Olafvs Karma
Olaf vs Karma is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Olaf wins with a 60.0% win rate (+20.0%) over Karma based on 5 games. Karma wins the early laning phase while Olaf scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Olaf build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Olaf vs Karma matchup.
Olaf Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Olaf performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Karma(60.0%)Who Wins the Olaf vs Karma Matchup?
Olaf vs Karma Matchup Summary
The Olaf vs Karma matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 5 recent matches analyzed, Olaf wins with a 60.0% win rate compared to Karma's 40.0%, giving Olaf a 20.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Karma controls the early laning stage, but Olaf outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Karma needs to press advantages before Olaf reaches their power spikes, while Olaf should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in sustain, where Olaf leads by 929 HP/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Olaf players can confidently pick into Karma and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Karma away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Olaf vs Karma Laning Phase Breakdown
Olaf is favored during the laning phase against Karma, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Olaf holds advantages in damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Olaf Build Against Karma
Plated Steelcaps is the optimal boots choice against Karma, providing the mobility and stats Olaf needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Olaf against Karma are Death's Dance, Ravenous Hydra and Experimental Hexplate. This combination gives Olaf an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Olaf vs Karma matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Olaf0.0%Karma100.0%Olaf75.0%Karma25.0%Karma dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 100.0% win rate — a 100.0 percentage point lead over Olaf. This lopsided early game means Karma can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Olaf is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 75.0% win rate — 50.0 points above Karma. Extended games heavily favor Olaf, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Karma must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Olaf reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Olaf survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Olaf Runes Against Karma
Precision
Inspiration
Running Precision primary with Inspiration secondary allows Olaf to press their advantage against Karma, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Olaf matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Olaf's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Olaf build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.94% | 187 | 6.4 | 828 | 12,736 | 57.0% | 50.0% | |
| 52.47% | 162 | 6.3 | 919 | 12,340 | 54.2% | 51.1% | |
| 42.75% | 138 | 6.6 | 877 | 11,755 | 41.0% | 44.2% | |
| 45.57% | 79 | 6.1 | 940 | 11,629 | 47.5% | 43.6% | |
| 46.84% | 79 | 6.1 | 725 | 10,621 | 40.0% | 53.9% | |
| 47.30% | 74 | 6.4 | 714 | 10,902 | 41.7% | 52.6% | |
| 46.58% | 73 | 6.2 | 808 | 10,977 | 43.6% | 50.0% | |
| 55.56% | 72 | 6.7 | 884 | 12,139 | 55.9% | 55.3% | |
| 55.56% | 72 | 6.3 | 1,160 | 11,990 | 56.7% | 54.8% | |
| 41.43% | 70 | 6.3 | 897 | 11,671 | 36.7% | 45.0% | |
| 56.72% | 67 | 6.5 | 961 | 11,965 | 66.7% | 48.6% | |
| 54.55% | 66 | 6.2 | 979 | 12,036 | 59.3% | 51.3% | |
| 46.67% | 60 | 6.8 | 937 | 12,036 | 52.0% | 42.9% | |
| 51.67% | 60 | 6.8 | 886 | 13,256 | 52.9% | 51.2% | |
| 45.76% | 59 | 6.2 | 800 | 11,051 | 43.3% | 48.3% | |
| 44.07% | 59 | 6.5 | 911 | 12,988 | 38.5% | 48.5% | |
| 42.37% | 59 | 6.5 | 873 | 12,324 | 44.4% | 40.6% | |
| 56.14% | 57 | 6.4 | 844 | 12,888 | 72.7% | 45.7% | |
| 40.74% | 54 | 5.7 | 779 | 10,680 | 36.0% | 44.8% | |
| 54.00% | 50 | 6.7 | 974 | 12,221 | 59.1% | 50.0% | |
| 43.75% | 48 | 5.1 | 788 | 11,464 | 40.7% | 47.6% | |
| 56.25% | 48 | 6.3 | 885 | 11,917 | 40.0% | 67.9% | |
| 42.55% | 47 | 6.1 | 1,084 | 12,200 | 47.8% | 37.5% | |
| 40.00% | 45 | 6.2 | 882 | 11,280 | 38.1% | 41.7% | |
| 50.00% | 42 | 3.7 | 848 | 13,576 | 53.3% | 48.1% | |
| 40.48% | 42 | 7.1 | 904 | 12,828 | 50.0% | 31.8% | |
| 45.24% | 42 | 6.4 | 887 | 12,706 | 47.1% | 44.0% | |
| 56.41% | 39 | 6.5 | 774 | 11,786 | 55.0% | 57.9% | |
| 66.67% | 39 | 6.6 | 924 | 12,518 | 65.0% | 68.4% | |
| 48.57% | 35 | 5.9 | 810 | 10,816 | 53.9% | 45.5% | |
| 59.38% | 32 | 3.3 | 802 | 13,395 | 61.5% | 57.9% | |
| 35.48% | 31 | 6.8 | 737 | 11,370 | 38.5% | 33.3% | |
| 35.48% | 31 | 1.3 | 826 | 13,219 | 38.5% | 33.3% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 6.0 | 883 | 12,485 | 61.5% | 35.3% | |
| 50.00% | 30 | 6.1 | 941 | 11,790 | 53.3% | 46.7% | |
| 43.33% | 30 | 2.8 | 853 | 12,583 | 60.0% | 26.7% | |
| 43.33% | 30 | 6.8 | 950 | 10,520 | 31.6% | 63.6% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 6.5 | 871 | 13,260 | 63.6% | 52.6% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 4.2 | 1,002 | 13,609 | 61.5% | 50.0% | |
| 58.62% | 29 | 6.2 | 862 | 12,097 | 41.7% | 70.6% | |
| 58.62% | 29 | 6.6 | 841 | 12,219 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 28 | 5.6 | 667 | 11,542 | 41.7% | 43.8% | |
| 33.33% | 27 | 6.2 | 868 | 12,481 | 27.3% | 37.5% | |
| 59.26% | 27 | 6.5 | 918 | 12,697 | 76.9% | 42.9% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 5.4 | 738 | 11,583 | 66.7% | 35.7% | |
| 34.62% | 26 | 6.8 | 1,025 | 12,637 | 40.0% | 31.3% | |
| 38.46% | 26 | 6.5 | 1,009 | 13,628 | 50.0% | 31.3% | |
| 65.38% | 26 | 2.4 | 881 | 13,931 | 60.0% | 68.8% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 6.6 | 990 | 13,771 | 50.0% | 35.7% | |
