Cotte De Maillesvs elsa bloodstone
Cotte De Mailles fait face à un affrontement difficile contre Elsa Bloodstone, ne gérant qu'un taux de victoire de 46.9% sur 130 rencontres. Elsa Bloodstone chasse Cotte De Mailles pour 20.8 éliminations moyennes, mais Cotte De Mailles peut renverser les combats avec 10,853 de soins si protégé. Contre Elsa Bloodstone, les joueurs de Cotte De Mailles devraient jouer prudemment, attendre le soutien de l'équipe et éviter les situations de 1v1 isolées.
Cotte De Mailles Matchup Breakdown
Select an opponent from the dropdown to see detailed matchup statistics for Cotte De Mailles. Compare win rates, KDA, damage dealt, and more to understand each head-to-head matchup.
Elsa Bloodstone(46.9%)
Who Wins the Cotte De Mailles vs Elsa Bloodstone Matchup?
Cotte De Mailles vs Elsa Bloodstone Matchup Analysis
The Cotte De Mailles vs Elsa Bloodstone matchup is decisively one-sided based on 130 match sample. Elsa Bloodstone dominates with a 53.1% win rate while Cotte De Mailles manages only 46.9%, a commanding 6.2% advantage. This represents one of the more lopsided hero matchups in Marvel Rivals, and players should strongly consider team composition when facing this scenario. Elsa Bloodstone excels at diving and eliminating Cotte De Mailles, who lacks the self-peel to escape focused aggression. Cotte De Mailles absolutely dominates the KDA statistics with 8.43, a massive +3.99 advantage over Elsa Bloodstone. This indicates Cotte De Mailles consistently outperforms in kill participation while maintaining superior survival rates. The largest difference appears in healing numbers, with Cotte De Mailles providing 10,758 more healing per match. This sustain advantage often determines which team wins prolonged engagements. This is a difficult matchup for Cotte De Mailles against Elsa Bloodstone. With only a 46.9% win rate, consider avoiding 1v1 confrontations, playing near teammates, and focusing on enabling your team rather than taking direct fights. As a Strategist, Cotte De Mailles's matchup against Elsa Bloodstone is heavily influenced by team protection. Stay positioned near allies who can peel, and communicate when you're being pressured.
Cotte De Mailles vs Elsa Bloodstone Combat Statistics
Cotte De Mailles holds a clear combat advantage over Elsa Bloodstone, winning 3 of 4 statistical categories (KDA, Deaths and Assists). This indicates a meaningful performance gap in direct confrontations.
Cotte De Mailles vs Elsa Bloodstone Impact Comparison
Cotte De Mailles3,743Elsa Bloodstone7,917Cotte De Mailles10,853Elsa Bloodstone95As a Duelist, Elsa Bloodstone expectedly leads damage with 7,917 average per match. This damage output allows them to threaten eliminations and pressure Cotte De Mailles consistently.
As a Strategist, Cotte De Mailles contributes 10,853 average healing per match, sustaining their team through Elsa Bloodstone's pressure and enabling extended team fights.
Strategist vs Duelist Role Matchup
Cotte De Mailles is vulnerable to Elsa Bloodstone with only a 46.9% win rate. Positioning is everything - stay near your Vanguard, use walls and terrain, and save defensive abilities for their engage. Call out flanks early.
Données complètes d'affrontement pour Cotte De Mailles dans Marvel Rivals (saison Season 2). Parcourez tous les affrontements de héros triés par taux de victoire, filtrez par rôle ou recherchez des adversaires spécifiques.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | Kills | Deaths | Damage | Healing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.9% | 130 | 8.43 | 14.2 | 5.4 | 3,743 | 10,853 | |
| 35.4% | 96 | 5.83 | 13.5 | 6.2 | 6,212 | 16,370 | |
