피언 조합 분석 중.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
2.25
Avg Place
97.42%
Top 4 Rate
31.61%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.06
Avg Place
96.39%
Top 4 Rate
39.25%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.08
Avg Place
95.88%
Top 4 Rate
37.05%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.17
Avg Place
95.67%
Top 4 Rate
34.66%
First Place
Moderately Contested
1.99
Avg Place
94.82%
Top 4 Rate
42.42%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
94.75%
Top 4 Rate
37.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.20
Avg Place
94.07%
Top 4 Rate
37.29%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.43
Avg Place
92.56%
Top 4 Rate
29.35%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.36
Avg Place
92.29%
Top 4 Rate
30.35%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.41
Avg Place
91.99%
Top 4 Rate
30.04%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.55
Avg Place
89.66%
Top 4 Rate
26.17%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.32
Avg Place
89.49%
Top 4 Rate
39.95%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.47
Avg Place
88.33%
Top 4 Rate
28.02%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.40
Avg Place
87.58%
Top 4 Rate
40.35%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.44
Avg Place
87.13%
Top 4 Rate
39.82%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.73
Avg Place
86.01%
Top 4 Rate
27.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.71
Avg Place
85.26%
Top 4 Rate
30.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.97
Avg Place
83.85%
Top 4 Rate
25.77%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.84
Avg Place
83.06%
Top 4 Rate
28.72%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.03
Avg Place
81.98%
Top 4 Rate
16.47%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.11
Avg Place
81.06%
Top 4 Rate
17.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.14
Avg Place
80.24%
Top 4 Rate
18.76%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.82
Avg Place
80.15%
Top 4 Rate
37.13%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.03
Avg Place
79.64%
Top 4 Rate
23.68%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.05
Avg Place
79.45%
Top 4 Rate
25.12%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.13
Avg Place
79.36%
Top 4 Rate
18.53%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.91
Avg Place
78.77%
Top 4 Rate
29.16%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.16
Avg Place
78.50%
Top 4 Rate
20.56%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.10
Avg Place
78.42%
Top 4 Rate
21.98%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.05
Avg Place
77.94%
Top 4 Rate
26.83%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
77.78%
Top 4 Rate
27.53%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.01
Avg Place
77.15%
Top 4 Rate
25.22%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.37
Avg Place
75.92%
Top 4 Rate
16.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.23
Avg Place
75.51%
Top 4 Rate
19.05%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.39
Avg Place
74.82%
Top 4 Rate
19.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.23
Avg Place
74.27%
Top 4 Rate
23.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.30
Avg Place
74.25%
Top 4 Rate
19.77%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.49
Avg Place
71.84%
Top 4 Rate
16.65%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.56
Avg Place
70.89%
Top 4 Rate
14.41%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.50
Avg Place
69.83%
Top 4 Rate
19.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.45
Avg Place
68.14%
Top 4 Rate
23.67%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.55
Avg Place
67.92%
Top 4 Rate
20.82%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.66
Avg Place
67.38%
Top 4 Rate
17.91%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.66
Avg Place
67.14%
Top 4 Rate
16.30%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.74
Avg Place
66.70%
Top 4 Rate
11.92%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.83
Avg Place
66.60%
Top 4 Rate
16.19%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.70
Avg Place
66.30%
Top 4 Rate
20.65%
First Place
Low Contested
3.93
Avg Place
65.47%
Top 4 Rate
7.82%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.74
Avg Place
64.80%
Top 4 Rate
17.51%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.95
Avg Place
63.45%
Top 4 Rate
6.99%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.07
Avg Place
59.35%
Top 4 Rate
7.61%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.90
Avg Place
59.24%
Top 4 Rate
20.93%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.32
Avg Place
56.96%
Top 4 Rate
6.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.26
Avg Place
56.43%
Top 4 Rate
4.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.32
Avg Place
55.03%
Top 4 Rate
8.52%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.43
Avg Place
54.22%
Top 4 Rate
3.21%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.43
Avg Place
51.97%
Top 4 Rate
5.34%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.43
Avg Place
49.82%
Top 4 Rate
5.78%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.60
Avg Place
49.74%
Top 4 Rate
3.95%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.86
Avg Place
43.02%
Top 4 Rate
3.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.85
Avg Place
42.51%
Top 4 Rate
7.58%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.97
Avg Place
41.14%
Top 4 Rate
6.69%
First Place
Moderately Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 62 team compositions ranked by performance to help you make informed decisions, based on 67.9K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 74.6% and average placement of 3.27 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is 도전자/불한당 with 카이사 as the primary carry, achieving a 97.4% win rate. Following closely is 불한당/N.O.V.A. at 96.4% win rate, and 불한당/N.O.V.A. at 95.9%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • 도전자/불한당 (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around 카이사
  • 불한당/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around 잭스
  • 불한당/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around 잭스

