Xin Zhaovs Nami
Xin Zhao vs Nami is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Xin Zhao wins with a 60.0% win rate (+20.0%) over Nami based on 5 games. Xin Zhao wins the early laning phase while Nami scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Xin Zhao build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Xin Zhao vs Nami matchup.
Xin Zhao Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Xin Zhao performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Nami(60.0%)Who Wins the Xin Zhao vs Nami Matchup?
Xin Zhao vs Nami Matchup Summary
The Xin Zhao vs Nami matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 5 recent matches analyzed, Xin Zhao wins with a 60.0% win rate compared to Nami's 40.0%, giving Xin Zhao a 20.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Xin Zhao controls the early laning stage, but Nami outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Xin Zhao needs to press advantages before Nami reaches their power spikes, while Nami should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in CS, where Xin Zhao leads by 1.3 CS/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Xin Zhao players can confidently pick into Nami and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Nami away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Xin Zhao vs Nami Laning Phase Breakdown
Xin Zhao is favored during the laning phase against Nami, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Xin Zhao holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and sustain, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Xin Zhao Build Against Nami
Mercury's Treads is the optimal boots choice against Nami, providing the mobility and stats Xin Zhao needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Xin Zhao against Nami are Eclipse, Sundered Sky and Kaenic Rookern. This combination gives Xin Zhao an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Xin Zhao vs Nami matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Xin Zhao75.0%Nami25.0%Xin Zhao0.0%Nami100.0%Xin Zhao dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 75.0% win rate — a 50.0 percentage point lead over Nami. This lopsided early game means Xin Zhao can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Nami is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 100.0% win rate — 100.0 points above Xin Zhao. Extended games heavily favor Nami, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Xin Zhao must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Nami reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Nami survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Xin Zhao Runes Against Nami
Precision
Resolve
Running Precision primary with Resolve secondary allows Xin Zhao to press their advantage against Nami, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Xin Zhao matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Xin Zhao's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Xin Zhao build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.59% | 187 | 1.2 | 659 | 12,070 | 50.0% | 45.7% | |
| 46.24% | 186 | 1.3 | 706 | 12,024 | 41.7% | 50.0% | |
| 43.02% | 179 | 1.1 | 704 | 12,034 | 41.1% | 44.3% | |
| 56.65% | 173 | 1.1 | 742 | 12,126 | 56.0% | 57.3% | |
| 47.90% | 167 | 1.2 | 698 | 12,249 | 42.5% | 52.9% | |
| 50.00% | 132 | 1.4 | 678 | 12,172 | 51.9% | 48.7% | |
| 46.34% | 123 | 1.2 | 712 | 12,022 | 44.2% | 47.9% | |
| 55.17% | 116 | 1.1 | 643 | 12,085 | 47.8% | 60.0% | |
| 55.79% | 95 | 1.2 | 763 | 12,085 | 51.1% | 60.0% | |
| 54.26% | 94 | 1.3 | 738 | 13,753 | 62.1% | 50.8% | |
| 47.78% | 90 | 2.1 | 760 | 11,841 | 50.0% | 46.0% | |
| 56.67% | 90 | 1.1 | 729 | 13,269 | 53.1% | 58.6% | |
| 55.95% | 84 | 2.6 | 795 | 11,509 | 53.1% | 60.0% | |
| 43.37% | 83 | 2.1 | 724 | 12,178 | 45.0% | 41.9% | |
| 43.21% | 81 | 1.1 | 656 | 11,379 | 38.5% | 47.6% | |
| 53.09% | 81 | 3.1 | 821 | 11,768 | 50.0% | 56.4% | |
| 41.25% | 80 | 3.2 | 877 | 12,451 | 39.4% | 42.5% | |
| 55.41% | 74 | 6.3 | 899 | 11,554 | 65.8% | 44.4% | |
| 41.67% | 72 | 3.0 | 851 | 12,408 | 30.4% | 46.9% | |
| 52.11% | 71 | 1.9 | 673 | 11,103 | 39.4% | 63.2% | |
| 65.22% | 69 | 6.3 | 910 | 12,343 | 77.8% | 57.1% | |
| 51.56% | 64 | 4.3 | 908 | 12,143 | 44.4% | 56.8% | |
| 34.92% | 63 | 1.0 | 726 | 12,266 | 20.0% | 44.7% | |
| 54.10% | 61 | 1.0 | 670 | 12,151 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 46.67% | 60 | 6.5 | 899 | 12,268 | 52.4% | 43.6% | |
| 52.54% | 59 | 5.6 | 910 | 12,365 | 62.5% | 45.7% | |
