
Quinnvs Gangplank
Quinn vs Gangplank is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.11. Gangplank wins with a 68.4% win rate (+36.8%) over Quinn based on 19 games. Gangplank holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Quinn build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Quinn vs Gangplank matchup.
Quinn Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Quinn performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Quinn vs Gangplank Matchup?

Quinn vs Gangplank Matchup Summary
The Quinn vs Gangplank matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 19 recent matches analyzed, Gangplank wins with a 68.4% win rate compared to Quinn's 31.6%, giving Gangplank a 36.8 percentage point advantage. Gangplank dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Quinn players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Quinn leads by 0.5s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Gangplank has a strong advantage in this matchup. Quinn players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Gangplank overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Quinn vs Gangplank Laning Phase Breakdown
Gangplank is favored during the laning phase against Quinn, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Gangplank holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Quinn Build Against Gangplank
Boots of Swiftness is the optimal boots choice against Gangplank, providing the mobility and stats Quinn needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Quinn against Gangplank are Profane Hydra, The Collector and Lord Dominik's Regards. This combination gives Quinn an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build achieves a solid 50.0% win rate across 2 games, proving it to be a reliable item path when facing Gangplank. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Quinn vs Gangplank matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Gangplank dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 70.0% win rate — a 40.0 percentage point lead over Quinn. This lopsided early game means Gangplank can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Gangplank is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 66.7% win rate — 33.3 points above Quinn. Extended games heavily favor Gangplank, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Gangplank holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Quinn players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Quinn Runes Against Gangplank
The Precision and Domination rune setup gives Quinn the best tools to compete against Gangplank in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Quinn matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.11. The table below shows Quinn's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Quinn build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.00% | 108 | 1.1 | 877 | 14,249 | 49.0% | 50.9% | |
| 49.45% | 91 | 1.3 | 870 | 13,764 | 51.2% | 48.0% | |
| 37.78% | 90 | 1.1 | 924 | 14,360 | 29.0% | 42.4% | |
| 52.27% | 88 | 1.2 | 822 | 13,546 | 51.4% | 52.8% | |
| 54.12% | 85 | 1.0 | 791 | 13,396 | 61.0% | 47.7% | |
| 45.57% | 79 | 1.2 | 865 | 14,405 | 48.1% | 44.2% | |
| 46.75% | 77 | 5.3 | 774 | 12,592 | 44.4% | 48.0% | |
| 39.47% | 76 | 1.2 | 902 | 13,432 | 39.3% | 39.6% | |
| 45.33% | 75 | 1.9 | 825 | 13,381 | 56.3% | 37.2% | |
| 59.42% | 69 | 6.1 | 954 | 12,513 | 62.1% | 57.5% | |
| 40.30% | 67 | 1.6 | 789 | 13,253 | 41.4% | 39.5% | |
| 39.39% | 66 | 1.2 | 772 | 13,787 | 44.4% | 35.9% | |
| 50.82% | 61 | 1.3 | 785 | 13,004 | 55.2% | 46.9% | |
| 52.46% | 61 | 2.8 | 881 | 12,392 | 46.4% | 57.6% | |
| 42.62% | 61 | 4.7 | 625 | 11,288 | 40.0% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 54 | 5.3 | 957 | 13,514 | 41.7% | 56.7% | |
| 48.00% | 50 | 1.6 | 913 | 13,735 | 50.0% | 46.7% | |
| 43.75% | 48 | 1.2 | 716 | 13,004 | 52.2% | 36.0% | |
| 63.83% | 47 | 2.6 | 880 | 13,884 | 70.6% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 42 | 0.9 | 805 | 12,612 | 60.0% | 54.5% | |
| 36.59% | 41 | 4.9 | 742 | 11,891 | 40.0% | 34.6% | |
| 55.00% | 40 | 1.1 | 838 | 12,343 | 66.7% | 37.5% | |
| 47.50% | 40 | 1.3 | 887 | 13,838 | 58.8% | 39.1% | |
| 57.50% | 40 | 1.8 | 860 | 14,137 | 50.0% | 61.5% | |
| 51.28% | 39 | 1.7 | 855 | 13,655 | 50.0% | 52.4% | |
| 50.00% | 36 | 1.2 | 765 | 14,182 | 53.3% | 47.6% | |
| 44.44% | 36 | 1.1 | 822 | 14,587 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 45.71% | 35 | 1.9 | 834 | 13,793 | 61.5% | 36.4% | |
