按胜率排名的最佳云顶之弈阵容
此表展示具有最高胜率的云顶之弈第16赛季阵容,帮助你识别最成功的上分阵容。 顶级 8英雄Set 16阵容:斗士 (82.5% 胜率, 2.8 均), 主宰 (79.5% 胜率, 3.0 均), 星界游神 (77.8% 胜率, 3.2 均)。 斗士/护卫以82.51%胜率和2.81平均排名领先。 主宰以79.45%胜率紧随其后。 实时分析49个8英雄阵容的性能数据。
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.81 Avg Place | 82.51% Top 4 Rate | 28.13% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.01 Avg Place | 79.45% Top 4 Rate | 24.66% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.25 Avg Place | 77.81% Top 4 Rate | 17.72% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.24 Avg Place | 77.63% Top 4 Rate | 13.90% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.27 Avg Place | 74.37% Top 4 Rate | 20.49% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.48 Avg Place | 73.46% Top 4 Rate | 11.58% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 3.44 Avg Place | 72.15% Top 4 Rate | 18.79% First Place | Low Contested | |||
3.65 Avg Place | 71.87% Top 4 Rate | 12.23% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.46 Avg Place | 71.47% Top 4 Rate | 15.11% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 71.43% Top 4 Rate | 23.81% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.55 Avg Place | 70.00% Top 4 Rate | 13.76% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.66 Avg Place | 68.18% Top 4 Rate | 15.34% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.75 Avg Place | 67.17% Top 4 Rate | 11.88% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.93 Avg Place | 61.45% Top 4 Rate | 10.34% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.09 Avg Place | 61.05% Top 4 Rate | 16.84% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.19 Avg Place | 58.18% Top 4 Rate | 7.38% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.16 Avg Place | 56.10% Top 4 Rate | 8.87% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.25 Avg Place | 55.73% Top 4 Rate | 10.06% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.40 Avg Place | 54.98% Top 4 Rate | 8.84% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.50 Avg Place | 52.88% Top 4 Rate | 4.81% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.29 Avg Place | 52.62% Top 4 Rate | 13.67% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.39 Avg Place | 52.26% Top 4 Rate | 5.97% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.47 Avg Place | 51.95% Top 4 Rate | 6.18% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.47 Avg Place | 51.03% Top 4 Rate | 8.04% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.49 Avg Place | 50.12% Top 4 Rate | 6.05% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.59 Avg Place | 45.65% Top 4 Rate | 4.88% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.73 Avg Place | 43.79% Top 4 Rate | 7.33% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.89 Avg Place | 43.08% Top 4 Rate | 6.75% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.97 Avg Place | 39.73% Top 4 Rate | 5.75% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.13 Avg Place | 39.70% Top 4 Rate | 2.58% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.19 Avg Place | 37.04% Top 4 Rate | 3.99% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.13 Avg Place | 36.93% Top 4 Rate | 4.99% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 5.14 Avg Place | 36.24% Top 4 Rate | 5.00% First Place | Low Contested | |||
5.25 Avg Place | 36.17% Top 4 Rate | 3.03% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.21 Avg Place | 35.98% Top 4 Rate | 4.06% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.25 Avg Place | 35.65% Top 4 Rate | 3.66% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.25 Avg Place | 35.47% Top 4 Rate | 3.57% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.19 Avg Place | 34.17% Top 4 Rate | 5.38% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.22 Avg Place | 32.04% Top 4 Rate | 1.94% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.39 Avg Place | 31.50% Top 4 Rate | 5.05% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.55 Avg Place | 27.27% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 5.64 Avg Place | 26.97% Top 4 Rate | 2.65% First Place | Low Contested | |||
5.59 Avg Place | 26.72% Top 4 Rate | 1.72% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.65 Avg Place | 25.42% Top 4 Rate | 1.13% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.73 Avg Place | 25.34% Top 4 Rate | 0.55% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.81 Avg Place | 22.22% Top 4 Rate | 4.13% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.94 Avg Place | 21.08% Top 4 Rate | 0.97% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.92 Avg Place | 18.91% Top 4 Rate | 2.99% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.46 Avg Place | 16.67% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested |
云顶之弈第16赛季阵容常见问题
TFT 第16赛季中最好的TFT阵容是什么?
TFT 第16赛季中最好的TFT阵容是斗士/护卫,以德莱文作为主C,达到82.5%胜率和2.81平均名次。这个阵容对爬分有效,能持续进入前四。
如何玩斗士/护卫阵容?
玩斗士/护卫时,专注于以德莱文为主C。尽早寻找德莱文和辅助单位,优先选择与主C协同的装备,目标在7-8级达到战力巅峰。这个阵容的选取率为0.1%,相对来说不太被抢。
TFT 第16赛季中哪些阵容适合爬分?
在TFT 第16赛季中稳定获得LP,斗士/护卫提供最佳平均名次2.81。其他可靠选择包括主宰/耀光使 (3.01 avg)和星界游神/护卫 (3.24 avg)。稳定的阵容最大限度减少下四名,提供稳定的爬分体验。
最简单的TFT阵容是什么?
斗士/护卫对于寻求轻松爬分的玩家来说是个好选择。胜率82.5%但选取率仅0.1%,您不太可能被抢,使游戏更容易进行。低争抢意味着您可以自然找到单位而不必强行转型。
在TFT 第16赛季中什么时候应该强玩阵容vs灵活转型?
在TFT 第16赛季中,护卫/耀光使的选取率为1.2%,意味着被大量抢夺。如果您看到其他人玩这个,考虑转型到斗士/护卫等替代方案。当您早期命中单位和装备,或者阵容没人抢时强玩。当2+玩家争抢相同单位时转型。
TFT 第16赛季中胜率最高的阵容是哪些?
胜率前三的阵容是:1) 斗士/护卫 (82.5%),2) 主宰/耀光使 (79.5%),3) 星界游神/护卫 (77.8%)。这些代表了在排位赛中最大化LP的最强阵容。
为什么胜率对TFT阵容很重要?
胜率显示阵容进入前四的频率,这在排位中获得LP。像斗士/护卫(82.5%)这样的高胜率阵容在多场游戏中持续表现良好。但是,也要考虑选取率——被大量抢夺的阵容如果多个玩家强玩可能在您的游戏中表现不佳。