최고 승률 TFT 팀 조합

이 표는 가장 높은 승률을 기록한 TFT 팀 조합을 보여주며, 랭크 상승을 위한 가장 성공적인 조합을 식별하는 데 도움이 됩니다. 최고 double-up챔피언 세트 17 조합: 도전자 (99.3% WR, 1.7 avg), 불한당 (97.9% WR, 1.7 avg), N.O.V.A. (97.8% WR, 1.8 avg). 도전자/N.O.V.A.가 99.26% 승률과 1.71 평균 순위로 선두. 불한당가 97.86% 승률로 뒤따름. 실시간 성능 통계로 100개의 double-up챔피언 조합 분석 중.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
1.71
Avg Place
99.26%
Top 4 Rate
49.07%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.66
Avg Place
97.86%
Top 4 Rate
55.61%
First Place
Severely Contested
1.83
Avg Place
97.80%
Top 4 Rate
51.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.80
Avg Place
96.97%
Top 4 Rate
54.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.62
Avg Place
96.03%
Top 4 Rate
66.40%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.26
Avg Place
95.46%
Top 4 Rate
32.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.04
Avg Place
95.20%
Top 4 Rate
44.72%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.27
Avg Place
95.04%
Top 4 Rate
32.23%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.38
Avg Place
94.26%
Top 4 Rate
29.50%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.27
Avg Place
93.97%
Top 4 Rate
31.16%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.39
Avg Place
92.65%
Top 4 Rate
24.93%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.31
Avg Place
92.61%
Top 4 Rate
31.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.37
Avg Place
92.42%
Top 4 Rate
33.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
92.22%
Top 4 Rate
42.45%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.47
Avg Place
92.06%
Top 4 Rate
28.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
91.52%
Top 4 Rate
46.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.45
Avg Place
91.39%
Top 4 Rate
29.59%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.20
Avg Place
91.30%
Top 4 Rate
44.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.25
Avg Place
91.24%
Top 4 Rate
45.62%
First Place
Severely Contested
1.98
Avg Place
91.00%
Top 4 Rate
57.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.52
Avg Place
90.38%
Top 4 Rate
26.97%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.42
Avg Place
90.13%
Top 4 Rate
33.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.55
Avg Place
89.60%
Top 4 Rate
25.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.91
Avg Place
89.30%
Top 4 Rate
15.72%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.64
Avg Place
89.00%
Top 4 Rate
27.61%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.64
Avg Place
88.91%
Top 4 Rate
24.64%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.68
Avg Place
87.92%
Top 4 Rate
25.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.54
Avg Place
87.70%
Top 4 Rate
32.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.76
Avg Place
85.47%
Top 4 Rate
31.83%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.81
Avg Place
84.04%
Top 4 Rate
32.53%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.07
Avg Place
83.74%
Top 4 Rate
16.56%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.88
Avg Place
83.61%
Top 4 Rate
21.58%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.98
Avg Place
83.60%
Top 4 Rate
18.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.84
Avg Place
82.86%
Top 4 Rate
27.24%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.92
Avg Place
82.80%
Top 4 Rate
24.01%
First Place
Low Contested
2.91
Avg Place
82.32%
Top 4 Rate
26.29%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.13
Avg Place
81.76%
Top 4 Rate
12.79%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.95
Avg Place
81.54%
Top 4 Rate
24.86%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.10
Avg Place
81.35%
Top 4 Rate
12.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.19
Avg Place
81.05%
Top 4 Rate
16.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.10
Avg Place
80.65%
Top 4 Rate
18.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.98
Avg Place
79.95%
Top 4 Rate
24.70%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.18
Avg Place
79.86%
Top 4 Rate
20.49%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.23
Avg Place
79.36%
Top 4 Rate
12.06%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.99
Avg Place
79.29%
Top 4 Rate
26.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
13.81%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.25
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
12.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.27
Avg Place
79.14%
Top 4 Rate
17.27%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.40
Avg Place
78.75%
Top 4 Rate
11.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.27
Avg Place
78.65%
Top 4 Rate
16.34%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.18
Avg Place
78.25%
Top 4 Rate
18.31%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.95
Avg Place
77.73%
Top 4 Rate
27.50%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.18