| 45.71% | 35 | 5.5 | 851 | 11,793 | 52.9% | 38.9% | |
| 62.86% | 35 | 5.7 | 1,010 | 12,608 | 73.3% | 55.0% | |
| 48.57% | 35 | 1.0 | 790 | 11,750 | 54.5% | 38.5% | |
| 35.29% | 34 | 5.1 | 970 | 11,448 | 18.8% | 50.0% | |
| 41.18% | 34 | 1.3 | 834 | 13,110 | 21.4% | 55.0% | |
| 51.52% | 33 | 4.6 | 737 | 11,073 | 57.9% | 42.9% | |
| 56.25% | 32 | 5.9 | 857 | 12,082 | 63.2% | 46.1% | |
| 46.88% | 32 | 3.1 | 950 | 12,635 | 40.0% | 52.9% | |
| 59.38% | 32 | 4.0 | 820 | 11,522 | 53.3% | 64.7% | |
| 53.13% | 32 | 0.9 | 759 | 13,264 | 36.4% | 61.9% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 3.6 | 960 | 12,996 | 45.5% | 42.9% | |
| 45.16% | 31 | 1.8 | 799 | 13,702 | 27.3% | 55.0% | |
| 63.33% | 30 | 2.6 | 899 | 13,787 | 58.8% | 69.2% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 3.8 | 744 | 11,524 | 33.3% | 47.1% | |
| 77.78% | 27 | 3.0 | 873 | 13,767 | 76.9% | 78.6% | |
| 46.15% | 26 | 5.9 | 762 | 11,695 | 41.7% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 6.4 | 1,025 | 12,825 | 37.5% | 55.6% | |
| 42.31% | 26 | 5.3 | 930 | 12,896 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 69.23% | 26 | 4.8 | 879 | 12,404 | 72.7% | 66.7% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 1.6 | 874 | 14,272 | 14.3% | 61.1% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 1.1 | 935 | 15,282 | 62.5% | 41.2% | |
| 58.33% | 24 | 1.0 | 865 | 14,175 | 57.1% | 60.0% | |
| 54.17% | 24 | 5.8 | 905 | 11,855 | 53.9% | 54.5% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 5.2 | 821 | 11,689 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 39.13% | 23 | 5.6 | 911 | 13,676 | 44.4% | 35.7% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 5.3 | 962 | 11,888 | 45.5% | 41.7% | |
| 59.09% | 22 | 6.0 | 929 | 10,438 | 69.2% | 44.4% | |
| 61.90% | 21 | 3.5 | 1,132 | 15,083 | 77.8% | 50.0% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 0.8 | 801 | 12,424 | 63.6% | 30.0% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 4.9 | 1,169 | 12,363 | 36.4% | 40.0% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 4.5 | 814 | 11,591 | 50.0% | 45.5% | |
| 40.00% | 20 | 2.0 | 1,051 | 15,125 | 62.5% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 5.5 | 841 | 14,396 | 0.0% | 58.8% | |
| 52.63% | 19 | 4.2 | 927 | 10,816 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 3.6 | 779 | 11,560 | 62.5% | 54.5% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 5.4 | 779 | 10,468 | 30.0% | 33.3% | |
| 33.33% | 18 | 3.7 | 713 | 12,401 | 22.2% | 44.4% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 4.8 | 748 | 12,012 | 37.5% | 40.0% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 4.9 | 778 | 13,776 | 40.0% | 69.2% | |
| 44.44% | 18 | 5.9 | 800 | 10,632 | 45.5% | 42.9% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 0.9 | 763 | 12,334 | 70.0% | 42.9% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 0.8 | 790 | 13,880 | 62.5% | 55.6% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 6.1 | 857 | 10,697 | 62.5% | 75.0% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 5.2 | 1,016 | 13,629 | 80.0% | 45.5% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 4.8 | 927 | 13,436 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 56.25% | 16 | 0.8 | 964 | 16,687 | 50.0% | 58.3% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 5.9 | 872 | 11,810 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 66.67% | 15 | 1.9 | 871 | 13,652 | 75.0% | 57.1% | |
| 64.29% | 14 | 5.8 | 1,066 | 14,030 | 57.1% | 71.4% | |
| 21.43% | 14 | 6.2 | 760 | 10,054 | 20.0% | 25.0% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 5.6 | 914 | 12,284 | 33.3% | 42.9% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 0.8 | 779 | 12,322 | 28.6% | 33.3% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 5.7 | 840 | 12,454 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 3.5 | 832 | 13,258 | 75.0% | 44.4% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 5.3 | 1,208 | 16,141 | 33.3% | 80.0% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 6.0 | 868 | 11,169 | 42.9% | 16.7% | |
| 75.00% | 12 | 5.3 | 898 | 12,132 | 60.0% | 85.7% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 5.4 | 793 | 13,236 | 75.0% | 62.5% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 5.1 | 946 | 14,147 | 33.3% | 55.6% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 5.8 | 912 | 12,687 | 40.0% | 85.7% | |
