冕卫云顶之弈阵容
无用大棒
锁子甲使用 冕卫的团队阵容，TFT Set 16.8。查看C位英雄装备此物品以获得最大效果的阵容。
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize 冕卫 as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 56 viable team comps currently building 冕卫, with an average win rate of 37.69% across all compositions. The highest performing 冕卫 comp achieves a 97.53% win rate, primarily featuring 斗神, 旅人, 斗士 traits with 奥瑞利安·索尔 as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where 冕卫 is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
2.08 Avg Place | 97.53% Top 4 Rate | 36.42% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.13 Avg Place | 97.44% Top 4 Rate | 35.26% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.90 Avg Place | 83.61% Top 4 Rate | 27.87% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.00 Avg Place | 82.65% Top 4 Rate | 20.41% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.98 Avg Place | 79.53% Top 4 Rate | 24.25% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.57 Avg Place | 70.46% Top 4 Rate | 14.12% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.58 Avg Place | 70.05% Top 4 Rate | 13.61% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.82 Avg Place | 69.70% Top 4 Rate | 8.71% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.86 Avg Place | 64.81% Top 4 Rate | 12.41% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.93 Avg Place | 63.33% Top 4 Rate | 13.33% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.28 Avg Place | 55.73% Top 4 Rate | 8.14% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.26 Avg Place | 53.81% Top 4 Rate | 3.39% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.41 Avg Place | 53.44% Top 4 Rate | 4.21% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.40 Avg Place | 52.98% Top 4 Rate | 6.67% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.50 Avg Place | 50.36% Top 4 Rate | 6.57% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 4.60 Avg Place | 48.27% Top 4 Rate | 6.44% First Place | Low Contested | |||
4.52 Avg Place | 47.71% Top 4 Rate | 6.86% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.78 Avg Place | 46.50% Top 4 Rate | 6.18% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.83 Avg Place | 42.92% Top 4 Rate | 7.29% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.02 Avg Place | 41.75% Top 4 Rate | 6.80% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 4.81 Avg Place | 41.72% Top 4 Rate | 13.50% First Place | Low Contested | |||
4.89 Avg Place | 41.57% Top 4 Rate | 6.42% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.93 Avg Place | 39.70% Top 4 Rate | 3.52% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.91 Avg Place | 39.18% Top 4 Rate | 2.86% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.06 Avg Place | 38.41% Top 4 Rate | 1.99% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.09 Avg Place | 37.19% Top 4 Rate | 2.88% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 5.26 Avg Place | 30.46% Top 4 Rate | 4.60% First Place | Low Contested | |||
- | 5.27 Avg Place | 30.25% Top 4 Rate | 4.94% First Place | Low Contested | |||
5.36 Avg Place | 29.49% Top 4 Rate | 3.21% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.70 Avg Place | 28.82% Top 4 Rate | 2.94% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.47 Avg Place | 28.80% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.41 Avg Place | 28.65% Top 4 Rate | 0.28% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.50 Avg Place | 25.23% Top 4 Rate | 3.67% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.85 Avg Place | 25.07% Top 4 Rate | 4.27% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.94 Avg Place | 22.67% Top 4 Rate | 1.74% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.62 Avg Place | 22.56% Top 4 Rate | 5.26% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.74 Avg Place | 22.16% Top 4 Rate | 2.23% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.80 Avg Place | 22.15% Top 4 Rate | 1.68% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.50 Avg Place | 21.64% Top 4 Rate | 3.73% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.82 Avg Place | 21.17% Top 4 Rate | 0.90% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.84 Avg Place | 19.66% Top 4 Rate | 0.28% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.85 Avg Place | 19.58% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.92 Avg Place | 19.41% Top 4 Rate | 2.13% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.80 Avg Place | 18.72% Top 4 Rate | 0.46% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.04 Avg Place | 18.43% Top 4 Rate | 1.44% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.13 Avg Place | 16.78% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.13 Avg Place | 16.61% Top 4 Rate | 1.28% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.98 Avg Place | 15.22% Top 4 Rate | 3.26% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.12 Avg Place | 14.66% Top 4 Rate | 1.72% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.18 Avg Place | 14.46% Top 4 Rate | 2.07% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.27 Avg Place | 13.98% Top 4 Rate | 0.61% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.12 Avg Place | 13.81% Top 4 Rate | 0.62% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.27 Avg Place | 13.29% Top 4 Rate | 0.63% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.49 Avg Place | 10.14% Top 4 Rate | 1.45% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.66 Avg Place | 9.22% Top 4 Rate | 0.92% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.09 Avg Place | 6.99% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
冕卫阵容 - 常见问题
云顶之弈第17赛季冕卫的最佳阵容是什么？
云顶之弈第17赛季使用冕卫的最佳阵容胜率为97.53%，选取率为0.06%。这个阵容使用斗神, 旅人, and 斗士羁绊，在包含冕卫的对局中有0.06%的选择率。
云顶之弈中有多少阵容使用冕卫？
云顶之弈第17赛季有56个常用冕卫的可行阵容。冕卫出现在平均胜率为37.69%的阵容中，共分析了30,400场对局。
云顶之弈中哪个阵容最常使用冕卫？
云顶之弈第17赛季冕卫最热门的阵容使用挑战者, 新星特攻队, and 斗士羁绊，选取率为2.02%。这个阵容胜率为53.44%，平均排名4.41。
云顶之弈中哪些羁绊与冕卫搭配效果好？
云顶之弈第17赛季与冕卫协同最佳的羁绊是斗神, 旅人, 斗士, 神谕, 霸天机甲, 狂战士, 黑暗魔女, and 命运祭司。这些羁绊组合出现在冕卫胜率最高的阵容中。