Quinnvs Cassiopeia
Quinn vs Cassiopeia is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Quinn wins with a 66.7% win rate (+33.3%) over Cassiopeia based on 6 games. Cassiopeia wins the early laning phase while Quinn scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Quinn build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Quinn vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Quinn Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Quinn performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Cassiopeia(66.7%)Who Wins the Quinn vs Cassiopeia Matchup?
Quinn vs Cassiopeia Matchup Summary
The Quinn vs Cassiopeia matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 6 recent matches analyzed, Quinn wins with a 66.7% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 33.3%, giving Quinn a 33.3 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Cassiopeia controls the early laning stage, but Quinn outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Cassiopeia needs to press advantages before Quinn reaches their power spikes, while Quinn should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Cassiopeia leads by 0.4s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Quinn players can confidently pick into Cassiopeia and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Cassiopeia away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Quinn vs Cassiopeia Laning Phase Breakdown
Cassiopeia is favored during the laning phase against Quinn, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Cassiopeia holds advantages in farming, crowd control and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Quinn Build Against Cassiopeia
Boots of Swiftness is the optimal boots choice against Cassiopeia, providing the mobility and stats Quinn needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Quinn against Cassiopeia are The Collector, Kraken Slayer and Edge of Night. This combination gives Quinn an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Cassiopeia. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Quinn vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Quinn0.0%Cassiopeia100.0%Quinn80.0%Cassiopeia20.0%Cassiopeia dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 100.0% win rate — a 100.0 percentage point lead over Quinn. This lopsided early game means Cassiopeia can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Quinn is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 80.0% win rate — 60.0 points above Cassiopeia. Extended games heavily favor Quinn, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Cassiopeia must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Quinn reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Quinn survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Quinn Runes Against Cassiopeia
Precision
Sorcery
Running Precision primary with Sorcery secondary allows Quinn to press their advantage against Cassiopeia, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Quinn matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Quinn's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Quinn build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39.18% | 97 | 1.2 | 763 | 13,255 | 33.3% | 42.6% | |
| 47.62% | 84 | 5.1 | 710 | 11,281 | 55.0% | 40.9% | |
| 35.44% | 79 | 1.4 | 722 | 12,434 | 21.2% | 45.6% | |
| 40.51% | 79 | 1.0 | 851 | 13,311 | 46.7% | 36.7% | |
| 31.75% | 63 | 1.1 | 737 | 11,690 | 34.4% | 29.0% | |
| 41.94% | 62 | 1.1 | 774 | 13,246 | 25.9% | 54.3% | |
| 56.45% | 62 | 1.0 | 778 | 13,028 | 51.5% | 62.1% | |
| 48.39% | 62 | 1.1 | 819 | 13,375 | 56.5% | 43.6% | |
| 47.54% | 61 | 5.7 | 985 | 12,182 | 52.0% | 44.4% | |
| 54.39% | 57 | 1.1 | 733 | 13,034 | 44.4% | 63.3% | |
| 41.67% | 48 | 5.2 | 896 | 11,606 | 48.0% | 34.8% | |
| 57.45% | 47 | 5.6 | 864 | 12,148 | 55.6% | 58.6% | |
| 39.13% | 46 | 1.5 | 791 | 13,166 | 30.0% | 46.1% | |
| 39.13% | 46 | 1.3 | 729 | 13,410 | 37.5% | 40.0% | |
| 53.49% | 43 | 4.7 | 1,018 | 13,605 | 42.9% | 58.6% | |
| 41.46% | 41 | 3.5 | 832 | 11,944 | 31.3% | 48.0% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 3.2 | 864 | 13,041 | 57.1% | 50.0% | |
| 46.15% | 39 | 1.8 | 901 | 13,205 | 11.8% | 72.7% | |
| 26.32% | 38 | 3.7 | 633 | 11,200 | 14.3% | 33.3% | |
| 40.54% | 37 | 2.5 | 806 | 12,746 | 31.6% | 50.0% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 0.9 | 793 | 12,532 | 55.6% | 36.8% | |
| 44.44% | 36 | 1.5 | 937 | 14,961 | 46.1% | 43.5% | |
| 28.57% | 35 | 1.1 | 724 | 12,016 | 25.0% | 31.6% | |
| 38.24% | 34 | 4.8 | 1,040 | 11,679 | 38.9% | 37.5% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 1.7 | 819 | 13,740 | 60.0% | 47.1% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 1.1 | 840 | 13,511 | 54.5% | 38.1% | |