Avg Place
77.70%
Top 4 Rate
17.88%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.08
Avg Place
77.54%
Top 4 Rate
23.19%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.17
Avg Place
77.53%
Top 4 Rate
22.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.17
Avg Place
77.46%
Top 4 Rate
24.10%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.34%
Top 4 Rate
15.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.08%
Top 4 Rate
19.48%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.13
Avg Place
76.66%
Top 4 Rate
25.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
76.43%
Top 4 Rate
16.25%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.26
Avg Place
76.38%
Top 4 Rate
20.70%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.29
Avg Place
76.14%
Top 4 Rate
14.05%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.01
Avg Place
76.08%
Top 4 Rate
33.63%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.22
Avg Place
75.80%
Top 4 Rate
23.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.29
Avg Place
75.39%
Top 4 Rate
16.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.45
Avg Place
74.75%
Top 4 Rate
15.03%
First Place
Low Contested
3.52
Avg Place
74.58%
Top 4 Rate
12.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.34
Avg Place
74.47%
Top 4 Rate
18.24%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.22
Avg Place
74.02%
Top 4 Rate
25.47%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.22
Avg Place
73.93%
Top 4 Rate
25.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.41
Avg Place
73.89%
Top 4 Rate
17.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.25
Avg Place
73.75%
Top 4 Rate
18.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
73.63%
Top 4 Rate
18.75%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.46
Avg Place
73.54%
Top 4 Rate
13.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.24
Avg Place
73.53%
Top 4 Rate
17.91%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.34
Avg Place
72.98%
Top 4 Rate
22.46%
First Place
Low Contested
3.45
Avg Place
72.80%
Top 4 Rate
14.76%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.52
Avg Place
72.20%
Top 4 Rate
12.08%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.30
Avg Place
71.20%
Top 4 Rate
23.73%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.54
Avg Place
71.12%
Top 4 Rate
13.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.74
Avg Place
71.06%
Top 4 Rate
7.72%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.41
Avg Place
70.77%
Top 4 Rate
21.03%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.55
Avg Place
70.03%
Top 4 Rate
14.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.67
Avg Place
69.93%
Top 4 Rate
11.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.48
Avg Place
69.26%
Top 4 Rate
23.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.71
Avg Place
68.58%
Top 4 Rate
11.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.75
Avg Place
67.05%
Top 4 Rate
8.24%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.75
Avg Place
66.95%
Top 4 Rate
11.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.64
Avg Place
65.71%
Top 4 Rate
21.55%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.77
Avg Place
65.31%
Top 4 Rate
16.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.66
Avg Place
65.12%
Top 4 Rate
19.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.78
Avg Place
64.84%
Top 4 Rate
14.84%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.94
Avg Place
64.09%
Top 4 Rate
5.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.64
Avg Place
62.99%
Top 4 Rate
28.89%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.92
Avg Place
61.30%
Top 4 Rate
16.09%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.03
Avg Place
61.02%
Top 4 Rate
6.66%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.96
Avg Place
58.72%
Top 4 Rate
20.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.09
Avg Place
57.03%
Top 4 Rate
17.84%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.15
Avg Place
56.52%
Top 4 Rate
14.35%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.15
Avg Place
56.39%
Top 4 Rate
11.11%
First Place
Moderately Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 100 team compositions sorted by win rate to help you find the strongest compositions for climbing ranked, based on 106.8K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 79.3% and average placement of 3.05 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is 도전자/N.O.V.A. with 마스터 이 as the primary carry, achieving a 99.3% win rate. Following closely is 불한당/정령족 at 97.9% win rate, and N.O.V.A./신성 결투가 at 97.8%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • 도전자/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around 마스터 이
  • 불한당/정령족 (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around 바드
  • N.O.V.A./신성 결투가 (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around 킨드레드