| 75.00% | 12 | 5.1 | 883 | 14,011 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.3 | 854 | 10,597 | 57.1% | 20.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 1.0 | 912 | 15,474 | 50.0% | 44.4% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 3.1 | 656 | 7,327 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 5.5 | 877 | 12,769 | 60.0% | 66.7% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 0.9 | 860 | 13,710 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.3 | 882 | 13,065 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 5.1 | 894 | 14,361 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 5.7 | 988 | 11,541 | 16.7% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 4.6 | 887 | 13,760 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 2.5 | 778 | 13,144 | 33.3% | 83.3% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 4.6 | 989 | 14,516 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 5.3 | 1,040 | 15,317 | 50.0% | 14.3% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 3.7 | 580 | 10,470 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 5.6 | 893 | 13,886 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.0 | 964 | 15,232 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.6 | 835 | 8,117 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 2.0 | 926 | 10,909 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 3.0 | 1,026 | 13,705 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.7 | 891 | 12,157 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.6 | 821 | 14,464 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.2 | 741 | 14,414 | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.0 | 891 | 11,989 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.0 | 1,299 | 12,910 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 2.9 | 1,044 | 14,596 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.9 | 807 | 12,268 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 2.5 | 820 | 13,916 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 5.8 | 951 | 13,127 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.9 | 1,042 | 15,967 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 0.00% | 5 | 0.4 | 790 | 10,318 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 3.4 | 820 | 10,188 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.4 | 1,169 | 8,793 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 692 | 12,271 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.0 | 925 | 13,860 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Quinn vs Gangplank - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Quinn do against Gangplank in League of Legends?
Gangplank wins the Quinn vs Gangplank matchup with a 68.4% win rate compared to Quinn's 31.6%, a 36.8 percentage point difference. This data is based on 19 recent ranked games in patch 26.11.
How does Quinn do against Gangplank in the early game?
In the early game, Gangplank has the advantage against Quinn with a 70.0% win rate versus 30.0%. Gangplank players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Quinn do against Gangplank in the late game?
In the late game, Gangplank takes over the Quinn vs Gangplank matchup with a 66.7% win rate compared to 33.3%. Gangplank scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Quinn vs Gangplank matchup?
Gangplank wins the matchup against Quinn with a 68.4% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.11. The 36.8 percentage point advantage means Gangplank is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 19 games analyzed.
What is the best Quinn build against Gangplank?
The best Quinn build against Gangplank includes Profane Hydra, The Collector, Lord Dominik's Regards with Boots of Swiftness. This build achieves a 50.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Quinn runes against Gangplank?
The best Quinn runes against Gangplank use the Precision primary tree with Domination secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Quinn vs Gangplank matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Quinn counter Gangplank?
No, Quinn struggles against Gangplank with only a 31.6% win rate. Gangplank has the advantage in this matchup. Quinn players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Gangplank's lead.
How do I play Quinn against Gangplank?
When playing Quinn against Gangplank, play cautiously and avoid Gangplank's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Gangplank has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.
