Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Raze's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Raze
46.2% WR
VS
Viper
53.8% WR
Who Wins the Raze vs Viper Matchup?
Winner
Viper
Matches: 52
46.2%
Win Rate
53.8%
1.36
Avg KDA
1.42
17.9
Avg Kills
16.3
16.2
Avg Deaths
15.2
162.9
DMG/Round
143.9
20.3%
HS %
31.5%
245
Combat Score
216
44.3%
Attack WR
45.9%
54.1%
Defense WR
55.7%
Raze vs Viper Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 52 matches reveals that Viper holds a clear advantage over Raze in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Raze shows strength in one category, Viper's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.36Raze
1.42Viper
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Raze and Viper, with KDA ratios of 1.36 and 1.42 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
162.9Raze
143.9Viper
Raze delivers substantially higher damage per round (162.9 ADR) compared to Viper's 143.9 ADR. This 19.1 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Raze a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
44.3%Raze
45.9%Viper
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Raze at 44.3% and Viper at 45.9% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
54.1%Raze
55.7%Viper
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Raze posting a 54.1% win rate and Viper at 55.7%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Raze vs Viper matchup in Valorant is a clear advantage for one side. Based on 52 competitive matches analyzed, Viper wins 53.8% of the time compared to Raze's 46.2%, a 7.7 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Viper consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Controller matchup, Viper dominates this matchup statistically. Viper can confidently take 1v1 duels, while Raze should focus on playing with teammates, using utility to create advantages, and avoiding direct confrontations.
Raze vs Viper Fragging Analysis
Viper edges out Raze in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 52 matches analyzed, this Raze vs Viper matchup remains contestable for both sides. Raze shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Raze's favor.
Avg KDA
1.36Raze
1.42Viper
The KDA comparison between Raze and Viper reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Raze averaging 1.36 and Viper posting 1.42. This razor-thin margin of just 0.06 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
17.9Raze
16.3Viper
Raze substantially outfrags Viper in this matchup, averaging 17.9 kills compared to 16.3 — a difference of nearly 1.5 eliminations per match. When Raze faces Viper, the data clearly shows Raze finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Viper players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Raze in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
16.2Raze
15.2Viper
Viper demonstrates markedly better survivability against Raze, recording 15.2 deaths per game versus 16.2. Dying nearly 1.0 fewer times per match gives Viper significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Raze players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
162.9Raze
143.9Viper
Raze significantly outdamages Viper in head-to-head encounters, posting 162.9 ADR versus 143.9. This 19.1 damage-per-round advantage means Raze consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Viper players should avoid prolonged dueling with Raze — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
20.3%Raze
31.5%Viper
The headshot percentage disparity between Viper and Raze is substantial: 31.5% compared to 20.3%, a 11.2 point difference. Viper consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Raze, challenging Viper in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Viper's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Raze vs Viper Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Viper
44.3%
45.9%
Defense Side
Viper
54.1%
55.7%
Attack Side Breakdown
Viper demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Raze in this matchup, converting 45.9% of attacking rounds versus 44.3%. While this 1.6 point edge gives Viper slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Raze players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 52 competitive games suggests Viper's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Raze teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.6% gap.
When taking entry duels, Viper holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Raze players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Viper can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Raze has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 15 agents in Valorant. Raze's strongest matchup is against Vyse with a 59.1% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 31.6% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Raze matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Raze's best matchup is against Vyse, achieving a 59.1% win rate. Raze excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Raze's hardest matchup?
Raze's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 31.6% win rate. Against this opponent, Raze should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Raze have?
Raze has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 15 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Raze in difficult matchups?
When playing Raze in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Raze's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Raze's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Raze's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Viper's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Raze should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.6 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Viper shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Raze, winning 55.7% of defense rounds compared to 54.1%. This 1.6 percentage point edge suggests Viper's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Raze players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Viper can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.6% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Raze should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Viper demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Viper converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Raze should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Viper when you can wait for teammates. Viper can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.6% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Raze should be more conservative with eco aggression against Viper and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Viper can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Viper holds clear advantages on both attack (45.9%) and defense (55.7%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Raze vs Viper matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Viper doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Viper's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Viper performs better. Raze teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Raze with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Raze's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Viper is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Viper provides a measurable ranked advantage. Raze players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Viper confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Viper wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 3.2 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Raze isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Duelist vs Controller Dynamics
The Duelist (Raze) vs Controller (Viper) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Raze's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Viper's Controller kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Controller counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Raze's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Viper's Controller kit counters others. The Viper advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
52.2%
51.1%
55.4%
51.8%
54.8%
53.0%
56.6%
49.4%
53.9%
50.6%
54.1%
52.7%
50.6%
56.3%
53.5%
55.0%
60.2%
48.2%
48.6%
45.0%
53.3%
41.7%
46.2%
67.0%
50.0%
Raze vs Viper is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (46.2% vs 53.8%). Based on 52 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.
