Tejo vs Neon matchup in Valorant
Win Rate
57.1%
Matches
7
Avg KDA
1.37
Avg ADR
134

Tejo vs NeonMatchup

Initiator
Patch12.01
Matches82,189
RegionAll Regions
RankAll Ranks
PlatformAll Platforms
ModeCompetitive
Last UpdatedFeb 3, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

Tejo vs Neon matchup breakdown: Tejo dominates with a 57.1% win rate across 7 matches. Superior fragging (1.37 KDA) gives Tejo a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.

Tejo Matchup Breakdown

Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Tejo's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.

Compare against an opponent
Neon - 57.1% win rateNeon(57.1%)
Tejo - 57.1% win rate in this matchup
Tejo
57.1% WR
VS
Neon vs Tejo matchup - 42.9% win rate
Neon
42.9% WR

Who Wins the Tejo vs Neon Matchup?

Tejo wins the Tejo vs Neon matchup
Winner
Tejo
Matches: 7
57.1%
Win Rate
42.9%
1.37
Avg KDA
1.13
15.3
Avg Kills
14.9
14.9
Avg Deaths
16.9
134.3
DMG/Round
125.0
23.4%
HS %
21.6%
206
Combat Score
199
57.5%
Attack WR
52.7%
47.3%
Defense WR
42.5%

Tejo vs Neon Performance Breakdown

Tejo vs Neon matchup breakdown - overall performance winner

In the Tejo vs Neon matchup, Tejo demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 7 analyzed matches, Tejo outperforms Neon in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Tejo the statistically favored pick when facing Neon in ranked Valorant matches.

Fragging Power
1.37Tejo
1.13Neon
Tejo maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.37 KDA versus Neon's 1.13. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Tejo players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
134.3Tejo
125.0Neon
Tejo outputs 134.3 average damage per round, edging out Neon's 125.0 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Tejo secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
57.5%Tejo
52.7%Neon
Tejo shows stronger attack-side performance with a 57.5% win rate versus Neon's 52.7%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Tejo provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
47.3%Tejo
42.5%Neon
Defensive capabilities favor Tejo at 47.3% win rate compared to Neon's 42.5%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Tejo provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.

Tejo vs Neon Matchup Summary

The Tejo vs Neon matchup in Valorant is a heavily one-sided matchup. Based on 7 competitive matches analyzed, Tejo wins 57.1% of the time compared to Neon's 42.9%, a 14.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Tejo consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Duelist matchup, Tejo has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Neon should never take isolated fights against Tejo and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.

Tejo vs Neon Fragging Analysis

Tejo wins fragging stats against Neon in Valorant

Tejo achieves a clean sweep in the fragging department, winning all five combat metrics against Neon in the Tejo vs Neon matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Tejo holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 7 competitive matches, Tejo players can approach duels against Neon with confidence, while Neon players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on utility-based contributions, information gathering, and team coordination to remain impactful.

KDA
1.37Tejo
1.13Neon
Tejo holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.37 compared to Neon's 1.13. While this 0.24 point difference indicates Tejo tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Neon players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Tejo's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Neon players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
15.3Tejo
14.9Neon
Kill production between Tejo and Neon is virtually identical, with Tejo averaging 15.3 kills per game and Neon securing 14.9. This parity suggests both agents are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and round outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, utility usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — entries, clutch situations, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
14.9Tejo
16.9Neon
The death disparity between Tejo and Neon is stark: 14.9 versus 16.9 deaths per game. Neon dies 2.0 more times per match on average, fundamentally impacting their ability to influence rounds. This suggests Neon either takes unfavorable fights against Tejo or lacks the tools to disengage safely. Neon players must completely rethink their aggression patterns — prioritize information and utility over kills, always have an exit plan, and never take coin-flip duels against Tejo.
DMG/Round
134.3Tejo
125.0Neon
Tejo applies 9.3 more damage per round than Neon in this matchup (134.3 vs 125.0 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Tejo contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Neon can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
Headshot %
23.4%Tejo
21.6%Neon
Tejo lands headshots at a slightly higher rate (23.4% vs 21.6%), providing a modest but meaningful advantage in time-to-kill during duels. This 1.8 percentage point edge translates to Tejo more frequently one-tapping or two-tapping opponents before Neon can fully react. Neon players should counter this by avoiding predictable angle holds, using movement to throw off Tejo's crosshair placement, and prefiring common positions to negate the accuracy gap.

