Kazanma Oranına Göre En İyi TFT Takım Kompozisyonları

Bu tablo, en yüksek kazanma oranlarına sahip TFT takım kompozisyonlarını göstererek dereceli yükseliş için en başarılı komboları belirlemenize yardımcı olur. En iyi 9 şampiyonlu Set 17 kompozisyonları: Atılgan (97.4% WR, 2.2 avg), Sinsi (96.4% WR, 2.1 avg), Sinsi (95.9% WR, 2.1 avg). Atılgan/Sinsi 97.42% kazanma oranı ve 2.25 ortalama sıralama ile lider. Sinsi 96.39% kazanma oranı ile takip ediyor. Gerçek zamanlı performans istatistikleriyle 62 9 şampiyonlu kompozisyon analiz ediliyor.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
2.25
Avg Place
97.42%
Top 4 Rate
31.61%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.06
Avg Place
96.39%
Top 4 Rate
39.25%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.08
Avg Place
95.88%
Top 4 Rate
37.05%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.17
Avg Place
95.67%
Top 4 Rate
34.66%
First Place
Moderately Contested
1.99
Avg Place
94.82%
Top 4 Rate
42.42%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
94.75%
Top 4 Rate
37.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.20
Avg Place
94.07%
Top 4 Rate
37.29%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.43
Avg Place
92.56%
Top 4 Rate
29.35%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.36
Avg Place
92.29%
Top 4 Rate
30.35%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.41
Avg Place
91.99%
Top 4 Rate
30.04%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.55
Avg Place
89.66%
Top 4 Rate
26.17%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.32
Avg Place
89.49%
Top 4 Rate
39.95%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.47
Avg Place
88.33%
Top 4 Rate
28.02%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.40
Avg Place
87.58%
Top 4 Rate
40.35%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.44
Avg Place
87.13%
Top 4 Rate
39.82%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.73
Avg Place
86.01%
Top 4 Rate
27.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.71
Avg Place
85.26%
Top 4 Rate
30.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.97
Avg Place
83.85%
Top 4 Rate
25.77%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.84
Avg Place
83.06%
Top 4 Rate
28.72%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.03
Avg Place
81.98%
Top 4 Rate
16.47%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.11
Avg Place
81.06%
Top 4 Rate
17.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.14
Avg Place
80.24%
Top 4 Rate
18.76%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.82
Avg Place
80.15%
Top 4 Rate
37.13%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.03
Avg Place
79.64%
Top 4 Rate
23.68%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.05
Avg Place
79.45%
Top 4 Rate
25.12%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.13
Avg Place
79.36%
Top 4 Rate
18.53%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.91
Avg Place
78.77%
Top 4 Rate
29.16%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.16
Avg Place
78.50%
Top 4 Rate
20.56%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.10
Avg Place
78.42%
Top 4 Rate
21.98%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.05
Avg Place
77.94%
Top 4 Rate
26.83%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
77.78%
Top 4 Rate
27.53%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.01
Avg Place
77.15%
Top 4 Rate
25.22%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.37
Avg Place
75.92%
Top 4 Rate
16.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.23
Avg Place
75.51%
Top 4 Rate
19.05%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.39
Avg Place
74.82%
Top 4 Rate
19.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.23
Avg Place
74.27%
Top 4 Rate
23.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.30
Avg Place
74.25%
Top 4 Rate
19.77%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.49
Avg Place
71.84%
Top 4 Rate
16.65%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.56
Avg Place
70.89%
Top 4 Rate
14.41%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.50
Avg Place
69.83%
Top 4 Rate
19.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.45
Avg Place
68.14%
Top 4 Rate
23.67%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.55
Avg Place
67.92%
Top 4 Rate
20.82%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.66
Avg Place
67.38%
Top 4 Rate
17.91%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.66
Avg Place
67.14%
Top 4 Rate
16.30%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.74
Avg Place
66.70%
Top 4 Rate
11.92%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.83
Avg Place
66.60%
Top 4 Rate
16.19%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.70
Avg Place
66.30%
Top 4 Rate
20.65%
First Place
Low Contested
3.93
Avg Place
65.47%
Top 4 Rate
7.82%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.74
Avg Place
64.80%
Top 4 Rate
17.51%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.95
Avg Place
63.45%
Top 4 Rate
6.99%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.07
Avg Place
59.35%
Top 4 Rate
7.61%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.90
Avg Place
59.24%
Top 4 Rate
20.93%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.32
Avg Place
56.96%
Top 4 Rate
6.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.26
Avg Place
56.43%
Top 4 Rate
4.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.32
Avg Place
55.03%
Top 4 Rate
8.52%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.43
Avg Place
54.22%
Top 4 Rate
3.21%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.43
Avg Place
51.97%
Top 4 Rate
5.34%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.43
Avg Place
49.82%
Top 4 Rate
5.78%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.60
Avg Place
49.74%
Top 4 Rate
3.95%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.86
Avg Place
43.02%
Top 4 Rate
3.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.85
Avg Place
42.51%
Top 4 Rate
7.58%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.97
Avg Place
41.14%
Top 4 Rate
6.69%
First Place
Moderately Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 62 team compositions ranked by performance to help you make informed decisions, based on 67.9K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 74.6% and average placement of 3.27 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Atılgan/Sinsi with Kai'Sa as the primary carry, achieving a 97.4% win rate. Following closely is Sinsi/N.O.V.A. at 96.4% win rate, and Sinsi/N.O.V.A. at 95.9%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Atılgan/Sinsi (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Kai'Sa
  • Sinsi/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax
  • Sinsi/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider Sinsi/N.O.V.A. which achieves first place in 42.4% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Most Consistent for Climbing

