
Cotte De Maillesvs invisible woman
Invisible Woman contre durement Cotte De Mailles dans Marvel Rivals—Cotte De Mailles ne gagne que 35.4% des 96 parties dans cet affrontement difficile. Le duel de supports revient à Invisible Woman—Invisible Woman fournit 17,804 soins contre 16,370 pour Cotte De Mailles, déterminant souvent quelle équipe tient le plus longtemps. Contre Invisible Woman, les joueurs de Cotte De Mailles devraient jouer prudemment, attendre le soutien de l'équipe et éviter les situations de 1v1 isolées.
Cotte De Mailles Matchup Breakdown
Select an opponent from the dropdown to see detailed matchup statistics for Cotte De Mailles. Compare win rates, KDA, damage dealt, and more to understand each head-to-head matchup.
Who Wins the Cotte De Mailles vs Invisible Woman Matchup?

Cotte De Mailles vs Invisible Woman Matchup Analysis
The Cotte De Mailles vs Invisible Woman matchup is decisively one-sided based on 96 match sample. Invisible Woman dominates with a 64.6% win rate while Cotte De Mailles manages only 35.4%, a commanding 29.2% advantage. This represents one of the more lopsided hero matchups in Marvel Rivals, and players should strongly consider team composition when facing this scenario. As a Strategist mirror matchup between Cotte De Mailles and Invisible Woman, this comes down to mechanical skill and ability usage timing. Invisible Woman has proven slightly more effective in these head-to-head encounters. Invisible Woman absolutely dominates the KDA statistics with 8.41, a massive +2.58 advantage over Cotte De Mailles. This indicates Invisible Woman consistently outperforms in kill participation while maintaining superior survival rates. This is a difficult matchup for Cotte De Mailles against Invisible Woman. With only a 35.4% win rate, consider avoiding 1v1 confrontations, playing near teammates, and focusing on enabling your team rather than taking direct fights. As a Strategist, Cotte De Mailles's matchup against Invisible Woman is heavily influenced by team protection. Stay positioned near allies who can peel, and communicate when you're being pressured.
Cotte De Mailles vs Invisible Woman Combat Statistics
Invisible Woman completely dominates the combat statistics against Cotte De Mailles, leading in all four categories: KDA, Kills, Deaths and Assists. This comprehensive advantage translates to consistent outperformance in team fights.
Cotte De Mailles vs Invisible Woman Impact Comparison
Interestingly, Strategist Invisible Woman leads damage with 7,008 average, suggesting strong offensive capabilities or sustained poke patterns against Cotte De Mailles.
In this Strategist matchup, Invisible Woman significantly outpaces Cotte De Mailles with 1,434 more healing per match. This sustain advantage allows Invisible Woman's team to win attrition fights and extended engagements.
Strategist vs Strategist Role Matchup
In this Strategist mirror matchup, Invisible Woman has demonstrated a 64.6% win rate advantage. Mirror matchups are the purest test of hero mastery - success comes down to ability timing, positioning, and understanding your hero's specific strengths. Study Invisible Woman's common patterns to improve your mirror match performance.
Données complètes d'affrontement pour Cotte De Mailles dans Marvel Rivals (saison Season 2). Parcourez tous les affrontements de héros triés par taux de victoire, filtrez par rôle ou recherchez des adversaires spécifiques.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | Kills | Deaths | Damage | Healing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.9% | 130 | 8.43 | 14.2 | 5.4 | 3,743 | 10,853 | |
| 35.4% | 96 | 5.83 | 13.5 | 6.2 | 6,212 | 16,370 | |
