已归档赛季： 这些阵容来自云顶之弈第16赛季，已不再属于当前赛季。显示的数据来自该赛季活跃期间。
按胜率排名的最佳云顶之弈阵容
此表展示具有最高胜率的云顶之弈第16赛季阵容，帮助你识别最成功的上分阵容。 顶级 9英雄Set 16阵容：护卫 (93.2% 胜率, 2.4 均), 斗士 (91.9% 胜率, 2.6 均), 山隐之焰 (91.3% 胜率, 2.5 均)。 护卫/耀光使以93.19%胜率和2.37平均排名领先。 斗士以91.88%胜率紧随其后。 实时分析55个9英雄阵容的性能数据。
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.37 Avg Place | 93.19% Top 4 Rate | 23.47% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.56 Avg Place | 91.88% Top 4 Rate | 24.35% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.54 Avg Place | 91.30% Top 4 Rate | 31.88% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.00 Avg Place | 90.67% Top 4 Rate | 45.33% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.43 Avg Place | 89.84% Top 4 Rate | 30.90% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.54 Avg Place | 89.70% Top 4 Rate | 29.09% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.05 Avg Place | 86.36% Top 4 Rate | 22.73% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.43 Avg Place | 86.00% Top 4 Rate | 38.51% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.87 Avg Place | 83.57% Top 4 Rate | 22.91% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.55 Avg Place | 82.61% Top 4 Rate | 31.88% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.73 Avg Place | 81.19% Top 4 Rate | 34.02% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.80 Avg Place | 80.92% Top 4 Rate | 33.06% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.01 Avg Place | 80.71% Top 4 Rate | 22.55% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.97 Avg Place | 79.39% Top 4 Rate | 27.43% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.90 Avg Place | 78.85% Top 4 Rate | 31.07% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.01 Avg Place | 78.82% Top 4 Rate | 25.12% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 78.61% Top 4 Rate | 22.08% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.92 Avg Place | 78.50% Top 4 Rate | 31.06% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.39 Avg Place | 78.12% Top 4 Rate | 12.46% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.00 Avg Place | 77.43% Top 4 Rate | 26.57% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.98 Avg Place | 77.21% Top 4 Rate | 33.46% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.04 Avg Place | 77.18% Top 4 Rate | 27.51% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.01 Avg Place | 77.17% Top 4 Rate | 31.08% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.01 Avg Place | 76.88% Top 4 Rate | 30.40% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 3.23 Avg Place | 76.36% Top 4 Rate | 20.00% First Place | Low Contested | |||
3.33 Avg Place | 75.99% Top 4 Rate | 21.11% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.15 Avg Place | 74.29% Top 4 Rate | 26.33% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.42 Avg Place | 74.27% Top 4 Rate | 19.69% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.24 Avg Place | 73.67% Top 4 Rate | 27.56% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.12 Avg Place | 73.65% Top 4 Rate | 30.39% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 3.41 Avg Place | 73.19% Top 4 Rate | 16.53% First Place | Low Contested | |||
3.26 Avg Place | 73.06% Top 4 Rate | 23.94% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 3.30 Avg Place | 72.88% Top 4 Rate | 22.99% First Place | Low Contested | |||
3.45 Avg Place | 72.73% Top 4 Rate | 13.64% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.25 Avg Place | 72.32% Top 4 Rate | 24.40% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.52 Avg Place | 72.30% Top 4 Rate | 11.95% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.51 Avg Place | 71.91% Top 4 Rate | 15.30% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.36 Avg Place | 71.90% Top 4 Rate | 22.77% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.37 Avg Place | 71.85% Top 4 Rate | 22.52% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 71.79% Top 4 Rate | 18.75% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.43 Avg Place | 71.58% Top 4 Rate | 20.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.35 Avg Place | 71.15% Top 4 Rate | 25.52% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.41 Avg Place | 71.15% Top 4 Rate | 15.38% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.59 Avg Place | 68.62% Top 4 Rate | 15.99% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.03 Avg Place | 62.42% Top 4 Rate | 10.09% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.96 Avg Place | 59.66% Top 4 Rate | 15.87% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.12 Avg Place | 58.39% Top 4 Rate | 11.19% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.51 Avg Place | 50.52% Top 4 Rate | 7.22% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.36 Avg Place | 50.27% Top 4 Rate | 7.47% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.63 Avg Place | 48.77% Top 4 Rate | 6.13% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.49 Avg Place | 45.89% Top 4 Rate | 5.70% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.65 Avg Place | 45.05% Top 4 Rate | 3.07% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.54 Avg Place | 37.50% Top 4 Rate | 4.17% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.95 Avg Place | 36.71% Top 4 Rate | 5.70% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 5.52 Avg Place | 28.16% Top 4 Rate | 4.21% First Place | Low Contested | |||
