Tejo vs AstraMatchup
Tejo vs Astra matchup guide: Astra leads with a 66.7% win rate, but Tejo can still win. Learn how Tejo's 130 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 3-match dataset into ranked wins.
Tejo Matchup Breakdown
Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Tejo's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Who Wins the Tejo vs Astra Matchup?
Tejo vs Astra Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 3 matches reveals that Astra holds a clear advantage over Tejo in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Tejo shows strength in one category, Astra's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Tejo vs Astra Matchup Summary
The Tejo vs Astra matchup in Valorant is a heavily one-sided matchup. Based on 3 competitive matches analyzed, Astra wins 66.7% of the time compared to Tejo's 33.3%, a 33.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Astra consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Controller matchup, Astra has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Tejo should never take isolated fights against Astra and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Tejo vs Astra Fragging Analysis
Astra edges out Tejo in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 3 matches analyzed, this Tejo vs Astra matchup remains contestable for both sides. Tejo shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Tejo's favor.
Tejo vs Astra Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side Breakdown
Astra holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Tejo vs Astra matchup, winning 55.6% of offensive rounds compared to 52.0% for Tejo. This 3.6 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 3 matches reveals Astra's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Astra consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Tejo teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Astra's favor in this matchup. When Astra takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Tejo. For Tejo players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Astra's advantages. Astra can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Post-plant is where Astra's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 3.6% attack-side gap suggests Astra excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Tejo should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Astra's kit advantages become decisive. For Astra, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Astra demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Tejo, holding 48.0% of rounds versus 44.4%. This 3.6 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for Astra's defensive advantage. Astra can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Tejo should avoid solo anchor positions against Astra — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Tejo's site with Astra on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Astra in this matchup. Our 3 match analysis shows Astra converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Tejo should never attempt solo retakes against Astra — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Astra can confidently take 1vX retakes that Tejo should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight Astra's defensive advantages. Tejo should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Astra, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Astra can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Tejo should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
Overall Side Analysis
Astra holds clear advantages on both attack (55.6%) and defense (48.0%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Tejo vs Astra matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Astra doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Astra's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Astra performs better. Tejo teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Tejo with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Tejo's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Astra is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Astra provides a measurable ranked advantage. Tejo players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Astra confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Astra wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 7.1 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Tejo isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Initiator vs Controller Dynamics
The Initiator (Tejo) vs Controller (Astra) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Tejo's Initiator abilities serve different purposes than Astra's Controller kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Initiator abilities interact with Controller counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Tejo's Initiator toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Astra's Controller kit counters others. The Astra advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Tejo has favorable matchups against 9 agents and unfavorable matchups against 9 agents in Valorant. Tejo's strongest matchup is against Sage with a 75.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Vyse at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.00% | 32 | 1.40 | 139.2 | 25.0% | 49.4% | 48.8% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 1.31 | 134.1 | 27.1% | 51.4% | 51.8% | |
| 27.78% | 18 | 1.12 | 133.9 | 22.0% | 42.2% | 39.8% | |
| 73.33% | 15 | 1.48 | 145.6 | 24.0% | 54.3% | 54.6% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 1.19 | 128.3 | 26.6% | 51.2% | 41.5% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 1.24 | 129.4 | 28.1% | 47.7% | 45.3% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.29 | 132.8 | 27.2% | 53.3% | 43.2% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.21 | 112.6 | 28.3% | 42.7% | 60.6% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.37 | 134.3 | 23.4% | 57.5% | 47.3% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.20 | 136.8 | 29.9% | 45.2% | 57.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.22 | 130.8 | 29.4% | 59.7% | 39.5% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.64 | 161.6 | 29.4% | 45.8% | 44.9% | |
| 0.00% | 4 | 1.08 | 126.0 | 28.4% | 38.5% | 37.8% | |
| 75.00% | 4 | 1.74 | 156.8 | 29.9% | 54.5% | 63.6% | |
| 50.00% | 4 | 1.71 | 172.5 | 30.3% | 45.8% | 58.1% | |
| 33.33% | 3 | 1.13 | 133.6 | 32.1% | 41.9% | 41.4% | |
| 33.33% | 3 | 1.19 | 130.2 | 27.5% | 48.4% | 48.7% | |
| 33.33% | 3 | 1.18 | 130.3 | 24.4% | 52.0% | 44.4% |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Tejo's best matchup in Valorant?
Tejo's best matchup is against Sage, achieving a 75.0% win rate. Tejo excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Tejo's hardest matchup?
Tejo's hardest matchup is against Vyse, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Tejo should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Tejo have?
Tejo has 9 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 9 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Tejo in difficult matchups?
When playing Tejo in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Tejo's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Tejo's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Tejo's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.