| 44.7% | 94 | 8.65 | 15.2 | 5.2 | 4,344 | 12,687 | |
| 35.7% | 84 | 6.53 | 13.2 | 5.7 | 6,739 | 17,813 | |
| 41.5% | 82 | 7.62 | 14.0 | 5.6 | 4,493 | 12,702 | |
| 41.4% | 70 | 7.35 | 12.8 | 5.3 | 4,730 | 13,253 | |
| 39.1% | 64 | 9.30 | 15.3 | 5.0 | 4,297 | 12,357 | |
| 36.5% | 63 | 8.00 | 13.9 | 5.6 | 3,254 | 9,393 | |
| 37.9% | 58 | 5.59 | 15.2 | 6.9 | 8,400 | 19,224 | |
| 24.6% | 57 | 7.99 | 13.8 | 5.3 | 4,063 | 10,713 | |
| 35.1% | 57 | 7.39 | 12.8 | 5.3 | 4,134 | 11,790 | |
| 33.3% | 54 | 5.48 | 11.8 | 5.7 | 7,461 | 20,263 | |
| 51.8% | 54 | 10.70 | 15.8 | 4.5 | 4,462 | 13,178 | |
| 47.8% | 46 | 7.45 | 14.2 | 5.8 | 3,497 | 9,631 | |
| 63.6% | 44 | 10.88 | 14.6 | 4.5 | 3,276 | 10,479 | |
| 37.2% | 43 | 7.61 | 13.2 | 5.3 | 4,300 | 11,296 | |
| 38.1% | 42 | 7.31 | 12.6 | 5.5 | 4,896 | 13,449 | |
| 50.0% | 42 | 6.45 | 14.6 | 6.2 | 7,406 | 16,965 | |
| 47.5% | 40 | 7.52 | 14.0 | 5.4 | 5,392 | 10,404 | |
| 22.5% | 40 | 6.66 | 13.1 | 6.1 | 4,293 | 11,472 | |
| 40.0% | 40 | 5.96 | 13.5 | 6.3 | 7,179 | 16,545 | |
| 61.5% | 39 | 9.45 | 15.5 | 4.8 | 4,636 | 12,565 | |
| 44.7% | 38 | 8.16 | 14.0 | 5.4 | 4,232 | 10,472 | |
| 62.2% | 37 | 8.41 | 15.2 | 5.3 | 5,805 | 13,986 | |
| 56.8% | 37 | 9.38 | 15.5 | 5.2 | 4,291 | 14,234 | |
| 42.9% | 35 | 7.81 | 14.3 | 5.2 | 5,703 | 9,348 | |
| 45.5% | 33 | 7.53 | 14.9 | 5.9 | 5,588 | 12,347 | |
| 38.7% | 31 | 7.59 | 14.4 | 6.0 | 2,803 | 9,046 | |
| 48.3% | 29 | 7.86 | 16.3 | 5.3 | 8,711 | 13,871 | |
| 65.5% | 29 | 6.22 | 11.9 | 5.2 | 4,970 | 12,099 | |
| 35.7% | 28 | 7.04 | 14.9 | 5.7 | 4,900 | 11,703 | |
| 40.7% | 27 | 7.48 | 13.6 | 5.8 | 4,435 | 13,295 | |
| 42.3% | 26 | 7.11 | 13.4 | 5.7 | 3,885 | 11,523 | |
| 28.0% | 25 | 8.13 | 13.9 | 4.8 | 6,165 | 11,422 | |
| 41.7% | 24 | 6.14 | 14.0 | 6.0 | 7,642 | 16,549 | |
| 31.8% | 22 | 9.41 | 15.1 | 5.0 | 4,573 | 11,493 | |
| 33.3% | 21 | 8.39 | 13.4 | 5.4 | 4,455 | 11,936 | |
| 57.1% | 21 | 7.64 | 14.6 | 5.2 | 6,617 | 14,957 | |
| 38.1% | 21 | 7.85 | 14.3 | 5.5 | 7,671 | 15,105 | |
| 38.1% | 21 | 6.20 | 12.7 | 6.0 | 5,060 | 13,782 | |
| 47.6% | 21 | 7.16 | 13.1 | 5.2 | 4,620 | 12,622 | |
| 37.5% | 16 | 8.04 | 13.6 | 5.3 | 4,043 | 13,899 | |
| 62.5% | 16 | 9.64 | 14.3 | 4.2 | 3,336 | 9,196 | |
| 33.3% | 15 | 7.01 | 12.7 | 5.8 | 3,952 | 15,223 | |
| 55.6% | 9 | 10.88 | 19.1 | 4.6 | 4,282 | 8,113 | |
| 100.0% | 7 | 8.58 | 18.1 | 4.7 | 4,490 | 8,723 |
Aidez-nous à maintenir la précision ! Si vous remarquez des statistiques incorrectes, des données manquantes ou d'autres problèmes, vos retours nous aident à améliorer la qualité de nos données pour toute la communauté.
FAQ Cotte De Mailles vs invisible woman
Quels sont les meilleurs affrontements de Cotte De Mailles dans Marvel Rivals ?
Cotte De Mailles performe le mieux contre Hero 10572, Hero 10573, the punisher. L'affrontement le plus fort est contre Cape de néant avec un taux de victoire de 100.0%.
Quels sont les pires affrontements de Cotte De Mailles dans Marvel Rivals ?
Cotte De Mailles a du mal contre elsa bloodstone, invisible woman, hela. Le contre le plus difficile est storm avec seulement un taux de victoire de 22.5%.
Comment gagner plus d'affrontements avec Cotte De Mailles ?
En tant que Strategist, Cotte De Mailles gagne 14 affrontements sur 49 (>50% taux de victoire). Concentrez-vous sur cibler les affrontements favorables et travaillez avec votre équipe pour gérer les adversaires difficiles.
Comment Cotte De Mailles performe-t-il contre différents rôles ?
En tant que Strategist, la performance d'affrontement de Cotte De Mailles varie selon le rôle de l'adversaire. Utilisez les filtres de rôle dans le tableau ci-dessus pour comparer les taux de victoire contre les Duellistes, Avant-gardes et Stratèges.