| 40.00% | 30 | 1.9 | 703 | 12,080 | 41.7% | 38.9% | |
| 35.71% | 28 | 1.6 | 661 | 13,300 | 25.0% | 40.0% | |
| 64.29% | 28 | 5.1 | 904 | 12,097 | 81.8% | 52.9% | |
| 28.57% | 28 | 1.5 | 772 | 11,987 | 42.9% | 14.3% | |
| 46.43% | 28 | 5.5 | 959 | 11,158 | 25.0% | 62.5% | |
| 53.57% | 28 | 5.7 | 877 | 12,262 | 30.0% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 27 | 0.9 | 745 | 12,577 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 44.44% | 27 | 5.3 | 816 | 11,042 | 46.1% | 42.9% | |
| 34.62% | 26 | 5.1 | 810 | 11,405 | 42.9% | 25.0% | |
| 26.92% | 26 | 4.3 | 784 | 14,293 | 14.3% | 31.6% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 5.4 | 1,033 | 13,075 | 33.3% | 64.7% | |
| 38.46% | 26 | 6.3 | 1,055 | 13,953 | 62.5% | 27.8% | |
| 64.00% | 25 | 5.9 | 737 | 10,820 | 46.1% | 83.3% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 6.0 | 881 | 12,700 | 58.3% | 61.5% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 5.2 | 832 | 10,464 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 36.00% | 25 | 1.5 | 836 | 15,532 | 33.3% | 36.8% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 5.2 | 906 | 13,163 | 10.0% | 66.7% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 1.9 | 891 | 14,640 | 37.5% | 62.5% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 5.4 | 1,061 | 13,268 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 24 | 0.8 | 757 | 11,389 | 38.5% | 36.4% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 2.9 | 894 | 13,844 | 0.0% | 68.8% | |
| 47.83% | 23 | 6.5 | 1,002 | 11,732 | 45.5% | 50.0% | |
| 26.09% | 23 | 1.6 | 564 | 9,601 | 28.6% | 22.2% | |
| 65.22% | 23 | 4.0 | 858 | 14,755 | 25.0% | 73.7% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 5.5 | 813 | 12,700 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 5.6 | 921 | 11,732 | 72.7% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 3.4 | 811 | 11,447 | 63.6% | 50.0% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 4.7 | 977 | 12,341 | 44.4% | 63.6% | |
| 55.00% | 20 | 5.5 | 926 | 12,182 | 71.4% | 46.1% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 0.9 | 705 | 11,341 | 50.0% | 30.0% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 5.4 | 933 | 13,153 | 28.6% | 33.3% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 0.7 | 776 | 11,338 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 4.6 | 873 | 13,755 | 28.6% | 63.6% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 4.4 | 959 | 14,560 | 60.0% | 23.1% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 5.8 | 842 | 12,019 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 22.22% | 18 | 3.9 | 747 | 11,167 | 25.0% | 16.7% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 5.9 | 881 | 12,964 | 33.3% | 62.5% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 3.8 | 796 | 12,447 | 50.0% | 54.5% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 3.6 | 761 | 9,481 | 54.5% | 40.0% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 6.4 | 1,098 | 14,811 | 33.3% | 61.5% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 5.6 | 710 | 13,538 | 25.0% | 58.3% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 3.8 | 904 | 9,835 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 20.00% | 15 | 5.0 | 949 | 10,357 | 0.0% | 42.9% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 5.5 | 851 | 11,413 | 22.2% | 66.7% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 4.0 | 845 | 12,795 | 33.3% | 55.6% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 5.7 | 953 | 14,348 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 4.5 | 991 | 14,129 | 40.0% | 77.8% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 5.4 | 819 | 12,746 | 20.0% | 37.5% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 6.0 | 814 | 10,259 | 28.6% | 33.3% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 5.3 | 886 | 12,363 | 50.0% | 71.4% | |
| 83.33% | 12 | 5.9 | 945 | 11,944 | 71.4% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 5.3 | 809 | 9,488 | 16.7% | 50.0% | |