| 56.52% | 23 | 4.5 | 897 | 12,414 | 54.5% | 58.3% | |
| 31.82% | 22 | 6.0 | 751 | 11,604 | 33.3% | 30.8% | |
| 50.00% | 22 | 6.4 | 1,016 | 13,967 | 54.5% | 45.5% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 2.8 | 619 | 10,708 | 58.3% | 50.0% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 1.9 | 1,011 | 13,409 | 77.8% | 44.4% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 6.5 | 1,041 | 15,018 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 3.3 | 763 | 11,073 | 83.3% | 62.5% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 6.6 | 871 | 11,991 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 3.5 | 904 | 13,802 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 78.57% | 14 | 1.2 | 865 | 11,528 | 80.0% | 77.8% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 2.2 | 600 | 10,577 | 55.6% | 40.0% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 2.4 | 814 | 13,770 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 76.92% | 13 | 2.5 | 691 | 14,420 | 83.3% | 71.4% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 5.2 | 933 | 13,819 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 2.9 | 578 | 9,827 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 7.3 | 975 | 12,947 | 83.3% | 33.3% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 1.9 | 733 | 12,182 | 33.3% | 16.7% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 1.0 | 636 | 13,271 | 60.0% | 14.3% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 2.3 | 954 | 13,867 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 2.1 | 870 | 14,600 | 25.0% | 28.6% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 6.0 | 712 | 12,382 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 4.0 | 814 | 12,329 | 66.7% | 71.4% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.3 | 723 | 12,330 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 5.4 | 669 | 11,566 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 5.5 | 741 | 11,627 | 0.0% | 37.5% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.8 | 793 | 14,259 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 6.4 | 824 | 13,344 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.9 | 768 | 13,295 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 4.6 | 935 | 13,885 | 80.0% | 75.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.0 | 752 | 11,897 | 80.0% | 25.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.6 | 929 | 12,755 | 40.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 3.5 | 714 | 11,188 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 3.2 | 591 | 8,580 | 66.7% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 2.8 | 672 | 12,387 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.0 | 732 | 8,767 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 14.29% | 7 | 1.4 | 703 | 13,261 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 1.6 | 848 | 14,435 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 2.5 | 769 | 11,248 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.6 | 695 | 12,775 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.5 | 846 | 12,997 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 5.6 | 911 | 16,000 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.8 | 868 | 12,695 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 3.1 | 797 | 10,812 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.8 | 802 | 13,757 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 4.7 | 661 | 8,262 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.7 | 666 | 11,751 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 1,010 | 13,591 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 878 | 12,238 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 1.6 | 738 | 14,607 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.1 | 535 | 10,620 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.7 | 565 | 11,817 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.1 | 845 | 15,659 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Olaf vs Karma - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Olaf do against Karma in League of Legends?
Olaf wins the Olaf vs Karma matchup with a 60.0% win rate compared to Karma's 40.0%, a 20.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 5 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Olaf do against Karma in the early game?
In the early game, Karma has the advantage against Olaf with a 100.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Karma players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Olaf do against Karma in the late game?
In the late game, Olaf takes over the Olaf vs Karma matchup with a 75.0% win rate compared to 25.0%. Olaf scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Olaf vs Karma matchup?
Olaf wins the matchup against Karma with a 60.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 20.0 percentage point advantage means Olaf is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 5 games analyzed.
What is the best Olaf build against Karma?
The best Olaf build against Karma includes Death's Dance, Ravenous Hydra, Experimental Hexplate with Plated Steelcaps. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Olaf runes against Karma?
The best Olaf runes against Karma use the Precision primary tree with Inspiration secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Olaf vs Karma matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Olaf counter Karma?
Yes, Olaf has a favorable matchup against Karma with a 60.0% win rate. Olaf strongly counters Karma in lane based on current patch 26.10 data.
How do I play Olaf against Karma?
When playing Olaf against Karma, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. Play safe early and scale into your power spikes where you outperform Karma. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.