| 53.45% | 58 | 1.2 | 727 | 12,105 | 38.7% | 70.4% | |
| 48.28% | 58 | 1.4 | 746 | 11,647 | 48.4% | 48.1% | |
| 56.14% | 57 | 4.4 | 870 | 11,977 | 54.2% | 57.6% | |
| 47.37% | 57 | 5.9 | 924 | 12,024 | 58.1% | 34.6% | |
| 40.35% | 57 | 4.8 | 802 | 12,360 | 28.6% | 47.2% | |
| 57.14% | 56 | 5.2 | 859 | 12,512 | 62.5% | 53.1% | |
| 34.55% | 55 | 6.2 | 1,003 | 12,386 | 32.0% | 36.7% | |
| 51.85% | 54 | 1.1 | 801 | 11,881 | 45.5% | 56.3% | |
| 49.06% | 53 | 4.4 | 780 | 11,134 | 35.7% | 64.0% | |
| 52.83% | 53 | 0.9 | 742 | 12,057 | 54.2% | 51.7% | |
| 45.28% | 53 | 1.1 | 670 | 11,917 | 52.2% | 40.0% | |
| 47.06% | 51 | 2.6 | 843 | 13,176 | 55.0% | 41.9% | |
| 46.00% | 50 | 5.7 | 927 | 12,190 | 47.4% | 45.2% | |
| 35.42% | 48 | 4.4 | 828 | 12,441 | 33.3% | 36.7% | |
| 48.94% | 47 | 0.9 | 751 | 11,635 | 40.9% | 56.0% | |
| 45.65% | 46 | 2.9 | 724 | 11,212 | 44.0% | 47.6% | |
| 50.00% | 44 | 3.6 | 730 | 11,908 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 52.27% | 44 | 4.2 | 1,183 | 12,138 | 52.4% | 52.2% | |
| 54.55% | 44 | 1.2 | 748 | 13,253 | 58.3% | 53.1% | |
| 51.16% | 43 | 5.7 | 920 | 13,203 | 57.1% | 48.3% | |
| 60.98% | 41 | 1.4 | 812 | 12,581 | 66.7% | 56.5% | |
| 37.50% | 40 | 3.6 | 889 | 11,372 | 52.6% | 23.8% | |
| 48.72% | 39 | 1.2 | 725 | 11,394 | 42.9% | 52.0% | |
| 38.46% | 39 | 4.2 | 799 | 11,833 | 52.6% | 25.0% | |
| 53.85% | 39 | 2.1 | 701 | 12,080 | 88.2% | 27.3% | |
| 50.00% | 38 | 6.4 | 889 | 11,984 | 59.1% | 37.5% | |
| 51.35% | 37 | 6.3 | 1,015 | 12,924 | 53.3% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 35 | 6.0 | 1,010 | 12,906 | 57.1% | 57.1% | |
| 57.14% | 35 | 5.0 | 1,060 | 13,457 | 56.3% | 57.9% | |
| 51.43% | 35 | 1.5 | 761 | 11,568 | 56.3% | 47.4% | |
| 42.86% | 35 | 3.2 | 746 | 10,913 | 29.4% | 55.6% | |
| 38.24% | 34 | 4.4 | 951 | 12,176 | 38.5% | 38.1% | |
| 42.42% | 33 | 6.2 | 1,006 | 12,263 | 76.9% | 20.0% | |
| 63.64% | 33 | 5.5 | 1,126 | 13,076 | 78.6% | 52.6% | |
| 43.75% | 32 | 5.4 | 872 | 11,285 | 33.3% | 52.9% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 6.7 | 1,143 | 11,290 | 57.9% | 41.7% | |
| 61.29% | 31 | 6.5 | 955 | 11,653 | 75.0% | 46.7% | |
| 48.39% | 31 | 5.6 | 881 | 11,555 | 50.0% | 46.7% | |
| 70.00% | 30 | 1.1 | 695 | 11,011 | 77.8% | 58.3% | |
| 50.00% | 30 | 6.2 | 947 | 11,652 | 42.9% | 56.3% | |
| 53.33% | 30 | 6.4 | 1,003 | 12,078 | 50.0% | 56.3% | |
| 46.67% | 30 | 6.2 | 1,009 | 13,540 | 58.3% | 38.9% | |
| 41.38% | 29 | 1.0 | 537 | 10,268 | 35.3% | 50.0% | |
| 48.15% | 27 | 6.5 | 828 | 10,958 | 56.3% | 36.4% | |
| 37.04% | 27 | 6.4 | 997 | 12,490 | 38.5% | 35.7% | |
| 53.85% | 26 | 6.1 | 785 | 10,592 | 53.3% | 54.5% | |
| 73.08% | 26 | 6.6 | 971 | 13,075 | 80.0% | 68.8% | |
| 52.00% | 25 | 1.1 | 733 | 11,833 | 50.0% | 53.9% | |
| 44.00% | 25 | 1.6 | 722 | 11,792 | 45.5% | 42.9% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 3.6 | 864 | 12,609 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 4.4 | 815 | 12,134 | 50.0% | 42.9% | |
| 30.43% | 23 | 4.2 | 791 | 10,835 | 30.8% | 30.0% | |
| 60.87% | 23 | 0.8 | 712 | 11,780 | 55.6% | 64.3% | |
| 43.48% | 23 | 3.7 | 864 | 11,884 | 30.0% | 53.9% | |
| 45.45% | 22 | 6.2 | 998 | 12,055 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 57.14% | 21 | 6.3 | 990 | 13,028 | 44.4% | 66.7% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 6.9 | 816 | 11,389 | 60.0% | 45.5% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 6.0 | 850 | 10,102 | 35.7% | 42.9% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 6.1 | 1,024 | 12,549 | 55.6% | 72.7% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 6.1 | 807 | 10,328 | 41.7% | 50.0% | |
| 35.00% | 20 | 6.1 | 996 | 12,189 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 6.7 | 783 | 10,899 | 63.6% | 33.3% | |
| 45.00% | 20 | 5.9 | 986 | 13,547 | 66.7% | 35.7% | |
| 65.00% | 20 | 4.1 | 716 | 11,413 | 72.7% | 55.6% | |
| 35.00% | 20 | 5.8 | 955 | 12,266 | 16.7% | 42.9% | |
| 73.68% | 19 | 5.6 | 968 | 12,919 | 75.0% | 72.7% | |
| 73.68% | 19 | 1.6 | 788 | 13,527 | 75.0% | 72.7% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 1.4 | 790 | 13,764 | 71.4% | 50.0% | |
| 47.37% | 19 | 3.6 | 779 | 13,568 | 33.3% | 53.9% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 6.2 | 782 | 11,813 | 37.5% | 40.0% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 4.8 | 960 | 14,721 | 40.0% | 76.9% | |