2.37
Avg Place93.19%
Top 4 Rate23.47%
First PlaceLow Contested
2.56
Avg Place91.88%
Top 4 Rate24.35%
First PlaceLow Contested
2.54
Avg Place91.30%
Top 4 Rate31.88%
First PlaceLow Contested
2.00
Avg Place90.67%
Top 4 Rate45.33%
First PlaceLow Contested
2.43
Avg Place89.84%
Top 4 Rate30.90%
First PlaceLow Contested
2.54
Avg Place89.70%
Top 4 Rate29.09%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.05
Avg Place86.36%
Top 4 Rate22.73%
First PlaceLow Contested
2.43
Avg Place86.00%
Top 4 Rate38.51%
First PlaceLow Contested
2.87
Avg Place83.57%
Top 4 Rate22.91%
First PlaceLow Contested
2.55
Avg Place82.61%
Top 4 Rate31.88%
First PlaceLow Contested
2.73
Avg Place81.19%
Top 4 Rate34.02%
First PlaceLow Contested
2.80
Avg Place80.92%
Top 4 Rate33.06%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.01
Avg Place80.71%
Top 4 Rate22.55%
First PlaceLow Contested
2.97
Avg Place79.39%
Top 4 Rate27.43%
First PlaceLow Contested
2.90
Avg Place78.85%
Top 4 Rate31.07%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.01
Avg Place78.82%
Top 4 Rate25.12%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.10
Avg Place78.61%
Top 4 Rate22.08%
First PlaceLow Contested
2.92
Avg Place78.50%
Top 4 Rate31.06%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.39
Avg Place78.12%
Top 4 Rate12.46%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.00
Avg Place77.43%
Top 4 Rate26.57%
First PlaceLow Contested
2.98
Avg Place77.21%
Top 4 Rate33.46%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.04
Avg Place77.18%
Top 4 Rate27.51%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.01
Avg Place77.17%
Top 4 Rate31.08%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.01
Avg Place76.88%
Top 4 Rate30.40%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.23
Avg Place76.36%
Top 4 Rate20.00%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.33
Avg Place75.99%
Top 4 Rate21.11%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.15
Avg Place74.29%
Top 4 Rate26.33%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.42
Avg Place74.27%
Top 4 Rate19.69%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.24
Avg Place73.67%
Top 4 Rate27.56%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.12
Avg Place73.65%
Top 4 Rate30.39%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.41
Avg Place73.19%
Top 4 Rate16.53%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.26
Avg Place73.06%
Top 4 Rate23.94%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.30
Avg Place72.88%
Top 4 Rate22.99%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.45
Avg Place72.73%
Top 4 Rate13.64%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.25
Avg Place72.32%
Top 4 Rate24.40%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.52
Avg Place72.30%
Top 4 Rate11.95%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.51
Avg Place71.91%
Top 4 Rate15.30%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.36
Avg Place71.90%
Top 4 Rate22.77%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.37
Avg Place71.85%
Top 4 Rate22.52%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.29
Avg Place71.79%
Top 4 Rate18.75%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.43
Avg Place71.58%
Top 4 Rate20.00%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.35
Avg Place71.15%
Top 4 Rate25.52%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.41
Avg Place71.15%
Top 4 Rate15.38%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.59
Avg Place68.62%
Top 4 Rate15.99%
First PlaceLow Contested
4.03
Avg Place62.42%
Top 4 Rate10.09%
First PlaceLow Contested
3.96
Avg Place59.66%
Top 4 Rate15.87%
First PlaceLow Contested
4.12
Avg Place58.39%
Top 4 Rate11.19%
First PlaceLow Contested
4.51
Avg Place50.52%
Top 4 Rate7.22%
First PlaceLow Contested
4.36
Avg Place50.27%
Top 4 Rate7.47%
First PlaceLow Contested
4.63
Avg Place48.77%
Top 4 Rate6.13%
First PlaceLow Contested
4.49
Avg Place45.89%
Top 4 Rate5.70%
First PlaceLow Contested
4.65
Avg Place45.05%
Top 4 Rate3.07%
First PlaceLow Contested
5.54
Avg Place37.50%
Top 4 Rate4.17%
First PlaceLow Contested
4.95
Avg Place36.71%
Top 4 Rate5.70%
First PlaceLow Contested
🔍Report an Issue
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
云顶之弈第16赛季阵容常见问题
TFT 第16赛季中最好的TFT阵容是什么？
TFT 第16赛季中最好的TFT阵容是护卫/耀光使，以佐伊作为主C，达到93.2%胜率和2.37平均名次。这个阵容对爬分有效，能持续进入前四。
如何玩护卫/耀光使阵容？
玩护卫/耀光使时，专注于以佐伊为主C。尽早寻找佐伊和辅助单位，优先选择与主C协同的装备，目标在7-8级达到战力巅峰。这个阵容的选取率为0.1%，相对来说不太被抢。
TFT 第16赛季中哪些阵容适合爬分？
在TFT 第16赛季中稳定获得LP，斗士/护卫提供最佳平均名次2.00。其他可靠选择包括护卫/耀光使 (2.37 avg)和铸星龙王/护卫 (2.43 avg)。稳定的阵容最大限度减少下四名，提供稳定的爬分体验。
最简单的TFT阵容是什么？
护卫/耀光使对于寻求轻松爬分的玩家来说是个好选择。胜率93.2%但选取率仅0.1%，您不太可能被抢，使游戏更容易进行。低争抢意味着您可以自然找到单位而不必强行转型。
在TFT 第16赛季中什么时候应该强玩阵容vs灵活转型？
在TFT 第16赛季中，山隐之焰/远古恐惧的选取率为1.0%，意味着被大量抢夺。如果您看到其他人玩这个，考虑转型到护卫/耀光使等替代方案。当您早期命中单位和装备，或者阵容没人抢时强玩。当2+玩家争抢相同单位时转型。
TFT 第16赛季中胜率最高的阵容是哪些？
胜率前三的阵容是：1) 护卫/耀光使 (93.2%)，2) 斗士/星界游神 (91.9%)，3) 山隐之焰/护卫 (91.3%)。这些代表了在排位赛中最大化LP的最强阵容。
为什么胜率对TFT阵容很重要？
胜率显示阵容进入前四的频率，这在排位中获得LP。像护卫/耀光使（93.2%）这样的高胜率阵容在多场游戏中持续表现良好。但是，也要考虑选取率——被大量抢夺的阵容如果多个玩家强玩可能在您的游戏中表现不佳。