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider 불한당/N.O.V.A. which achieves first place in 42.4% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Most Consistent for Climbing

For players focused on consistent LP gains, 불한당/N.O.V.A. offers the best average placement at 1.99.Consistent compositions minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing, even if they don't win lobbies as often.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • 도전자/불한당: 97.4% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • 불한당/N.O.V.A.: 96.4% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • 불한당/N.O.V.A.: 95.9% win rate with only 0.3% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is 복제자/암흑의 별 with a 1.4% pick rate, though its 66.7% win rate suggests it may be over-contested. 중재자/복제자 follows at 1.1% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

정확성 유지를 도와주세요! 잘못된 통계, 누락된 데이터 또는 문제를 발견하면 피드백을 보내주세요. 커뮤니티 전체의 데이터 품질 향상에 직접적으로 도움이 됩니다.

문제 신고

전략적 팀 전투 팀 조합 - 시즌 17 FAQ

TFT 시즌 17에서 최고의 TFT 조합은 무엇인가요?

TFT 시즌 17에서 최고의 TFT 조합은 도전자/불한당입니다, 카이사가 주력 캐리. 승률 97.4%, 평균 순위 2.25를 달성합니다. 이 조합은 랭크 상승에 효과적이며 꾸준히 4등 안에 듭니다.

도전자/불한당 조합을 어떻게 플레이하나요?

도전자/불한당을 플레이할 때, 카이사를 메인 캐리로 빌드하는 데 집중하세요. 초반에 카이사와 서포트 유닛을 찾고, 캐리와 시너지가 맞는 아이템을 우선시하며, 7-8레벨에서 파워 스파이크를 목표로 하세요. 이 조합의 픽률은 0.1%입니다, 상대적으로 경쟁이 적은 옵션입니다.

TFT 시즌 17에서 랭크 상승에 좋은 조합은 무엇인가요?

TFT 시즌 17에서 꾸준한 LP 획득을 위해, 불한당/N.O.V.A.이 평균 순위 1.99로 최고의 성능을 보입니다. 다른 신뢰할 만한 옵션으로는 불한당/N.O.V.A. (평균 2.06)와 불한당/N.O.V.A. (평균 2.08)이 있습니다. 안정적인 조합은 하위 4등을 최소화하고 꾸준한 상승을 제공합니다.

TFT에서 가장 쉬운 조합은 무엇인가요?

도전자/불한당은 쉬운 상승을 원하는 플레이어에게 좋은 옵션입니다. 승률 97.4%에 픽률 0.1%만으로 경쟁이 적어 게임을 더 쉽게 진행할 수 있습니다. 낮은 경쟁은 강제 피벗 없이 자연스럽게 유닛을 찾을 수 있음을 의미합니다.

TFT 시즌 17에서 조합을 강제로 가져가야 할 때와 유연하게 가야 할 때는 언제인가요?

TFT 시즌 17에서 복제자/암흑의 별의 픽률은 1.4%로 경쟁이 치열합니다. 다른 사람들이 가져가는 것을 보면 도전자/불한당 같은 대안으로 유연하게 전환하는 것을 고려하세요. 초반 유닛과 아이템을 맞췄거나 경쟁이 없을 때 강제로 가세요. 2명 이상이 같은 유닛을 경쟁할 때는 유연하게 대처하세요.