| 38.89% | 18 | 3.3 | 853 | 10,306 | 44.4% | 33.3% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 6.5 | 939 | 12,567 | 57.1% | 30.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 5.8 | 1,212 | 11,825 | 45.5% | 83.3% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 4.6 | 983 | 12,313 | 71.4% | 30.0% | |
| 47.06% | 17 | 1.2 | 674 | 10,723 | 27.3% | 83.3% | |
| 50.00% | 16 | 6.5 | 840 | 12,183 | 66.7% | 28.6% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 5.4 | 731 | 11,615 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 6.8 | 805 | 12,668 | 66.7% | 22.2% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 5.8 | 959 | 13,036 | 0.0% | 70.0% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 6.6 | 986 | 11,048 | 37.5% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 2.2 | 926 | 12,940 | 33.3% | 54.5% | |
| 71.43% | 14 | 6.0 | 897 | 10,101 | 42.9% | 100.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 6.3 | 1,036 | 13,552 | 83.3% | 28.6% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 5.9 | 963 | 13,355 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 5.9 | 893 | 11,098 | 66.7% | 42.9% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 5.9 | 984 | 12,814 | 33.3% | 42.9% | |
| 76.92% | 13 | 4.3 | 715 | 10,187 | 85.7% | 66.7% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 5.2 | 936 | 12,262 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 5.7 | 929 | 11,759 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 2.0 | 730 | 14,503 | 75.0% | 83.3% | |
| 20.00% | 10 | 5.0 | 803 | 11,008 | 20.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.2 | 791 | 13,798 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 10 | 7.0 | 905 | 12,175 | 83.3% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.4 | 728 | 14,224 | 75.0% | 60.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.5 | 986 | 12,617 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 5.8 | 927 | 11,964 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.3 | 842 | 11,572 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.5 | 1,096 | 14,762 | 100.0% | 57.1% | |
| 87.50% | 8 | 6.9 | 1,348 | 15,704 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 6.1 | 1,058 | 13,594 | 100.0% | 83.3% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 3.2 | 802 | 10,680 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 2.3 | 696 | 11,596 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 5.8 | 1,039 | 10,954 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 6.5 | 1,056 | 10,236 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 3.8 | 937 | 13,476 | 100.0% | 16.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.8 | 1,032 | 11,848 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 834 | 10,580 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.9 | 589 | 9,088 | 75.0% | 0.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Xin Zhao vs Nami - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Xin Zhao do against Nami in League of Legends?
Xin Zhao wins the Xin Zhao vs Nami matchup with a 60.0% win rate compared to Nami's 40.0%, a 20.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 5 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Xin Zhao do against Nami in the early game?
In the early game, Xin Zhao has the advantage against Nami with a 75.0% win rate versus 25.0%. Xin Zhao players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Xin Zhao do against Nami in the late game?
In the late game, Nami takes over the Xin Zhao vs Nami matchup with a 100.0% win rate compared to 0.0%. Nami scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Xin Zhao vs Nami matchup?
Xin Zhao wins the matchup against Nami with a 60.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 20.0 percentage point advantage means Xin Zhao is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 5 games analyzed.
What is the best Xin Zhao build against Nami?
The best Xin Zhao build against Nami includes Eclipse, Sundered Sky, Kaenic Rookern with Mercury's Treads. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Xin Zhao runes against Nami?
The best Xin Zhao runes against Nami use the Precision primary tree with Resolve secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Xin Zhao vs Nami matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Xin Zhao counter Nami?
Yes, Xin Zhao has a favorable matchup against Nami with a 60.0% win rate. Xin Zhao strongly counters Nami in lane based on current patch 26.10 data.
How do I play Xin Zhao against Nami?
When playing Xin Zhao against Nami, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.