| 44.7% | 94 | 8.65 | 15.2 | 5.2 | 4,344 | 12,687 | |
| 35.7% | 84 | 6.53 | 13.2 | 5.7 | 6,739 | 17,813 | |
| 41.5% | 82 | 7.62 | 14.0 | 5.6 | 4,493 | 12,702 | |
| 41.4% | 70 | 7.35 | 12.8 | 5.3 | 4,730 | 13,253 | |
| 39.1% | 64 | 9.30 | 15.3 | 5.0 | 4,297 | 12,357 | |
| 36.5% | 63 | 8.00 | 13.9 | 5.6 | 3,254 | 9,393 | |
| 37.9% | 58 | 5.59 | 15.2 | 6.9 | 8,400 | 19,224 | |
| 24.6% | 57 | 7.99 | 13.8 | 5.3 | 4,063 | 10,713 | |
| 35.1% | 57 | 7.39 | 12.8 | 5.3 | 4,134 | 11,790 | |
| 33.3% | 54 | 5.48 | 11.8 | 5.7 | 7,461 | 20,263 | |
| 51.8% | 54 | 10.70 | 15.8 | 4.5 | 4,462 | 13,178 | |
| 47.8% | 46 | 7.45 | 14.2 | 5.8 | 3,497 | 9,631 | |
| 63.6% | 44 | 10.88 | 14.6 | 4.5 | 3,276 | 10,479 | |
| 37.2% | 43 | 7.61 | 13.2 | 5.3 | 4,300 | 11,296 | |
| 38.1% | 42 | 7.31 | 12.6 | 5.5 | 4,896 | 13,449 | |
| 50.0% | 42 | 6.45 | 14.6 | 6.2 | 7,406 | 16,965 | |
| 47.5% | 40 | 7.52 | 14.0 | 5.4 | 5,392 | 10,404 | |
| 22.5% | 40 | 6.66 | 13.1 | 6.1 | 4,293 | 11,472 | |
| 40.0% | 40 | 5.96 | 13.5 | 6.3 | 7,179 | 16,545 | |
| 61.5% | 39 | 9.45 | 15.5 | 4.8 | 4,636 | 12,565 | |
| 44.7% | 38 | 8.16 | 14.0 | 5.4 | 4,232 | 10,472 | |
| 62.2% | 37 | 8.41 | 15.2 | 5.3 | 5,805 | 13,986 | |
| 56.8% | 37 | 9.38 | 15.5 | 5.2 | 4,291 | 14,234 | |
| 42.9% | 35 | 7.81 | 14.3 | 5.2 | 5,703 | 9,348 | |
| 45.5% | 33 | 7.53 | 14.9 | 5.9 | 5,588 | 12,347 | |
| 38.7% | 31 | 7.59 | 14.4 | 6.0 | 2,803 | 9,046 | |
| 48.3% | 29 | 7.86 | 16.3 | 5.3 | 8,711 | 13,871 | |
| 65.5% | 29 | 6.22 | 11.9 | 5.2 | 4,970 | 12,099 | |
| 35.7% | 28 | 7.04 | 14.9 | 5.7 | 4,900 | 11,703 | |
| 40.7% | 27 | 7.48 | 13.6 | 5.8 | 4,435 | 13,295 | |
| 42.3% | 26 | 7.11 | 13.4 | 5.7 | 3,885 | 11,523 | |
| 28.0% | 25 | 8.13 | 13.9 | 4.8 | 6,165 | 11,422 | |
| 41.7% | 24 | 6.14 | 14.0 | 6.0 | 7,642 | 16,549 | |
| 31.8% | 22 | 9.41 | 15.1 | 5.0 | 4,573 | 11,493 | |
| 33.3% | 21 | 8.39 | 13.4 | 5.4 | 4,455 | 11,936 | |
| 57.1% | 21 | 7.64 | 14.6 | 5.2 | 6,617 | 14,957 | |
| 38.1% | 21 | 7.85 | 14.3 | 5.5 | 7,671 | 15,105 | |
| 38.1% | 21 | 6.20 | 12.7 | 6.0 | 5,060 | 13,782 | |
| 47.6% | 21 | 7.16 | 13.1 | 5.2 | 4,620 | 12,622 | |
| 37.5% | 16 | 8.04 | 13.6 | 5.3 | 4,043 | 13,899 | |
| 62.5% | 16 | 9.64 | 14.3 | 4.2 | 3,336 | 9,196 | |
| 33.3% | 15 | 7.01 | 12.7 | 5.8 | 3,952 | 15,223 | |
| 55.6% | 9 | 10.88 | 19.1 | 4.6 | 4,282 | 8,113 | |
| 100.0% | 7 | 8.58 | 18.1 | 4.7 | 4,490 | 8,723 |
Aidez-nous à maintenir la précision ! Si vous remarquez des statistiques incorrectes, des données manquantes ou d'autres problèmes, vos retours nous aident à améliorer la qualité de nos données pour toute la communauté.
FAQ Cotte De Mailles vs elsa bloodstone
Quels sont les meilleurs affrontements de Cotte De Mailles dans Marvel Rivals ?
Cotte De Mailles performe le mieux contre Hero 10572, Hero 10573, the punisher. L'affrontement le plus fort est contre Cape de néant avec un taux de victoire de 100.0%.
Quels sont les pires affrontements de Cotte De Mailles dans Marvel Rivals ?
Cotte De Mailles a du mal contre elsa bloodstone, invisible woman, hela. Le contre le plus difficile est storm avec seulement un taux de victoire de 22.5%.
Comment gagner plus d'affrontements avec Cotte De Mailles ?
En tant que Strategist, Cotte De Mailles gagne 14 affrontements sur 49 (>50% taux de victoire). Concentrez-vous sur cibler les affrontements favorables et travaillez avec votre équipe pour gérer les adversaires difficiles.
Comment Cotte De Mailles performe-t-il contre différents rôles ?
En tant que Strategist, la performance d'affrontement de Cotte De Mailles varie selon le rôle de l'adversaire. Utilisez les filtres de rôle dans le tableau ci-dessus pour comparer les taux de victoire contre les Duellistes, Avant-gardes et Stratèges.