Tejo vs NeonMatchup
Tejo vs Neon matchup breakdown: Tejo dominates with a 57.1% win rate across 7 matches. Superior fragging (1.37 KDA) gives Tejo a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.
Tejo Matchup Breakdown
Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Tejo's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Who Wins the Tejo vs Neon Matchup?
Tejo vs Neon Performance Breakdown
In the Tejo vs Neon matchup, Tejo demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 7 analyzed matches, Tejo outperforms Neon in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Tejo the statistically favored pick when facing Neon in ranked Valorant matches.
Tejo vs Neon Matchup Summary
The Tejo vs Neon matchup in Valorant is a heavily one-sided matchup. Based on 7 competitive matches analyzed, Tejo wins 57.1% of the time compared to Neon's 42.9%, a 14.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Tejo consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Duelist matchup, Tejo has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Neon should never take isolated fights against Tejo and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Tejo vs Neon Fragging Analysis
Tejo achieves a clean sweep in the fragging department, winning all five combat metrics against Neon in the Tejo vs Neon matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Tejo holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 7 competitive matches, Tejo players can approach duels against Neon with confidence, while Neon players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on utility-based contributions, information gathering, and team coordination to remain impactful.
Tejo vs Neon Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side Breakdown
Tejo holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Tejo vs Neon matchup, winning 57.5% of offensive rounds compared to 52.7% for Neon. This 4.8 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 7 matches reveals Tejo's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Tejo consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Neon teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Tejo's favor in this matchup. When Tejo takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Neon. For Neon players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Tejo's advantages. Tejo can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Post-plant is where Tejo's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 4.8% attack-side gap suggests Tejo excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Neon should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Tejo's kit advantages become decisive. For Tejo, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Tejo demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Neon, holding 47.3% of rounds versus 42.5%. This 4.8 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for Tejo's defensive advantage. Tejo can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Neon should avoid solo anchor positions against Tejo — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Neon's site with Tejo on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Tejo in this matchup. Our 7 match analysis shows Tejo converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Neon should never attempt solo retakes against Tejo — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Tejo can confidently take 1vX retakes that Neon should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight Tejo's defensive advantages. Neon should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Tejo, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Tejo can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Neon should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
Overall Side Analysis
Tejo demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (57.5%) and defense (47.3%), comprehensively outperforming Neon across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 7 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Tejo holding advantages at every stage.
Map selection and team composition cannot fix Neon's disadvantage in this matchup. Tejo outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Neon into Tejo, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Neon's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Neon in isolated Tejo encounters.
For ranked climbing, avoid playing Neon when you expect to face Tejo frequently. The 9.7 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Tejo is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.
Final verdict: Tejo decisively wins the Tejo vs Neon matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Tejo has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Neon players facing Tejo should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.
Initiator vs Duelist Dynamics
The Initiator (Tejo) vs Duelist (Neon) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Tejo's Initiator abilities serve different purposes than Neon's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Initiator abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Tejo's Initiator toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Neon's Duelist kit counters others. The Tejo advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Tejo has favorable matchups against 9 agents and unfavorable matchups against 9 agents in Valorant. Tejo's strongest matchup is against Sage with a 75.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Vyse at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.00% | 32 | 1.40 | 139.2 | 25.0% | 49.4% | 48.8% | |
| 57.89% | 19 | 1.31 | 134.1 | 27.1% | 51.4% | 51.8% | |
| 27.78% | 18 | 1.12 | 133.9 | 22.0% | 42.2% | 39.8% | |
| 73.33% | 15 | 1.48 | 145.6 | 24.0% | 54.3% | 54.6% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 1.19 | 128.3 | 26.6% | 51.2% | 41.5% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 1.24 | 129.4 | 28.1% | 47.7% | 45.3% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 1.29 | 132.8 | 27.2% | 53.3% | 43.2% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.21 | 112.6 | 28.3% | 42.7% | 60.6% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.37 | 134.3 | 23.4% | 57.5% | 47.3% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.20 | 136.8 | 29.9% | 45.2% | 57.7% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.22 | 130.8 | 29.4% | 59.7% | 39.5% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.64 | 161.6 | 29.4% | 45.8% | 44.9% | |
| 0.00% | 4 | 1.08 | 126.0 | 28.4% | 38.5% | 37.8% | |
| 75.00% | 4 | 1.74 | 156.8 | 29.9% | 54.5% | 63.6% | |
| 50.00% | 4 | 1.71 | 172.5 | 30.3% | 45.8% | 58.1% | |
| 33.33% | 3 | 1.13 | 133.6 | 32.1% | 41.9% | 41.4% | |
| 33.33% | 3 | 1.19 | 130.2 | 27.5% | 48.4% | 48.7% | |
| 33.33% | 3 | 1.18 | 130.3 | 24.4% | 52.0% | 44.4% |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Tejo's best matchup in Valorant?
Tejo's best matchup is against Sage, achieving a 75.0% win rate. Tejo excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Tejo's hardest matchup?
Tejo's hardest matchup is against Vyse, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Tejo should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Tejo have?
Tejo has 9 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 9 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Tejo in difficult matchups?
When playing Tejo in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Tejo's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Tejo's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Tejo's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.