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider 파티광/N.O.V.A. which achieves first place in 66.4% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Most Consistent for Climbing

For players focused on consistent LP gains, 파티광/N.O.V.A. offers the best average placement at 1.62.Consistent compositions minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing, even if they don't win lobbies as often.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • 도전자/N.O.V.A.: 99.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • 불한당/정령족: 97.9% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./신성 결투가: 97.8% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is 복제자/N.O.V.A. with a 1.9% pick rate, though its 74.0% win rate suggests it may be over-contested. 파티광/암흑의 별 follows at 1.6% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

정확성 유지를 도와주세요! 잘못된 통계, 누락된 데이터 또는 문제를 발견하면 피드백을 보내주세요. 커뮤니티 전체의 데이터 품질 향상에 직접적으로 도움이 됩니다.

문제 신고

전략적 팀 전투 팀 조합 - 시즌 17 FAQ

TFT 시즌 17에서 최고의 TFT 조합은 무엇인가요?

TFT 시즌 17에서 최고의 TFT 조합은 도전자/N.O.V.A.입니다, 마스터 이가 주력 캐리. 승률 99.3%, 평균 순위 1.71를 달성합니다. 이 조합은 랭크 상승에 효과적이며 꾸준히 4등 안에 듭니다.

도전자/N.O.V.A. 조합을 어떻게 플레이하나요?

도전자/N.O.V.A.을 플레이할 때, 마스터 이를 메인 캐리로 빌드하는 데 집중하세요. 초반에 마스터 이와 서포트 유닛을 찾고, 캐리와 시너지가 맞는 아이템을 우선시하며, 7-8레벨에서 파워 스파이크를 목표로 하세요. 이 조합의 픽률은 0.1%입니다, 상대적으로 경쟁이 적은 옵션입니다.

TFT 시즌 17에서 랭크 상승에 좋은 조합은 무엇인가요?

TFT 시즌 17에서 꾸준한 LP 획득을 위해, 파티광/N.O.V.A.이 평균 순위 1.62로 최고의 성능을 보입니다. 다른 신뢰할 만한 옵션으로는 불한당/정령족 (평균 1.66)와 도전자/N.O.V.A. (평균 1.71)이 있습니다. 안정적인 조합은 하위 4등을 최소화하고 꾸준한 상승을 제공합니다.

TFT에서 가장 쉬운 조합은 무엇인가요?

도전자/N.O.V.A.은 쉬운 상승을 원하는 플레이어에게 좋은 옵션입니다. 승률 99.3%에 픽률 0.1%만으로 경쟁이 적어 게임을 더 쉽게 진행할 수 있습니다. 낮은 경쟁은 강제 피벗 없이 자연스럽게 유닛을 찾을 수 있음을 의미합니다.

TFT 시즌 17에서 조합을 강제로 가져가야 할 때와 유연하게 가야 할 때는 언제인가요?

TFT 시즌 17에서 복제자/N.O.V.A.의 픽률은 1.9%로 경쟁이 치열합니다. 다른 사람들이 가져가는 것을 보면 도전자/N.O.V.A. 같은 대안으로 유연하게 전환하는 것을 고려하세요. 초반 유닛과 아이템을 맞췄거나 경쟁이 없을 때 강제로 가세요. 2명 이상이 같은 유닛을 경쟁할 때는 유연하게 대처하세요.

TFT 시즌 17에서 어떤 조합이 가장 높은 승률을 가지고 있나요?

승률 상위 3개 조합: 1) 도전자/N.O.V.A. (99.3%), 2) 불한당/정령족 (97.9%), 3) N.O.V.A./신성 결투가 (97.8%). 이것들은 랭크에서 LP를 최대화하기 위한 가장 강력한 조합입니다.

왜 승률이 TFT 조합에서 중요한가요?

승률은 조합이 얼마나 자주 4등 안에 드는지를 보여주며, 랭크에서 LP를 얻습니다. 도전자/N.O.V.A. (99.3%)과 같은 높은 승률 조합은 여러 게임에서 꾸준히 좋은 성적을 냅니다. 하지만 픽률도 고려하세요—여러 플레이어가 같은 조합을 강제하면 경쟁이 심한 조합은 실제 게임에서 성적이 떨어질 수 있습니다.