For players focused on consistent LP gains, Sinsi/N.O.V.A. offers the best average placement at 1.99.Consistent compositions minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing, even if they don't win lobbies as often.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Atılgan/Sinsi: 97.4% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Sinsi/N.O.V.A.: 96.4% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Sinsi/N.O.V.A.: 95.9% win rate with only 0.3% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Replikacı/Sonsuz Karanlık with a 1.4% pick rate, though its 66.7% win rate suggests it may be over-contested. Hâkim/Replikacı follows at 1.1% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Doğruluğu korumamıza yardım edin! Yanlış istatistikler, eksik veriler veya herhangi bir sorun fark ederseniz, geri bildiriminiz tüm topluluk için veri kalitemizi doğrudan iyileştirir.

Sorun Bildir

TFT Takım Kompları - Set 17 SSS

TFT Set 17'da en iyi TFT dizilimi nedir?

TFT Set 17'da en iyi TFT dizilimi Atılgan/Sinsi, Kai'Sa ana taşıyıcı olarak, %97.4 kazanma oranı ve 2.25 ortalama sıralama ile. Bu dizilim sıralama tırmanması için etkilidir ve sürekli olarak ilk 4'e girer.

Atılgan/Sinsi dizilimi nasıl oynanır?

Atılgan/Sinsi oynamak için Kai'Sa'ı ana taşıyıcınız olarak inşa etmeye odaklanın. Erken dönemde Kai'Sa ve destek birimlerini arayın, taşıyıcınızla sinerji yapan eşyaları önceliklendirin ve 7-8. seviyede güç zirvesine ulaşmayı hedefleyin. Bu dizilimin seçim oranı %0.1, nispeten yarışılmayan bir seçenek yapıyor.

TFT Set 17'da tırmanmak için hangi dizilimler iyi?

TFT Set 17'da istikrarlı LP kazanımı için Sinsi/N.O.V.A. 1.99 ile en iyi ortalama sıralamayı sunar. Diğer güvenilir seçenekler Sinsi/N.O.V.A. (ort. 2.06) ve Sinsi/N.O.V.A. (ort. 2.08). İstikrarlı dizilimler alt 4 bitişleri minimize eder ve sabit tırmanma sağlar.

En kolay TFT dizilimi nedir?

Atılgan/Sinsi daha kolay tırmanma arayan oyuncular için harika bir seçenek. %97.4 kazanma oranı ama sadece %0.1 seçim oranıyla yarışılma ihtimaliniz düşük, oyunu daha kolay gezinebilir kılıyor. Düşük yarışma, pivotları zorlamadan birimlerinizi doğal olarak bulabileceğiniz anlamına gelir.

TFT Set 17'da dizilimi zorlamak vs esnek olmak ne zaman gerekir?

TFT Set 17'da Replikacı/Sonsuz Karanlık'ın seçim oranı %1.4, yani yoğun yarışılıyor. Başkalarının gittiğini görürseniz, Atılgan/Sinsi gibi alternatiflere pivot etmeyi düşünün. Erken birimleri ve eşyaları bulduğunuzda veya yarışılmadığında zorlayın. 2+ oyuncu aynı birimler için yarıştığında esnek olun.