按排名分类的最佳云顶之弈阵容
此表按平均排名对云顶之弈第undefined赛季阵容进行排序,展示哪些阵容能持续获得顶级排名。 顶级 8英雄Set undefined阵容:新星特攻队 (89.0% 胜率, 2.6 均), 新星特攻队 (87.9% 胜率, 2.7 均), 游侠 (89.3% 胜率, 2.9 均)。 新星特攻队/斗士以89.00%胜率和2.64平均排名领先。 新星特攻队以87.92%胜率紧随其后。 实时分析54个8英雄阵容的性能数据。
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.64 Avg Place | 89.00% Top 4 Rate | 27.61% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.68 Avg Place | 87.92% Top 4 Rate | 25.75% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.91 Avg Place | 89.30% Top 4 Rate | 15.72% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.92 Avg Place | 82.80% Top 4 Rate | 24.01% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.17 Avg Place | 77.46% Top 4 Rate | 24.10% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.17 Avg Place | 77.53% Top 4 Rate | 22.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 74.02% Top 4 Rate | 25.47% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.30 Avg Place | 71.20% Top 4 Rate | 23.73% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.34 Avg Place | 72.98% Top 4 Rate | 22.46% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.45 Avg Place | 74.75% Top 4 Rate | 15.03% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.45 Avg Place | 72.80% Top 4 Rate | 14.76% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.52 Avg Place | 74.58% Top 4 Rate | 12.41% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.52 Avg Place | 72.20% Top 4 Rate | 12.08% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.71 Avg Place | 68.58% Top 4 Rate | 11.03% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.75 Avg Place | 67.05% Top 4 Rate | 8.24% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.78 Avg Place | 64.84% Top 4 Rate | 14.84% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.92 Avg Place | 61.30% Top 4 Rate | 16.09% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.15 Avg Place | 56.39% Top 4 Rate | 11.11% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.15 Avg Place | 56.52% Top 4 Rate | 14.35% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.20 Avg Place | 55.44% Top 4 Rate | 12.09% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.33 Avg Place | 54.68% Top 4 Rate | 6.47% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.40 Avg Place | 54.00% Top 4 Rate | 10.86% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.60 Avg Place | 47.68% Top 4 Rate | 7.78% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.62 Avg Place | 45.77% Top 4 Rate | 11.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.65 Avg Place | 48.65% Top 4 Rate | 4.00% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.70 Avg Place | 44.66% Top 4 Rate | 7.57% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.70 Avg Place | 45.99% Top 4 Rate | 5.61% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.84 Avg Place | 44.95% Top 4 Rate | 3.26% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.93 Avg Place | 41.36% Top 4 Rate | 6.63% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.98 Avg Place | 39.64% Top 4 Rate | 7.29% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.00 Avg Place | 38.30% Top 4 Rate | 4.17% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.01 Avg Place | 35.93% Top 4 Rate | 7.46% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.05 Avg Place | 37.81% Top 4 Rate | 5.60% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.11 Avg Place | 38.66% Top 4 Rate | 1.49% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.29 Avg Place | 31.73% Top 4 Rate | 4.80% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.37 Avg Place | 26.85% Top 4 Rate | 1.68% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.37 Avg Place | 32.70% Top 4 Rate | 3.08% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.38 Avg Place | 29.93% Top 4 Rate | 4.82% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.41 Avg Place | 28.68% Top 4 Rate | 2.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.42 Avg Place | 29.75% Top 4 Rate | 3.94% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.42 Avg Place | 29.59% Top 4 Rate | 3.00% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.48 Avg Place | 29.02% Top 4 Rate | 3.11% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.51 Avg Place | 28.18% Top 4 Rate | 1.34% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.56 Avg Place | 27.43% Top 4 Rate | 5.43% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.60 Avg Place | 27.22% Top 4 Rate | 1.16% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.68 Avg Place | 25.40% Top 4 Rate | 1.95% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.69 Avg Place | 24.40% Top 4 Rate | 0.89% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.72 Avg Place | 25.12% Top 4 Rate | 1.40% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.74 Avg Place | 21.02% Top 4 Rate | 1.20% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.93 Avg Place | 20.10% Top 4 Rate | 1.44% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.94 Avg Place | 20.90% Top 4 Rate | 2.43% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.02 Avg Place | 21.36% Top 4 Rate | 0.65% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
6.18 Avg Place | 17.28% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
6.26 Avg Place | 13.42% Top 4 Rate | 0.39% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
云顶之弈第undefined赛季阵容常见问题
TFT 第undefined赛季中最好的TFT阵容是什么?
TFT 第undefined赛季中最好的TFT阵容是游侠/新星特攻队,以贾克斯作为主C,达到89.3%胜率和2.91平均名次。这个阵容对爬分有效,能持续进入前四。
如何玩游侠/新星特攻队阵容?
玩游侠/新星特攻队时,专注于以贾克斯为主C。尽早寻找贾克斯和辅助单位,优先选择与主C协同的装备,目标在7-8级达到战力巅峰。这个阵容的选取率为0.1%,相对来说不太被抢。
TFT 第undefined赛季中哪些阵容适合爬分?
在TFT 第undefined赛季中稳定获得LP,新星特攻队/斗士提供最佳平均名次2.64。其他可靠选择包括新星特攻队/斗士 (2.68 avg)和游侠/新星特攻队 (2.91 avg)。稳定的阵容最大限度减少下四名,提供稳定的爬分体验。
最简单的TFT阵容是什么?
游侠/新星特攻队对于寻求轻松爬分的玩家来说是个好选择。胜率89.3%但选取率仅0.1%,您不太可能被抢,使游戏更容易进行。低争抢意味着您可以自然找到单位而不必强行转型。
在TFT 第undefined赛季中什么时候应该强玩阵容vs灵活转型?
在TFT 第undefined赛季中,游侠/木灵族的选取率为3.3%,意味着被大量抢夺。如果您看到其他人玩这个,考虑转型到游侠/新星特攻队等替代方案。当您早期命中单位和装备,或者阵容没人抢时强玩。当2+玩家争抢相同单位时转型。
TFT 第undefined赛季中最稳定的TFT阵容是什么?
新星特攻队/斗士拥有最佳平均名次2.64,是爬分最稳定的阵容。其他可靠选择包括新星特攻队/斗士 follows at 2.68和游侠/新星特攻队 at 2.91。更低的平均名次意味着更少的下四名。
平均名次比胜率更适合爬分吗?
对于稳定的LP收益,平均名次通常比纯胜率更可靠。像新星特攻队/斗士这样平均名次2.64的阵容最大限度减少下四带来的大量LP损失。高方差阵容可能赢得更多对局但也更容易第八。对于爬分,稳定性通常优于赌博策略。