최고 1등률 TFT 더블업 조합

이 표는 가장 높은 1등률을 가진 TFT 더블업 팀 조합을 강조하며, 승리 확률을 극대화하려는 듀오에게 완벽합니다. 상위 9챔피언 더블업 세트 17 조합: Rogue (54.5% WR, 3.5 avg), Replicator (87.2% WR, 2.5 avg), N.O.V.A. (97.9% WR, 2.2 avg). Rogue/Meeple가 54.55% 승률과 3.55 평균 순위로 선두. Replicator가 87.18% 승률로 뒤따름. 88개의 9챔피언 더블업 조합을 실시간 성능 통계로 분석 중.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
3.55
Avg Place
54.55%
Top 4 Rate
36.36%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.46
Avg Place
87.18%
Top 4 Rate
28.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.19
Avg Place
97.87%
Top 4 Rate
34.04%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.07
Avg Place
46.67%
Top 4 Rate
33.33%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.33
Avg Place
71.05%
Top 4 Rate
14.04%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.93
Avg Place
82.61%
Top 4 Rate
28.26%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.68
Avg Place
65.81%
Top 4 Rate
18.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.52
Avg Place
87.50%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.53
Avg Place
71.05%
Top 4 Rate
18.42%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.80
Avg Place
83.67%
Top 4 Rate
26.53%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.78
Avg Place
82.42%
Top 4 Rate
26.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.47
Avg Place
71.88%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Low Contested
4.24
Avg Place
52.94%
Top 4 Rate
5.88%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
65.00%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.94
Avg Place
81.48%
Top 4 Rate
22.22%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.71
Avg Place
88.61%
Top 4 Rate
24.05%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.59
Avg Place
64.43%
Top 4 Rate
27.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
68.61%
Top 4 Rate
23.36%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.49
Avg Place
67.44%
Top 4 Rate
23.26%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.11
Avg Place
80.00%
Top 4 Rate
23.08%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.72
Avg Place
88.68%
Top 4 Rate
22.64%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.97
Avg Place
81.20%
Top 4 Rate
22.22%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.83
Avg Place
82.81%
Top 4 Rate
26.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.63
Avg Place
59.26%
Top 4 Rate
22.22%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.55
Avg Place
71.05%
Top 4 Rate
15.79%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.11
Avg Place
78.57%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.61
Avg Place
66.07%
Top 4 Rate
21.43%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.63
Avg Place
63.89%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.97
Avg Place
80.73%
Top 4 Rate
22.28%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.12
Avg Place
80.23%
Top 4 Rate
20.93%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.56
Avg Place
65.93%
Top 4 Rate
20.88%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.59
Avg Place
68.25%
Top 4 Rate
20.63%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.99
Avg Place
82.93%
Top 4 Rate
21.95%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.04
Avg Place
75.94%
Top 4 Rate
21.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.60
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
20.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.85
Avg Place
65.00%
Top 4 Rate
20.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.20
Avg Place
53.06%
Top 4 Rate
22.45%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.72
Avg Place
59.80%
Top 4 Rate
14.71%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.79
Avg Place
57.34%
Top 4 Rate
20.63%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.69
Avg Place
64.14%
Top 4 Rate
19.31%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.93
Avg Place
57.94%
Top 4 Rate
15.89%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.85
Avg Place
65.38%
Top 4 Rate
19.23%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.66
Avg Place
67.95%
Top 4 Rate
18.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.59
Avg Place
64.86%
Top 4 Rate
21.62%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.93
Avg Place
57.89%
Top 4 Rate
22.81%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.04
Avg Place
62.50%
Top 4 Rate
12.50%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.19
Avg Place
55.93%
Top 4 Rate
15.68%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.38
Avg Place
54.17%
Top 4 Rate
16.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.46
Avg Place
68.10%
Top 4 Rate
27.62%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.27
Avg Place
72.73%
Top 4 Rate
18.18%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.71
Avg Place
62.22%
Top 4 Rate
24.44%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.98
Avg Place
58.49%
Top 4 Rate
16.60%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.47
Avg Place
67.94%
Top 4 Rate
23.66%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
73.51%
Top 4 Rate
18.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.21
Avg Place
76.32%
Top 4 Rate
21.05%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.80
Avg Place
63.41%
Top 4 Rate
17.07%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.15
Avg Place
53.27%
Top 4 Rate
14.74%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.98
Avg Place
59.52%
Top 4 Rate
13.10%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.17
Avg Place
76.74%
Top 4 Rate
21.86%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.35
Avg Place
55.00%
Top 4 Rate
15.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.81
Avg Place
59.46%
Top 4 Rate
18.92%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.65
Avg Place
64.65%
Top 4 Rate
17.32%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.06
Avg Place
58.68%
Top 4 Rate
16.77%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.26
Avg Place
70.37%
Top 4 Rate
20.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.13
Avg Place
52.08%
Top 4 Rate
14.58%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.21
Avg Place
71.43%
Top 4 Rate
14.29%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.83
Avg Place
39.66%
Top 4 Rate
8.62%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.38
Avg Place
45.59%
Top 4 Rate
11.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.38
Avg Place
72.73%
Top 4 Rate
22.73%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.23
Avg Place
29.55%
Top 4 Rate
9.09%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.81
Avg Place
59.74%
Top 4 Rate
12.99%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.47
Avg Place
50.53%
Top 4 Rate
12.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.31
Avg Place
50.72%
Top 4 Rate
12.92%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.08
Avg Place
60.27%
Top 4 Rate
15.07%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.50
Avg Place
48.80%
Top 4 Rate
13.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.68
Avg Place
44.30%
Top 4 Rate
10.53%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.04
Avg Place
54.35%
Top 4 Rate
13.04%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.54
Avg Place
41.67%
Top 4 Rate
8.33%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.38
Avg Place
50.85%
Top 4 Rate
12.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.49
Avg Place
47.06%
Top 4 Rate
7.84%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.97
Avg Place
59.78%
Top 4 Rate
20.65%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.40
Avg Place
27.27%
Top 4 Rate
9.09%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.78
Avg Place
36.96%
Top 4 Rate
8.70%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.78
Avg Place
43.84%
Top 4 Rate
6.85%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.40
Avg Place
50.94%
Top 4 Rate
7.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.67
Avg Place
53.85%
Top 4 Rate
2.56%
First Place
Severely Contested
6.06
Avg Place
18.75%
Top 4 Rate
6.25%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.96
Avg Place
36.97%
Top 4 Rate
11.52%
First Place
Highly Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 88 team compositions sorted by first place rate to find compositions with the highest potential to win lobbies, based on 11.3K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 63.1% and average placement of 3.76 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is N.O.V.A./Brawler with Viktor as the primary carry, achieving a 97.9% win rate. Following closely is Replicator/N.O.V.A. at 88.7% win rate, and Rogue/N.O.V.A. at 88.6%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Pantheon
  • Rogue/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider Rogue/Meeple which achieves first place in 36.4% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 97.9% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A.: 88.7% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Rogue/N.O.V.A.: 88.6% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Challenger/Rogue with a 1.3% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 80.7% win rate despite high contestation. Replicator/Dark Star follows at 1.3% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