| 16.67% | 12 | 0.8 | 653 | 12,997 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 6.1 | 750 | 11,258 | 42.9% | 40.0% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 1.1 | 728 | 13,343 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 5.0 | 883 | 14,202 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 3.4 | 749 | 10,625 | 66.7% | 60.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 4.9 | 938 | 12,330 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.3 | 686 | 11,074 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 0.9 | 718 | 12,990 | 20.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 10 | 6.7 | 779 | 11,420 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 6.0 | 942 | 11,573 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.3 | 936 | 14,807 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 100.00% | 10 | 5.6 | 941 | 13,991 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.6 | 951 | 13,404 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.9 | 854 | 16,233 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 5.1 | 688 | 9,672 | 85.7% | 0.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 1.0 | 749 | 14,778 | 0.0% | 71.4% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 3.8 | 712 | 12,076 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.1 | 899 | 12,506 | 25.0% | 40.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 3.7 | 731 | 13,612 | 100.0% | 16.7% | |
| 12.50% | 8 | 6.8 | 855 | 12,902 | 0.0% | 16.7% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 1.6 | 1,026 | 14,998 | 0.0% | 28.6% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.6 | 678 | 9,977 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.3 | 820 | 9,902 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.8 | 1,223 | 13,906 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 5.3 | 1,002 | 12,694 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 3.8 | 876 | 11,709 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.5 | 826 | 12,618 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 3.1 | 746 | 13,560 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.6 | 841 | 12,268 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.7 | 836 | 14,783 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 3.7 | 904 | 14,457 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 2.0 | 661 | 10,856 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 4.2 | 647 | 10,719 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.9 | 1,040 | 17,125 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.9 | 841 | 14,942 | 50.0% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.7 | 729 | 12,778 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.2 | 805 | 13,273 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.6 | 1,015 | 17,065 | 0.0% | 80.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 0.9 | 652 | 12,889 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 860 | 9,337 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 925 | 9,072 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.5 | 850 | 9,552 | 80.0% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 1.3 | 773 | 9,903 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.8 | 658 | 9,091 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 986 | 11,688 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 2.4 | 806 | 13,583 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Quinn vs Cassiopeia - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Quinn do against Cassiopeia in League of Legends?
Quinn wins the Quinn vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 33.3%, a 33.3 percentage point difference. This data is based on 6 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Quinn do against Cassiopeia in the early game?
In the early game, Cassiopeia has the advantage against Quinn with a 100.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Cassiopeia players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Quinn do against Cassiopeia in the late game?
In the late game, Quinn takes over the Quinn vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 80.0% win rate compared to 20.0%. Quinn scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Quinn vs Cassiopeia matchup?
Quinn wins the matchup against Cassiopeia with a 66.7% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 33.3 percentage point advantage means Quinn is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 6 games analyzed.
What is the best Quinn build against Cassiopeia?
The best Quinn build against Cassiopeia includes The Collector, Kraken Slayer, Edge of Night with Boots of Swiftness. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Quinn runes against Cassiopeia?
The best Quinn runes against Cassiopeia use the Precision primary tree with Sorcery secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Quinn vs Cassiopeia matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Quinn counter Cassiopeia?
Yes, Quinn has a favorable matchup against Cassiopeia with a 66.7% win rate. Quinn strongly counters Cassiopeia in lane based on current patch 26.10 data.
How do I play Quinn against Cassiopeia?
When playing Quinn against Cassiopeia, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. Play safe early and scale into your power spikes where you outperform Cassiopeia. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.