
Olafvs Tryndamere
Olaf vs Tryndamere is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.7. Tryndamere wins with a 63.6% win rate (+27.3%) over Olaf based on 33 games. Tryndamere holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Olaf build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Olaf vs Tryndamere matchup.
Olaf Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Olaf performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Olaf vs Tryndamere Matchup?

Olaf vs Tryndamere Matchup Summary
The Olaf vs Tryndamere matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 33 recent matches analyzed, Tryndamere wins with a 63.6% win rate compared to Olaf's 36.4%, giving Tryndamere a 27.3 percentage point advantage. Tryndamere dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Olaf players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in damage output, where Tryndamere leads by 218 DMG/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Tryndamere has a strong advantage in this matchup. Olaf players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Tryndamere overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Olaf vs Tryndamere Laning Phase Breakdown
Tryndamere is favored during the laning phase against Olaf, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Tryndamere holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Olaf Build Against Tryndamere
Plated Steelcaps is the optimal boots choice against Tryndamere, providing the mobility and stats Olaf needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Olaf against Tryndamere are Stridebreaker, Death's Dance and Experimental Hexplate. This combination gives Olaf an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 2 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Tryndamere. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Olaf vs Tryndamere matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Tryndamere dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 63.2% win rate — a 26.3 percentage point lead over Olaf. This lopsided early game means Tryndamere can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Tryndamere is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 64.3% win rate — 28.6 points above Olaf. Extended games heavily favor Tryndamere, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Tryndamere holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Olaf players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Olaf Runes Against Tryndamere
The Precision and Resolve rune setup gives Olaf the best tools to compete against Tryndamere in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Olaf matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.7. The table below shows Olaf's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Olaf build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 62.62% | 107 | 6.5 | 982 | 12,984 | 63.8% | 61.7% | |
| 42.50% | 80 | 6.6 | 869 | 12,164 | 55.6% | 31.8% | |
| 45.83% | 48 | 6.1 | 845 | 12,833 | 31.6% | 55.2% | |
| 58.33% | 48 | 7.0 | 1,067 | 12,861 | 72.0% | 43.5% | |
| 46.67% | 45 | 6.6 | 848 | 11,672 | 40.9% | 52.2% | |
| 51.28% | 39 | 7.0 | 1,078 | 12,787 | 58.8% | 45.5% | |
| 51.28% | 39 | 6.2 | 815 | 11,475 | 63.2% | 40.0% | |
| 41.03% | 39 | 6.2 | 844 | 10,492 | 34.6% | 53.9% | |
| 40.54% | 37 | 6.5 | 965 | 13,248 | 29.4% | 50.0% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 6.7 | 877 | 14,070 | 46.1% | 45.8% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 5.5 | 1,114 | 12,267 | 43.8% | 55.0% | |
| 51.43% | 35 | 6.5 | 1,070 | 12,368 | 50.0% | 52.6% | |
| 51.43% | 35 | 7.1 | 895 | 11,966 | 47.6% | 57.1% | |
| 44.12% | 34 | 3.7 | 892 | 13,810 | 40.0% | 47.4% | |
| 54.55% | 33 | 5.4 | 909 | 12,092 | 45.0% | 69.2% | |
| 36.36% | 33 | 6.5 | 782 | 10,502 | 36.8% | 35.7% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 5.9 | 899 | 12,742 | 69.2% | 42.1% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 6.5 | 933 | 14,040 | 71.4% | 50.0% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 5.6 | 812 | 11,771 | 56.3% | 53.9% | |
| 35.71% | 28 | 6.8 | 851 | 13,630 | 50.0% | 27.8% | |
| 34.62% | 26 | 6.4 | 1,104 | 14,545 | 20.0% | 38.1% | |
| 56.00% | 25 | 7.1 | 958 | 10,312 | 64.3% | 45.5% | |
| 56.00% | 25 | 6.2 | 896 | 13,187 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 34.78% | 23 | 6.2 | 767 | 11,318 | 36.4% | 33.3% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 6.5 | 916 | 11,638 | 69.2% | 55.6% | |
| 63.64% | 22 | 6.5 | 1,032 | 12,459 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 5.1 | 748 | 10,587 | 42.9% | 71.4% | |
| 71.43% | 21 | 6.9 | 961 | 13,325 | 57.1% | 78.6% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 2.4 | 781 | 11,836 | 45.5% | 55.6% | |
| 35.00% | 20 | 7.5 | 894 | 12,334 | 33.3% | 36.4% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 2.0 | 805 | 14,202 | 28.6% | 58.3% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 6.9 | 915 | 11,897 | 20.0% | 55.6% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 6.2 | 902 | 12,511 | 44.4% | 55.6% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 6.3 | 802 | 12,082 | 28.6% | 54.5% | |
| 64.71% | 17 | 4.9 | 931 | 14,498 | 66.7% | 62.5% | |
| 35.29% | 17 | 6.3 | 853 | 10,668 | 25.0% | 44.4% | |