Tejo vs Neon Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side
Tejo
Tejo57.5%
Neon52.7%
Defense Side
Tejo
Tejo47.3%
Neon42.5%

Attack Side Breakdown

Tejo holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Tejo vs Neon matchup, winning 57.5% of offensive rounds compared to 52.7% for Neon. This 4.8 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.

Our analysis of 7 matches reveals Tejo's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Tejo consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Neon teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.

Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Tejo's favor in this matchup. When Tejo takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Neon. For Neon players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Tejo's advantages. Tejo can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.

Post-plant is where Tejo's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 4.8% attack-side gap suggests Tejo excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Neon should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Tejo's kit advantages become decisive. For Tejo, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.

Defense Side Breakdown

Tejo demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Neon, holding 47.3% of rounds versus 42.5%. This 4.8 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.

Site anchor assignments should account for Tejo's defensive advantage. Tejo can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Neon should avoid solo anchor positions against Tejo — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Neon's site with Tejo on the execute, expect faster site falls.

Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Tejo in this matchup. Our 7 match analysis shows Tejo converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Neon should never attempt solo retakes against Tejo — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Tejo can confidently take 1vX retakes that Neon should avoid.

Economy rounds highlight Tejo's defensive advantages. Neon should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Tejo, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Tejo can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Neon should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.

Overall Side Analysis

Tejo demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (57.5%) and defense (47.3%), comprehensively outperforming Neon across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 7 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Tejo holding advantages at every stage.

Map selection and team composition cannot fix Neon's disadvantage in this matchup. Tejo outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Neon into Tejo, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Neon's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Neon in isolated Tejo encounters.

For ranked climbing, avoid playing Neon when you expect to face Tejo frequently. The 9.7 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Tejo is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.

Final verdict: Tejo decisively wins the Tejo vs Neon matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Tejo has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Neon players facing Tejo should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.

Initiator vs Duelist Dynamics

The Initiator (Tejo) vs Duelist (Neon) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Tejo's Initiator abilities serve different purposes than Neon's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.

Understanding how Initiator abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Tejo's Initiator toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Neon's Duelist kit counters others. The Tejo advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.

Tejo has favorable matchups against 9 agents and unfavorable matchups against 9 agents in Valorant. Tejo's strongest matchup is against Sage with a 75.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Vyse at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.

Tejo matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 12.01)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
DMG/Rnd
HS %
Atk WR
Def WR
50.00%321.40139.225.0%49.4%48.8%
57.89%191.31134.127.1%51.4%51.8%
27.78%181.12133.922.0%42.2%39.8%
73.33%151.48145.624.0%54.3%54.6%
40.00%151.19128.326.6%51.2%41.5%
38.46%131.24129.428.1%47.7%45.3%
54.55%111.29132.827.2%53.3%43.2%
62.50%81.21112.628.3%42.7%60.6%
57.14%71.37134.323.4%57.5%47.3%
71.43%71.20136.829.9%45.2%57.7%
42.86%71.22130.829.4%59.7%39.5%
40.00%51.64161.629.4%45.8%44.9%
0.00%41.08126.028.4%38.5%37.8%
75.00%41.74156.829.9%54.5%63.6%
50.00%41.71172.530.3%45.8%58.1%
33.33%31.13133.632.1%41.9%41.4%
33.33%31.19130.227.5%48.4%48.7%
33.33%31.18130.324.4%52.0%44.4%
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Tejo's best matchup in Valorant?

Tejo's best matchup is against Sage, achieving a 75.0% win rate. Tejo excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.

What is Tejo's hardest matchup?

Tejo's hardest matchup is against Vyse, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Tejo should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.

How many favorable matchups does Tejo have?

Tejo has 9 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 9 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play Tejo in difficult matchups?

When playing Tejo in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Tejo's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.

What stats matter most in Tejo's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in Tejo's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.

See Also: Other Initiators