정확성 유지를 도와주세요! 잘못된 통계, 누락된 데이터 또는 문제를 발견하면 피드백을 보내주세요. 커뮤니티 전체의 데이터 품질 향상에 직접적으로 도움이 됩니다.

문제 신고

TFT 더블업 조합 - 세트 17 FAQ

TFT 시즌 17에서 최고의 TFT 더블업 조합은 무엇인가요?

TFT 시즌 17에서 최고의 TFT 더블업 조합은 N.O.V.A./Brawler, Viktor가 주력 캐리이며, 97.9% 승률과 2.19 평균 등수를 달성합니다. 이 조합은 파트너와 함께 랭크를 올리는 데 효과적입니다.

더블업에서 N.O.V.A./Brawler 조합은 어떻게 플레이하나요?

더블업에서 N.O.V.A./Brawler을(를) 플레이하려면 파트너와 조율하세요. Viktor를 메인 캐리로 육성하는 데 집중하세요. 이 조합의 픽률은 0.1%입니다, 상대적으로 경쟁이 적은 옵션입니다. 듀오 파트너와 지원 및 공유 아이템을 조율하세요.

TFT 시즌 17에서 랭크 상승에 좋은 더블업 조합은 무엇인가요?

TFT 시즌 17 더블업에서 꾸준한 LP 획득을 위해 N.O.V.A./Brawler이(가) 2.19로 최고의 평균 등수를 제공합니다. 다른 신뢰할 수 있는 옵션은 Replicator/N.O.V.A. (평균 2.46)과(와) Dark Star/Brawler (평균 2.52)입니다. 파트너와 조율하여 서로 경쟁하지 않도록 하세요.

가장 쉬운 TFT 더블업 조합은 무엇인가요?

N.O.V.A./Brawler은 쉬운 상승을 원하는 플레이어에게 좋은 옵션입니다. 승률 97.9%에 픽률 0.1%만으로 경쟁이 적어 게임을 더 쉽게 진행할 수 있습니다. 낮은 경쟁은 강제 피벗 없이 자연스럽게 유닛을 찾을 수 있음을 의미합니다.

더블업에서 듀오 파트너와 같은 조합을 플레이해야 하나요?

TFT 시즌 17 더블업에서는 일반적으로 유닛 경쟁을 피하기 위해 다른 조합을 플레이하는 것이 좋습니다. Challenger/Rogue이(가) 1.3% 픽률로 가장 인기 있습니다. 파트너가 보완적인 옵션으로 N.O.V.A./Brawler을(를) 플레이하는 것을 고려하세요.