| 37.50% | 16 | 6.7 | 870 | 13,597 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 7.0 | 872 | 11,757 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 5.7 | 974 | 14,343 | 71.4% | 12.5% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 6.7 | 805 | 11,865 | 0.0% | 55.6% | |
| 53.33% | 15 | 2.6 | 813 | 15,320 | 66.7% | 44.4% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 3.8 | 754 | 11,649 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 21.43% | 14 | 6.0 | 784 | 12,461 | 16.7% | 25.0% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 5.2 | 810 | 11,538 | 72.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 1.6 | 984 | 14,197 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 1.3 | 669 | 10,730 | 55.6% | 40.0% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 6.2 | 1,056 | 14,483 | 57.1% | 71.4% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 1.3 | 801 | 10,715 | 28.6% | 83.3% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 2.0 | 571 | 11,003 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 75.00% | 12 | 7.8 | 901 | 13,787 | 66.7% | 83.3% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 5.4 | 810 | 12,276 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 6.2 | 963 | 10,648 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 2.6 | 711 | 13,586 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 7.0 | 677 | 10,217 | 42.9% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 2.3 | 802 | 14,406 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.2 | 908 | 11,020 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 6.4 | 752 | 11,996 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.6 | 885 | 10,979 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.6 | 839 | 14,968 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.1 | 653 | 12,655 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.3 | 793 | 11,525 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 1.4 | 803 | 13,720 | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 7.2 | 744 | 11,305 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.0 | 755 | 11,403 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 6.7 | 770 | 14,631 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 6.7 | 1,216 | 14,845 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 7.3 | 1,133 | 14,974 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.7 | 972 | 13,879 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 100.00% | 6 | 7.7 | 972 | 11,480 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 3.9 | 1,014 | 15,864 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 4.9 | 739 | 11,681 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 6.0 | 982 | 12,579 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.0 | 624 | 12,680 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 959 | 12,935 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 1.0 | 584 | 10,552 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 2.5 | 576 | 9,251 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.8 | 862 | 17,877 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.1 | 1,024 | 15,885 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 100.00% | 5 | 1.1 | 980 | 15,699 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Olaf vs Tryndamere - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Olaf do against Tryndamere in League of Legends?
Tryndamere wins the Olaf vs Tryndamere matchup with a 63.6% win rate compared to Olaf's 36.4%, a 27.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 33 recent ranked games in patch 26.7.
How does Olaf do against Tryndamere in the early game?
In the early game, Tryndamere has the advantage against Olaf with a 63.2% win rate versus 36.8%. Tryndamere players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Olaf do against Tryndamere in the late game?
In the late game, Tryndamere takes over the Olaf vs Tryndamere matchup with a 64.3% win rate compared to 35.7%. Tryndamere scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Olaf vs Tryndamere matchup?
Tryndamere wins the matchup against Olaf with a 63.6% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.7. The 27.3 percentage point advantage means Tryndamere is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 33 games analyzed.
What is the best Olaf build against Tryndamere?
The best Olaf build against Tryndamere includes Stridebreaker, Death's Dance, Experimental Hexplate with Plated Steelcaps. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Olaf runes against Tryndamere?
The best Olaf runes against Tryndamere use the Precision primary tree with Resolve secondary. This rune setup achieves a 60.0% win rate in the Olaf vs Tryndamere matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Olaf counter Tryndamere?
No, Olaf struggles against Tryndamere with only a 36.4% win rate. Tryndamere has the advantage in this matchup. Olaf players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Tryndamere's lead.
How do I play Olaf against Tryndamere?
When playing Olaf against Tryndamere, play cautiously and avoid Tryndamere's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Tryndamere has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.